Suggestive Findings
MELAS (mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes) should be suspected in individuals with the following features.
Clinical Features
Stroke-like episodes before the age of 40 years
Acquired encephalopathy with seizures and/or dementia
Recurrent headaches
Muscle weakness and exercise intolerance
Cortical vision loss
Hemiparesis
Recurrent vomiting
Short stature
Hearing impairment
Normal early psychomotor development
Peripheral neuropathy
Learning disability
Brain Imaging
Brain MRI
Head CT. Basal ganglia calcifications are occasionally seen.
Electromyography and Nerve Conduction Studies
Findings are consistent with a myopathic process, but neuropathy may coexist. Neuropathy can be axonal or mixed axonal and demyelinating [Kärppä et al 2003, Kaufmann et al 2006b].
Suggestive Laboratory Findings
Lactic acidosis both in blood and CSF. Lactic acidemia is very common. CSF lactate is also elevated in most affected individuals.
Lactic acidemia is not specific for MELAS syndrome as it can occur in other mitochondrial diseases, metabolic diseases, and systemic illness. Other situations (unrelated to the diagnosis of MELAS) in which lactate can be elevated are acute neurologic events such as seizure or stroke. On the other hand, lactate level can be normal in a minority of individuals with MELAS syndrome [Hirano & Pavlakis 1994].
Elevated CSF protein rarely surpasses 100 mg/dL.
Muscle biopsy
Ragged red fibers (RRFs) with the modified Gomori trichrome stain, which represent mitochondrial proliferation below the plasma membrane of the muscular fibers causing the contour of the muscle fiber to become irregular. These proliferated mitochondria also stain strongly with the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) stain giving the appearance of ragged blue fibers.
Although RRFs are present in many other mitochondrial diseases e.g., MERRF (myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers), most of the RRFs in MELAS stain positively with the cytochrome c oxidase (COX) histochemical stain, unlike other mitochondrial diseases where RRFs do not react with COX.
An overabundance of mitochondria in smooth muscle and endothelial cells of intramuscular blood vessels, best revealed with the SDH stain ("strongly succinate dehydrogenase-reactive blood vessels," or SSVs)
Respiratory chain studies on muscle tissue: typically multiple partial defects, especially involving complex I and/or complex IV. However, biochemical results can also be normal.
Note: Muscle biopsy is not required to make this diagnosis; molecular genetic testing is frequently used in lieu of muscle biopsy to establish the diagnosis.
Establishing the Diagnosis
Two sets of clinical diagnostic criteria for MELAS (mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes) have been published:
- I.
A clinical diagnosis of MELAS can be made if the following three criteria are met [Hirano et al 1992]:
Stroke-like episodes before age 40 years
Encephalopathy characterized by seizures and/or dementia
Mitochondrial myopathy is evident by the presence of lactic acidosis and/or ragged-red fibers (RRFs) on muscle biopsy.
AND at least two of the following criteria are present:
- II.
A clinical diagnosis of MELAS can also be made in an individual with at least two category A AND two category B criteria [Yatsuga et al 2012]:
Category A criteria
Headaches with vomiting
Seizures
Hemiplegia
Cortical blindness
Acute focal lesions on neuroimaging (See Suggestive Findings,
Brain Imaging.)
Category B criteria
The diagnosis of MELAS is established in a proband who meets the clinical diagnostic criteria discussed above and who has a pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in one of the genes listed in Table 1 identified by molecular genetic testing.
Note: (1) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include any likely pathogenic variants. (2) Identification of a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance in one of the genes listed in Table 1 does not establish or rule out a diagnosis. (3) Pathogenic variants can usually be detected in mtDNA from leukocytes in individuals with typical MELAS; however, the occurrence of "heteroplasmy" in disorders of mtDNA can result in varying tissue distribution of mutated mtDNA. Hence, the pathogenic variant may be undetectable in mtDNA from leukocytes and may be detected only in other tissues, such as buccal mucosa, cultured skin fibroblasts, hair follicles, urinary sediment, or (most reliably) skeletal muscle.
Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, concurrent or serial single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive
genomic testing (exome sequencing, exome array, genome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.
Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Individuals with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those with a phenotype indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders with seizures and weakness are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).
Option 1
When the phenotypic and laboratory findings suggest the diagnosis of MELAS, molecular genetic testing approaches can include serial single-gene testing or use of a multigene panel.
Serial single-gene testing can be considered if (1) mutation of a particular gene accounts for a large proportion of the condition or (2) clinical findings, laboratory findings, ancestry, or other factors indicate that mutation of a particular gene is most likely.
Typically, blood leukocyte DNA is initially tested for the
m.3243A>G pathogenic variant in
MT-TL1, which is present in approximately 80% of individuals with typical clinical findings.
If this is normal, targeted testing for the pathogenic variants
m.3271T>C and
m.3252A>G in
MT-TL1 and
m.13513G>A in
MT-ND5 is considered next.
A multigene panel that includes MT-TL1, MT-ND5, and other mtDNA genes of interest (see Table 1 and Differential Diagnosis) may also be considered. Note: (1) The genes included and the sensitivity of multigene panels vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview; thus, clinicians need to determine which multigene panel is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
Entire mitochondrial genome sequencing that includes MT-TL1, MT-ND5, and other mtDNA genes of interest (see Table 1 and Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype.
For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.
Option 2
When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by seizures and weakness, comprehensive
genomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine which gene[s] are likely involved) is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible. Many laboratories require that the clinician specify if the mitochondrial genome should be included as part of the comprehensive genomic testing.
For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.
Table 1.
View in own window
Gene 1, 2 | % of MELAS Attributed to Pathogenic Variants in Gene | Proportion of Pathogenic Variants 3 Detectable by Sequence Analysis 4 |
---|
MT-TL1
| >80% | 100% |
MT-ND5
| <10% | 100% |
MT-TC
MT-TF
MT-TH
MT-TK
MT-TL2
MT-TQ
MT-TV
MT-TW
MT-TS1
MT-TS2
MT-ND1
MT-ND6
MT-CO2
MT-CO3
MT-CYB
| Rare | 100% |
Pathogenic variants of any one of the genes included in this table account for >1% of MELAS.
- 1.
Genes are listed from most frequent to least frequent genetic cause of MELAS.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.