U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Henderson JT, Webber EM, Sawaya GF. Screening for Ovarian Cancer: An Updated Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Feb. (Evidence Synthesis, No. 157.)

Cover of Screening for Ovarian Cancer

Screening for Ovarian Cancer: An Updated Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].

Show details

Appendix ADetailed Methods

Literature Search Strategies for Primary Literature

Key:

  • / = MeSH subject heading
  • $ = truncation
  • * = truncation
  • ? = wildcard
  • ab = word in abstract
  • adj# = adjacent within x number of words
  • ae = adverse effects
  • hw = subject heading word
  • id = identifier
  • kw = keyword
  • md = methodology
  • near/# = adjacent within x number of words
  • ti = word in title

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)

#1(ovar* or (fallopian next tub*) or adenx*):ti,ab,kw near/4 (cancer* or neoplas* or tumo* or malignan* or carcinoma* or adenocarcinoma* or mass*):ti,ab,kw
#2screen*:ti,ab,kw
#3detect*:ti
#4(sonog* or ultraso*):ti,ab,kw
#5(tumo* next marker*):ti,ab,kw
#6(serum next cancer next antigen*):ti,ab,kw
#7“CA 125”:ti,ab,kw
#8101-#7
#9#1 and #8 Publication Year from 2003 to 2016, in Trials

MEDLINE

1Ovarian Neoplasms/
2Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/
3((ovar$ or fallopian tub$ or adenx$) adj4 (cancer$ or neoplas$ or tumo$ or malignan$ or carcinoma$ or adenocarcinoma$ or mass$)).ti,ab.
4or/1-3
5Mass screening/
6“Early detection of cancer”/
7(screen$ adj5 (ovar$ or fallopian tub$ or adnex$)).ti,ab.
8detect$.ti.
9Ultrasonography/
10(sonog$ or ultraso$).ti,ab.
11Tumor Markers, Biological/
12tumo?r marker$.ti,ab.
13serum cancer antigen$.ti,ab.
14CA 125.ti,ab.
15algorithm$.ti,ab.
16ROCA.ti,ab.
17or/5-16
184 and 17
19Ovarian Neoplasms/us [Ultrasonography]
20Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/us [Ultrasonography]
2118 or 19 or 20
22clinical trials as topic/ or controlled clinical trials as topic/ or randomized controlled trials as topic/ or meta-analysis as topic/
23(clinical trial or controlled clinical trial or meta analysis or randomized controlled trial).pt.
24Random$.ti,ab.
25control groups/ or double-blind method/ or single-blind method/
26clinical trial$.ti,ab.
27controlled trial$.ti,ab.
28meta analy$.ti,ab.
29or/22-28
3021 and 29
31Animals/ not (Humans/ and Animals/)
3230 not 31
33limit 32 to (english language and yr=“2003 -Current”)
34remove duplicates from 33

PUBMED, publisher-supplied records

#14Search (((#13) AND publisher[sb]) AND (“2003/01/01”[Date - Publication] : “3000”[Date - Publication])) AND English[Language]
#13Search #8 AND #12
#12Search #9 OR #10 OR #11
#11Search (control[tiab] OR controls[tiab] OR controlled[tiab] OR controled[tiab]) AND (trial[tiab] OR trials[tiab])
#10Search “clinical trial”[tiab] OR “clinical trials”[tiab] OR random*[tiab]
#9Search systematic review[sb] OR metaanaly*[tiab] OR meta analysis[tiab]
#8Search #1 AND #7
#7Search #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5 OR #6
#6Search CA 125[tiab]
#5Search serum cancer antigen*[tiab]
#4Search tumo* marker*[tiab]
#3Search sonog*[tiab] or ultraso*[tiab]
#2Search screen*[tiab] OR detect*[tiab]
#1Search (ovar*[tiab] or fallopian tub*[tiab] or adenx*[tiab]) AND (cancer*[tiab] or neoplas*[tiab] or tumor*[tiab] OR tumour*[tiab] or malignan*[tiab] or carcinoma*[tiab] or adenocarcinoma*[tiab] or mass*[tiab])
This figure is a flow chart that summarizes the search and selection of articles in the review. There were 1337 citations identified through literature databases. An additional 17 citations were identified from outside sources such as reference lists and suggestions from peer reviewers, 27 citations were from the previous reviews for the USPSTF on screening for ovarian cancer. After duplicates were removed, 1381 unique citations were screened at the title/abstract stage. The full text of 74 citations were examined for inclusion for one or more of the Key Questions. There were 3 studies (in 14 articles) included for Key Question 1, and 4 studies (in 15 articles) included for Key Question 2. Reasons for excluding the other articles are available in Appendix C.

Appendix A Figure 1Literature Flow Diagram

Appendix A Table 1Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

CategoryIncludedExcluded
AimScreening for ovarian cancer in a primary care setting (alone or as part of a clinical examination)Screening for ovarian cancer in selected high-risk populations, such as women who are BRCA mutation carriers or patients of a specialty practice, such as oncology
PopulationsAsymptomatic, average risk women, ages 45 years and olderTrials enrolling only women who are selected based on an increased risk for ovarian cancer (e.g. known predisposing genetic syndromes, strong family history)
Screening testsScreening tests and approaches evaluated in clinical trials such as, but not limited to: testing for serum cancer antigen (CA–125), transvaginal ultrasonography, and combined screening approaches or algorithmsScreening tests not evaluated in clinical trials
ComparisonsComparison of screening with usual care or no screening; comparison of different included screening methods or programs
OutcomesKQ 1: Ovarian cancer–specific mortality (including primary peritoneal and fallopian tube cancer), all-cause mortality, cancer-related morbidity, and quality of life.
KQ 2: Surgery rate, rates of false-positive screening results, complications of diagnostic surgical procedures, and health and psychological effects of screening tests
SettingsPrimary care settings, including obstetrics/gynecology practicesSpecialty practice settings, such as oncology
Study designsRandomized, controlled trialsCohort studies, case-controls, case reports, case series, and decision analyses
Study qualityGood and fair quality according to USPSTF criteria and supplemented quality measuresPoor quality according to USPSTF criteria and supplemental quality measures
LanguageEnglishNon–English language studies

Abbreviations: KQ = key question; USPSTF = United States Preventive Services Task Force

Appendix A Table 2Quality Assessment Criteria of Randomized Controlled Trials

USPSTF quality rating criteria120
  • Initial assembly of comparable groups employs adequate randomization, including first concealment and whether potential confounders were distributed equally among groups
  • Maintenance of comparable groups (includes attrition, crossovers, adherence, contamination)
  • Important differential loss to followup or overall high loss to followup
  • Measurements: equal, reliable, and valid (includes masking of outcome assessment)
  • Clear definition of the interventions
  • All important outcomes considered
  • Intention-to-treat analysis

Abbreviations: KQ = key question; USPSTF = United States Preventive Services Task Force

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (530K)

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...