U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Shamliyan T, Wyman J, Kane RL. Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: Diagnosis and Comparative Effectiveness [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Apr. (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 36.)

  • This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

This publication is provided for historical reference only and the information may be out of date.

Cover of Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: Diagnosis and Comparative Effectiveness

Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Adult Women: Diagnosis and Comparative Effectiveness [Internet].

Show details

Appendix DAnalytical Framework

Appendix Table D1. Algorithm to define eligibility of studies

Appendix Table D2. Definitions of population, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and settings (PICOS) framework

Appendix Table D3. Refinement of the questions following PICOS framework

Appendix Table D4. Pharmacological treatments for UI

Appendix Table D5. Data synthesis

References for Appendix D

1.
Abrams P. Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence; Paris. July 5–8, 2008; Health Publications Ltd.; 2009. [Paris] Committee 1 Epidemiology of Urinary (UI) and Fecal (FI) Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP).
2.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. for the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61:37–49. [PubMed: 12559262]
3.
Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, Halvorson LM, et al. Chapter 23. Urinary Incontinence. In: Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, Halvorson LM, et al., editors. Gynecology. http://www​.accessmedicine​.com/content.aspx?alD=3150435.
4.
Tarnay CM, Bhatia Narender N. Chapter 45. Urinary Incontinence. In: DeCherney AH, Nathan L, editors. Current Diagnosis & Treatment Obstetrics & Gynecology. 10e. http://www​.accessmedicine​.com/content.aspx?aID=2390665.
5.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(1):4–20. [PubMed: 19941278]
6.
AHCPR Urinary Incontinence in Adults Guideline Update Panel. Managing acute and chronic urinary incontinence. Am Fam Physician. 1996;54:1661–72. [PubMed: 8857788]
7.
Resnick NM. Urinary incontinence. In: Beers MH, Jones TV, Berkwits M, et al., editors. The Merck manual of geriatrics [online]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co. Inc.; 2010. Available at http://www​.merck.com/mkgr/mmg/home.jsp.
8.
Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Seim A, et al. Validation of a severity index in female urinary incontinence and its implementation in an epidemiological survey. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Dec;47(6):497–9. [PMC free article: PMC1059866] [PubMed: 8120507]
9.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff - Clinical Investigations of Devices Indicated for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061: Food and Drug Administration; 2009. [Accessed August, 2009]. Available at: http://www​.fda.gov/MedicalDevices​/DeviceRegulationandGuidance​/GuidanceDocuments/ucm070852.htm.
10.
Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994 Jul 9;309(6947):102. [PMC free article: PMC2540558] [PubMed: 8038641]
11.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177–88. [PubMed: 3802833]
12.
Knapp G, Biggerstaff BJ, Hartung J. Assessing the amount of heterogeneity in random-effects meta-analysis. Biom J. 2006 Apr;48(2):271–85. [PubMed: 16708778]
13.
Knapp G, Hartung J. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Stat Med. 2003 Sep 15;22(17):2693–710. [PubMed: 12939780]
14.
Kahn HA, Sempos CT. Statistical Methods in Epidemiology (Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics). USA: Oxford University Press; 1989.
15.
Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic Reviews in Health Care. London: NetLibrary, Inc BMJ Books; 2001.
16.
Dawson B, Trapp RG. Basic & Clinical Biostatistics (LANGE Basic Science). 3rd ed. New York: Lange Medical Books-McGraw-Hill; 2004.
17.
Ebrahim S. The use of numbers needed to treat derived from systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Caveats and pitfalls. Eval Health Prof. 2001 Jun;24(2):152–64. [PubMed: 11523384]
18.
Abrams P. Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence; Paris. July 5–8; Health Publications Ltd.; 2008. 2009. [Paris]

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (12M)

Other titles in these collections

Recent Activity

ClearTurn OffTurn On

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...