U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet]. Austin (TX): Landes Bioscience; 2000-2013.

Cover of Madame Curie Bioscience Database

Madame Curie Bioscience Database [Internet].

Show details

IL-10 Gene Polymorphisms in Transplantation

, , and .

Introduction

Transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for end-stage insufficiency of various organs and severe hematologic disorders. Cytokine gene polymorphisms have been extensively explored in transplantation because they are thought to possibly explain the heterogeneity of courses and outcomes and to help in immunosuppression individualization. Although many polymorphisms have been described in the IL-10 gene, the -1082 single nucleotide polymorphism is the most investigated in transplantation. Furthermore, acute rejection is the endpoint most frequently used in cytokine gene polymorphisms studies in organ transplantation. It appears that factors such as effect of HLA and minor histocompatibility mismatch, type of donor, and type of immunosuppression are important to determine the influence of IL-10 gene polymorphisms on transplant outcome. Although there are several discrepancies between the results of studies of IL-10 gene polymorphisms and transplant outcome, it seems that recipient's IL-10 polymorphisms may indicate the severity of acute graft versus host disease in bone marrow transplantation, frequency of acute rejection in organ transplantation and even could be associated with long-term renal graft outcome. In conclusion, data collected up to now demonstrate substantial evidence of IL-10 gene polymorphism involvement in post-transplant outcome. Multi-centric prospective studies using multi-locus approaches might ascertain when and how IL-10 genotype information should be considered in clinical transplant practice.

Transplantation and Cytokine Polymorphisms

Transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for end-stage insufficiency of various organs and severe hematologic disorders. Despite high short-term survival rates for most of the transplants, long-term results still need to be improved. Among different possibilities for improvement of transplant outcome, the individualization of immunosuppression therapy and tolerance induction seem to be the most promising ones.

Regulated by different cytokines, the post-transplant immune response is a very important variable influencing graft outcome. Thus, any variations in cytokine levels may directly influence the course of transplant. Therefore, cytokine gene polymorphisms have been extensively explored in transplantation because they are thought to possibly explain the heterogeneity of courses and outcomes and to help in immunosuppression adjustment.

Why Study Gene Polymorphisms of IL-10?

In studies with twins, it has been suggested that 50-75% of the variation in IL-10 production is genetically determined.1,2 Although the basis for heritable differences has not been completely defined, the polymorphisms located within and around the IL-10 gene have been implicated. Indeed, variations in the distal and proximal IL-10 gene promoter regions were shown to be associated with transcriptional activity and/or production of IL-10.3-8

Which IL-10 Polymorphisms Are Usually Analyzed in Transplantation?

Although many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and microsatellites have been described in the IL-10 gene, the SNP at -1082 position is the polymorphism most frequently investigated in transplantation. SNPs at the -819, -592 positions and microsatellites at the -1064 position are also popular, while SNPs in the distal 5' promoter region and other microsatellites are rarely analyzed.

Which Follow-Up Parameters Are Usually Analyzed?

Several parameters are used to evaluate the transplant follow-up. They include incidence and severity of acute and chronic rejection, graft and patient survival, occurrence of infection episodes, and cancer. There are also particular parameters for a given type of transplantation, like Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, or functional characteristics specific for each organ. Acute rejection is the endpoint most frequently used in cytokine gene polymorphisms studies in organ transplantation.

IL-10 Polymorphisms in Different Transplant Models

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which includes the use of bone marrow, cord blood, or peripheral blood stem cells, can cure many patients with a variety of hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant bone marrow failure syndromes. The major complication of this type of transplantation is acute GVHD (aGVHD), which is caused by the immune response of the injected allograft against the recipient's tissues and is characterized by the presence of dermatitis, hepatitis, and gastroenteritis developing within the first 100 days after transplantation. Lesions in the same organs, occurring more than 100 days after transplantation, are called chronic GVHD.9 The level of IL-10 was shown to be associated with the development of aGVHD and even demonstrated a predictive value. Indeed, two groups independently observed an association between increased pretransplant production of IL-10 and low incidence of aGVHD.10,11 Furthermore, the therapeutic use of this cytokine has been suggested as an additional or alternative prophylaxis for GVHD.12

