NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Jadad AR, Boyle M, Cunningham C, et al. Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 1999 Nov. (Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, No. 11.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Evidence Tables

Evidence Tables A: General Characteristics of All Studies

Evidence Table A1. Where Study Was First Identified

MEDLINE65
CINAHL0
HEALTHStar0
PsychINFO3
EMBASE7
Other source: Reference list, personal file, special release3

Evidence Table A2. Type of Study

RCT parallel29
RCT crossover48
Non-RCT1

Evidence Table A3. Funding Source (multiple answers possible)

Industry23
Government agency47
Consumer organization2
Charity5
Professional organization2
Not reported22

Evidence Table A4. Publication Year

1971-757
1976--8011
1981--8511
1986--9017
1991--9519
1996--9913

Evidence Table A5. Country of Publication

USA66
Canada6
Sweden1
Australia2
New Zealand1
Norway1
Netherlands1

Evidence Table A6. Number of Authors

13
28
319
419
510
6 or more19

Evidence Table A7. Areas Covered (multiple areas possible)

Drug vs drug22
Drug vs nondrug6
Long-term therapy15
Combination therapy20
Adult ADHD12
Adverse effects29

Evidence Table A8. Background of First Author (multiple backgrounds possible)

Psychology16
Psychiatry41
Pediatrics30
Pharmacology6
Neurology4
Not reported9

Evidence Table A9. Number of Research Centers

176
20
30
41
61

Evidence Table A10. (Study Duration)

< 4 weeks15
5-8 weeks25
9-12 weeks17
13-16 weeks5
17-20 weeks2
21-28 weeks2
> 52 weeks5
Unclear5
Not reported2

Evidence Table A11. Ethnic Groups

Ethnic groups mentioned
Yes24
No54
Groups mentioned (more than one group possible)
White23
Afro-American14
Asian2
Hispanic7
Other2

Evidence Table A12. Treatment Setting (more than one setting possible)

Home17
School10
Community2
Hospital inpatient5
Hospital outpatient19
Mental health outpatient47
Pediatric clinic1
Not reported1

Evidence Table A13. Is the Analysis Grouped by Treatment Setting?

Yes0
No2
Not applicable76

Evidence Table A14. Are the Inclusion Criteria Reported?

Yes58
No19
Unclear2

Evidence Table A15. Are the Exclusion Criteria Reported?

Yes39
No38
Unclear1

Evidence Table A16. Is the Primary Outcome Stated?

Yes17
No61

Evidence Table A17. Age of Subjects (more than one age group possible)

<5 years2
5 to 12 years64
13 to 18 years19
>18 years12
Not reported2

Evidence Table A18. Gender of Subjects (more than one gender choice possible)

Male75
Female51
Not reported1

Evidence Table A19. IQ Considered

Is IQ considered?
Yes62
No14
Not reported2
Is IQ one of the exclusion criteria?
Yes31
No40
Not reported7
IQ cutoff used
< 707
71--8015
> 808
Unclear1

Evidence Table A20. Diagnostic Model Used

MBD6
Hyperkinetic syndrome2
ADD (DSM I-III)28
ADHD (DSM-IIIR and -IV)29
Teacher diagnosis1
Individual method6
Not reported6

Evidence Table A21. Comorbid Disorders of Subjects (more than one choice possible)

ODD24
CD24
Tourette's syndrome5
Anxiety disorder17
Depressive disorder6
Learning disorder11
Mental retardation/low IQ3
Autistic1
None43

Evidence Table A22. Who Made the Diagnosis? (more than one choice possible)

Clinician71
Parent10
Teacher13
Not reported6

Evidence Table A23. Sample Origin (more than one choice possible)

Hospital inpatient4
Hospital outpatient14
Mental health outpatient38
Community13
School19
Home2
Community physicians13
Pediatric clinic outpatient1
Not reported10

Evidence Table A24. Family Characteristics

Are family characteristics mentioned?
Yes32
No46
Which family characteristics are mentioned (more than one choice possible)
Family history of ADHD12
Family structure5
Socioeconomic status24
Maternal education4
Paternal education3
Income4
Family functioning4
Maternal depression4
Paternal depression4
Ethno-cultural background5

Evidence Table A25. Number of Treatment Arms

228
326
420
51
63

Evidence Table A26. Monitoring of Treatments

Was there fidelity and monitoring of treatment?
Yes25
No53
Which methods were used? (more than one choice possible)
Trained therapists19
Treatment manual4
Self-monitoring and administration of treatment11

Evidence Table A27. Was Compliance With Treatment Measured?

Yes33
No 45

Evidence Table A28. Scores and Tests

Are baseline test scores given?
Yes54
No24
Which tests were reported on?
Abikoff Classroom Observation1
ACTeRS1
ADHD rating scale1
Beck's depression inventory3
Behavior problem checklist - attention1
BPC1
Brief psychiatric rating scale1
CBCL2
CGI3
Children's Depression Inventory1
Conners37
Corrected grade placement (CGP)1
CPT5
Family history of disorders2
Global assessment scale5
Hamilton anxiety scale1
Hamilton psychiatric rating -- depression4
Hollingshead SES1
Home activity scale1
Kaufman brief intelligence (KBIT)1
KIDDIE-SADS1
MFFT1
Peak interval timing procedure1
Physicians global rating scale2
Piers Harris scale self-esteem1
Profile of mood state (POMS)1
Reaction performance1
Reading grade level1
Revised children's manifest anxiety 1
SCL 901
SCRS1
Self-control rating scale 1
SNAP2
STESS2
STROOP1
Structured clinical interview DSM-III-R1
Telephone interview probe (TIP)1
TOTS2
WAIS-R3
Wender-Utah rating1
Werry2
Weschler22
WRAT3
Unclear/not reported1

Evidence Table A29. Treatment Described

Is randomization reported?
Yes77
No1
Is randomization described?
Yes3
No74
Is randomization appropriate?
Yes2
No1
Is double blinding reported?
Yes67
No10
Is double blinding described?
Yes57
No10
Is double blinding appropriate?
Yes8
No49
Are withdrawals reported in terms of number and reasons per arm?
Yes10
No68

Evidence Table A30. Is the Intended Allocation to Treatment Group Concealed From the Investigator?

Yes4
No69
Not reported5

Evidence Table A31. Industry Association

Is an association with industry reported?
Yes27
No51
Which companies are mentioned?
Abbott2
Autogenics Systems1
Ciba Geigy16
Efamol Ltd1
General Foods Ltd1
JB Roerig Division Pfizer Inc1
Merrell-Dow Pharmaceutical1
National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies1
Smith Kline & French1
Somerset1
Tutag Pharmaceutical Division1

Evidence Table A32. Overall Frequencies of Interventions

Intervention Frequency
Amphetamine1
Attention control/child training4
Behavior modification5
Bibliotherapy-protocol1
Buproprion1
Caffeine3
Child training4
Chlorpromazine1
Clonidine1
Cognitive behavioral therapy6
Desipramine5
Dexamphetamine18
EEG biofeedback1
Efamol1
Haloperidol1
Hydroxyzine1
Imipramine6
L-amphetamine1
Lithium carbonate1
Lethylphenidate56
Nicotine1
Nothing (e.g., wait lists)3
Parent training1
Pemoline5
Phenylalanine1
Pindolol1
Placebo64
Racemic amphetamine1
Secobarbitol1
Selegiline1
Supportive therapy1
Thioridazine1

Evidence Table A33. Overall Outcomes

Outcomes Frequency
Abdominal pain21
Achievement pests9
Aggressiveness2
Anorexia6
Anxiety22
Arithmetic3
Behavior disturbances5
CD15
Core symptoms20
Crying7
Decreased appetite17
Depression8
Disturbed sleep3
Emotional1
Fatigue/tiredness10
Global mood1
Global side effects4
Global symptoms21
Grades2
Growth1
Headache20
Height4
Hyperactivity30
Impulsivity12
Inattention29
Increased appetite6
Interaction with family1
Interaction with friends6
Irritability14
Listening2
Motor Tics8
Nausea11
Nightmares8
ODD7
Reading5
Performance4
Sadness10
Self-control2
Self-esteem2
Sleep disorder -- insomnia22
Sleep disorder -- sleep12
Social competence11
Somatic effects3
Spelling1
Verbal3
Weight7
Weight gain1
Weight loss1

Evidence Table A34. Overall Frequencies of Tests

TestsFrequency
ACTeRS1
ADHD Rating Scale2
Beck Depression Inventory3
Behavior Problem Checklist1
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale1
CGI - Global Improvement1
CGI - Severity of Illness1
Child Psychological Rating1
Children's Checking Task2
Children's Depression Inventory1
Clinical Global Improvement8
Conners Child/Self2
Conners Parent Rating Scale22
Conners Teacher/Spouse37
CPT4
DETROIT133
DETROIT163
DETROIT63
DTS2
Durrell Anal. Reading2
EFT2
Gates McGinty Test1
Global Assessment Scale3
HAM-A1
Hamilton Psychiatric Rating - Depression2
How I Feel1
Humphries Self-Control - Teacher1
KBIT1
MFFT3
Other Clinician Report1
Other Parent Report8
Other Teacher Report12
Peterson Quay Checklist1
PGS3
Physician Global Assessment of Change1
Piers Harris Scale1
POMS1
PTSR1
Report Only32
SNAP1
STESS5
STM Task1
Unspecified Reaction Performance2
Werry Weiss Activity Scale2
Weschler7
WRAT3
Unclear/Not Reported1

Evidence Table B1. Key Characteristics of Studies With Drug vs. Drug Comparisons

Author & Year of PublicationTypePatients RandomizedDiagnosis ModelInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Outcomes of Interest Measured 2 Outcome Results3,4,5
Same drug comparisons
Arnold 1976 Crossover31MBDDEX
L-amph
Placebo
4113Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS; except one parent report of DEX > L-Amphetamine
NR
NR
NR
NS
Fitzpatrick 1992 Crossover19 6 ADD (DSM-I-III)MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH-high-SR
Placebo
2132Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NR
NS
NS
Pelham 1987 Crossover13 6 ADD (DSM-I-III)MPH-reg
MPH-SR
Placebo
5112Core/Global Symptoms
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS
NS
Srinivas 1992 Crossover9Other l-MPH
d-MPH
dl-MPH
Placebo
Unclear92Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Whitehouse 1980 Parallel34MBDMPH-reg
MPH-SR
2132Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS; except one teacher report of MPH > MPH-SR
NS
NS
MPH-SR > MPH for parent; MPH > MPH-SR for teacher
NS
Stimulant vs. stimulant comparisons
Arnold 1978 Crossover29 6 MBDMPH
DEX
Caffeine
Placebo
3102Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
MPH vs DEX = NS
NR
MPH vs DEX = NS
NR
NR
Borcherding 1989 Crossover18 6 ADD (DSM-I-III)MPH
DEX
Placebo
3122Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Castellanos 1997 Crossover22ADHD (DSM-IIIR/IV)MPH
DEX
Placebo
3182Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Conners 1972 Parallel84MBDDEX
Pemoline
Placebo
8151Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MBDMPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8173Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Efron 1997 Crossover125OtherMPH
DEX
2112Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NR
MPH > DEX; except for parent report of impulsivity = NS
NS
MPH > DEX for teacher; NS for parent
MPH > DEX and NS
Stimulant vs. stimulant comparisons
Elia 1991 Crossover48 6 ADD DSM I-IIIMPH
DEX
Placebo
3132Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
NS
Gross 1976 Crossover50MBDMPH
DEX
R-Amph
Placebo
172Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Kauffman 1981 Crossover12 6 OtherMPH
DEX
Placebo
6133Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Matochik 1994 Parallel37 6 ADHD DSM-IIIR/IVMPH
DEX
Unclear111Core/Global Symptoms Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityNR
NR
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 6 ADHD DSM-IIIR/IVMPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1112Core/Global Symptoms
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NR
NR
Stephens 1984 Crossover36ADD DSM-I-IIIMPH
Pemoline
Placebo
192AcademicData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Winsberg 1974 Crossover20OtherMPH
DEX
Placebo
1122Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Stimulant vs. tricyclic antidepressants
Quinn 1975 Parallel75OtherMPH
Imipramine
5272Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NR
NS
NS
Rapport 1993 Crossover16ADHD (DSM-IIIR/IV)MPH
Desipramine
MPH + Desipramine
Placebo
1173Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Spring 1976 Parallel58OtherMPH+Placebo
Placebo+ MPH
Imipramine + Placebo
Placebo + Imipramine
3133Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Werry 1980 Crossover30OtherMPH
Imipramine
Placebo
4122Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
Imipramine > MPH
NS; except one parent report of Imipramine > MPH
NS
Imipramine > MPH for parent; NS for teacher
NS
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table B3, for details of the 20 elements.

2

Data on adverse effects are included in the Adverse Effects Table only (Evidence Tables H1a-H1h).

3

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. Specific outcomes in each category are given in Evidence Tables B2, B3, and Supplemental Evidence Tables B4--B8.

