U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Saldanha IJ, Cao W, Broyles JM, et al. Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021 Jul. (Comparative Effectiveness Review, No. 245.)

Cover of Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [Internet].

Show details

Appendix EResults: Summary Tables for Outcomes

Table E-1.1. Summary Table – Key Question 1: IBR versus AR – continuous outcomes (general quality of life, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, patient satisfaction with breasts, and patient satisfaction with outcome)

Table E-1.2. Summary Table – Key Question 1: IBR versus AR – continuous outcomes (physical well-being)

Table E-1.3. Summary Table – Key Question 1: IBR versus AR – NRCSs, categorical outcomes (physical well-being and recurrence of breast cancer)

Table E-1.4. Summary Table – Key Question 1: IBR versus AR – NRCSs, categorical outcomes (patient satisfaction with breasts and with outcome)

Table E-1.5. Summary Table – Key Question 1: IBR versus AR – categorical outcomes, mortality, unplanned repeat hospitalizations, necrosis, thromboembolic events, wound dehiscence, delayed healing, seroma, and hematoma

Table E-1.6. Summary Table – Key Question 1: IBR versus AR – NRCSs, categorical outcomes (unplanned repeat surgeries for revision, unplanned repeat surgeries for complications, pain, infections not explicitly implant related, and reconstructive failure)

Table E-1.7. Summary Table – Key Question 1: IBR versus AR – NRCSs, continuous outcomes (pain and analgesic use)

Table E-2.1. Summary Table – Key Question 2b: Timing of IBR in relation to radiation therapy – NRCSs, continuous outcomes (various)

Table E-2.2. Summary Table – Key Question 2b: Timing of IBR in relation to radiation therapy – NRCSs, categorical outcomes (various)

Table E-3.1. Summary Table – Key Question 3: Comparisons of implant materials for IBR – NRCSs, continuous outcomes (general quality of life, physical well-being, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, satisfaction with outcome, and satisfaction with breasts)

Table E-3.2. Summary Table – Key Question 3: Comparisons of implant materials for IBR – NRCSs, categorical outcomes (mortality, implant failure/loss, and capsular contracture)

Table E-4.1. Summary Table – Key Question 4: Comparisons of anatomic planes of implant placement for IBR – continuous outcomes (various)

Table E-4.2. Summary Table – Key Question 4: Comparisons of anatomic planes of implant placement for IBR – categorical outcomes (various)

Table E-5.1. Summary Table – Key Question 5: Use versus nonuse of human ADMs during IBR – continuous outcomes (physical well-being, psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and satisfaction with breasts)

Table E-5.2. Summary Table – Key Question 5: Use versus nonuse of human ADMs during IBR – categorical outcomes not meta-analyzed (various)

Table E-5.3. Summary Table – Key Question 5: Use versus nonuse of human ADMs during IBR – continuous outcomes (pain and analgesic use)

Table E-5.4. Summary Table – Key Question 5: Use versus nonuse of human ADMs during IBR – categorical outcomes (composite or unspecified harms)

Table E-6.1. Summary Table – Key Question 6: Comparisons of flap types for AR – continuous outcomes (physical well-being)

Table E-6.2. Summary Table – Key Question 6: Comparisons of flap types for AR – NRCS, continuous outcomes (psychosocial and sexual well-being)

Table E-6.3. Summary Table – Key Question 6: Comparisons of flap types for AR – continuous outcomes (patient satisfaction with breasts and duration of initial hospitalization)

Table E-6.4. Summary Table – Key Question 6: Comparisons of flap types for AR – categorical outcomes (patient satisfaction with breasts, patient satisfaction with outcome, recurrence of breast cancer, and duration of initial hospitalization)

Table E-6.5. Summary Table – Key Question 6: Comparisons of flap types for AR – categorical outcomes (various)

Table E-6.6. Summary Table – Key Question 6: Comparisons of flap types for AR – categorical outcomes (composite or unspecified harms)

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (9.9M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...