Promising results were obtained in the first study on IL-10 polymorphism in bone marrow transplantation with HLA-identical donors. The authors analyzed the -1064 dinucleotide CA repeat of the IL-10 gene. An increased frequency of alleles with 12 to 16 repeats was found in the group of recipients with more severe aGVHD.13 This finding was confirmed in two other independent groups of patients by the same investigators (Table 1).14,15 In contrast, no similar association was observed in Japanese patients who received transplants from related or unrelated donors.16

Table 1. IL-10 gene polymorphisms in renal transplantation.

Table 1

IL-10 gene polymorphisms in renal transplantation.

In a more recent study of transplants involving sibling and unrelated donors, Nordlander and collaborators17 reported that patients homozygous for the IL-10 -1064 allele 13 showed an increased risk of developing grade II-IV aGVHD compared to all other patients. Even though these investigators did not find exactly the same phenomenon as demonstrated previously, their results agreed with the initial studies. In contrast to HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation, in mismatched unrelated cord blood transplantation IL-10 -1064 alleles were not associated with aGVHD (Table 1).18

Another widely explored IL-10 polymorphism is -1082 G/A. The data regarding this SNP are controversial. Although three studies did not show any relation of this SNP to aGVHD,14,17,19 a group from France reported association between G/G genotype and severity of aGVHD (Table 1).20,21 There is also no agreement between the results of three studies that analyzed chronic GVHD in relation to IL-10 polymorphisms.14,16,21

Briefly, studies conducted on bone marrow transplantation have shown that factors such as effect of HLA mismatch, type of donor (siblings or unrelated subjects), type of GVHD prophylaxis, and minor histocompatibility are important to determine the influence of cytokine gene polymorphisms on transplant outcome. It seems that recipient's IL-10 -1064 alleles may indicate the severity of aGVHD in HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation, while there is no consensus about other IL-10 polymorphisms.

Kidney

Renal transplantation is a widely used therapy for patients with end-stage renal insufficiency. An important cause of morbidity early after renal transplantation is acute allograft rejection, which is induced by the immune response of the recipient against the transplanted organ and leads to allograft deterioration and functional insufficiency.

Increased IL-10 intragraft expression was shown during acute rejection.22,23 It is interesting to note that, although the strong candidates to produce IL-10 in the graft are cells from the mononuclear infiltrate, it is possible that graft cells could also contribute to the increased IL-10 levels during rejection. This raises the idea of the analysis not only of recipient's but also of donor's genotypes, as well as a combination of both. In contrast to bone marrow transplantation, the most frequently studied IL-10 polymorphism in renal transplantation is -1082 SNP. Table 2 summarizes the results of IL-10 polymorphisms genetic association studies in renal transplantation.

Table 2. IL-10 gene polymorphisms in renal transplantation.

Table 2

IL-10 gene polymorphisms in renal transplantation.

The IL-10 -1082 G/G genotype (corresponding to the high producer phenotype in vitro) was associated with an increase in the incidence of multiple acute rejection episodes in recipients with HLA-DR-mismatched transplants.24 In the cited study, the same genotype was associated with the severity of acute rejection in combination with TNF -308 high production genotype. Similar results were obtained by a Chinese group that observed a higher incidence of rejection in recipients with high/intermediate IL-10 producer genotypes.25 In agreement, Pelletier and colleagues26 reported that a combination of TNF low and IL-10 high producer genotypes was an indicator of increased frequency of acute rejection. On the other hand, in an African American population the -1082 A/A genotype (low producer) alone was associated with the absence of acute rejection.27

In contrast, in another study, the -1082 A/A genotype was more frequent in the group of rejectors than in the group free of rejection.28 A similar finding was also reported by Poole and colleagues,29 who observed a tendency to a higher frequency of rejection in recipients with -1082 A/A and A/G genotypes. Other studies did not show any association between -1082 SNP and acute rejection. 30,31,32,33