4

Results given are for drug-to-drug comparisons, NOT baseline/placebo comparisons.

5

Outcomes regarded, a priori, as not of interest by expert panel are not included in this table but are discussed in the text if clinically significant.

6

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; Des-desipramine; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; > = better than; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table B2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Drug vs. Drug Comparisons1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 2 IQ Considered in election of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 2 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment (Q34) 2 Compliance With Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Same drug comparisons
Arnold 1976 1110110011010011000111
Fitzpatrick 1992 0010100011111111101113
Pelham 1987 0010100011111111000111
Srinivas 1992 111010001100000101109
Whitehouse 1980 0111111011011110000113
Stimulant vs. stimulant comparisons
Arnold 1978 1010110011010011000110
Borcherding 1989 0010110111111111000012
Castellanos 1997 1111111111111111010118
Conners 1972 0111101011111111100115
Conners 1980 1111111011111110101117
Efron 1997 0100110011101111000111
Elia 1991 0010111011111111000113
Gross 1976 011010001101001000007
Kauffman 1981 0011110111101111001013
Matochik 1994 0010111011110010100111
Pelham 1990 0010100011111111000111
Stephens 1984 011010011101001100009
Winsberg 1974 0110110011101111010012
Stimulant vs. tricyclic antidepressants
Quinn 1975 011010000100110000017
Rapport 1993 1111110011111111111017
Spring 1976 0110111011101111100013
Werry 1980 0110110011101111001012
1

0 = absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Evidence Table B3. Description of Characteristics Checked for Drug vs. Drug Comparisons

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting(Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects(Q25) 1 IQ Considered in Selection Of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin(Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance With Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Same drug comparisons
Arnold 1976 313131NoMHOPYesNoNo<5 yr 5-12 yrMale FemaleNoMBDNoNMClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Fitzpatrick 1992 NRNR19NoMHOP HomeNoNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesODD
CD
Clin
Teach
PCYesNoYesYes13
Pelham 1987 NRNR13NoMHOP
Home
NoNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
ADDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Srinivas 1992 999NoHoOPNoNoNo5-12 yrMaleNRNRNoNMNRHoOPNoYesYesNo9
Whitehouse 1980 NR3430WhiteAfroMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
NoMBDYesNPClinNRNoNoNoYes13
Stimulant vs. stimulant comparisons
Arnold 1978 31NR29NoMHOP
Home
YesNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
NoMBDNoNMClinMHOPNoNoNoYes10
Borcherding 1989 NRNR18NoMHOPYesNoYes5-12 yrMaleYes
>80
ADDYesODD
CD,AD
Clin
Teach
PCOP
School
NoNoNoNo12
Castellanos 1997 382220White
Afro
Asian
Hispanic
MHOPYesYesYes5-12 yrMaleYes
>75
ADHDYesODD
CD
Touret
ClinPC/MHOP
Comm
School
NoYesNoYes18
Conners 1972 NR8481White
Afro
HoOPNoYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
MBDYesNPClinPC/MHOP
Com
School
YesNoNoYes15
Conners 1980 606060White
Afro
MHOP
Home
YesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
>80
MBDYesNPClinNRYesNoYesYes17
Efron 1997 NR125NRNoMHOPYesNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
ADHDYesNPClinPC/MHOP
Comm
Home
School
NoNoNoYes11
Elia 1991 NRNR48NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes
>80
ADDYesODD
CD, AD
ClinPCOP
School
NoNoNoYes13
Gross 1976 NR5048NoMHOPNoNoNo<5 yr
5-18 yr
Male
Female
NoMBDNoNMClinNRNoNoNoNo7
Kauffman 1981 NRNR12WhitePCOPYesNoYes5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
InMeYesNPClinMHOP
CommPhy
NoNoYesNo13
Matochik 1994 NRNR37NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
ADHDNoNMClinUnclearYesNoNoYes11
Pelham 1990 NRNR22NoMHOPNoNoNo5-12 yr
13-18 yr
MaleYes
NM
ADHDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Stephens 1984 NR3636NoMHOPNoNoYes5-12 yrMale
Female
NoADDNoNMClinMHOP
PCOP
NoNoNoNo9
Winsberg 1974 NR2018NoHoIPYesNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
InMeYesNPClinHoOP
HoIP
NoYesNoNo12
Stimulant vs. tricyclic antidepressants
Quinn 1975 NR7536NoComNoNoNoNRMaleNRNRYesNPNRNRNoNoNoYes7
Rapport 1993 201616WhiteAfroHoIPYesNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes
>80
ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
DD, LD
ClinHoIPYesYesYesNo17
Spring 1976 NR5847NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
InMeYesNPClin
Parent
Teach
PCOPYesNoNoNo13
Werry 1980 NR3030NoHoOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes NMInMeYesNPClinHoOP
School
NoNoYesNo12
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD-anxiety disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD-attention-deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); CD-conduct disorder; Clin-clinician; Com-community; CommPhy-community physicians; DD-depressive disorder; HoIP-hospital inpatient; HoOP-hospital outpatient; HySy-hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe-individual method; LD-learning disorder; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP-mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ-mental retardation/low IQ; NM-none mentioned; NP-none present; NR-not reported; ODD-oppositional defiant disorder; PC-pediatric clinic; PCOP-pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach-teacher; TeDi-teacher diagnosis; Touret-Tourette's syndrome; ADHD-ADHD Activity Scale.

Evidence Table C1. Key Characteristics of Studies with Drug vs. Nondrug Comparisons

Author &Year of PublicationTypePatients RandomizedDiagnosis ModelInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Outcomes of Interest Measured 2 Outcome Results 3, 4, 5
Arnold 1989 Crossover18 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
DEX
Efamol
Placebo
4103Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
NS
DEX > Efamol
Brown 1985 Parallel30ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
MPH + CBT
CBT
12151Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
NR
NR
NR
Conrad 1971 Parallel81OtherDEX
DEX + CT
Placebo
Placebo + CT
Not reported122AcademicData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Firestone 1986 Parallel73 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
MPH + PT
Placebo + PT
12162Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
MPH, MPH + PT>Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
MPH, MPH + PT>Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
Placebo + PT, MPH, MPH + PT = NS
MPH, MPH + PT > Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
Klein 1997 Parallel89OtherMPH
MPH + CBT
Placebo + CBT
8131Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS; except MPH + CBT > CBT
MPH+CBT, MPH > Placebo+CBT; MPH vs MPH+CBT = NS
MPH+CBT, MPH > Placebo+CBT; MPH vs MPH+CBT = NS
MPH+CBT, MPH > Placebo+CBT; MPH vs MPH+CBT = NS
NS
MTA Coop Group 1999 Parallel579ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Medication (MedMgt)
Psychosocial (Beh)
Combined Med + Psychosocial (Comb)
Assessment + Referral (CC)
varies up to 112 weeks203Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Social
MedMgt > Beh; Comb~MedMgt;
Comb, MedMgt > Beh, CC
Comb > Beh, CC (reading only)
Comb > Beh, CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
MedMgt, Beh, Comb > CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table C3 for details of the 20 elements.

2

Data on adverse effects are included in the Adverse Effects Table only (Evidence Tables H1a--H1h).

3

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. Specific outcomes in each category are given in Evidence Tables C2, C3, and Supplemental Evidence Tables C4--C8.

4

Results given are for drug-to-drug comparisons, NOT baseline/placebo comparisons.

5

Outcomes regarded, a priori, as not of interest by expert panel are not included in this table but are discussed in the text if clinically significant.

6

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; Des-desipramine; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; > = better than; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported; ~ about the same as.

Evidence Table C2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Drug vs. Nondrug Comparisons1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender of Subjects (Q25)IQ Considered In Selection of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 2 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 2 Compliance With Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Arnold 1989 0010010111111100000110
Brown 1985 0110111011111111010115
Conrad 1971 1110110010100011111012
Firestone 1986 1010111011111111110116
Klein 1997 01111110110111000001 13
MTA Coop Group 1999 1111111111111111111120
1

0 = absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Evidence Table C3. Description of Characteristics Checked for Drug vs. Nondrug Comparisons

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting (Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects (Q25)IQ Considered In Selection of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin (Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Arnold 1989 NRNR18NoNRYesNoYes5-12MaleYes NMADDYesNPNRNRNoNoNoYes10
Brown 1985 NR3030NoMHOP HomeYesYesNo5-12MaleYes NMADDYesNPClin Parent TeachPCOP SchoolNoYesNoYes15
Conrad 1971 2628168NoMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12NRYes NMTeDiNoNMTeachSchoolYesYesYesNo12
Firestone 1986 134NR73NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12Male FemaleYes >85ADDYesCDClinMHOP PCOPYesYesNoYes16
Klein 1997 NR8986White Afro Hispanic AsianHome SchoolYesYesNo5-12Male FemaleYes >85InMeYesNPClin Parent TeachNRNoNoNoYes13
MTA Coop Group 1999 609579559White Afro HispanicHome School CommYesYesYes5-12Male FemaleYes >80ADHDYesODD, CD, Touret Depress AnxietyClin ParentMHOP Comm SchoolYesYesYesYes20
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD-anxiety disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD-attention-deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); Clin-clinician; Com-community; CoPh-community physicians; DD-depressive disorder; HoIP-hospital inpatient; HoOP-hospital outpatient; HySy-hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe-individual method; LD-learning disorder; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP-mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ-mental retardation/low IQ; NM-none mentioned; NP-none present; NR-not reported; PC-pediatric clinic; PCOP-pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach-teacher; TeDi-teacher diagnosis; Touret-Tourette's syndrome; ADHD-ADHD Activity Scale.

Evidence Table D1. Key Characteristics of Studies with Combination Therapy

Author & Year of PublicationTypePatients RandomizedDiagnosis ModelInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Outcomes of Interest Measured 2 Outcome Results 3, 4, 5
Stimulant vs. a combination of two or more drugs
Garfinkel 1981 Crossover6ADD
DSM-I-III
Caffeine - low
Caffeine - high
Caffeine - low + MPH
Caffeine - high + MPH
Placebo
Placebo + MPH
3152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
MPH vs MPH + caffeine (high) = NS; MPH + Caffeine (low) > Placebo, Placebo + MPH, Caffeine (low), Caffeine (high), Caffeine (high) + MPH
MPH vs MPH + caffeine (high) = NS; MPH + Caffeine (low) > Placebo, Placebo + MPH, Caffeine (low), Caffeine (high), Caffeine (high) + MPH
MPH vs MPH + caffeine (high) = NS; MPH + Caffeine (low) > Placebo,
Placebo + MPH, Caffeine (low), Caffeine (high), Caffeine (high) + MPH
Gittelman-Klein 1976 Parallel166ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
THIOR
MPH + THIOR
12163Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
MPH ± THIOR > THIOR NS for parents; MPH ± THIOR > THIOR for teachers NS for parents; MPH ± THIOR > THIOR for teachers NS for parents; MPH ± THIOR > THIOR for teachers NS
Levy 1996 Crossover10**ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH + Haloperidol
Placebo + Haloperidol
Placebo + MPH
Placebo
NR132Reaction timesData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Rapport 1993 Crossover16ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
MPH+ Desipramine
Desipramine
Placebo
NR173Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Schechter 1985 Crossover10Hyperkinetic syndromeDEX-low
DEX-high
DEX + Caffeine
Caffeine
2132Core/Global SymptomsNR
Stimulant vs. stimulant plus nondrug intervention
Brown 1985 Parallel30ADD
DSM-1-III
MPH
MPH + CBT
CBT
12151Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
NS
NS
NS
Conrad 1971 Parallel81OtherDEX
DEX + CT
Placebo
Placebo + CT
NR122AcademicNS
Firestone 1986 Parallel73 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
MPH + PT
PT
12162Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
MPH, MPH + PT>Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
MPH, MPH + PT>Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
Placebo + PT, MPH, MPH + PT = NS
MPH, MPH + PT > Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
Klein 1997 Parallel89OtherMPH
MPH + CBT
Placebo + CBT
8131Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS; except MPH + CBT > CBT
MPH + CBT, MPH > Placebo + CBT; MPH vs MPH + CBT = NS
MPH + CBT, MPH > Placebo + CBT; MPH vs MPH + CBT = NS
MPH + CBT, MPH > Placebo + CBT; MPH vs MPH + CBT = NS
NS
Long 1993 Parallel32ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
MPH + Bibliotherapy-protocol
8101Core/Global Symptoms Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Conduct/Oppositional DisordersMPH + PT manual > MPH
NS
MPH + PT manual > MPH
MTA Coop Group 1999 Parallel579ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Medication (MedMgt)
Psychosocial (Beh)
Combined Med + Psychosocial (Comb)
Assessment + Referral (CC)
Varies up to 112 weeks203Core/Global Symptoms Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Academic Conduct/Oppositional Disorders SocialMedMgt > Beh; Comb~MedMgt;
Comb, MedMgt > Beh,CC
Comb > Beh, CC (reading only)
Comb > Beh, CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
MedMgt, Beh, Comb > CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
Nondrug vs. stimulant plus nondrug intervention
Borden 1989 Parallel30ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH + CBT
Placebo + CBT
CBT
12172Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Data not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Brown 1985 Parallel30ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
MPH + CBT
CBT
12151Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
NR
NR
NR
Brown 1986 Parallel40ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH + AC
MPH + CBT
Placebo + AC
Placebo + CBT
12143Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS
NS
NS
NS
Brown 1988 Parallel71ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH + CT
MPH + AC
Placebo + CT
Placebo + AC
12152Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Carlson 1992 Crossover24ADHD
(DSM-IIIR/IV)
MPH + AC
MPH + BC/Mod
MPH + AC
MPH + BC/Mod
Placebo + AC
Placebo + BC/Mod
Unclear151AcademicData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Christensen 1975 Crossover16OtherMPH + BC/Mod
Placebo + BC/Mod
4124Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Data not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Conrad 1971 Parallel81OtherDEX
DEX + CT
Placebo
Placebo + CT
NR122AcademicData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Firestone 1986 Parallel73 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
MPH + PT
PT
12162Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
MPH, MPH + PT>Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
MPH, MPH + PT>Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
Placebo + PT, MPH, MPH + PT = NS
MPH, MPH + PT > Placebo + PT; MPH vs MPH + PT = NS
Klein 1997 Parallel89OtherMPH
MPH + CBT
Placebo + CBT
8131Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS; except MPH + CBT > CBT
MPH+CBT, MPH > Placebo+CBT; MPH vs MPH+CBT = NS
MPH+CBT, MPH > Placebo+CBT; MPH vs MPH+CBT = NS
MPH+CBT, MPH > Placebo+CBT; MPH vs MPH+CBT = NS
NS
Nondrug vs. stimulant plus nondrug intervention (cont.)
Hinshaw 1989 Crossover24ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH + CBT
Placebo + CBT
Unclear152Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityMPH+CBT > Placebo + CBT
Hinshaw 1984 Crossover24ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH + CT
MPH + AC
Placebo + CT
Placebo + AC
5 (drug) 1 (therapy)182AcademicNS except for CT, MPH + CT, MPH + AC > AC
MTA Coop Group 1999 Parallel579ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Medication (MedMgt)
Psychosocial (Beh)
Combined Med + Psychosocial (Comb)
Assessment + Referral (CC)
varies up to 112 weeks203Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityEffect of BC/Mod added to MPH was not significant for any of the dependent measures
Pelham 1993 Crossover31ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Placebo
BC/Mod
Low MPH + BC/Mod
Low MPH
High MPH + BC/Mod
High MPH
Unclear151Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityNS except for MPH + AC, MPH + BC/Mod > AC
Solanto 1997 Crossover22ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH + AC
MPH + BC/Mod
Placebo + AC
Placebo+ BC/Mod
1173Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Social
MedMgt > Beh; Comb~MedMgt;
Comb, MedMgt > Beh, CC
Comb > Beh, CC (reading only)
Comb > Beh, CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
MedMgt, Beh, Comb > CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table D3 for details of the 20 elements.

