Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes Overview

Synonym: Congenital Myasthenia

Abicht A, Müller JS, Lochmüller H.

Publication Details

Estimated reading time: 26 minutes

Summary

The purpose of this overview is to increase the awareness of clinicians regarding congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) and their genetic causes and management.

The following are the goals of this overview:

Goal 1.

Briefly describe the clinical characteristics of CMS.

Goal 2.

Review the subtypes and genetic causes of CMS.

Goal 3.

Review the differential diagnosis of CMS.

Goal 4.

Provide an evaluation strategy to identify the genetic cause of CMS in a proband.

Goal 5.

Inform genetic counseling of family members of a proband with CMS

Goal 6.

Review management of CMS following diagnosis: evaluations, treatment (based on genetic cause when possible) and surveillance.

1. Clinical Characteristics of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes

Clinical Features

An individual with a congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS) typically presents with a history of fatigable weakness involving ocular, bulbar, and limb muscles with onset at or shortly after birth or in early childhood, usually in the first two years. Rarely, onset is in the second to third decade of life [McMacken et al 2017, Engel et al 2018, Kao et al 2018, Rodríguez Cruz et al 2018, Finsterer 2019, Vanhaesebrouck & Beeson 2019].

In its classical presentation, CMS is limited to weakness of the skeletal muscles. Cardiac and smooth muscle are not involved. Cognitive skills, coordination, sensation, and tendon reflexes are normal. However, in some newly identified CMS subtypes, myasthenia is only one element of a more severe and complex clinical spectrum.

Severity and course of disease are highly variable, ranging from minor symptoms to progressive disabling weakness. In some subtypes of CMS, myasthenic symptoms may be mild, but sudden severe exacerbations of weakness or even sudden episodes of respiratory insufficiency may be precipitated by fever, infections, or excitement.

An absence of major pathology is noted on skeletal muscle biopsy despite considerable muscle weakness ‒ except for GMPPB-related CMS, where a dystrophic pattern is found on biopsy (see Table 1).

Neonatal presentation. Some myasthenic symptoms are present at birth.

  • Respiratory insufficiency with sudden, episodic apnea and cyanosis are common findings in neonates.
  • Neonates with CMS can have multiple joint contractures (often described as arthrogryposis multiplex congenita) resulting from a lack of fetal movement in utero.
  • Other major findings in the neonatal period may include feeding difficulties, poor suck and cry, choking spells, eyelid ptosis, and facial, bulbar, and generalized weakness. Stridor in infancy may be an important clue to CMS.
  • In some individuals, long face, narrow jaw, and a high-arched palate have been reported.

Childhood presentation. Individuals with onset later in childhood show abnormal muscle fatigability, with difficulty in running or climbing stairs.

  • Motor milestones may be delayed.
  • Affected individuals present with fluctuating eyelid ptosis and fixed or fluctuating extraocular muscle weakness. Ptosis may involve one or both eyelids.
  • Facial and bulbar weakness with nasal speech and difficulties in coughing and swallowing may be present.
  • Spinal deformity or muscle atrophy may occur.

Limb-girdle presentation. Some individuals display a characteristic "limb-girdle" pattern of weakness with ptosis and a waddling gait, usually without ophthalmoparesis ("limb-girdle myasthenia") [O'Connor et al 2018].

Prognosis. Severity and course of disease are highly variable and depend on the underlying genetic defect [Della Marina et al 2020]. Findings range from minor symptoms (e.g., mild exercise intolerance) to progressive disabling weakness. Minor myasthenic symptoms may be exacerbated by sudden onset of severe weakness or respiratory insufficiency precipitated by fever, infections, or excitement, especially in individuals with CMS with episodic apnea or endplate rapsyn deficiency.

Laboratory and Test Findings

Laboratory findings

  • Serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration may be normal or slightly elevated (usually ≤10-fold normal value). CK levels may be higher only in GMPPB-related CMS.
  • Anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibody testing (serum) is negative.
    Note: (1) Absence of anti-AChR, anti-MuSK, and anti-LRP4 antibodies in serum can help distinguish CMS from myasthenia gravis (MG), but does not exclude seronegative types of MG which lack those antibodies.
  • With the exception of GMPPB-related CMS, major pathology in a skeletal muscle biopsy specimen is absent despite considerable muscle weakness

EMG testing. EMG testing is helpful to establish a defect in neuromuscular transmission.

  • In the majority of CMS subtypes, a decremental EMG response of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) can be evoked on low-frequency (2-3 Hz) stimulation.
    • Generally, individuals should be tested for a decremental EMG response of CMAP on low-frequency (2- to 3-Hz) stimulation.
    • In some cases, 2- to 3-Hz stimulation elicits no decremental response from rested non-weak muscle, but elicits a significant decremental response after five to ten minutes of stimulation at 10 Hz.
    • If CMAP amplitude is normal in two distal and two proximal muscles, facial muscles should be tested.
    • Alternatively, or in addition, a single-fiber EMG is a good determinant of a neuromuscular transmission defect.
    • A single nerve stimulus may elicit a repetitive CMAP (the "double response to single nerve stimulus") in individuals with endplate acetylcholinesterase (AChE) deficiency or slow-channel CMS, or in those taking high doses of AChE inhibitors.
  • By contrast with the majority of CMS, some presynaptic subtypes (e.g., PREPL-, SNAP25B-, SYT2-, UNC13A-, and VAMP1-associated CMS) may show increment of CMAP amplitude with high-frequency repetitive nerve stimulation.