The only study of -1064 microsatellite in renal transplantation with living related haplo-identical donors demonstrated a marked difference in the frequencies of the allele with 12 repeats between rejectors and nonrejectors, with an increase in this difference observed in a subgroup of steroid-resistant rejections.34

Some studies have explored the effect of donor (graft) polymorphisms on transplant outcome. Neither -1082 SNP nor -1064 repeat polymorphism was shown to be associated with acute renal rejection in three studies.24,34,35 However, in the study of Poole and colleagues,29 -1082 A donor allele frequency was decreased in multiple rejectors with HLA-DR mismatch. In addition, the combination of recipient -1082A negative/donor -1082A positive (recipient high producer/donor low producer) was also significantly decreased in multiple rejectors but independently of HLA match.29

Other parameters whose evaluation could be even more important than incidence of acute rejection in renal transplants are long-term graft function and patient and graft survival. Unfortunately, up to now only a few studies have explored these endpoints. Three studies that analyzed 3 and/or 5 years graft survival did not observe any association with IL-10 polymorphisms at -1082.24,32,36 However, an increased frequency of the -1082 A/A genotype was demonstrated in the group of patients with graft survival of more than 15 years compared to patients transplanted more recently.33

Finally, it is worth citing an interesting single study that explored the relationship between skin cancer after renal transplantation and IL-10 SNPs.37 In fact, the investigators demonstrated the association of skin squamous cell carcinoma with the presence of -1082, -819, -592 GCC haplotype, as well as with higher IL-10 production in vitro by the individuals that possessed this marker.

Liver

The role of IL-10 in liver transplantation is controversial. Despite promising results in animal models, such as prolongation of graft survival by IL-10 gene transfer,38 there is no clear picture in clinical transplants. Indeed, while some investigations39 have shown increased IL-10 mRNA levels just before rejection, others40 have failed to detect any changes in IL-10 level related to rejection or even observed an association of increased levels with a rejection-free transplant course.41

Controversies are also observed in studies of IL-10 polymorphisms and liver transplant outcome. Among five studies published on this issue, three did not show any relationship between IL-10 -1082 polymorphism and acute rejection. 42,43,44 One study detected an increased frequency of the -1082 G/G genotype in rejectors compared to nonrejectors,45 while another observed a trend to a higher incidence of IL-10 A/A genotype in patients with rejection compared to control individuals.46

Although about 50% of allograft recipients suffer from acute rejection in liver transplantation, in this type of transplantation patients more frequently develop a state of tolerance than in other organ transplants. A tolerance induction protocol and/or assay that could identify a subset of patients in whom immunosuppression could be successfully withdrawn is the Holy Grail of transplant immunology. Authors from Pittsburgh University demonstrated that none of the clinically tolerant patients, in whom immunosuppression was successfully withdrawn, had the low producer IL-10 -1082 genotype, whereas about 27% of the patients requiring immunosuppression presented this genotype.47 Despite the retrospective character of this investigation and the small number of tolerant patients under study, these results are promising and warrant future investigation.

Heart and Lung

The first study on cytokine gene polymorphism in transplantation was done in 1995 by Hutchinson_s group in heart transplant recipients.48 Shortly after, they showed that a combination of high TNF -308 and low IL-10 -1082 genotypes was associated with acute cardiac rejection.49 Similar data were also reported in pediatric transplantation by investigators from Pittsburgh University. In fact, a higher frequency of the low producer genotype IL-10 was observed in rejectors (41%) than in nonrejectors (18%).50 Recently our group also evaluatedIL-10 SNPs in heart transplant recipients, observing a trend to a lower frequency of intermediate IL-10 producer GCC/ATA genotype in rejectors (8%) versus nonrejectors (29%).51 However, no association with acute rejection was detected by other investigators examining either SNPs -1082, -819, -592 or microsatellite -1064 of the IL-10 gene.52 Furthermore, the analysis of IL-10 polymorphisms in relation to coronary vasculopathy, which is considered to represent chronic allograft cardiac rejection, also failed to reveal any difference.53 No association was seen in relation to IL-10 _1082, -819 and _592 polymorphisms in the sole investigation conducted on lung allograft recipients.54

