NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Ip S, Bonis P, Tatsioni A, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies For Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Dec. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 1.)
This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.
Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies For Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease [Internet].
Show detailsEvidence Table 1. Comparative studies of medical vs. surgical management in patients with GERD
Evidence Table 2. Studies on endoscopic procedures
Evidence Table 3. Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses
Evidence Table 4. RCTs on surgical interventions
Evidence Table 5. Non-randomized comparative studies on surgical interventions
Evidence Table 6. Cohorts (non-comparative) studies on surgical interventions
Evidence Table 7a. Age as modifying factor for outcomes after laparoscopic fundoplication
Evidence Table 7b. Age as modifying factor for outcomes after endoscopic therapy
Evidence Table 8. Sex as modifying factor for outcomes after laparoscopic fundoplication
Evidence Table 15. Weight as modifying factor for outcomes after ARS
Evidence Table 18. Complications occurring more than 30 days after surgical or endoscopic procedures
- Evidence Tables - Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies For Gastroe...Evidence Tables - Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies For Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
- Precocious costochondral ossificationPrecocious costochondral ossificationMedGen
- Y50D4A.3 [Caenorhabditis elegans]Y50D4A.3 [Caenorhabditis elegans]Gene ID:190092Gene
- Collection Development Guidelines of the National Library of MedicineCollection Development Guidelines of the National Library of Medicine
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...