AChE inhibitors. In some subtypes of CMS, a positive response to acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors may occur. Response to AChE inhibitors is usually assessed by a controlled/supervised trial of oral AChE inhibitors and monitoring of fatigable muscle weakness and obvious clinical symptoms (e.g., ptosis, bulbar weakness).

2. Subtypes and Genetic Causes of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes

Table 1.

Table 1.

Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes: CMS Subtypes and Distinguishing Clinical Features

3. Differential Diagnosis of Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes

Myasthenia gravis (OMIM 254200). The clinical picture of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) is similar to that of myasthenia gravis (MG), in which individuals have a history of fatigable weakness involving ocular, bulbar, and limb muscles; however, the myasthenic symptoms of CMS usually start at or shortly after birth rather than in adulthood, as is usual for MG. Because seronegative autoimmune MG has been reported on occasion in children younger than age two years, MG may be difficult to differentiate from CMS, especially in later childhood or adulthood. Of note, immunosuppressive therapy does not improve clinical symptoms in CMS, whereas it does in MG.

Transient neonatal myasthenia gravis. Autoimmune MG can be passed across the placenta from mother to fetus and so can affect offspring at birth.

Childhood-onset disorders. Other genetic disorders partially resembling CMS to consider include the following:

Additional considerations include infantile botulism and brain stem anomalies.

Adulthood-onset disorders. Other genetic disorders partially resembling CMS to consider include the following:

4. Evaluation Strategies to Identify the Genetic Cause of a Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome in a Proband

Establishing a specific genetic cause of a congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS):

  • Can aid in discussions of prognosis (which are beyond the scope of this GeneReview) and genetic counseling;
  • Usually involves a medical history, physical examination, laboratory testing, family history, and genomic/genetic testing.

Medical history and physical examination are directed at identifying clinical features associated with a CMS (see Table 1).

Laboratory testing is directed at identifying lab findings associated with a CMS, especially findings on EMG and response to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.

Family history. A three-generation family history should be taken, with attention to relatives with manifestations of CMS and documentation of relevant findings through direct examination or review of medical records, including results of molecular genetic testing.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing, genome sequencing). Gene-targeted testing requires the clinician to hypothesize which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not.

  • A multigene panel that includes some or all of the genes listed in Table 2 is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. Of note, given the rarity of some of the genes associated with CMS, some panels may not include all the genes mentioned in this overview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.
  • Comprehensive genomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine which gene[s] are likely involved) may be considered. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.
    For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table 2.

Table 2.

Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes: Genes and Frequency

5. Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are typically inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. Less commonly, CMS is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner (Table 3).

Table 3.

Table 3.

Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes: Mode of Inheritance

Autosomal Recessive Inheritance – Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • The parents of a child with autosomal recessive congenital myasthenic syndrome (ARCMS) are obligate heterozygotes (i.e., presumed to be carriers of one pathogenic variant based on family history).
  • If a molecular diagnosis has been established in the proband, molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of a proband to confirm that both parents are heterozygous for a CMS-causing pathogenic variant and to allow reliable recurrence risk assessment.
  • If a pathogenic variant is detected in only one parent and parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity, it is possible that one of the pathogenic variants identified in the proband occurred as a de novo event in the proband or as a postzygotic de novo event in a mosaic parent [Jónsson et al 2017]. If the proband appears to have homozygous pathogenic variants, additional possibilities to consider include:
    • A large deletion (i.e., a copy number variation) in the proband that was not detected by sequence analysis and that resulted in the artifactual appearance of homozygosity;
    • Uniparental isodisomy for the parental chromosome with the pathogenic variant that resulted in homozygosity for the pathogenic variant in the proband [Shchagina et al 2020].
  • Heterozygotes (carriers) are clinically asymptomatic and are not at risk of developing the disorder.

Sibs of a proband

  • If both parents are known to be heterozygous for an ARCMS-causing pathogenic variant, each sib of an affected individual has at conception a 25% chance of being affected, a 50% chance of being an asymptomatic carrier, and a 25% chance of being unaffected and not a carrier.
  • Heterozygotes (carriers) are clinically asymptomatic and are not at risk of developing the disorder.

Offspring of a proband

  • Unless an affected individual's reproductive partner also has ARCMS or is a carrier, offspring will be obligate heterozygotes (carriers) for an ARCMS-causing pathogenic variant.
  • In populations with a high carrier rate and/or a high rate of consanguineous marriages, the risk to the offspring of an affected individual of being affected is increased.

Other family members. Each sib of the proband's parents is at a 50% risk of being a carrier of an ARCMS-causing pathogenic variant.

Carrier detection. Carrier testing for at-risk relatives requires prior identification of the ARCMS-causing pathogenic variants in the family.