Discussion

Reasons for the Discrepant Results

Although a lot of data supporting the involvement of IL-10 polymorphisms in transplantation have been reported, some results are not obvious and are even discrepant. It is important to note that this situation is not a particular characteristic of the transplantation field. Moreover, the problem of replicates in genetic association studies is contemporary and has been the subject of various recent reviews.55-57 Herein we discuss the reasons for the discrepant results that are specific for genetic associations in transplantation.

Evidently, only case-control and not family-based studies can be done in transplantation, a fact that implies the problem of population stratification. In transplantation, HLA matching, type of donor, and immunosuppression should be taken into account. This, however, sometimes is not done but, when considered, it leads to small numbers of subjects under study, decreasing the power of the statistical analysis. Also the failure to see consistent associations might be due in part to misinterpretation of the endpoints analyzed, such as different criteria for the diagnosis of acute rejection or different patient management approaches at transplant centers. Accordingly, some apparently discrepant results are actually results of studies with different designs that cannot be compared to each other. Finally, it seems that even stratification by sex could be important in IL-10 polymorphism studies in transplantation. Indeed, a gender-specific association between -1082 IL-10 promoter polymorphism and longevity has been recently demonstrated.58

Perspectives

It seems that investigations of IL-10 polymorphism in transplantation are approaching the end of the exploratory stage. Indeed, hypotheses are already being generated based on the results of numerous preliminary studies.

Usually two solutions are offered to confirm a hypothesis: meta-analysis and multi-centric prospective studies. However, we believe that meta-analysis may be difficult to conduct. First, there is a traditional bias of nonpublishing of negative results. Second, many details specific for the transplantation field such as HLA match, immunosuppression, ethnicity and several others are not reported in some studies but are essential for correct implementation of meta-analysis.

In contrast, multi-centric prospective studies seem to be the most promising solution. Large numbers of patients should permit careful stratification based on well known risk factors as well as the uniform analysis of independent sets of patients that should greatly increase the statistical power of the study. Contrary to the current state-of-the-art, the long-term evaluation and composite endpoints should be prioritized.59 Regarding the IL-10 gene, it is important to note that the polymorphisms already explored in transplantation are only partially responsible for the heredity-related differences in IL-10 production. Thus, other polymorphisms of IL-10 should be included in future investigations, permitting the analysis of extended haplotypes of the IL-10 gene that may also reduce the amount of contradictory results. Considering the pleiotropic character of IL-10 function and the fact that the outcome of transplantation itself is a complex phenotype, multi-locus approaches should be used.60 The analyses combining IL-10 polymorphisms with TNF SNPs are very common. There are some other strong candidates for multi-locus analysis like the recently described IL-10 receptor polymorphisms that have functional significance for TNF production.61

Conclusion

In conclusion, data collected up to now demonstrate substantial evidence of IL-10 gene polymorphism involvement in post-transplant outcome. Multi-centric prospective studies using multi-locus approaches might ascertain when and how IL-10 genotype information should be considered in clinical transplant practice.