2

Data on adverse effects are included in the Adverse Effects Table only (Evidence Tables H1a--H1h).

3

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. Specific outcomes in each category are given in Evidence Tables D2, D3, and Supplemental Evidence Tables D4--D8.

4

Results given are for drug-to-drug comparisons, NOT baseline/placebo comparisons.

5

Outcomes regarded, a priori, as not of interest by expert panel are not included in this table but are discussed in the text if clinically significant

6

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; Des-desipramine; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; > = better than; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table D2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Combination Therapy Comparisons1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 2 IQ Considered In Selection of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 2 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 2 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Stimulant vs. a combination of two or more drugs
Garfinkel 1981 0110110011111111011115
Gittelman-Klein 1976 1111110011111111100116
Levy 1996 0010110111111111100013
Rapport 1993 1111110011111111111017
Schechter 1985 0110100011111101011113
Stimulant vs. stimulant plus nondrug intervention
Brown 1985 0110111011111111010115
Conrad 1971 1110110010100011111012
Firestone 1986 1010111011111111110116
Klein 1997 0111111011101110000113
Long 1993 0100110011010011110010
MTA Coop Group 1999 1111111111111111111120
Nondrug vs. stimulant plus nondrug intervention
Borden 1989 0110111011111111111117
Brown 1985 0110111011111111010115
Brown 1986 0110100011111111011114
Brown 1988 0100111011111110111115
Carlson 1992 0110101011111111011115
Christensen 1975 0110100011101101011112
Conrad 1971 1110110010100011111012
Firestone 1986 1010111011111111110116
Klein 1997 0111111011101110000113
Hinshaw 1984 1100110111111111011015
Hinshaw 1989 0111111011111111111118
MTA Coop Group 1999 1111111111111111111120
Pelham 1993 0111101011111111011116
Solanto 1997 1111110111111111100117
1

0 = absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E)

Evidence Table D3. Description of Characteristics Checked for Combination Therapy Comparisons

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting (Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 1 IQ Considered in Selection of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29A) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29B) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin (Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Stimulant vs. a combination of two or more drugs
Garfinkel 1981 NR66NoMHOPYesNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes >90ADDYesNPClinMHOPNoYesYesYes15
Gittelman-Klein 1976 166166155White AfroMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >85ADDYesNPClin Parent TeachMHOP PCOP Home SchoolYesNoNoYes16
Levy 1996 NRNR10NoHoOPyesNoYes5-12 yrMaleYes NMADDYesODDClinHoOPYesNoNoNo13
Rapport 1993 201616White AfroHoIPYesNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes >80ADHDYesODD CD, AD DD, LDClinHoIPYesYesYesNo17
Schechter 1985 NR1010NoHoOP HomeNoNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes >85HySyYesNPNRHoOPNoYesYesYes13
Stimulant vs. stimulant plus nondrug intervention
Brown 1985 NR3030NoMHOP HomeYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADDYesNPClin Parent TeachPCOP SchoolNoYesNoYes15
Conrad 1971 2628168NoMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrNRYes NMTeDiNoNMTeachSchoolYesYesYesNo12
Firestone 1986 134NR73NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >85ADDYesCDClinMHOP PCOPYesYesNoYes16
Klein 1997 NR8986White Afro Hispanic AsianHome SchoolYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >85InMeYesNPClin Parent TeachNRNoNoNoYes13
Long 1993 NR32NRNoMHOPYesNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleNoADHDNoNMClinMHOPYesYesNoNo10
MTA Coop Group 1999 609579559White Afro HispanicHome School CommYesYesYes5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >80ADHDYesODD, CD, AD, Depress TouretClin ParentMHOP Comm SchoolYesYesYesYes20
Nondrug vs. stimulant plus nondrug intervention
Borden 1989 NR3023NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >80ADDYesNPClinPCOPYesYesYesYes17
Brown 1985 NR3030NoMHOP HomeYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADDYesNPClin Parent TeachPCOP SchoolNoYesNoYes15
Brown 1986 NR4035NoMHOPNoNoNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesCDClinPCOP SchoolNoYesYesYes14
Brown 1988 NR71NRNoHoOP HomeYesYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesNPClin Parent TeachNRYesYesYesYes15
Carlson 1992 NR2424NoSchoolNoYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADHDYesODD CD, LDClinMHOPNoYesYesYes15
Christensen 1975 NR1613NoSchoolNoNoNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes <70NRYesMRIQUnclearSchoolNoYesYesYes12
Conrad 1971 2628168NoMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrNRYes NMTeDiNoNMTeachSchoolYesYesYesNo12
Firestone 1986 134NR73NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesCDClinMHOP PCOPYesYesNoYes16
Hinshaw 1984 2424UnclearNoSchoolYesNoYes5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes >85InMeYesNPClin Parent TeachNRNoNoNoYes13
Hinshaw 1989 NR2424White Afro HispanicMHOP Home SchoolYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADHDYesNPClinMHOP PCOP Comm SchoolOnYesYesNo15
Klein 1997 NR8986White Afro Hispanic AsianHome SchoolYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADHDYesODD CD,LDClinMHOP PCOPYesYesYesYes18
MTA Coop Group 1999 609579559White Afro HispanicHome School CommYesYesYes5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >80ADHDYesODD, CD, AD, Depress TouretClin ParentMHOP Comm SchoolYesYesYesYes20
Pelham 1993 NR3131White AfroMHOP SchoolNoYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADHDYesODD CD, LDClinMHOPNoYesYesYes15
Solanto 1997 222222White Hispanic East IndianHoOPYesNoYes5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >80ADHDYesODD ADClinHoOP PCOPYesNoNoYes17
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD- anxiety disorder; ADHD- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD- attention-deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); Clin- clinician; Com- community; CoPh- community physicians; DD- depressive disorder; HoIP- hospital inpatient; HoOP- hospital outpatient; HySy- hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe- individual method; LD- learning disorder.

MBD- minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP- mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ- mental retardation/low IQ; NM- none mentioned; NP- none present; NR- not reported; PC- pediatric clinic; PCOP- pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach- teacher; TeDi- teacher diagnosis; Touret- Tourette's; ADHD- ADHD Activity Scale.

Evidence Table E1. Key Characteristics of Studies Comparing Tricyclic Antidepressants vs. Placebo

Author & Year of PublicationTypePatients RandomizedDiagnosis ModelInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Outcomes of Interest Measured 2 Outcome Results 3, 4, 5
Studies evaluating desipramine
Biederman 1989a+b Parallel73ADD DSM-I-IIIPlacebo
Desipramine
6164Core/Global Symptoms
Depression
Desipramine > Placebo
Desipramine > Placebo
Donnelly 1986 Parallel29ADD DSM-I-IIIPlacebo
Desipramine
2132Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Desipramine > Placebo
NS
Gualtieri 1991 Crossover12ADD DSM-I-IIIPlacebo
Desipramine-L
Desipramine-M
Desipramine-H
1142Core/Global SymptomsDesipramine-M > Placebo for parent; NS for teacher
Rapport 1993 Crossover16ADHD DSM-IIIR/IVMPH
Desipramine
MPH + Desipramine
Placebo
1173Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Singer 1995 Crossover37ADHD DSM-IIIR/IVPlacebo
Desipramine
Clonidine
6123Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityDesipramine > Clonidine
Wilens 1996 Parallel43ADHD DSM-IIIR/IVDesipramine
Placebo
6152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Desipramine > Placebo
Desipramine > Placebo
Studies evaluating imipramine
Gualtieri 1988 Crossover9 6 ADD (DSM-I-III)Placebo
Imipramine 1 mg
Imipramine 2 mg
Imipramine 5 mg
1112Inattention/Hyperactivity/
Impulsivity
Imipramine > Placebo
Werry 1980 Crossover30OtherMPH
Imipramine
Placebo
4122Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
Imipramine > MPH, Placebo
NS for teachers; Imipramine > MPH for parents
NS
NS for teachers; Imipramine > MPH, Placebo for parents
NS
Winsberg 1980 Crossover11ADD (DSM-I-III)Placebo
Imipramine
2153Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS; except Imipramine > Placebo for parent report of inattention
NS
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table E3 for details of the 20 elements.

2

Data on adverse effects are included in the Adverse Effects Table only (Evidence Tables H1a--H1h).

3

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. Specific outcomes in each category are given in Evidence Tables E2, E3, and Supplemental Evidence Tables E4--E8.

4

Results given are for drug-to-drug comparisons, NOT baseline/placebo comparisons.

5

Outcomes regarded, a priori, as not of interest by expert panel are not included in this table but are discussed in the text if clinically significant.

6

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; Des-desipramine; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; > = better than; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported; ~ about the same as.

Evidence Table E2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Studies Evaluating Tricyclic Antidepressants vs. Placebo1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender Of Subjects (Q25) 2 IQ Considered In Selection of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 2 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment (Q34) 2 Compliance With Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Studies evaluating desipramine
Biederman 1989 a+b 0111110011111111101116
Donnelly 1986 0110110011111111000113
Gualtieri 1991 0110111011111111001014
Rapport 1993 1111110011111111111017
Singer 1995 1111100011011111000012
Wilens 1996 0110111011111111100115
Studies evaluating imipramine
Gualtieri 1988 0010110001111111000111
Werry 1980 0110110011101111001012
Winsberg 1980 0110111011111111100115
1

0 = absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Evidence Table E3. Description of Characteristics Checked for Studies Evaluating Tricyclic Antidepressants vs. Placebo

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting (Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories Of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 1 IQ Considered In Selection of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin (Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance With Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Studies evaluating desipramine
Biederman 1989a, 1989b NR7362WhiteMHOPYesNoNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes > 70ADDYesODD
CD, AD
DD, LD
Clin Parent TeachMHOPYesNoYesYes16
Donnelly 1986 NR2929NoMHOPYesNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADDYesODD
CD, LD
Clin Parent TeachSchoolNoNoNoYes13
Gualtieri 1991 NR1212NoHoIPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes > 70ADDYesNPClinHoIPNoNoYesNo14
Rapport 1993 201616White AfroHoIPYesNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes > 80ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
DD, LD
ClinHoIPYesYesYesNo17
Singer 1995 373734White AfroHoOPNoNoNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleNoADHDYesTouretClinHoOPNoNoNoNo12
Wilens 1996 NR4341NoHoOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale FemaleYes > 75ADHDYesCD, AD
DD
ClinHoOPYesNoNoYes15
Studies evaluating imipramine
Gualtieri 1988 NRNR9NoHoIPYesNoNoNRMale FemaleYes NMADDYesNPClinHoIPNoNoNoYes11
Werry 1980 NR3030NoHoOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMInMeYesNPClinHoOP SchoolNoNoYesNo12
Winsberg 1980 NR1110NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesNPClin TeachMHOP SchoolYesNoNoYes15
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD-anxiety disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD-attention-deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); Clin-clinician; Comm-community; CommPh-community physicians; DD-depressive disorder; HoIP-hospital inpatient; HoOP-hospital outpatient; HySy-hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe-individual method; LD-learning disorder; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP-mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ-mental retardation/low IQ; NM-none mentioned; NP-none present; NR-not reported; PC-pediatric clinic; PCOP-pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach-teacher; TeDi-teacher diagnosis; Touret-Tourette's syndrome; ADHD-ADHD Activity Scale.