Autosomal Dominant Inheritance – Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • Some individuals diagnosed with autosomal dominant congenital myasthenic syndrome (ADCMS) have an affected parent.
  • A proband with ADCMS may have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant. The proportion of individuals with ADCMS caused by a de novo pathogenic variant is unknown.
  • If a molecular diagnosis has been established in the proband and the proband appears to be the only affected family member (i.e., a simplex case), molecular genetic testing is recommended for the parents of the proband to confirm their genetic status and to allow reliable recurrence risk counseling.
  • If the pathogenic variant identified in the proband is not identified in either parent and parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity, the following possibilities should be considered:
    • The proband has a de novo pathogenic variant.
    • The proband inherited a pathogenic variant from a parent with germline (or somatic and germline) mosaicism. Note: Testing of parental leukocyte DNA may not detect all instances of somatic mosaicism and will not detect a pathogenic variant that is present in the germ cells only.
  • The family history of some individuals diagnosed with ADCMS may appear to be negative because of failure to recognize the disorder in affected family members, early death of the parent before the onset of symptoms, or late onset of the disease in the affected parent. Reduced penetrance is unlikely to be a factor in ADCMS with severe clinical presentation at birth but may be taken into account when considering the family history of a proband with a milder late-onset form.

Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of the proband depends on the clinical/genetic status of the proband's parents:

  • If a parent of the proband is affected and/or is known to have the pathogenic variant identified in the proband, the risk to the sibs is 50%.
  • If the proband has a known ADCMS-causing pathogenic variant that cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of either parent, the recurrence risk to sibs is estimated to be 1% because of the theoretic possibility of parental germline mosaicism [Rahbari et al 2016].
  • If the parents are clinically unaffected but their genetic status is unknown, the risk to the sibs of a proband appears to be low but increased over that of the general population because of the possibility of reduced penetrance in a heterozygous parent or the theoretic possibility of parental germline mosaicism.

Offspring of a proband. Each child of an individual with ADCMS has a 50% chance of inheriting the pathogenic variant.

Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the status of the proband's parents: if a parent is affected and/or has an ADCMS-causing pathogenic variant, the parent's family members are at risk.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management, Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk relatives for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected or at risk, are carriers, or are at risk of being carriers.

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the CMS-related pathogenic variant(s) have been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

  • Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, Inc. (MGFA)
    Phone: 800-541-5454
    Email: mgfa@myasthenia.org
  • MyAware: Fighting Myasthenia Together
    Phone: 01332 290 219
    Email: info@myaware.org
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
    PO Box 5801
    Bethesda MD 20824
    Phone: 800-352-9424 (toll-free); 301-496-5751; 301-468-5981 (TTY)
  • European Myasthenia Gravis Association (EuMGA)
  • Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) - USA
    Phone: 833-275-6321
  • Muscular Dystrophy Canada
    Canada
    Phone: 800-567-2873
    Email: info@muscle.ca
  • Muscular Dystrophy UK
    United Kingdom
    Phone: 0800 652 6352
  • TREAT-NMD
    Advancing diagnosis, care and treatment for those living with neuromuscular diseases around the world.

6. Management

While there are no recent published consensus guidelines for the management of congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS), Thompson et al [2019] summarized the current knowledge about the treatments for the various subtypes of CMS as related to the underlying genetic cause.

This section provides information regarding recommendations for evaluations following initial diagnosis (Table 3), medical management in general and based (when possible) on the genetic cause (Table 4), and recommended surveillance for individuals with CMS.

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with a CMS, the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table 4.

Table 4.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with a Congenital Myasthenic Syndrome

Treatment of Manifestations

Medications Used in CMS

The choice of medication varies with the CMS subtype [Schara et al 2012, Finsterer 2019, Thompson et al 2019, Vanhaesebrouck & Beeson 2019, Huang et al 2021]; thus, genetic testing will help guide management. However, individual clinical situations may demand an immediate therapeutic trial. While monotherapy is the usual course of treatment for congenital myasthenia, a combination of drugs may be necessary to optimize the therapeutic effect and to minimize side effects [Thompson et al 2019].

Side effects of drugs used to treat myasthenic symptoms should be carefully monitored. If necessary, individual doses should be adjusted or treatment stopped.

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors (pyridostigmine). Although the majority of individuals with CMS benefit from AChE inhibitors (pyridostigmine), some myasthenic symptoms may remain refractory to treatment even in individuals who are otherwise responsive. Certain CMS subtypes (see Table 1), including slow-channel CMS, COLQ-related endplate AChE deficiency, and DOK7-related CMS, are refractory to or deteriorate with AChE inhibitors. See Table 5 for recommendations for treatment of those CMS subtypes.

3,4-diaminopyridine (3,4-DAP). Alternatively or in addition to AChE inhibitors, the potassium channel blocker 3,4-DAP may be used. This drug increases the release of ACh and prolongs the presynaptic action potential. Of note, two children with fast-channel CMS (FCCMS; caused by autosomal recessive loss-of-function variants of the genes encoding the acetylcholine receptor [AChR] subunits that shorten the time that the AChR channel is open) died when started on 3,4-DAP [Beeson et al 2005]. Although a relation to 3,4-DAP has not been proven, clinicians must be cautious when using 3,4-DAP in young children and in individuals with FCCMS.

Ephedrine (adrenergic agonist) treatment shows positive effects in different subtypes of CMS [Schara et al 2012, Rodríguez Cruz et al 2015] (see Table 5). It is well tolerated by most individuals and improvement in strength can be profound.

Albuterol, a beta-2-agonist, is effective in several CMS subtypes, in particular in endplate AChE deficiency, and in patients with DOK7 pathogenic variants. Moreover, in patients with CMS responsive to AChE inhibitors, it may mitigate the detrimental effects on the endplate fine structure caused by long-term anticholinesterase treatment [Vanhaesebrouck et al 2019].

Table 5.

Table 5.

Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes: Medication Recommendations for Certain Genetic Causes and Subtypes

Non-Pharmaceutical Treatment

In addition to medication therapy, a multidisciplinary approach to the clinical management of the affected individual greatly improves quality of life and can influence survival. Management should be tailored to the individual, the specific CMS subtype, and the rate of progression.

Depending on the individual clinical situation, clinical management may include the following:

  • Physical and occupational therapy
  • Speech therapy
  • Orthotics or a wheelchair
  • A percutaneous gastric tube
  • Ventilatory support

Prevention of Primary Manifestations

Sudden respiratory insufficiency or apneic attacks provoked by fever or infections are common in individuals with pathogenic variants in CHAT or RAPSN, even if the myasthenic symptoms are mild between crises. These individuals should receive prophylactic anticholinesterase therapy.

Note: Less frequently, acute respiratory events may also occur in other CMS subtypes. Parents of infants are advised to use apnea monitors and be trained in CPR.

Surveillance

Regular surveillance of muscle strength and respiratory function is recommended, usually at least every six months in children and every 12 months in adults. In some individuals, especially those with COLQ and DOK7 pathogenic variants, slowly progressive respiratory impairment is seen with increasing age. Symptoms of nighttime hypoventilation should be considered.

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

A number of drugs are known to affect neuromuscular transmission and therefore exacerbate symptoms of myasthenia gravis (e.g., ciprofloxacin, chloroquine, procaine, lithium, phenytoin, beta-blockers, procainamide, and quinidine). These drugs are not absolutely contraindicated and may be used with caution in CMS. See Myasthenia Gravis: Cautionary Drugs for a more complete list.

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to evaluate apparently asymptomatic at-risk relatives of a proband in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from initiation of treatment and preventive measures ‒ especially newborns or young children, who could benefit from early treatment to prevent sudden respiratory failure. Evaluations can include:

  • Molecular genetic testing if the pathogenic variant(s) in the family are known;
  • Neurologic/neuropediatric examination and electrophysiologic testing (repetitive nerve stimulation) if the pathogenic variant(s) in the family are not known.

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Pregnancy Management

Data on pregnancies in CMS are limited. Seventeen pregnancies were reported in eight French individuals with CMS [Servais et al 2013]. According to these data pregnancy was a frequent cause of clinical exacerbation but the vast majority of individuals recovered their pre-pregnancy clinical status six months after delivery. The children's outcome was excellent, except for one newborn who developed a severe neonatal (autosomal dominant) slow-channel CMS. Pregnant individuals should be closely followed by neurologists during the course of pregnancy. Careful respiratory and cardiac surveillance should be initiated in consultation with obstetric specialists.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for access to information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Chapter Notes

Author Notes

Dr Hanns Lochmüller's lab website: lochmullerlab.org

Revision History

  • 23 December 2021 (ha) Comprehensive update posted live; scope changed to overview
  • 14 July 2016 (ha) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 28 June 2012 (cd) Revision: targeted mutation analysis of CHRNA1 no longer listed in the GeneTests™ Laboratory Directory as being available clinically
  • 22 March 2012 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 26 September 2006 (aa) Revision: clinical testing available for: mutation scanning of RAPSN, CHAT, COLQ, CHRNB1, and CHRND; sequence analysis of CHRNE and CHRNA1; targeted mutation analysis of RAPSN mutation p.N88K, CHAT mutation p.I305T, and CHRNA1 mutation p.G153S; prenatal diagnosis for CHAT, CHRNA1, CHRNB1, CHRND, CHRNE, COLQ, and RAPSN
  • 20 September 2005 (aa) Revision: sequence analysis for RAPSN clinically available
  • 8 August 2005 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 9 May 2003 (me) Review posted live
  • 30 January 2003 (aa) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Arican P, Gencpinar P, Cavusoglu D, Olgac Dundar N. Clinical and genetic features of congenital myasthenic syndromes due to CHAT mutations: case report and literature review. Neuropediatrics. 2018;49:283–8. [PubMed: 29783273]

  • Balaraju S, Töpf A, McMacken G, Kumar VP, Pechmann A, Roper H, Vengalil S, Polavarapu K, Nashi S, Mahajan NP, Barbosa IA, Deshpande C, Taylor RW, Cossins J, Beeson D, Laurie S, Kirschner J, Horvath R, McFarland R, Nalini A, Lochmüller H. Congenital myasthenic syndrome with mild intellectual disability caused by a recurrent SLC25A1 variant. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:373–7. [PMC free article: PMC7029005] [PubMed: 31527857]

  • Bauché S, O'Regan S, Azuma Y, Laffargue F, McMacken G, Sternberg D, Brochier G, Buon C, Bouzidi N, Topf A, Lacène E, Remerand G, Beaufrere AM, Pebrel-Richard C, Thevenon J, El Chehadeh-Djebbar S, Faivre L, Duffourd Y, Ricci F, Mongini T, Fiorillo C, Astrea G, Burloiu CM, Butoianu N, Sandu C, Servais L, Bonne G, Nelson I, Desguerre I, Nougues MC, Bœuf B, Romero N, Laporte J, Boland A, Lechner D, Deleuze JF, Fontaine B, Strochlic L, Lochmuller H, Eymard B, Mayer M, Nicole S. Impaired presynaptic high-affinity choline transporter causes a congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnea. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99:753–61. [PMC free article: PMC5011057] [PubMed: 27569547]

