U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Ip S, Bonis P, Tatsioni A, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies For Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Dec. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 1.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies For Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies For Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [Internet].

Show details

Appendix ASearch strategy

Search strategy

1.

exp Gastroesophageal Reflux

2.

gastro-esophageal reflux.tw.

3.

gastro-esophageal reflux.tw.

4.

gastro-oesophageal reflux.tw.

5.

exp esophagitis

6.

esophagitis.tw.

7.

oesophagitis.tw.

8.

(GERD or GORD).tw.

9.

bile reflux

10.

heartburn

11.

heartburn.tw.

12.

(acid adj5 reflux).tw.

13.

exp dyspepsia

14.

dyspep$.tw.

15.

or/1–14

16.

limit 15 to human

17.

limit 16 to english language

18.

limit 17 to adult

19.

17 not 18

20.

limit 19 to child

21.

17 not 20

22.

follow-up studies

23.

(follow-up or followup).tw.

24.

exp cohort studies

25.

cohort.tw.

26.

exp Case-Control Studies

27.

(case adj20 control).tw.

28.

exp Longitudinal Studies

29.

longitudinal.tw.

30.

(random$ or rct).tw.

31.

exp Randomized Controlled Trials

32.

exp random allocation

33.

exp Double-Blind Method

34.

exp Single-Blind Method

35.

randomized controlled trial.pt.

36.

clinical trial.pt.

37.

controlled clinical trials

38.

(clin$ adj trial$).tw.

39.

((singl$ or doubl$ or trebl$ or tripl$) adj (blind$ or mask$)).tw.

40.

exp Research Design

41.

exp Evaluation Studies

42.

exp Prospective Studies

43.

exp Comparative Study

44.

or/22–41

45.

21 and 44

46.

limit 45 to (addresses or bibliography or biography or case reports or congresses or consensus development conference or consensus development conference, nih or dictionary or directory or editorial or festschrift or government publications or interview or lectures or legal cases or legislation or letter or news or newspaper article or patient education handout or periodical index)

47.

45 not 46

48.

limit 47 to (guideline or meta analysis or practice guideline or “review” or review, academic or “review literature” or review, multicase or “review of reported cases” or review, tutorial)

49.

47 not 48

50.

dt.fs.

51.

su.fs.

52.

49 and (50 and 51)

53.

49 not 52

54.

53 and 51

55.

53 not 54

56.

55 and 50

57.

55 not 56

58.

th.fs.

59.

57 and 58

60.

57 not 59

61.

co.fs.

62.

60 and 61

63.

60 not 62

64.

limit 63 to “all adult (19 plus years)”

65.

exp Gastroesophageal Reflux

66.

gastro-esophageal reflux.tw.

67.

gastro-esophageal reflux.tw.

68.

gastro-oesophageal reflux.tw.

69.

exp esophagitis

70.

esophagitis.tw.

71.

oesophagitis.tw.

72.

(GERD or GORD).tw.

73.

bile reflux

74.

heartburn

75.

heartburn.tw.

76.

(acid adj5 reflux).tw.

77.

exp dyspepsia

78.

dyspep$.tw.

79.

or/65–78

80.

limit 79 to human

81.

limit 80 to english language

82.

limit 81 to “all adult (19 plus years)”

83.

81 not 82

84.

limit 83 to “all child (0 to 18 years)”

85.

81 not 84

86.

follow-up studies

87.

(follow-up or followup).tw.

88.

exp cohort studies

89.

cohort.tw.

90.

exp Case-Control Studies

91.

(case adj20 control).tw.

92.

exp Longitudinal Studies

93.

longitudinal.tw.

94.

(random$ or rct).tw.

95.

exp Randomized Controlled Trials

96.

exp random allocation

97.

exp Double-Blind Method

98.

exp Single-Blind Method

99.

randomized controlled trial.pt.

100.

clinical trial.pt.

101.

controlled clinical trials

102.

(clin$ adj trial$).tw.

103.

((singl$ or doubl$ or trebl$ or tripl$) adj (blind$ or mask$)).tw.

104.

exp Research Design

105.

exp Evaluation Studies

106.

exp Prospective Studies

107.

exp Comparative Study

108.

or/86–105

109.

85 and 108

110.

limit 109 to (addresses or bibliography or biography or case reports or congresses or consensus development conference or consensus development conference, nih or dictionary or directory or editorial or festschrift or government publications or interview or lectures or legal cases or legislation or letter or news or newspaper article or patient education handout or periodical index)

111.

109 not 110

112.

limit 111 to (guideline or meta analysis or practice guideline or “review” or review, academic or “review literature” or review, multicase or “review of reported cases” or review, tutorial)

113.

111 not 112

114.

dt.fs.

115.

su.fs.

116.

113 and (114 and 115)

117.

113 not 116

118.

117 and 115

119.

117 not 118

120.

119 and 114

121.

119 not 120

122.

th.fs.

123.

121 and 122

124.

121 not 123

125.

co.fs.

126.

124 and 125

127.

124 not 126

128.

from 127 keep 1

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (2.0M)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...