Evidence Table F1. Key Characteristics of Studies With Long-term Therapy

Author & Year of PublicationTypePatients RandomizedDiagnosis ModelInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Outcomes of Interest Measured 2 Outcome Results 3, 4, 5
Studies evaluating MPH vs. placebo
Brown 1986 Parallel40ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH + CT
MPH + CBT
Placebo + CT
Placebo + CBT
12143Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS
NS
NS
NS
Brown 1988 Parallel71ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH + CT
MPH + AC
Placebo + CT
Placebo + AC
12152Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Firestone 1986 Parallel73 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
MPH + PT
Placebo + PT
12162Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
No statistical evidence of long-term difference among the three groups in any of the outcomes measured.
Kupietz 1988 Parallel58ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH-high
Placebo
28163Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
MPH > Placebo
MPH 0.7 > Placebo; MPH 0.3, 0.5 vs Placebo = NS
NS
MPH > Placebo
Schachar 1997 Parallel91ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
Placebo
16174Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS for parent; MPH > Placebo
MPH > Placebo for teachers; NS for parents
NS; except MPH > Placebo ODD and aggressiveness teachers
Studies evaluating MPH vs. other interventions
Brown 1985 Parallel30ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
MPH + CBT
CBT
12151Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
NR
NR
NR
Gittelman-Klein 1976 Parallel166ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
THIOR
MPH + THIOR
12163Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
MPH, MPH + THIOR > THIOR
MPH, MPH + THIOR > THIOR teachers; NS parents
NS; except MPH, MPH + THIOR > THIOR arithmetic
MPH ± THIOR > THIOR teachers; NS parents
NS
MTA Coop Group 1999 Parallel579ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Medication (MedMgt)
Psychosocial (Beh)
Combined Med + Psychosocial (Comb)
Assessment + Referral (CC)
60202Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
Quinn 1975 Parallel75OtherMPH
Imipramine
5273Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Social
MedMgt > Beh; Comb~MedMgt;
Comb, MedMgt > Beh,CC
Comb > Beh, CC (reading only)
Comb > Beh, CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
MedMgt, Beh, Comb > CC; MedMgt ~ Beh, Comb
Studies evaluating DEX
Conrad 1971 Parallel81OtherDEX
DEX + CT
Placebo
Placebo + CT
Approx. 20122AcademicData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
DEX
Placebo
52152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
DEX > Placebo
DEX > Placebo
NS
DEX > Placebo
NS
Greenhill 1973 Crossover9OtherDEX
Lithium carbonate
Placebo
12122Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Studies evaluating other interventions
Fehlings 1991 Parallel26ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Supportive therapy
CBT
16162Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Depression
NS; except CBT > ST for hyperactivity
CBT > ST
Linden 1996 Parallel18ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
EEG-Biofeedback
Nothing
26141Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Biofeedback > Nothing for inattention
NS for hyperactivity
Biofeedback > Nothing
NS
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table F3 for details of the 20 elements.

2

Data on adverse effects are included in the Adverse Effects Table only (Evidence Tables H1a-H1h).

3

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. Specific outcomes in each category are given in Evidence Tables F2, F3, and Supplemental Evidence Tables F4--F8.

4

Results given are for drug-to-drug comparisons, NOT baseline/placebo comparisons.

5

Outcomes regarded, a priori, as not of interest by expert panel are not included in this table but are discussed in the text if clinically significant.

6

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; Des-desipramine; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; > = better than; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported; ~ about the same as.

Evidence Table F2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Studies Evaluating Long-term Therapy1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender Of Subjects (Q25) 2 IQ Considered in Selection of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29A) 2 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29B) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment (Q34) 2 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Studies evaluating MPH vs. placebo
Brown 1986 0110100011111111011114
Brown 1988 0100111011111110111115
Firestone 1986 1010111011111111110116
Kupietz 1988 1110111011111111001116
Schachar 1997 1110111011111111011117
Studies evaluating MPH vs. other interventions
Brown 1985 0110111011111111010115
Gittelman-Klein 1976 1111110011111111100116
MTA Coop Group 1999 111111111100110000017
Quinn 1975 0110100001111111111120
Studies evaluating DEX
Conrad 1971 1110110010100011111012
Gillberg 1997 1110111011111111000115
Greenhill 1973 0111110011101100110012
Studies evaluating other interventions
Fehlings 1991 0110111011111111011116
Linden 1996 0110101010111111011114
1

0 = absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Evidence Table F3. Description of Characteristics Checked for Studies Evaluating Long-term Therapy

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting (Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 1 IQ Considered in Selection Of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin (Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Studies evaluating MPH vs. placebo
Brown 1986 NR4035NoMHOPNoNoNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesCDClinPCOP SchoolNoYesYesYes14
Brown 1988 NR71NRNoHoOP HomeYesYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesNPClin Parent TeachNRYesYesYesYes15
Firestone 1986 134NR73NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes > 85ADDYesCDClinMHOP PCOPYesYesNpYes16
Kupietz 1988 585847NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes > 80ADDYesNPClin TeachHoOP Com SchoolNoNoYesYes16
Schachar 1997 1059166NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes > 80ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
ClinHoOPNoYesYesYes17
Studies evaluating MPH vs. other interventions
Brown 1985 NR3030NoMHOP HomeYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADDYesNPClin Parent TeachPCOP SchoolNoYesNoYes15
Gittelman-Klein 1976 166166155White AfroMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes > 85ADDYesNPClin ParentMHOP PCOP Home SchoolYesNoNoYes16
MTA Coop Group 1999 609579559white afro hispanicHome School CommYesYesYes5-12 yrMaleNRNRYesNPNRNRNoNoNoYes7
Quinn 1975 NR7536NoCommNoNoNoNRMale FemaleYes >80ADHDYesODD, CD
Touret, DD, AD
Clin ParentMHOP Comm SchoolYesYesYesYes20
Studies evaluating DEX
Conrad 1971 2628168NoMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrNRYes NMTeDiNoNMTeachSchoolYesYesYesNo12
Gillberg 1997 726232NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes > 50ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
Touret
MRIQ
Autism
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes15
Greenhill 1973 NR99WhiteHoOP HoIP Home SchoolYesNoNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes NMNRYesNPNRNRYesYesNoNo12
Studies evaluating other interventions
Fehlings 1991 NR2625NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMaleYes > 85ADHDYesNPClinPCOP SchoolNoYesYesYes16
Linden 1996 NR1818NoMHOPNoYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrNRYes NMADHDYesODD
LD
ClinComNoYesYesYes14
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD- anxiety disorder; ADHD- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD- attention-deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); Clin- clinician; Com- community; CoPh- community physicians; DD- depressive disorder; HoIP- hospital inpatient; HoOP- hospital outpatient; HySy- hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe- individual method; LD- learning disorder; MBD- minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP- mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ- mental retardation/low IQ; NM- none mentioned; NP- none present; NR- not reported; PC- pediatric clinic; PCOP- pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach- teacher; TeDi- teacher diagnosis; Touret- Tourette's syndrome; ADHD- ADHD Activity Scale.

Evidence Table G1. Key Characteristics of Studies in Adults

Author & Year of PublicationTypePatients RandomizedDiagnosis ModelInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Outcomes of Interest Measured 2 Outcome Results 3, 4, 5
Studies evaluating MPH vs. placebo
Evans 1994 Crossover1ADHD
(DSM-IIIR/IV)
MPH
Placebo
1142Adverse effectsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Mattes 1984 Crossover66ADD
(DSM-I-III)
MPH
Placebo
3142Core/Global SymptomsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Reimherr 1984 Crossover36ADD
(DSM-I-III)
MPH
Placebo
2122Core/Global SymptomsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Spencer 1995 Crossover25ADHD
(DSM-IIIR/IV)
MPH
Placebo
3193Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Depression
MPH > Placebo
MPH > Placebo
NR
Wender 1985 Crossover37 6 ADD
(DSM-I-III)
MPH
Placebo
2152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
MPH > Placebo; except report of NS
MPH > Placebo
NS
NS for BDI and sadness report; MPH > Placebo for POMS
depression & anxiety
Studies evaluating DEX
Deveaugh-Geiss 1980 Crossover1Hyperkinetic
Syndrome
DEX-low
DEX-high
Secobarbitol
Placebo
Unclear122Core/Global SymptomsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Matochik 1994 Parallel37 6 ADHD
(DSM-IIIR/IV)
MPH
DEX
Unclear111Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
NR
NR
Other interventions
Conners 1996 Crossover18ADHD
(DSM-IIIR/IV)
Nicotine
Placebo
1142DepressionData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Ernst 1996 Parallel24**ADHD
(DSM-IIIR/IV)
Selegiline-low
Selegiline-high
Placebo
6152Core/Global Symptoms
Depression
NS
NS
Wender 1981 Parallel60ADD
(DSM-I-III)
Pemoline
Placebo
6172Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Pemoline > Placebo
Pemoline > Placebo
Wilens 1996 Parallel43ADHD
(DSM-IIIR/IV)
Desipramine
Placebo
6152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Desipramine > Placebo
Desipramine > Placebo
Wood 1985 Crossover16ADD
(DSM-I-III)
Phenylalanine
Placebo
Unclear142Core/Global SymptomsNS
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table G3 for details of the 20 elements.

2

Data on adverse effects are included in the Adverse Effects Table only (Evidence Tables H1a-H1h).

3

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. Specific outcomes in each category are given in Evidence Tables G2, G3, and Supplemental Evidence Tables G5 --G8.

4

Results given are for drug-to-drug comparisons, NOT baseline/placebo comparisons.

5

Outcomes regarded, a priori, as not of interest by expert panel are not included in this table but are discussed in the text if clinically significant.

6

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; Des-desipramine; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; > = better than; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table G2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Studies in Adults1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 2 IQ Considered in Selection Of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 2 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment (Q34) 2 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Studies evaluating MPH vs. placebo
Evans 1994 1110100111011111110014
Mattes 1984 1110111011111111000014
Reimherr 1984 0100111111011111000012
Spencer 1995 1111111111111111101119
Wender 1985 0011111011111111100115
Studies evaluating DEX
Deveaugh-Geiss 1980 1110100011111111000012
Matochik 1994 0010111011110010100111
Other interventions
Conners 1996 1110111011011111000114
Ernst 1996 1010111011011111101115
Wender 1981 1111111011111111100117
Wilens 1996 0110111011111111100115
Wood 1985 1110111011111111000014
1

0= absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Evidence Table G3. Description of Characteristics Checked for Studies in Adults

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q!7) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting (Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects (Q25)IQ Considered in Selection of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29A) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29B) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin (Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Studies evaluating MPH vs. placebo
Evans 1994 111NoMHOPUnclearUnclearYes>18 yrFemaleNoADHDYesNPClinHoOP
MHOP
YesYesNoNo14
Mattes 1984 1166661NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
ADDYesADClinMHOP
Com
NoNoNoNo14
Reimherr 1984 NR36NRNoHoOPYesYesYes>18 yrMale
Female
NoADDYesAD, DDClinMHOP
Com
NoNoNoNo12
Spencer 1995 252523WhiteHoOPYesYesYes>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>75
ADHDYesAD, CD
DD
ClinHoOPYesNoYesYes19
Wender 1985 NRNR37WhiteMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>90
ADDYesADClinMHOP
PCOP
Com
YesNoNoYes15
Studies evaluating DEX
Deveaugh-Ggeiss 1980 111NoHoOPUnclearNoNo>18 yrMaleYes
80
HySyYesNPClinHoOPNoNoNoNo12
Matochik 1994 NRNR37NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
ADHDNoNMClinUnclearYesNoNoYes11
Other interventions
Conners 1996 221817NoHoOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
NoADHDYesNPClinPCOP
Com
NoNoNoYes14
Ernst 1996 44unclear24NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
NoADHDYesNPClinComYesNoYesYes15
Wender 1981 606026WhiteMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>90
ADDYesADClinHoOP
MHOP
PCOP
YesNoNoYes17
Wilens 1996 NR4341NoHoOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>75
ADHDYesCD, AD
DD
ClinHoOPYesNoNoYes15
Wood 1985 191613NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>90
ADDYesNPClinMHOPNoNoNoNo14
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD- anxiety disorder; ADHD- attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD- attention-deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); Clin- clinician; Com- community; CoPh- community physicians; DD- depressive disorder; HoIP- hospital inpatient; HoOP- hospital outpatient; HySy- hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe- individual method; LD- learning disorder; MBD- minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP- mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ- mental retardation/low IQ; NM- none mentioned; NP- none present; NR- not reported; PC- pediatric clinic; PCOP- pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach- teacher; TeDi- teacher diagnosis; Touret- Tourette's; ADHD- ADHD Activity Scale.