  • Bauché S, Sureau A, Sternberg D, Rendu J, Buon C, Messéant J, Boëx M, Furling D, Fauré J, Latypova X, Gelot AB, Mayer M, Mary P, Whalen S, Fournier E, Cloix I, Remerand G, Laffargue F, Nougues MC, Fontaine B, Eymard B, Isapof A, Strochlic L. New recessive mutations in SYT2 causing severe presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndromes. Neurol Genet. 2020;6:e534. [PMC free article: PMC7803339] [PubMed: 33659639]

  • Bauché S, Vellieux G, Sternberg D, Fontenille M-J, De Bruyckere E, Davoine C-S, Brochier G, Messéant J, Wolf L, Fardeau M, Lacène E, Romero N, Koenig J, Fournier E, Hantaï D, Streichenberger N, Manel V, Lacour A, Nadaj-Pakleza A, Sukno S, Bouhour F, Laforêt P, Fontaine B, Strochlic L, Eymard B, Chevessier F, Stojkovic T, Nicole S. Mutations in GFPT1-related congenital myasthenic syndromes are associated with synaptic morphological defects and underlie a tubular aggregate myopathy with synaptopathy. J Neurol. 2017;264:1791–803. [PubMed: 28712002]

  • Beeson D, Hantaï D, Lochmüller H, Engel AG. 126th International Workshop: congenital myasthenic syndromes, 24-26 September 2004, Naarden, the Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2005;15:498–512. [PubMed: 15951177]

  • Belaya K, Rodríguez Cruz PM, Liu WW, Maxwell S, McGowan S, Farrugia ME, Petty R, Walls TJ, Sedghi M, Basiri K, Yue WW, Sarkozy A, Bertoli M, Pitt M, Kennett R, Schaefer A, Bushby K, Parton M, Lochmüller H, Palace J, Muntoni F, Beeson D. Mutations in GMPPB cause congenital myasthenic syndrome and bridge myasthenic disorders with dystroglycanopathies. Brain. 2015;138:2493–504. [PMC free article: PMC4547052] [PubMed: 26133662]

  • Chaouch A, Müller JS, Guergueltcheva V, Dusl M, Schara U, Rakocević-Stojanović V, Lindberg C, Scola RH, Werneck LC, Colomer J, Nascimento A, Vilchez JJ, Muelas N, Argov Z, Abicht A, Lochmüller H. A retrospective clinical study of the treatment of slow-channel congenital myasthenic syndrome. J Neurol. 2012;259:474–81. [PubMed: 21822932]

  • Cossins J, Belaya K, Hicks D, Salih MA, Finlayson S, Carboni N, Liu WW, Maxwell S, Zoltowska K, Farsani GT, Laval S, Seidhamed MZ, Donnelly P, Bentley D, McGowan SJ, Müller J, Palace J, Lochmüller H, Beeson D, et al. Congenital myasthenic syndromes due to mutations in ALG2 and ALG14. Brain. 2013;136:944–56. [PMC free article: PMC3580273] [PubMed: 23404334]

  • Cossins J, Webster R, Maxwell S, Rodríguez Cruz PM, Knight R, Llewelyn JG, Shin JY, Palace J, Beeson D. Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to a TOR1AIP1 mutation: a new disease pathway for impaired synaptic transmission. Brain Commun. 2020;2:fcaa174. [PMC free article: PMC7660151] [PubMed: 33215087]

  • Della Marina A, Wibbeler E, Abicht A, Kölbel H, Lochmüller H, Roos A, Schara U. Long term follow-up on pediatric cases with congenital myasthenic syndromes-a retrospective single centre cohort study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:560860. [PMC free article: PMC7750519] [PubMed: 33364925]

  • Durmuş H, Ayhan Ö, Çırak S, Deymeer F, Parman Y, Franke A, Eiber N, Chevessier F, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Clemen CS, Hashemolhosseini S, Schröder R, Hemmrich-Stanisak G, Tolun A, Serdaroğlu-Oflazer P. Neuromuscular endplate pathology in recessive desminopathies: Lessons from man and mice. Neurology. 2016;87:799–805. [PubMed: 27440146]

  • Engel AG, Selcen D, Shen X-M, Milone M, Harper CM. Loss of MUNC13-1 function causes microcephaly, cortical hyperexcitability, and fatal myasthenia. Neurol Genet. 2016;2:e105. [PMC free article: PMC5017540] [PubMed: 27648472]

  • Engel AG, Shen X-M, Selcen D. The unfolding landscape of the congenital myasthenic syndromes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1413:25–34. [PMC free article: PMC5800977] [PubMed: 29355968]

  • Finsterer J. Congenital myasthenic syndromes. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 26. 2019;14:57. [PMC free article: PMC6390566] [PubMed: 30808424]

  • Gan S, Yang H, Xiao T, Pan Z, Wu L. AGRN gene mutation leads to congenital myasthenia syndromes: a pediatric case report and literature review. Neuropediatrics. 2020;51:364–7. [PubMed: 32221959]