References

1.
Westendorp RG, Langermans JA, Huizinga TW. et al. Genetic influence on cytokine production and fatal meningococcal disease. Lancet. 1997:349–353. [PubMed: 9111542]
2.
Reuss E, Fimmers R, Kruger A. et al. Differential regulation of interleukin-10 production by genetic and environmental factors-a twin study. Genes Immun. 2002;3:407–413. [PubMed: 12424622]
3.
Turner DM, Williams DM, Sankaran D. et al. An investigation of polymorphism in the interleukin-10 gene promoter. Eur J Immunogenet. 1997;24:1–8. [PubMed: 9043871]
4.
Eskdale J, Gallagher G, Verweij CL. et al. Interleukin 10 secretion in relation to human IL-10 locus haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:9465–9470. [PMC free article: PMC21361] [PubMed: 9689103]
5.
Crawley E, Kay R, Sillibourne J. et al. Polymorphic haplotypes of the interleukin-10 5' flanking region determine variable interleukin-10 transcription and are associated with particular phenotypes of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1101–1108. [PubMed: 10366102]
6.
Lim S, Crawley E, Woo P. et al. Haplotype associated with low interleukin-10 production in patients with severe asthma. Lancet. 1998;352:113. [PubMed: 9672280]
7.
Gibson AW, Edberg JC, Wu J. et al. Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in the distal IL-10 promoter affect IL-10 production and enhance the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2001;166:3915–3922. [PubMed: 11238636]
8.
Suarez A, Castro P, Alonso R. et al. Interindividual variations in constitutive interleukin-10 messenger RNA and protein levels and their association with genetic polymorphisms. Transplantation. 2003;75:711–717. [PubMed: 12640314]
9.
Goker H, Haznedaroglu IC, Chao NJ. Acute graft-vs-host disease: Pathobiology and management. Exp Hematol. 2001;29:259–277. [PubMed: 11274753]
10.
Holler E, Roncarolo MG, Hintermeier-Knabe R. et al. Prognostic significance of increased IL-10 production in patients prior to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;25:237–241. [PubMed: 10673693]
11.
Ju X, Wang J, Xu B. et al. Roles of interleukin-10 in acute graft-versus-host disease and graft rejection. Chin Med J. 2003;116:534–537. [PubMed: 12875717]
12.
Wang XN, Lange C, Schulz U. et al. Interleukin-10 modulation of alloreactivity and graft-versus-host reactions. Transplantation. 2002;74:772–778. [PubMed: 12364854]
13.
Middleton PG, Taylor PR, Jackson G. et al. Dickinson Cytokine gene polymorphisms associating with severe acute graft-versus-host disease in HLA-identical sibling transplants. Blood. 1998;92:3943–3948. [PubMed: 9808588]
14.
Cavet J, Middleton PG, Segall M. et al. Recipient tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms associate with early mortality and acute graft-versus-host disease severity in HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplants. Blood. 1999;94:3941–3946. [PubMed: 10572111]
15.
Cavet J, Dickinson AM, Norden J. et al. Interferon-gamma and interleukin-6 gene polymorphisms associate with graft-versus-host disease in HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2001;98:1594–1600. [PubMed: 11520812]
16.
Takahashi H, Furukawa T, Hashimoto S. et al. Contribution of TNF-alpha and IL-10 gene polymorphisms to graft-versus-host disease following allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;26:1317–1323. [PubMed: 11223972]
17.
Nordlander A, Uzunel M, Mattsson J. et al. The TNFd4 allele is correlated to moderate-to-severe acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol. 2002;119:1133–1136. [PubMed: 12472598]
18.
Kogler G, Middleton PG, Wilke M. et al. Recipient cytokine genotypes for TNF-alpha and IL-10 and the minor histocompatibility antigens HY and CD31 codon 125 are not associated with occurrence or severity of acute GVHD in unrelated cord blood transplantation: A retrospective analysis. Transplantation. 2002;74:1167–1175. [PubMed: 12438965]
19.
Tambur AR, Yaniv I, Stein J. et al. Cytokine gene polymorphism in patients with graft-versus-host disease. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:502–503. [PubMed: 11266928]
20.
Socie G, Loiseau P, Tamouza R. et al. Both genetic and clinical factors predict the development of graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;72:699–706. [PubMed: 11544434]