Evidence Table H1a. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Sleep Disorders

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)CommentsSleep Disorders Outcome Results 2, 3 (x > y : adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or intensity)
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Ahmann 1993 Crossover206 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1, 2132
  • Increase in insomnia with MPH therapy
  • No significant dose effect
MPH 0.9, 1.5 > Placebo;
MPH 0.9 vs. MPH 1.5 = NS
Barkley 1990 Crossover83 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear142
  • Insomnia measured as "severe" in 7% placebo, 18% MPH.03, and MPH.05 by parents; in 2% placebo, 0% MPH.03 and 2% MPH.05 by teachers
  • Information alsocollected on nightmares
  • Mean severity ratings: no significant differences between groups
MPH 0.3, 0.5 > Placebo;
MPH 0.3 vs. MPH 0.5 = NS for
parent;
NS for teacher
Fine 1993 Parallel24 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear82
  • Information collected on trouble sleeping and nightmares
  • No significant drug or dose effect reported
  • High correlation between symptoms on parents ACRS and side effects questionnaire
NS
Fitzpatrick 1992 Crossover19 4 MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH high-SR
Placebo
2132
  • Information collected from parents using the STESS
  • Sleep problems generally increased with MPH
MPH + MPH-SR > Placebo
Handen 1991 Crossover27MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
2142
  • Side effects listed in the Physician's Desk Reference (presence or absence of symptom) based upon ratings of teachers
NS
Klorman 1990 Crossover48MPH
Placebo
3172
  • Information collected from parents in weekly telephone conversation
NS
Klorman 1987 Crossover19MPH
Placebo
3162
  • Frequency dichotomized as present or absent
  • Information collected on sleep problem and sleepiness
NS
Spencer 1995 Crossover25MPH
Placebo
3193
  • Reported as insomnia
  • 2 subjects had dose lowered because of side effects
  • Subjective adverse effects more pronounced with active medication
NR
Stein 1996 Crossover25MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1173
  • Reported as nightmares on SSERS parent interview
  • Rated as severe in 12% at baseline, 4% on each of placebo, titration, and MPH-high; 0% MPH-low
NS
Wender 1985 Crossover37 4 MPH
Placebo
2152
  • Information collected from patients' subjective experience measuring on a 5-point scale, absent to very much
NS
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo
Arnold 1978 Crossover29 4 MPH
DEX
Caffeine
Placebo
3102
  • Reported as "awake at night"
  • Reported by parents on a 4-point checklist -- "not at all" to "very much"
NS
Castellanos 1997 Crossover22MPH
DEX
Placebo
3182
  • Reported as "insomnia"
  • Effect remitted with change of medication or decreasing dose
NR
Elia 1991 Crossover48 4 MPH
DEX
Placebo
3132
  • STESS data presented as mild, moderate, severe
  • No significant difference between drugs or drug order
MPH, DEX > Placebo;
MPH vs. DEX = NR
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62DEX
Placebo
52152
  • Information collected at physical examination
  • "Early awakenings" and "disturbed sleep" occurred less frequently with DEX than at baseline
NS
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo (cont.)
Matochik 1994 Parallel37 4 MPH
DEX
Unclear111
  • Only pre-post comparisons available
NR
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 4 MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1112
  • Reported as disturbed sleep, nightmares and sleep disorder
  • Considerably more difficulty falling asleep was reported for all long-acting drugs than for placebo or MPH reg
  • Pemoline had this effect in twice as many children
NR
Winsberg 1974 Crossover20MPH
DEX
Placebo
1122
  • Reported as nightmares
  • Side effects were rated by a nurse with a 33-item checklist as severe, moderate, mild or absent
NR
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 Crossover18MPH
Bupropion
6162
  • Adverse effects were always transient and primarily reported during first 2 weeks of treatment
  • No statistical analysis presented
NR
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4194
  • Reported as nightmares
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks (SSERS) on a 3-point scale
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8173
  • Reported as nightmares
  • Several methods of recording side effects were used
  • Little difference in parent-reported side effects among 3 treatment groups
NR
Gittelman-Klein 1976 Parallel166MPH
THIOR
MPH+THIOR
12163
  • Reported as insomnia, trouble sleeping and sleepiness
  • Presented information as mild or moderate, dichotomized from a 7-point scale
NR
Rapport 1993 Crossover16MPH
MPH + Desipramine
Desipramine
Placebo
NR173Sleep disturbance not found to differ significantly across medicationsNR for STESS; NS for CDRS
Studies evaluating drugs other than MPH
Arnold 1976 Crossover31DEX
L-Amph
Placebo
4113
  • Reported as awake at night
  • Side effects are conspicuously undramatic
NS
Greenberg 1972 Parallel61 4 DEX
Hydroxyzine
Chlorpromazine
Placebo
8122
  • Children receiving chlorpromazine report sleepiness more often than any of the other children
  • Intensity of all side effects improved with decreased dosage
NR at p=0.05 level
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H1b. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Headaches

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)CommentsHeadaches: Outcome Results 2, 3 (x > y : adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or intensity)
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Ahmann 1993 Crossover206 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1, 2132
  • One child reported severe headaches and could not complete the protocol
  • No significant dose effect
MPH 1.5 > Placebo;
Placebo, MPH 1.5 vs. MPH 0.9 = NS
Barkley 1990 Crossover80 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear142
  • Low dose and high dose showed significant increase relative to placebo but no significant dose effect was apparent Rated as severe: 0% placebo, 1% MPH 0.3, 4% MPH 0.5 (parent); 0% placebo, 2% MPH 0.3, 0% MPH 0.5 (teacher)
MPH 0.3, 0.5 > Placebo;
MPH 0.3 vs. MPH 0.5 = NS for
parent;
NS for teacher
Fine 1993 Parallel24 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear82
  • No statistically significant drug or dose effect reported
NS
Fitzpatrick 1992 Crossover73 4 MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH high-SR
Placebo
2132
  • Information collected from parents using STESS
  • No statistically significant difference reported
NS
Handen 1991 Crossover27MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
2142
  • Side effects listed in Physician's Desk Reference (presence or absence of symptom) based upon ratings of teachers
NS
Klorman 1990 Crossover48MPH
Placebo
3172
  • Information collected from parents in weekly telephone conversation
NS
Klorman 1987 Crossover19MPH
Placebo
3162
  • Frequency dichotomized as present or absent
NS
Stein 1996 Crossover25MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1173
  • Collected on SSERS parent rating
  • Rated as severe in 4% titration, 4% MPH 0.9, 0% baseline, placebo and MPH 0.6
MPH 0.6 vs. MPH 0.9 = NS;
Placebo vs. MPH 0.6, 0.9, titration =
NS
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo
Arnold 1978 Crossover29 4 MPH
DEX
Caffeine
Placebo
3102
  • Reported by parents on a 4-point checklist: not at all to very much
NS
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62DEX
Placebo
52152
  • Information collected at physical examination
NS
Matochik 1994 Parallel37 4 MPH
DEX
Unclear111
  • Only pre-post comparisons available
NR
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 4 MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX
Pemoline
Placebo
1112
  • No clear differences between drugs
NR
Studies evaluating MPH and drug other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 Crossover18MPH
Bupropion
6162
  • Adverse effects were always transient and primarily reported during first 2 weeks of treatment
  • No statistical analysis presented
NR
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4194
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks (SSERS) on a 3-point scale
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8173
  • Several methods of recording side effects were used
  • Little difference in parent reported side effects among 3 treatment group
NR
Gittelman-Klein 1976 Parallel166MPH
THIOR
MPH+THIOR
12163
  • Presented information as mild or moderate dichotomized from a 7-point scale
NR
Rapport 1993 Crossover16MPH
MPH + Desipramine
Desipramine
Placebo
NR173
  • Somatic factor on the IGRS; subjects were significantly worse on the combination MPH and desipramine when compared with MPH alone
NR statistically as an individual
condition
Studies evaluating drugs other than MPH
Arnold 1976 Crossover31DEX
L-Amph
Placebo
4113
  • Potential side effects were conspicuously undramatic as rated on the parents' checklist
NS
Greenberg 1972 Parallel61 4 DEX
Hydroxyzine
Chlorpromazine
Placebo
8122
  • Intensity of side effects improved with decreased dosage
NR at p=0.05 level
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; IGRS-Inpatient Global Rating Scale; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H1c. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Motor Tics

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)CommentsMotor Tics: Outcome Results2,3 (x > y : adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or intensity)
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Barkley 1990 Crossover83 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear142
  • No drug or dose effect reached statistical significance
  • Score of 7 or higher on 10-point scale considered severe
Severe tics:
11% Placebo, 8% MPH-low; 4% MPH-high (teacher);
4% placebo, 7% MPH-low, 5% MPH-high (parent)
Gadow 1995 Crossover34 4 MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH-high
Placebo
2162
  • Ratings of motor, vocal and tic severity measured by the clinician
  • Ratings of motor tic frequency and tic severity improved with MPH treatment
NS; except placebo > MPH for teacher
Schachar 1997 Parallel91MPH
Placebo
16174
  • Motor and vocal tics measured on 10-point scale
  • Clinically significant if change >1SD or move from absent/mild to moderate or severe
NS
Stein 1996 Crossover25MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1173
  • SSERS completed by parents (10-point scale)
  • Side effects (%present/%severe): Placebo 20/8; titration 16/4; MPH-low 8/0; MPH-high 12/4
MPH-low vs. MPH-high = NS;
Placebo vs. MPH-low, MPH-high, titration = NR
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX
Castellanos 1997 Crossover22MPH
DEX
Placebo
3182
  • Tic severity significantly greater during the 2nd and 3rd weeks of DEX and during 2nd week of MPH
    (NS at week 3 for MPH)
DEX > placebo
MPH vs. Placebo, DEX = NS
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62Dex
Placebo
52152
  • Information collected at physical examination
  • 18 children reported tics during the course of this study; 0 showed an increase in tic frequency or severity
NS
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4194
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks (SSERS) on a 3-point scale
  • Measured no distress, distress, considerable distress
NS
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SD-standard deviation; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H1d. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Decreased Appetite

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)CommentDecreased Appetite/Anorexia: Outcome Results2,3 (x > y: adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or intensity)
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Ahmann 1993 Crossover206 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1, 2132A significant dose effect is apparent for decreased appetite
  • 2 children removed from protocol for "severe" appetite side effects
MPH-low, MPH-high > Placebo;
MPH-low vs MPH-high = NS
Barkley 1990 Crossover80 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear142
  • Significant drug and dose effect in parent rating
  • Decreased appetite measured as "severe" in 1% placebo, 7% MPH-low; 13% MPH-high (parents), 2% placebo, 2% MPH-low, 6% MPH-high (teachers)
MPH-low, MPH-high > Placebo;
MPH-low > MPH-high (parent rating)
Fine 1993 Parallel24 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear82
  • Mean severity rating by parents between active drug and placebo.
    No report of dose effect
MPH doses > Placebo
Fitzpatrick 1992 Crossover73 4 MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH high-SR
Placebo
2132
  • Information collected from parents using STESS
  • No significant difference
NS
Handen 1991 Crossover27MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
2142
  • Side effects listed in the Physician's Desk Reference (presence or absence of symptom) based upon ratings of teachers
NS
Klorman 1987 Crossover19MPH
Placebo
3162
  • Frequency dichotomized as present or absent
  • Information collected on "eat less"
NS
Klorman 1990 Crossover48MPH
Placebo
3172
  • Weekly telephone conversation with parents
  • Patients and parents report statistically significant appetite loss
  • Weight loss not significantly correlated with reported appetite loss
MPH > Placebo
Spencer 1995 Crossover25MPH
Placebo
3193
  • Subjective adverse effects more pronounced with active medication
NS
Stein 1996 Crossover25MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1173
  • Measured on the SSERS parent interview rated as severe in 12% titration, 4% MPH-low, 16% MPH-high
MPH-high, MPH titration > Placebo;
MPH-low vs. MPH-high = NS
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo
Arnold 1978 Crossover29 4 MPH
DEX
Caffeine
Placebo
3102
  • Recorded as poor appetite
  • Reported by parents on a 4-point checklist, "not at all" to "very much"
MPH, DEX > Placebo;
DEX > Caffeine; MPH vs. Caffeine, DEX = NR
Castellanos 1997 Crossover22MPH
DEX
Placebo
3182
  • Recorded as "marked appetite suppression with transient weight loss"
NR
Elia 1991 Crossover48 4 MPH
DEX
Placebo
3132
  • STESS data presented in terms of level of severity: mild, moderate, severe
  • No significant difference between drugs or drug order
MPH, DEX > Placebo;
MPH vs. DEX = NR
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo (cont.)
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62DEX
Placebo
52152
  • Recorded as "poor appetite"
  • Information collected at physical examination at 6 months
Amphetamine > Placebo
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 4 MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1112
  • All medication caused a loss of appetite relative to placebo
  • Long acting forms more than standard MPH
NR
Winsberg 1974 Crossover20MPH
DEX
Placebo
1122
  • Reported as "anorexia"
  • Side effects were monitored with a 33-item nurse-rated checklist as severe, moderate, mild, or absent
NR
Studies evaluating MPH and drug other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 Crossover18MPH
Bupropion
6162
  • Reported as "anorexia"
  • Adverse effects were always transient and primarily reported during first 2 weeks of treatment
  • No statistical analysis presented
NR
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4194
  • Reported as "anorexia"
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks (SSERS) on a 3-point scale
  • Measured no distress, distress, considerable distress
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8173
  • Reported as "anorexia "
  • Several methods of recording side effects used
  • Little difference in parent-reported side effects among 3 treatment groups
NR

NR
Gittelman-Klein 1976 Parallel166MPH
THIOR
MPH+THIOR
12163
  • Reported as "appetite decreasing"
  • Presented information as mild or moderate, dichotomized from a 7-point scale
NR
Quinn 1975 Parallel75MPH
Imipramine
5272
  • Reported as "anorexia"
NR
Rapport 1993 Crossover16MPH
MPH +
Desipramine
Desipramine
Placebo
NR173
  • Appetite disturbance" on CDRS showed significant medication condition differences
NS
Studies evaluating drugs other than MPH
Arnold 1976 Crossover31DEX
L-Amphetamine
Placebo
4113
  • Side effects are conspicuously undramatic
  • Data collected as "poor appetite"
L-Amphetamine, DEX > Placebo
Greenberg 1972 Parallel60 4 DEX
Hydroxyzine
Chlorpromazine
Placebo
8122
  • DEX group complained of decreased appetite more than hydroxyzine and placebo-treated children
  • Intensity of side effects improved with decreased dosage
NR at p=0.05 level
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H1e. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Abdominal Pain

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 CommentsAbdominal pain: Outcome Results2,3 (x > y: adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or intensity
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Ahmann 1993 Crossover206 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1, 2213
  • Prevalence of stomach ache increased with MPH therapy but with no apparent dose effect
  • One child withdrawn from study due to "severe" stomach aches
MPH-low, MPH-high > Placebo;
MPH-low vs. MPH-high = NS
Barkley 1990 Crossover83 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear214
  • Significant drug and dose effect
  • "Severe" stomach aches reported by parents in 0% placebo, 1% MPH-low , 6% MPH-high; by teachers in 0% placebo, 2% MPH-low, 2% MPH-high
MPH-low, MPH-high > Placebo;
MPH-high > MPH-low for parent; NS for teacher
Fine 1993 Parallel24 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear28
  • No significant drug or dose effect reported
NS
Fitzpatrick 1992 Crossover19 4 MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH high-SR
Placebo
2213
  • Information collected from parents using STESS
  • No significant difference
NS
Handen 1991 Crossover27MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
2214
  • Side effects listed in the Physicians' Desk Reference (presence or absence of symptoms) based upon ratings of teachers
NS
Klorman 1990 Crossover48MPH
Placebo
3217
  • Information collected from parents in weekly telephone conversations
NS
Klorman 1987 Crossover19MPH
Placebo
3216
  • Frequency dichotomized as presence or absence
NS
Stein 1996 Crossover25MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1317
  • Rated as "severe" in 8% on titration, 4% on MPH-low, 4% on MPH-high, 0% at baseline or on placebo
  • SSERS rating by parents
MPH-low vs. MPH-high = NS;
Placebo vs. MPH-low, MPH-high, titration = NS
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo
Arnold 1978 Crossover29 4 MPH
DEX
Caffeine
Placebo
3210
  • Reported by parents on a 4-point checklist "not at all" to "very much"
  • Data collected as "tummy aches"
NS
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62DEX
Placebo
52215
  • Info collected at physical exam
  • Occasionally or often in 32% on at least 1 assessment but no difference between baseline or treatment groups
NS
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 4 MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1211
  • No clear difference between drugs
NR
Winsberg 1974 Crossover20MPH
DEX
Placebo
1212
  • Side effects were monitored with a 33-item side-effects checklist rated by a nurse as "severe," "moderate," "mild," or "absent"
NR
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 Crossover18MPH
Bupropion
6216
  • Adverse effects were always transient and primarily reported during first 2 weeks of treatment
  • No statistical analysis presented
NR
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4419
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks on a 3-point scale (SSERS)
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8317
  • Several methods of recording side effects were used
  • Little difference in parent-reported side effects among 3 treatment groups
NR
Gittelman-Klein 1976 Parallel166MPH
THIOR
MPH+THIOR
12316
  • Presented information as mild or moderate dichotomized from a 7-point scale
NR
Rapport 1993 Crossover16MPH
MPH + Desipramine
Desipramine
Placebo
NR317
  • "Stomach ache" data presented as >3 on the STESS
NR
Studies evaluating drugs other than MPH
Arnold 1976 Crossover31DEX
L-Amph
Placebo
4311
  • Data collected as "tummy aches"
  • "Side effects are conspicuously undramatic"
NS
Greenberg 1972 Parallel61 4 DEX
Hydroxyzine
Chlorpromazine
Placebo
8212
  • Children receiving DEX complained of stomach aches more often than those receiving hydroxyzine and placebo
  • Intensity of all side effects improved with decreased dosage
NR at p=0.05 level
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H1f. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Irritability

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)CommentsIrritability: Outcome Results 2, 3 (x > y: adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or intensity)
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Ahmann 1993 Crossover206 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1, 2132
  • Decrease in irritability during Ritalin weeks of trial
MPH-low vs. Placebo, MPH-high = NS
Barkley 1990 Crossover80 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear142
  • Neither drug nor dose effect reached statistical significance
  • Irritability measured as "severe" in 18% on placebo, 15% MPH-low, 13% MPH-high (parent ratings); 9% Placebo; 7% MPH-low, 2% MPH-high (teacher ratings)
NS
Fine 1993 Parallel24 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear82
  • No significant drug or dose effect reported
  • High correlation between variables on parent ACRS and side effect questionnaire
NS
Handen 1991 Crossover27MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
2142
  • Side effects listed in the Physician's Desk Reference (presence or absence of symptom) based upon ratings of teachers
MPH-high > Placebo;
Placebo vs. MPH-low = NS;
MPH-low vs. MPH-high = NR
Klorman 1987 Crossover19MPH
Placebo
3162
  • Frequency of symptoms dichotomized as present or absent
NS
Stein 1996 Crossover25MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1173
  • Reported as severe in 28% at baseline; 21% on Placebo; 12% titration; 17% MPH-low; 16% MPH-high; (SSERS) parent rating
MPH-low vs. MPH-high = NS;
Placebo vs. MPH-low, MPH-high, titration = NR
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX
Arnold 1978 Crossover29 4 MPH
DEX
Caffeine
Placebo
3102
  • Reported by parents on a 4-point checklist -- "not at all" to "very much"
NS
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 4 MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1112No clear difference between drugsNR
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 Crossover18MPH
Bupropion
6162
  • Adverse effects were always transient and primarily reported during first 2 weeks of treatment
  • No statistical analysis presented
NR
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4194
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks (SSERS)
  • Measured no distress, distress, considerable distress
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8173
  • Several methods of recording side effects were used
  • Little difference in parent-reported side effects among 3 treatment groups
NR
Studies evaluating drugs other than MPH
Arnold 1976 Crossover31DEX
L-Amph
Placebo
4113
  • "Side effects are conspicuously undramatic" for both parents and teachers on David's Hyperkinetic Rating scale
NS
Greenberg 1972 Parallel60 4 DEX
Hydroxyzine
Chlorpromazine
Placebo
8122
  • Intensity of all side effects improved with decreased dosage
NR at p=0.05 level
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H1g. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Nausea

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)CommentsNausea: Outcome Results 2, 3 (x > y : adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or intensity)
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Fitzpatrick 1992 Crossover73 4 MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH high-SR
Placebo
2132
  • Information collected from parents using STESS
  • No significant difference
NS
Klorman 1990 Crossover48MPH
Placebo
3172
  • Information collected from parents in weekly telephone conversation
NS
Klorman 1987 Crossover19MPH
Placebo
3162
  • Frequency of symptom dichotomized as present or absent
NS
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62DEX
Placebo
52152
  • Information collected at physical exam
NS
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 4 MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1112
  • No clear difference between drugs
NR
Winsberg 1974 Crossover20MPH
DEX
Placebo
1122
  • Side effects were monitored with a 33-item checklist as severe, moderate, mild, or absent rated by a nurse
NR
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 Crossover18MPH
Bupropion
6162
  • Adverse effects were always transient and primarily reported during first 2 weeks of treatment
  • No statistical analysis presented
NR
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4194
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks (SSERS)
  • Measured no distress, distress, considerable distress
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8173
  • Several methods of recording side effects were used
  • Little difference in parent-reported side effects among 3 treatment groups
NR
Gittelman-Klein 1976 Parallel166MPH
THIOR
MPH+THIOR
12163
  • Presented information as mild or moderate, dichotomized from a 7-point scale
NR
Rapport 1993 Crossover16MPH
MPH + Desipramine
Desipramine
Placebo
NR173
  • Considered a positive endorsement if scored > 3 on the STESS
NR
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H1h. Key Characteristics of Studies with Adverse Effects Focusing on Fatigue/Tiredness

Author & Year of PublicationTypeNumber of Patients RandomizedInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20)1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)CommentsFatigue/Tiredness: Outcome Results 2, 3 (x > y: adverse effects are significantly worse in x than y either in terms of frequency or severity)
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Barkley 1990 Crossover80 4 MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear142
  • Reported as drowsiness, not statistically significant in drug or dose effect by parent or teacher
  • Reported as "severe" by parent in 1% of placebo, 2% of MPH-low, 1% MPH-high; and by teacher in 4% placebo, 4% MPH-low, 2% MPH-high
NS
Klorman 1987 Crossover19MPH
Placebo
3172
  • Frequency dichotomized as present or absent
NS
Stein 1996 Crossover25MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1173
  • SSERS parent rated "severe" in 8% at baseline, 8% on placebo, 4% on titration, 4% on high, 0% on low
MPH low vs. high = NS; Placebo vs.
MPH 0.6, 0.9, titration = NR
Wender 1985 Crossover37 4 MPH
Placebo
2152
  • Data collected from patient's subjective experience ranking 1=absent, 5=very much
NS
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX
Matochik 1994 Parallel37 4 MPH
DEX
Unclear111
  • Only pre -- postcomparisons available
NR
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 4 MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1112
  • No clear difference between drugs
NR
Winsberg 1974 Crossover20MPH
DEX
Placebo
1122
  • Side effects were monitored with a 33-item side- effects checklist rated as "severe," "moderate," "mild," or "absent" by a nurse
NR
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 Crossover18MPH
Bupropion
6162
  • Adverse effects were always transient and primarily reported during first 2 weeks of treatment
  • No statistical analysis presented
NR
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4192
  • Measured by parents after 2 and 4 weeks (SSERS) on a 3-point scale
NS
Rapport 1993 Crossover16MPH
MPH + Desipramine
Desipramine
Placebo
NR173
  • Data presented as a positive endorsement of >3 on the STESS
NR
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research. Refer to Evidence Table H3 for the details of the 20 elements.

2

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. For more details, see Evidence Tables H2, H3, and Supplemental Evidence Table H4.

3

Results given are for drug-to-drug/nondrug/placebo comparisons, NOT baseline comparisons.

4

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject's Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table H2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Studies with Adverse Effects1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 2 IQ Considered in Selection Of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 2 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 2 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Ahmann 1993 1010111111011111000013
Barkley 1990 0010110111101111101114
Fine 1993 001010011101001100008
Fitzpatrick 1992 0010100011111111101113
Gadow 1995 0011111011111111101116
Gittelman-Klein 1988 0110100011111111000112
Handen 1991 0111111011111110001014
Klorman 1987 0110111011111111101116
Klorman 1990 0111111011111111101117
Schachar 1997 1110111011111111011117
Spencer 1995 1111111111111111101119
Stein 1996 0111111011111111101117
Wender 1985 0011111011111111100115
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo
Arnold 1978 1010110011010011000110
Castellanos 1997 1111111111111111010118
Elia 1991 0010111011111111000113
Gillberg 1997 1110111011111111000115
Matochik 1994 0010111011110010100111
Pelham 1990 0010100011111111000111
Winsberg 1974 0110110011101111010012
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 0111111011111111100116
Buitelaar 1996 1110111111111111111119
Conners 1980 1111111011111110101117
Gittelman-Klein 1976 1111110011111111100116
Quinn 1975 011010000100110000017
Rapport 1993 1111110011111111111017
Studies evaluating drugs other than MPH
Arnold 1976 1110110011010011000111
Greenberg 1972 0011100011111111000112
1

0 = absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Evidence Table H3. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Studies with Adverse Effects

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q17) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting (Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 1 IQ Considered In Selection of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin (Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Studies evaluating only MPH and placebo
Ahmann 1993 234NR206NoMHOPYesYesYes5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleNoADHDYesNPClinMHOPNoNoNoNo13
Barkley 1990 NRNR83NoMHOPYesNoYes5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes >80NRYesNPClinMHOPYesNoYesYes14
Fine 1993 NRNR24NoMHOPNoNoYes5-12 yrMale FemaleNoADHDNoNMClinMHOP PCOP SchoolNoNoNoNo8
Fitzpatrick 1992 NRNR19NoMHOP HomeNoNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesODD
CD
Clin TeachPCOPYesNoYesYes13
Gadow 1995 NRNR34White, Afro Hispanic AsianMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes >70ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
Touret
Clin Parent TeachMHOPYesNoYesYes16
Gittelman-Klein 1988 NR6234NoMHOPNoNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMADDYesNPClinMHOPNoNoNoYes12
Handen 1991 NR2727White, AfroMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes <80ADHDYesMRIQClinNRNoNoYesNo14
Klorman 1987 NR1919NoMHOP HomeYesYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes >74ADDYesNPClinMHOPYesNoYesYes16
Klorman 1990 NR4848WhiteMHOP Home SchoolYesYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYes >80ADDYesODD
CD, AD
ClinMHOPYesNoYesYes17
Schachar 1997 1059166NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes >80ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
ClinHoOPNoYesYesYes17
Spencer 1995 252523WhiteHoOPYesYesYes>18 yrMale FemaleYes >75ADHDYesCD, AD
DD
ClinHoOPYesNoYesYes19
Stein 1996 NR2525White HispanicHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes NMADHDYesODD
CD
ClinMHOP PCOP ComYesNoYesYes17
Wender 1985 NRNR37WhiteMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale FemaleYes >90ADDYesADClinMHOP PCOP ComYesNoNoYes15
Studies evaluating MPH and DEX with or without placebo
Arnold 1978 31NR29NoMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleNoMBDNoNMClinMHOPNoNoNoYes10
Castellanos 1997 382220White, Afro Hispanic AsianMHOPYesYesYes5-12 yrMaleYes >75ADHDYesODD
CD
Touret
ClinMHOP PCOP Com SchoolNoYesNoYes18
Elia 1991 NRNR48NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes >80ADDYesODD
CD, AD
ClinPCOP SchoolNoNoNoYes13
Gillberg 1997 726232NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMADHDYesODD
CD, AD
Touret
MRIQ
Autism
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes15
Matochik 1994 NRNR37NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale FemaleYes NMADHDNoNMClinUnclearYesNoNoYes11
Pelham 1990 NRNR22NoMHOPNoNoNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMaleYes NMADHDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Winsberg 1974 NR2018NoHoIPYesNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYes NMInMeYesNP0ClinHoIP HoOPNoYesNoNo12
Studies evaluating MPH and drugs other than DEX
Barrickman 1995 NR1815WhiteMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYesADHDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPYesNoNoYes16
Buitelaar 1996 553232NoMHOPYesYesYes5-12 yr 13-18 yrMale FemaleYesADHDYesODD
CD, AD
Clin ParentMHOPYesYesYesYes19
Conners 1980 606060White AfroMHOP HomeYesYesNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYesMBDYesNPClinNRYesNoYesYes17
Gittelman-Klein 1976 166166155White AfroMHOP HomeYesNoNo5-12 yrMale FemaleYesADDYesNPClin Parent TeachMHOP PCOP Home SchoolYesNoNoYes16
Quinn 1975 NR7536NoComNoNoNoNRMaleNRNRYesNPNRNRNoNoNoYes7
Rapport 1993 201616White AfroHoIPYesNoNo5-12 yrMaleYesADHDYesODD
CD, AD
DD, LD
ClinHoIPYesYesYesNo17
Studies valuating drugs other than MPH
Arnold 1976 313131NoMHOPYesNoNo<5 yr 5-12 yrMale FemaleNoMBDNoNMClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Greenberg 1972 NRNR61AfroHoOPNoNoNo5-12 yrMaleYesHySyYesNPClinPCOP SchoolNoNoNoYes12
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD-anxiety disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/Hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD-attention deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); Clin-clinician; Com-community; CoPh-community physicians; DD-depressive disorder; HoIP-hospital inpatient; HoOP-hospital outpatient; HySy-hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe-individual method; LD- learning disorder; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP-mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ-mental retardation/low IQ; NM-none mentioned; NP-none present; NR-not reported; PC-pediatric clinic; PCOP-pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach-teacher; TeDi-teacher diagnosis; Touret-Tourette's; ADHD-ADHD Activity Scale.

Evidence Table I1. Key Characteristics of Studies with Stimulant vs. Placebo Comparisons

Author & Year of PublicationTypePatients RandomizedDiagnosis ModelInterventionsDuration per Intervention (weeks)Clinically Relevant Elements (of 20) 1 Quality Assessment Total Score (of 5)Outcomes of Interest Measured 2 Outcome Results3,4,5
Ahmann 1993 CrossoverNRADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1132Data on adverse effects onlyNo significant dose effect for adverse effects
Arnold 1976 Crossover31MBDDEX
L-amph
Placebo
4113Core/Global Symptoms
Depression
NS; one parent report of DEX > L-Amphetamine
NS
Arnold 1978 Crossover29 6 MBDMPH
DEX
Caffeine
Placebo
3102Core/Global Symptoms
Academic
MPH vs. DEX = NS
MPH vs. DEX = NS
Arnold 1989 Crossover18 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
DEX
Efamol
Placebo
4103Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
NS
DEX > Efamol
Barkley 1990 Crossover80 6 OtherMPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear142Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Borcherding 1989 Crossover18 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
DEX
Placebo
3122Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Brown 1986 Parallel40ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH + AC
MPH + CBT
Placebo + AC
Placebo + CBT
12143Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS
NS
NS
NS
Buitelaar 1996 Crossover32ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
Pindolol
Placebo
4194Data on adverse effects availableDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Carlson 1992 Crossover24ADHD
DSM- IIIR/IV
MPH + AC
MPH + BC/Mod
MPH + AC
MPH + BC/Mod
Placebo + AC
Placebo+ BC/Mod
Unclear151AcademicData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Castellanos 1997 Crossover22ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
DEX
Placebo
3182Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Christensen 1975 Crossover16OtherMPH + BC/Mod
Placebo + BC/Mod
4124Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Data not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Conners 1972 Parallel84MBDDEX
Pemoline
Placebo
8151Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Conners 1980 Parallel60MBDMPH
Pemoline
Placebo
8173Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Conners 1996 Crossover18ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Nicotine
Placebo
1142DepressionData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Deveaugh-Geiss 1980 Crossover1Hyperkinetic
Syndrome
DEX-low
DEX-high
Secobarbitol
Placebo
Unclear122Core/Global SymptomsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Elia 1991 Crossover48 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
DEX
Placebo
3132Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
NS
Evans 1994 Crossover1ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
Placebo
1142Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Fine 1993 Parallel24 6 Not
Reported
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
Unclear82Data on adverse effects availableDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Fitzpatrick 1992 Crossover19 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH-high-SR
Placebo
2132Core/Global Symptoms
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NS
NS
NS
Gadow 1995 Crossover34 6 ADHD
DSM- IIIR/IV
MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH-high
Placebo
2162Core/Global SymptomsMPH > Placebo
Garfinkel 1981 Crossover6ADD
DSM-I-III
Caffeine - low
Caffeine - high
Caffeine - low + MPH
Caffeine - high + MPH
Placebo
Placebo + MPH
1,2,3152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
MPH vs. MPH + caffeine (308.6mg) = NS;
MPH + Caffeine (158.6) > Placebo, Placebo + MPH, Caffeine (158.6), Caffeine (308.6), Caffeine (308.6) + MPH;
MPH vs. MPH + caffeine (308.6mg) = NS;
MPH + Caffeine (158.6) > Placebo, Placebo + MPH, Caffeine (158.6), Caffeine (308.6), Caffeine (308.6) + MPH;
MPH vs. MPH + caffeine (308.6mg) = NS; MPH + Caffeine (158.6) > Placebo, Placebo + MPH, Caffeine (158.6), Caffeine (308.6), Caffeine (308.6) + MPH
Gillberg 1997 Parallel62ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
DEX
Placebo
52152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
DEX > Placebo
DEX > Placebo
NS
DEX > Placebo
NS
Greenberg 1972 Parallel60 6 Hyperkinetic
Syndrome
DEX
Hydroxyzine
Chlorpromazine
Placebo
8122Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Greenhill 1973 Crossover9OtherDEX
Lithium carbonate
Placebo
12122Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Gross 1976 Crossover50MBDMPH
DEX
R-Amph
Placebo
172Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Handen 1991 Crossover27ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
2142Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Hinshaw 1984 Crossover24ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH + CT
MPH + AC
Placebo + CT
Placebo + AC
1,5182AcademicNS except for CT, MPH + CT, MPH + AC > AC
Kauffman 1981 Crossover12 6 OtherMPH
DEX
Placebo
6133Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Klorman 1987 Crossover19ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
Placebo
3172Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
MPH > Placebo
MPH > Placebo
Klorman 1990 Crossover48ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
Placebo
3172Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
MPH > Placebo
MPH > Placebo
Kupietz 1988 Parallel58ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH-low
MPH-med
MPH-high
Placebo
28163Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
MPH > Placebo
MPH 0.7 > Placebo; MPH 0.3, 0.5 vs. Placebo = NS
MPH > Placebo
Mattes 1984 Crossover66ADD
DSM I-III
MPH
Placebo
3142Core/Global SymptomsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Pelham 1987 Crossover13 6 ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH-reg
MPH-SR
Placebo
5112Core/Global Symptoms
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS
NS
Pelham 1990 Crossover22 6 ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH-reg
MPH-SR
DEX-SR
Pemoline
Placebo
1112Core/Global Symptoms
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
NR
NR
NS
Pelham 1993 Crossover31ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
Placebo
BC/Mod
Low MPH + BC/Mod
Low MPH
High MPH + BC/Mod
High MPH
Unclear153Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityEffect of BC/Mod added to MPH was not significant for any of the dependent measures
Rapport 1993 Crossover16ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
Desipramine
MPH + Desipramine
Placebo
1173Data on adverse effects onlyDetails available in Tables H1a through H1h
Reimherr 1984 Crossover36ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
Placebo
2122Core/Global SymptomsData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Schachar 1997 Parallel91ADHD
DSM- IIIR/IV
MPH
Placebo
16174Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
NS for parent; MPH > Placebo
MPH > Placebo for teachers; NS for parents
NS; except MPH > Placebo ODD and aggressiveness teachers
Spencer 1995 Crossover25ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH
Placebo
3193Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Depression
MPH > Placebo
MPH > Placebo
NR
Spring 1976 Parallel58OtherMPH+Placebo
Placebo+ MPH
Imipramine + Placebo
Placebo + Imipramine
3133Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Srinivas 1992 Crossover9Other l-MPH
d-MPH
dl-MPH
Placebo
Unclear92Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Stein 1996 Crossover25ADHD
DSM-IIIR/IV
MPH-titrate
MPH-low
MPH-high
Placebo
1173Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
MPH high > Placebo
MPH high > Placebo, MPH low
Stephens 1984 Crossover36ADD
DSM-I-III
MPH
Pemoline
Placebo
192AcademicData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
Wender 1981 Parallel60ADD
DSM-I-III
Pemoline
Placebo
6172Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Pemoline > Placebo
Pemoline > Placebo
Wender 1985 Crossover37 6 ADD
DSM I-III
MPH
Placebo
2152Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
MPH > Placebo; except report of NS
MPH > Placebo
NS
NS for BDI and sadness report; MPH > Placebo for POMS depression & anxiety
Werry 1980 Crossover30OtherMPH
Imipramine
Placebo
4122Core/Global Symptoms
Inattention/Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
Academic
Conduct/Oppositional Disorders
Depression
Imipramine > MPH
parent report of Imipramine > MPH
NS
Imipramine > MPH for parent; NS for teacher
NS
Winsberg 1974 Crossover20OtherMPH
DEX
Placebo
1122Inattention/Hyperactivity/ImpulsivityData not presented in a manner compatible with extraction
1

These are clinically relevant elements extracted from the studies that are not supported by empirical methodological research.

2

Data on adverse effects are included in the Adverse Effects Table only (Evidence Tables H1a-H1h).

3

Results are based on various reports, not all of which give usable data or outcomes. Specific outcomes in each category are given in Evidence Tables B4--B6.

4

Results given are for drug-to-drug comparisons, NOT baseline/placebo comparisons.

5

Outcomes regarded, a priori, as not of interest by expert panel are not included in this table but are discussed in the text if clinically significant.

6

Number of randomized subjects not reported; number of subjects analyzed is given in table.

Abbreviations used: AC-attention control; ADD-attention-deficit disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; BC/Mod-behavioral contingencies/modification; BDI-Beck's depression inventory; CBT-cognitive behavioral therapy; CDRS-Children's Depression Rating Scale; CT-child training; Des-desipramine; DEX-dextroamphetamine; DSM-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; L-amph-l-amphetamine; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MPH or MPH-reg-methylphenidate; MPH-SR-sustained-release methylphenidate; POMS-Profile of mood states; PT-parent training; SSERS-Stimulant Side Effects Rating Scale; ST-supportive therapy; STESS-Subject.s Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale; THIOR-thioridazine; > = better than; NS-not significant; NR-statistical significance not reported.

Evidence Table I2. Total Number of Characteristics Checked for Studies Involving MPH vs. Placebo1

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 2 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 2 # Subjects Analyzed (Q!7) 2 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 2 Treatment Setting (Q19) 2 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 2 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 2 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 2 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 2 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 2 IQ Considered in Selection Of Subjects (Q26) 2 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 2 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 2 Comorbid Disorders In Population (Q29b) 2 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 2 Sample Origin (Q31) 2 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 2 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment (Q34) 2 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 2 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 2 Total Count (20) 2
Ahmann 1993 1010111111011111000013
Arnold 1976 1110110011010011000111
Arnold 1978 1010110011010011000110
Arnold 1989 0010010111111100000110
Barkley 1990 0010110111101111101114
Barrickman 1995 0111111011111111100116
Borcherding 1989 0010110111111111000012
Brown 1986 0110100011111111011114
Buitelaar 1996 1110111111111111111119
Carlson 1992 0110101011111111011115
Castellanos 1997 1111111111111111010118
Christensen 1975 0110100011101101011112
Conners 1972 0111101011111111100115
Conners 1980 1111111011111110101117
Conners 1996 1110111011011111000114
Deveaugh-Geiss 1980 1110100011111111000012
Elia 1991 0010111011111111000113
Ernst 1996 1010111011011111101115
Evans 1994 1110100111011111110014
Fine 1993 001010011101001100008
Fitzpatrick 1992 0010100011111111101113
Gadow 1995 0011111011111111101116
Garfinkel 1981 0110110011111111011115
Gillberg 1997 1110111011111111000115
Greenberg 1972 0011100011111111000112
Greenhill 1973 0111110011101100110012
Gross 1976 011010001101001000007
Handen 1991 0111111011111110001014
Hinshaw 1984 1100110111111111011015
Kauffman 1981 0011110111101111001013
Klorman 1987 0110111011111111101116
Klorman 1990 0111111011111111101117
Kupietz 1988 1110111011111111001116
Mattes 1984 1110111011111111000014
Pelham 1987 0010100011111111000111
Pelham 1990 0010100011111111000111
Pelham 1993 0111101011011111011115
Rapport 1993 1111110011111111111017
Reimherr 1984 0100111111011111000012
Schachar 1997 1110111011111111011117
Spencer 1995 1111111111111111101119
Spring 1976 0110111011101111100013
Srinivas 1992 111010001100000101109
Stein 1996 0111111011111111101117
Stephens 1984 011010011101001100009
Wender 1981 1111111011111111100117
Wender 1985 0011111011111111100115
Werry 1980 0110110011101111001012
Winsberg 1974 0110110011101111010012
1

0 = absent; 1 = present

2

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Evidence Table I3. Description of Characteristics Checked for Studies Involving MPH vs. Placebo

Author# Subjects Eligible (Q14) 1 # Subjects Randomized (Q15) 1 # Subjects Analyzed (Q!7) 1 Ethnic Groups Considered (Q18) 1 Treatment Setting (Q19) 1 Inclusion Criteria Reported (Q21) 1 Exclusion Criteria Reported (Q22) 1 Primary Outcome Stated (Q23) 1 Age Categories of Subjects (Q24) 1 Gender of Subjects (Q25) 1 IQ Considered in Selection Of Subjects (Q26) 1 Diagnosis Model Used (Q28) 1 Comorbid Disorders Considered (Q29a) 1 Comorbid Disorders in Population (Q29b) 1 Who Diagnosed Subjects (Q30) 1 Sample Origin (Q31) 1 Family Characteristics Mentioned (Q32) 1 Fidelity & Monitoring of Treatment Mentioned (Q34) 1 Compliance with Treatment Measured (Q35) 1 Baseline Test Scores Presented (Q36) 1 Total Count (20) 1
Ahmann 1993 234NR206NoMHOPYesYesYes5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
NoADHDYesNPClinMHOPNoNoNoNo13
Arnold 1976 313131NoMHOPYesNoNo<5 yr
5-12 yr
Male
Female
NoMBDNoNMClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Arnold 1978 31NR29NoMHOP
Home
YesNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
NoMBDNoNMClinMHOPNoNoNoYes10
Arnold 1989 NRNR18NoNRYesNoYes5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
ADDYesNPNRNRNoNoNoYes10
Barkley 1990 NRNR83NoMHOPYesNoYes5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes>
80
NRYesNPClinMHOPYesNoYesYes14
Barrickman 1995 NR1815WhiteMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
>70
ADHDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPYesNoNoYes16
Borcherding 1989 NRNR18NoMHOPYesNoYes5-12 yrMaleYes
>80
ADDYesODD
CD, AD
Clin
Teach
PCOP
School
NoNoNoNo12
Brown 1986 NR4035NoMHOPNoNoNo5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
NM
ADDYesCDClinPCOP
School
NoYesYesYes14
Buitelaar 1996 553232NoMHOPYesYesYes5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
NM
ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
Clin
Parent
MHOPYesYesYesYes19
Carlson 1992 NR2424NoSchoolNoYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
ADHDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPNoYesYesYes15
Castellanos 1997 382220White
Afro
Hispanic
Asian
MHOPYesYesYes5-12 yrMaleYes
>75
ADHDYesODD
CD
Touret
ClinMHOP
Com
School
PCOP
NoYesNoYes18
Christensen 1975 NR1613NoSchoolNoNoNo5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
<70
NRYesMRIQUnclearSchoolNoYesYesYes12
Conners 1972 NR8481White
Afro
HoOPNoYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
>80
MBDYesNPClinMHOP
PCOP
Com
School
YesNoNoYes15
Conners 1980 606060White
Afro
MHOP
Home
YesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
>80
MBDYesNPClinNRYesNoYesYes17
Conners 1996 221817NoHoOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
NoADHDYesNPClinPCOP
Com
NoNoNoYes14
Deveaugh-Geiss1980 111NoHoOPUnclearNoNo>18 yrMaleYes
80
HySyYesNPClinHoOPNoNoNoNo12
Elia 1991 NRNR48NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes>
80
ADDYesODD
CD, AD
ClinPCOP
School
NoNoNoYes13
Ernst 1996 44Unclear24NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
NoADHDYesNPClinComYesNoYesYes15
Evans 1994 111NoMHOPUnclearUnclearYes>18 yrFemaleNoADHDYesNPClinHoOP
MHOP
YesYesNoNo14
Fine 1993 NRNR24NoMHOPNoNoYes5-12 yrMale
Female
NoADHDNoNMClinMHOP
PCOP
School
NoNoNoNo8
Fitzpatrick 1992 NRNR19NoMHOP
Home
NoNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
ADDYesODD
CD
Clin
Teach
PCYesNoYesYes13
Gadow 1995 NRNR34White
Afro
Hispanic
Asian
MHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes
>70
ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
Tourette
Clin
Parent
Teach
MHOPYesNoYesYes16
Garfinkel 1981 NR66NoMHOPYesNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes
>90
ADDYesNPClinMHOPNoYesYesYes15
Gillberg 1997 726232NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes>
50
ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
Tourette
MRIQ
Autism
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes15
Greenberg 1972 NRNR61AfroHoOPNoNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
HySyYesNPClinPCOP
School
NoNoNoYes12
Greenhill 1973 NR99WhiteHoOP
HoIP
Home
School
YesNoNo5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
NM
NRYesNPNRNRYesYesNoNo12
Gross 1976 NR5048NoMHOPNoNoNo<5 yr
5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
NoMBDNoNMClinNRNoNoNoNo7
Handen 1991 NR2727White
Afro
MHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
<80
ADHDYesMRIQClinNRNoNoYesNo14
Hinshaw 1984 2424UnclearNoSchoolYesNoYes5-12 yr
13-18 yr
MaleYes
NM
ADHDYesNPClinMHOP
PCOP
Com
School
OnYesYesNo15
Kauffman 1981 NRNR12WhitePCOPYesNoYes5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
InMeYesNPClinMHOP
CoPh
NoNoYesNo13
Klorman 1987 NR1919NoMHOP
Home
YesYesNo5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
>74
ADDYesNPClinMHOPYesNoYesYes16
Klorman 1990 NR4848WhiteMHOP
Home
School
YesYesNo
5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
>80
ADDYesODD
CD
AD
ClinMHOPYesNoYesYes17
Kupietz 1988 585847NoMHOPYesYesNo
5-12 yr
13-18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
>80
ADDYesNPClin
Teach
HoOP
Com
School
NoNoYesYes16
Mattes 1984 1166661NoMHOPYesYesNo>18 yr
Male
Female
Yes
NM
ADDYesADClinMHOP
Com
NoNoNoNo14
Pelham 1987 NRNR13NoMHOP
Home
NoNoNo5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
ADDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Pelham 1990 NRNR22NoMHOPNoNoNo5-12 yr
13-18 yr
MaleYes
NM
ADHDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPNoNoNoYes11
Pelham 1993 NR3131White
Afro
MHOP
School
NoYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
ADHDYesODD
CD, LD
ClinMHOPNoYesYesYes15
Rapport 1993 201616White
Afro
HoIPYesNoNo
5-12 yr
MaleYes
>80
ADHDYesODD
CD, AD
DD, LD
ClinHoIPYesYesYesNo17
Reimherr 1984 NR36NRNoHoOPYesYesYes>18 yrMale
Female
NoADDYesAD, DDClinMHOP
Com
NoNoNoNo12
Schachar 1997 1059166NoHoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
>80
ADHDYesODD
CD,AD
ClinHoOPNoYesYesYes17
Spencer 1995 252523WhiteHoOPYesYesYes>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>75
ADHDYesAD,CD
DD
ClinHoOPYesNoYesYes19
Spring 1976 NR5847NoMHOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
InMeYesNPClin
Parent
Teach
PCOPYesNoNoNo13
Srinivas 1992 999NoHoOPNoNoNo5-12 yrMaleNRNRNoNMNRHoOPNoYesYesNo9
Stein 1996 NR2525White
Hispanic
HoOPYesYesNo5-12 yrMaleYes
NM
ADHDYesODD
CD
ClinMHOP
PCOP
Com
YesNoYesYes17
Stephens 1984 NR3636NoMHOPNoNoYes5-12 yrMale
Female
NoADDNoNMClinMHOP
PCOP
NoNoNoNo9
Wender 1981 606026WhiteMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>90
ADDYesADClinHoOP
MHOP
PCOP
YesNoNoYes17
Wender 1985 NRNR37WhiteMHOPYesYesNo>18 yrMale
Female
Yes
>90
ADDYesADClinMHOP
PCOP
Com
YesNoNoYes15
Werry 1980 NR3030NoHoOP
Home
YesNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
InMeYesNPClinHoOP
School
NoNoYesNo12
Winsberg 1974 NR2018NoHoIPYesNoNo5-12 yrMale
Female
Yes
NM
InMeYesNPClinHoOP
HoIP
NoYesNoNo12
1

Q numbers given in brackets are the question number from the data extraction form (Appendix E).

Abbreviations: AD-anxiety disorder; ADHD-attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (DSM-IIIR-IV); ADD-attention deficit disorder (DSM-I-III); Clin-clinician; Com-community; CoPh-community physicians; DD-depressive disorder; HoIP-hospital inpatient; HoOP-hospital outpatient; HySy-hyperkinetic syndrome; InMe-individual method; LD-learning disorder; MBD-minimal brain dysfunction; MHOP-mental health clinic outpatient; MRIQ-mental retardation/low IQ; NM-none mentioned; NP-none present; NR-not reported; PC-pediatric clinic; PCOP-pediatric clinic outpatient; Teach-teacher; TeDi-teacher diagnosis; Touret-Tourette's; ADHD-ADHD Activity Scale.