  • Guergueltcheva V, Müller JS, Dusl M, Senderek J, Oldfors A, Lindbergh C, Maxwell S, Colomer J, Mallebrera CJ, Nascimento A, Vilchez JJ, Muelas N, Kirschner J, Nafissi S, Kariminejad A, Nilipour Y, Bozorgmehr B, Najmabadi H, Rodolico C, Sieb JP, Schlotter B, Schoser B, Herrmann R, Voit T, Steinlein OK, Najafi A, Urtizberea A, Soler DM, Muntoni F, Hanna MG, Chaouch A, Straub V, Bushby K, Palace J, Beeson D, Abicht A, Lochmüller H. Congenital myasthenic syndrome with tubular aggregates caused by GFPT1 mutations. J Neurol. 2012;259:838–50. [PubMed: 21975507]

  • Hakonen AH, Polvi A, Saloranta C, Paetau A, Heikkilä P, Almusa H, Ellonen P, Jakkula E, Saarela J, Aittomäki K. SLC18A3 variants lead to fetal akinesia deformation sequence early in pregnancy. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179:1362–5. [PubMed: 31059209]

  • Huang K, Luo Y-B, Bi F-F, Yang H. Pharmacological strategy for congenital myasthenic syndrome with CHRNE mutations: a meta-analysis of case reports. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19:718–29.

  • Jónsson H, Sulem P, Kehr B, Kristmundsdottir S, Zink F, Hjartarson E, Hardarson MT, Hjorleifsson KE, Eggertsson HP, Gudjonsson SA, Ward LD, Arnadottir GA, Helgason EA, Helgason H, Gylfason A, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Rafnar T, Frigge M, Stacey SN, Th Magnusson O, Thorsteinsdottir U, Masson G, Kong A, Halldorsson BV, Helgason A, Gudbjartsson DF, Stefansson K. Parental influence on human germline de novo mutations in 1,548 trios from Iceland. Nature. 2017;549:519–22. [PubMed: 28959963]

  • Kao JC, Milone M, Selcen D, Shen X-M, Engel AG, Liewluck T. Congenital myasthenic syndromes in adult neurology clinic: A long road to diagnosis and therapy. Neurology. 2018;91:e1770–7. [PMC free article: PMC6251603] [PubMed: 30291185]

  • Klein A, Robb S, Rushing E, Liu W-W, Belaya K, Beeson D. Congenital myasthenic syndrome caused by mutations in DPAGT. Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;25:253–6. [PubMed: 25500013]

  • Klöckner C, Sticht H, Zacher P, Popp B, Babcock HE, Bakker DP, Barwick K, Bonfert MV, Bönnemann CG, Brilstra EH. Care4Rare Canada Consortium, Chung WK, Clarke AJ, Devine P, Donkervoort S, Fraser JL, Friedman J, Gates A, Ghoumid J, Hobson E, Horvath G, Keller-Ramey J, Keren B, Kurian MA, Lee V, Leppig KA, Lundgren J, McDonald MT, McLaughlin HM, McTague A, Mefford HC, Mignot C, Mikati MA, Nava C, Raymond FL, Sampson JR, Sanchis-Juan A, Shashi V, Shieh JTC, Shinawi M, Slavotinek A, Stödberg T, Stong N, Sullivan JA, Taylor AC, Toler TL, van den Boogaard MJ, van der Crabben SN, van Gassen KLI, van Jaarsveld RH, Van Ziffle J, Wadley AF, Wagner M, Wigby K, Wortmann SB, Zarate YA, Møller RS, Lemke JR, Platzer K. De novo variants in SNAP25 cause an early-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Genet Med. 2021;23:653–60.

  • Lamond A, Buckley D, O'Dea J, Turner L. Variants of SLC18A3 leading to congenital myasthenic syndrome in two children with varying presentations. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14:e237799. [PMC free article: PMC7813295] [PubMed: 33462016]

  • Lee CY, Petkova M, Morales-Gonzalez S, Gimber N, Schmoranzer J, Meisel A, Böhmerle W, Stenzel W, Schuelke M, Schwarz JM. A spontaneous missense mutation in the chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 8 (CHD8) gene: a novel association with congenital myasthenic syndrome. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2020;46:588–601. [PubMed: 32267004]

  • Lorenzoni PJ, Kay CSK, Arndt RC, Hrysay NMC, Ducci RD-P, Fustes OHJ, Töpf A, Lochmüller H, Werneck LC, Scola RH. Congenital myasthenic syndrome due to DOK7 mutation in a cohort of patients with "unexplained" limb-girdle muscular weakness. J Clin Neurosci. 2020;75:195–8.

  • Malfatti E, Catchpool T, Nouioua S, Sihem H, Fournier E, Carlier RY, Cardone N, Davis MR, Laing NG, Sternberg D, Ravenscroft G. A. TOR1AIP1 variant segregating with an early onset limb girdle myasthenia-support for the role of LAP1 in NMJ function and disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2022;48:e12743. [PubMed: 34164833]

  • Maselli RA, Arredondo J, Vázquez J, Chong JX, Bamshad MJ, Nickerson DA, Lara M, Ng F, Lo VL, Pytel P, McDonald CM. A presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome attributed to a homozygous sequence variant in LAMA5. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018a;1413:119–25. [PMC free article: PMC6252105] [PubMed: 29377152]

  • Maselli RA, Ng JJ, Anderson JA, Cagney O, Arredondo J, Williams C, Wessel HB, Abdel-Hamid H, Wollmann RL. Mutations in LAMB2 causing a severe form of synaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome. J Med Genet. 2009;46:203–8. [PMC free article: PMC2643050] [PubMed: 19251977]

