NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Jadad AR, Boyle M, Cunningham C, et al. Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 1999 Nov. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 11.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Appendix G: Peer Review Process

The San Francisco Cochrane Center helped coordinate the peer review of this report. Our thanks go to Dr. Lisa Bero, Dr. Drummond Rennie and Ms. Andrea Clark.

Structured Format for Referee Comments

(Please refer to page and paragraph number when making very specific comments.)

Question Formulation

Are evidence report questions well formulated and easily understandable?

Study Identification

Is there a thorough search for relevant data using appropriate resources?

Are there unbiased, explicit searching strategies that are appropriately matched to the question?

Study Selection

Are appropriate inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select articles? Are selection criteria applied in a manner that limits bias? Are efforts made to identify unpublished data, if this is appropriate? Are reasons for excluding studies from the report stated?

Appraisal of Studies

Is the validity of individual studies addressed in a reliable manner? Are important parameters (e.g. setting, study population, study design) that could affect study results systematically addressed?

Data Collection

Is there a minimal amount of missing information regarding outcomes and other variables considered key to the interpretation of results? Are efforts made to reduce bias in the data collection process?

Data Synthesis

Are important parameters, such as study designs, considered in the synthesis? Are reasonable decisions made concerning whether and how to combine the data? Are results sensitive to changes in the way the analysis was done? Is precision of results reported? Are limitations and inconsistencies of studies stated? Are limitations of the review process stated?

Research

Are implications for research discussed?

Conclusions (stated throughout the report)

Are conclusions supported by the data reviewed? Is evidence appropriately interpreted as inconclusive (no evidence of effect) or as showing a particular strategy did not work (evidence of no effect)? Is a summary of pertinent findings provided?

Format

Does the Executive Summary adequately summarize the report? Is the evidence report presented in a clear readable manner? If not, your suggestions are:

Other

What are the major strengths of this report? What are the major limitations of this report?

Indicate here whether you have any conflicts of interest regarding the review of the Evidence Report.

-I certify that I have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with a direct financial interest in the subject matter of the Evidence Report (e.g. employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, expert testimony.)

Declare your conflict of interest here.

Reviewers of this Task Order :

NameAffiliation
Ronald Brown, PhDSociety for Pediatric Psychology
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina
Mina Dulcan, MDChildren's Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois
Theodore Ganiats, MD
(Methodology expert)
American Academy of Family Physicians
UCSD School of Medicine
LaJolla, California
Peter Jenssen, MDNIH Associate Director for Child and Adolescent Research
Washington, DC
Rachel Klein, MDNew York State Psychiatric Institute
Columbia University
New York, NY
Geraldine Macdonald
(Methodology expert)
Centre for Professional Studies
University of Bristol
Bristol, United Kingdom
William Mahoney, MDProfessor, Pediatrics
McMaster University Children's Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario
James Perrin, MDCo-Chair, AAP subcommittee on ADHD
Boston, Massachusetts
Karen Pierce, MDAmerican Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Chicago, Illinois
Parminder Raina, Ph.D
(Methodology expert)
Centre for Community & Child Health Research
Co-Author, CCOHTA report
Vancouver, British Columbia
Leonard Rapport, MDChildren's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts
Bennett Shaywitz, MDChild Neurology Society
New Haven, Connecticut
Martin Stein, MDCo-chair, AAP subcommittee
LaJolla, California
Richard Ward, MDFaculty of Medicine,
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Deborah Zarin, MDAmerican Psychiatric Association
Washington, DC
Criticism Editor
Patricia Huston, MD, MPH

Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada