NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Excerpt
Our recent systematic review examined specific questions about the comparative effectiveness of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring methods. The review found that intensive insulin therapy delivered either by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI) is equally effective in lowering glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. Intensive insulin therapy delivered by both methods resulted in similar rates of severe hypoglycemia for adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes. The review also found evidence that real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) is superior to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in lowering HbA1c, without altering the risk balance of severe hypoglycemia, particularly among those who are compliant with wearing the monitoring device. Even though CSII and MDI without rt-CGM have similar effects on HbA1c, the addition of rt-CGM to CSII is superior to MDI/SMBG in lowering HbA1c. Thus, the addition of this monitoring method to SMBG and intensive insulin therapy can assist in achieving glycemic targets in individuals with type 1 diabetes. However, the review also identified several important gaps in the evidence. The objective of this report is to prioritize the needs for research addressing those gaps in the existing literature on management of insulin-requiring diabetes by engaging expert stakeholders using a modified Delphi method.
Contents
Addendum added June 2013
Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services1, Contract No. 290-2007-10061-I, Prepared by: Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center, Baltimore, MD
Suggested citation:
Yeh H-C, Lau BD, Golden SH, Donner T, Brown TT, Bass EB. Insulin Delivery and Glucose Monitoring Methods: Future Research Needs. Future Research Needs Paper No.32. (Prepared by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10061-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC037-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. March 2013. Addendum added June 2013. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm.
This report is based on research conducted by the Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2007-10061-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s), who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The information in this report is intended to help health care researchers and funders of research make well-informed decisions in designing and funding research and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of scientific judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical research and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances.
None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report.
- 1
540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; www
.ahrq.gov
- NLM CatalogRelated NLM Catalog Entries
- Review Methods for Insulin Delivery and Glucose Monitoring: Comparative Effectiveness[ 2012]Review Methods for Insulin Delivery and Glucose Monitoring: Comparative EffectivenessGolden SH, Brown T, Yeh HC, Maruthur N, Ranasinghe P, Berger Z, Suh Y, Wilson LM, Haberl EB, Bass EB. 2012 Jul
- Review Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.[Ann Intern Med. 2012]Review Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Yeh HC, Brown TT, Maruthur N, Ranasinghe P, Berger Z, Suh YD, Wilson LM, Haberl EB, Brick J, Bass EB, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Sep 4; 157(5):336-47.
- Review Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring in diabetes: summary of a comparative effectiveness review.[J Manag Care Pharm. 2012]Review Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring in diabetes: summary of a comparative effectiveness review.Golden SH, Sapir T. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Aug; 18(6 Suppl):S1-17.
- Review Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.[Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011]Review Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.Shalitin S, Peter Chase H. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb; (170):76-82.
- The relationship between the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or on multiple daily injections.[J Diabetes Investig. 2015]The relationship between the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or on multiple daily injections.Murata T, Tsuzaki K, Yoshioka F, Okada H, Kishi J, Yamada K, Sakane N. J Diabetes Investig. 2015 Nov; 6(6):687-91. Epub 2015 May 25.
- Insulin Delivery and Glucose Monitoring Methods: Future Research NeedsInsulin Delivery and Glucose Monitoring Methods: Future Research Needs
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...