This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.
Abstraction Instrument, items 1-17
Abstraction Instrument, items 18-28
Abstraction Instrument, items 29-37
Abstraction Instrument, Question #1: Does the Application of Early,
Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Improve Outcomes for Persons With Traumatic Brain
Injury? (items 1-7)
Abstraction Instrument, Question 1, items 8-12
Abstraction Instrument,
Question #2: Does the Intensity of In-Patient Rehabilitation Affect Outcomes for
Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury? (items 1-5)
Abstraction Instrument, Question 2, items 6-11
Abstraction Instrument, Question #3: Does the Application of Compensatory
Cognitive Rehabilition Enhance Outcomes for Persons Who Sustain Traumatic Brain Injury
(items 1-8)
Abstraction Instrument, Question 3, items 9-13
Abstraction Instrument, Question #4: Does the Application of supported Employment
Enhance Outcomes for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury? (items 1-8)
Abstraction Instrument, Question 4, items 9-11
Abstraction Instrument, Question #5: Does the Provision of Long-Term Care
Coordination Enhance the General Functional Status of Persons With Traumatic Brain
Injury? What is the Cost-Effectiveness of the Provision of this Intervention? (items 1-9
Abstraction Instrument, Question 5 item 10
Publication Details
Copyright
Publisher
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US), Rockville (MD)
NLM Citation
Chesnut RM, Carney N, Maynard H, et al. Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury. Rockville (MD): Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (US); 1999 Feb. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 2.) Appendix 4. Initial Abstraction Instrument.