21.
Rocha V, Franco RF, Porcher R. et al. Host defense and inflammatory gene polymorphisms are associated with outcomes after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2002;100:3908–3918. [PubMed: 12393699]
22.
Xu GP, Sharma VK, Li B. et al. Intragraft expression of IL-10 messenger RNA: A novel correlate of renal allograft rejection. Kidney Int. 1995;48:1504–1507. [PubMed: 8544407]
23.
Strehlau J, Pavlakis M, Mark Lipman. et al. Quantitative detection of immune activation transcripts as a diagnostic tool in kidney transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:695–700. [PMC free article: PMC19576] [PubMed: 9012847]
24.
Sankaran D, Asderakis A, Ashraf S. et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms predict acute graft rejection following renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1999;56:281–288. [PubMed: 10411704]
25.
Tian Y, Ma W, Zhang Y. Influence of cytokine gene polymorphism on renal transplantation. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002;40:256–258. [PubMed: 12133353]
26.
Pelletier R, Pravica V, Perrey C. et al. Evidence for a genetic predisposition towards acute rejection after kidney and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;70:674–680. [PubMed: 10972228]
27.
Hutchings A, Guay-Woodford L, Thomas JM. et al. Association of cytokine single nucleotide polymorphisms with B7 costimulatory molecules in kidney allograft recipients. Pediatr Transplant. 2002;6:69–77. [PubMed: 11906646]
28.
George S, Turner D, Reynard M. et al. Significance of cytokine gene polymorphism in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:483–484. [PubMed: 11266919]
29.
Poole KL, Gibbs PJ, Evans PR. et al. Influence of patient and donor cytokine genotypes on renal allograft rejection: Evidence from a single centre study. Transpl Immunol. 2001;8:259–265. [PubMed: 11316069]
30.
Marshall SE, McLaren AJ, Haldar NA. et al. The impact of recipient cytokine genotype on acute rejection after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;70:1485–1491. [PubMed: 11118095]
31.
Hahn AB, Kasten-Jolly JC, Constantino DM. et al. TNF-alpha, IL-6, IFN-gamma, and IL-10 gene expression polymorphisms and the IL-4 receptor alpha-chain variant Q576R: Effects on renal allograft outcome. Transplantation. 2001;72:660–665. [PubMed: 11544427]
32.
Asderakis A, Sankaran D, Dyer P. et al. Association of polymorphisms in the human interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 gene with acute and chronic kidney transplant outcome: The cytokine effect on transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;71:674–677. [PubMed: 11292301]
33.
Poli F, Boschiero L, Giannoni F. et al. TNF-alpha IFN-gamma IL-6, IL-10, and TGF-beta1 gene polymorphisms in renal allografts. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:348–349. [PubMed: 11266855]
34.
Kobayashi T, Yokoyama I, Hayashi S. et al. Genetic polymorphism in the IL-10 promoter region in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1999;31:755–756. [PubMed: 10083323]
35.
Marshall SE, McLaren AJ, McKinney EF. et al. Donor cytokine genotype influences the development of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2001;71:469–476. [PubMed: 11233912]
36.
Mytilineos J, Opelz G. Impact of cytokine gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2002;74:43.
37.
Alamartine E, Berthoux P, Mariat C. et al. Interleukin-10 promoter polymorphisms and susceptibility to skin squamous cell carcinoma after renal transplantation. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120:99–103. [PubMed: 12535204]
38.
Shinozaki K, Yahata H, Tanji H. et al. Allograft transduction of IL-10 prolongs survival following orthotopic liver transplantation. Gene Ther. 1999;6:816–822. [PubMed: 10505106]
39.
Platz KP, Mueller AR, Rossaint R. et al. Cytokine pattern during rejection and infection after liver transplantation-improvements in postoperative monitoring? Transplantation. 1996;62:1441–1450. [PubMed: 8958270]
40.
Conti F, Boulland ML, Leroy-Viard K. et al. Low level of interleukin 10 synthesis during liver allograft rejection. Lab Invest. 1998;78:1281–1289. [PubMed: 9800954]
41.