  • Maselli RA, Vázquez J, Schrumpf L, Arredondo J, Lara M, Strober JB, Pytel P, Wollmann RL, Ferns M. Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome with altered synaptic vesicle homeostasis linked to compound heterozygous sequence variants in RPH3A. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2018b;6:434–40. [PMC free article: PMC6014458] [PubMed: 29441694]

  • Maselli RA, Wei DT, Hodgson TS, Sampson JB, Vazquez J, Smith HL, Pytel P, Ferns M. Dominant and recessive congenital myasthenic syndromes caused by SYT2 mutations. Muscle Nerve. 2021;64:219–24. [PubMed: 34037996]

  • McMacken G, Abicht A, Evangelista T, Spendiff S, Lochmüller H. The increasing genetic and phenotypical diversity of congenital myasthenic syndromes. Neuropediatrics. 2017;48:294–308. [PubMed: 28505670]

  • McMacken G, Whittaker RG, Evangelista T, Abicht A, Dusl M, Lochmüller H. Congenital myasthenic syndrome with episodic apnoea: clinical, neurophysiological and genetic features in the long-term follow-up of 19 patients. J Neurol. 2018;265:194–203. [PMC free article: PMC5760613] [PubMed: 29189923]

  • Mihaylova V, Müller JS, Vilchez JJ, Salih MA, Kabiraj MM, D'Amico A, Bertini E, Wölfle J, Schreiner F, Kurlemann G, Rasic VM, Siskova D, Colomer J, Herczegfalvi A, Fabriciova K, Weschke B, Scola R, Hoellen F, Schara U, Abicht A, Lochmüller H. Clinical and molecular genetic findings in COLQ-mutant congenital myasthenic syndromes. Brain. 2008;131:747–59. [PubMed: 18180250]

  • Monies DM, Al-Hindi HN, Al-Muhaizea MA, Jaroudi DJ, Al-Younes B, Naim EA, Wakil SM, Meyer BF, Bohlega S. Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of a congenital disorder of glycosylation manifesting as a myasthenic/myopathic syndrome. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24:353–9. [PubMed: 24461433]

  • Mroczek M, Durmus H, Töpf A, Parman Y, Straub V. Four individuals with a homozygous mutation in exon 1f of the PLEC gene and associated myasthenic features. Genes (Basel). 2020;11:716. [PMC free article: PMC7397187] [PubMed: 32605089]

  • Murali C, Li D, Grand K, Hakonarson H, Bhoj E. Isolated vocal cord paralysis in two siblings with compound heterozygous variants in MUSK: expanding the phenotypic spectrum. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179:655–8. [PMC free article: PMC6924566] [PubMed: 30719842]

  • O'Connor E, Töpf A, Müller JS, Cox D, Evangelista T, Colomer J, Abicht A, Senderek J, Hasselmann O, Yaramis A, Laval SH, Lochmüller H. Identification of mutations in the MYO9A gene in patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome. Brain. 2016;139:2143–53. [PMC free article: PMC4958899] [PubMed: 27259756]

  • O'Connor E, Töpf A, Zahedi RP, Spendiff S, Cox D, Roos A, Lochmüller H. Clinical and research strategies for limb-girdle congenital myasthenic syndromes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1412:102–12. [PubMed: 29315608]

  • O'Grady GL, Verschuuren C, Yuen M, Webster R, Menezes M, Fock JM, Pride N, Best HA, Benavides Damm T, Turner C, Lek M, Engel AG, North KN, Clarke NF, MacArthur DG, Kamsteeg EJ, Cooper ST. Variants in SLC18A3, vesicular acetylcholine transporter, cause congenital myasthenic syndrome. Neurology. 2016;87:1442–8. [PMC free article: PMC5075972] [PubMed: 27590285]

  • Oury J, Liu Y, Töpf A, Todorovic S, Hoedt E, Preethish-Kumar V, Neubert TA, Lin W, Lochmüller H, Burden SJ. MACF1 links Rapsyn to microtubule- and actin-binding proteins to maintain neuromuscular synapses. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:1686–705. [PMC free article: PMC6504910] [PubMed: 30842214]

  • Owen D, Töpf A, Preethish-Kumar V, Lorenzoni PJ, Vroling B, Scola RH, Dias-Tosta E, Geraldo A, Polavarapu K, Nashi S, Cox D, Evangelista T, Dawson J, Thompson R, Senderek J, Laurie S, Beltran S, Gut M, Gut I, Nalini A, Lochmüller H. Recessive variants of MuSK are associated with late onset CMS and predominant limb girdle weakness. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:1594–601. [PubMed: 29704306]

  • Polavarapu K, Vengalil S, Preethish-Kumar V, Arunachal G, Nashi S, Mohan D, Chawla T, Bardhan M, Nandeesh B, Gupta P, Gowda VK, Lochmüller H, Nalini A. Recessive VAMP1 mutations associated with severe congenital myasthenic syndromes - a recognizable clinical phenotype. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2021;31:54–60. [PubMed: 33631708]

  • Rahbari R, Wuster A, Lindsay SJ, Hardwick RJ, Alexandrov LB, Turki SA, Dominiczak A, Morris A, Porteous D, Smith B, Stratton MR, Hurles ME, et al. Timing, rates and spectra of human germline mutation. Nat Genet. 2016;48:126–33. [PMC free article: PMC4731925] [PubMed: 26656846]

  • Régal L, Shen X-M, Selcen D, Verhille C, Meulemans S, Creemers JWM, Engel AG. PREPL deficiency with or without cystinuria causes a novel myasthenic syndrome. Neurology. 2014;82:1254–60. [PMC free article: PMC4001208] [PubMed: 24610330]

  • Rodríguez Cruz PM, Belaya K, Basiri K, Sedghi M, Farrugia ME, Holton JL, Liu WW, Maxwell S, Petty R, Walls TJ, Kennett R, Pitt M, Sarkozy A, Parton M, Lochmüller H, Muntoni F, Palace J, Beeson D. Clinical features of the myasthenic syndrome arising from mutations in GMPPB. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:802–9. [PMC free article: PMC6047737] [PubMed: 27147698]

  • Rodríguez Cruz PM, Cossins J, Estephan EDP, Munell F, Selby K, Hirano M, Maroofin R, Mehrjardi MYV, Chow G, Carr A, Manzur A, Robb S, Munot P, Wei Liu W, Banka S, Fraser H, De Goede C, Zanoteli E, Conti Reed U, Sage A, Gratacos M, Macaya A, Dusl M, Senderek J, Töpf A, Hofer M, Knight R, Ramdas S, Jayawant S, Lochmüller H, Palace J, Beeson D. The clinical spectrum of the congenital myasthenic syndrome resulting from COL13A1 mutations. Brain. 2019;142:1547–60. [PMC free article: PMC6752227] [PubMed: 31081514]

  • Rodríguez Cruz PM, Hughes I, Manzur A, Munot P, Ramdas S, Wright R, Breen C, Pitt M, Pagnamenta AT, Taylor JC, Palace J, Beeson D. Presynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome due to three novel mutations in SLC5A7 encoding the sodium-dependant high-affinity choline transporter. Neuromuscul Disord. 2021;31:21–8. [PubMed: 33250374]

  • Rodríguez Cruz PM, Palace J, Beeson D. The neuromuscular junction and wide heterogeneity of congenital myasthenic syndromes. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:E1677. [PMC free article: PMC6032286] [PubMed: 29874875]

  • Rodríguez Cruz PM, Palace J, Ramjattan H, Jayawant S, Robb SA, Beeson D. Salbutamol and ephedrine in the treatment of severe AChR deficiency syndromes. Neurology. 2015;85:1043–7. [PMC free article: PMC4603597] [PubMed: 26296515]

  • Schara U, Della Marina A, Abicht A. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Neuropediatrics. 2012;43:184–93. [PubMed: 22911480]

  • Selcen D, Ohkawara B, Shen X-M, McEvoy K, Ohno K, Engel AG. Impaired synaptic development, maintenance, and neuromuscular transmission in LRP4-related myasthenia. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:889–96. [PMC free article: PMC4532561] [PubMed: 26052878]

  • Selcen D, Shen X-M, Brengman J, Li Y, Stans AA, Wieben E, Engel AG. DPAGT1 myasthenia and myopathy: genetic, phenotypic, and expression studies. Neurology. 2014;82:1822–30. [PMC free article: PMC4035711] [PubMed: 24759841]

  • Servais L, Baudoin H, Zehrouni K, Richard P, Sternberg D, Fournier E, Eymard B, Stojkovic T. Pregnancy in congenital myasthenic syndrome. J Neurol. 2013;260:815–9. [PubMed: 23108489]

  • Shchagina O, Bessonova L, Bychkov I, Beskorovainaya T, Poliakov A. A family case of congenital myasthenic syndrome-22 induced by different combinations of molecular causes in siblings. Genes (Basel). 2020;11:821. [PMC free article: PMC7397044] [PubMed: 32707643]

  • Shen X-M, Selcen D, Brengman J, Engel AG. Mutant SNAP25B causes myasthenia, cortical hyperexcitability, ataxia, and intellectual disability. Neurology. 2014;83:2247–55. [PMC free article: PMC4277673] [PubMed: 25381298]

  • Thompson R, Bonne G, Missier P, Lochmüller H. Targeted therapies for congenital myasthenic syndromes: systematic review and steps towards a treatabolome. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2019;3:19–37. [PMC free article: PMC6436731] [PubMed: 30931400]

  • Vanhaesebrouck AE, Beeson D. The congenital myasthenic syndromes: expanding genetic and phenotypic spectrums and refining treatment strategies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32:696–703. [PMC free article: PMC6735524] [PubMed: 31361628]

  • Vanhaesebrouck AE, Webster R, Maxwell S, Rodriguez Cruz PM, Cossins J, Wickens J, Liu WW, Cetin H, Cheung J, Ramjattan H, Palace J, Beeson D. β2-Adrenergic receptor agonists ameliorate the adverse effect of long-term pyridostigmine on neuromuscular junction structure. Brain. 2019;142:3713–27. [PMC free article: PMC6892641] [PubMed: 31633155]

  • Wargon I, Richard P, Kuntzer T, Sternberg D, Nafissi S, Gaudon K, Lebail A, Bauche S, Hantaï D, Fournier E, Eymard B, Stojkovic T. Long-term follow-up of patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome caused by COLQ mutations. Neuromuscul Disord. 2012;22:318–24. [PubMed: 22088788]

  • Witting N, Vissing J. Pharmacologic treatment of downstream of tyrosine kinase 7 congenital myasthenic syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:350–4. [PubMed: 24425145]