Minguela A, Torio A, Marin L. et al. Implication of soluble and membrane HLA class I and serum IL-10 in liver graft acceptance. Hum Immunol. 1999;60:500–509. [PubMed: 10408799]
42.
Bathgate AJ, Pravica V, Perrey C. et al. Polymorphisms in tumour necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-10 and transforming growth factor beta1 genes and end-stage liver disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:1329–1333. [PubMed: 11192323]
43.
Jonsson JR, Hong C, Purdie DM. et al. Role of cytokine gene polymorphisms in acute rejection and renal impairment after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:255–263. [PubMed: 11244168]
44.
Fernandes H, Koneru B, Fernandes N. et al. Investigation of promoter polymorphisms in the tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-10 genes in liver transplant patients. Transplantation. 2002;73:1886–1891. [PubMed: 12131682]
45.
Warle MC, Farhan A, Metselaar HJ. et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and acute human liver graft rejection. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:603–611. [PubMed: 12089714]
46.
Tambur AR, Ortegel JW, Ben-Ari Z. et al. Role of cytokine gene polymorphism in hepatitis C recurrence and allograft rejection among liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2001;71:1475–1480. [PubMed: 11391238]
47.
Mazariegos GV, Reyes J, Webber SA. et al. Cytokine gene polymorphisms in children successfully withdrawn from immunosuppression after liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2002;73:1342–1345. [PubMed: 11981433]
48.
Turner DM, Grant SC, Lamb WR. et al. A genetic marker of high TNF-alpha production in heart transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1995;60:1113–1117. [PubMed: 7482718]
49.
Turner D, Grant SC, Yonan N. et al. Cytokine gene polymorphism and heart transplant rejection. Transplantation. 1997;64:776–779. [PubMed: 9311720]
50.
Awad MR, Webber S, Boyle G. et al. The effect of cytokine gene polymorphisms on pediatric heart allograft outcome. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001;20:625–630. [PubMed: 11404167]
51.
Morgun A, Shulzhenko N, Rampim GF. et al. Influence of cytokine genetic polymorphisms on cardiac transplant outcome. In: Hansen JA, Dupont B, eds. HLA 2002, Immunobiology of the human MHC. Seattle, WA: IHWG press, in press.
52.
Bijlsma FJ, Bruggink AH, Hartman M. et al. No association between IL-10 promoter gene polymorphism and heart failure or rejection following cardiac transplantation. Tissue Antigens. 2001;57:151–153. [PubMed: 11260510]
53.
Densem CG, Hutchinson IV, Yonan N. et al. Influence of interleukin-10 polymorphism on the development of coronary vasculopathy following cardiac transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2003;11:223–228. [PubMed: 12799207]
54.
Lu KC, Jaramillo A, Lecha RL. et al. Interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma gene polymorphisms in the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2002;74:1297–12302. [PubMed: 12451269]
55.
Daly AK, Day CP. Candidate gene case-control association studies: Advantages and potential pitfalls. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:489–499. [PMC free article: PMC2014606] [PubMed: 11736857]
56.
Cardon LR, Palmer LJ. Population stratification and spurious allelic association. Lancet. 2003;361:598–604. [PubMed: 12598158]
57.
Colhoun HM, McKeigue PM, Davey SmithG. Problems of reporting genetic associations with complex outcomes. Lancet. 2003;361:865–872. [PubMed: 12642066]
58.
Lio D, Scola L, Crivello A. et al. Gender-specific association between -1082 IL-10 promoter polymorphism and longevity. Genes Immun. 2002;3:30–33. [PubMed: 11857058]
59.
Hariharan S, McBride MA, Cohen EP. Evolution of endpoints for renal transplant outcome. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:933–941. [PubMed: 12859527]
60.
Hoh J, Ott J. Mathematical multi-locus approaches to localizing complex human trait genes. Nat Rev Genet. 2003;4:701–709. [PubMed: 12951571]
61.
Gasche C, Grundtner P, Zwirn P. et al. Novel variants of the IL-10 receptor 1 affect inhibition of monocyte TNF-alpha production. J Immunol. 2003;170:5578–5582. [PubMed: 12759436]
Copyright © 2000-2013, Landes Bioscience.
Bookshelf ID: NBK6340

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...