U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK). Neutropenic Sepsis: Prevention and Management of Neutropenic Sepsis in Cancer Patients. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE); 2012 Sep. (NICE Clinical Guidelines, No. 151.)

Cover of Neutropenic Sepsis: Prevention and Management of Neutropenic Sepsis in Cancer Patients

Neutropenic Sepsis: Prevention and Management of Neutropenic Sepsis in Cancer Patients.

Show details

List of all recommendations

Chapter 2 - Diagnosis of neutropenic sepsis

Definition of neutropenia and fever

Chapter 3 - Information, support and training

Information and support for patients and carers

Content of information and support

Training for healthcare professionals

  • Healthcare professionals and staff who come into contact with patients having anticancer treatment should be provided with training on neutropenic sepsis. The training should be tailored according to the type of contact.

Chapter 4 – Identification and assessment

Signs and symptoms that necessitate referral to secondary/tertiary care

Emergency assessment in secondary/tertiary care

Investigation appropriate for clinical management and risk stratification

Further assessment

Assessing the patient's risk of septic complications

  • A healthcare professional with competence in managing complications of anticancer treatment should assess the patient's risk of septic complications within 24 hours of presentation to secondary or tertiary care, basing the risk assessment on presentation features and using a validated risk scoring system4.

Chapter 5 – Reducing the risk of septic complications of anticancer treatment

Preventing the septic complications of anticancer treatment

Chapter 6 – Initial treatment

Timing of initial antibiotic treatment

Empiric intravenous antibiotic monotherapy or intravenous antibiotic dual therapy

Empiric glycopeptide antibiotics in patients with central venous access devices

Indications for removing central venous access devices

Inpatient versus outpatient management strategies

  • Consider outpatient antibiotic therapy for patients with confirmed neutropenic sepsis and a low risk of developing septic complications, taking into account the patient's social and clinical circumstances and discussing with them the need to return to hospital promptly if a problem develops.

Chapter 7 – Subsequent treatment

Changing the initial empiric treatment in unresponsive fever

Switching from intravenous to oral antibiotic treatment

Duration of inpatient care

  • Offer discharge to patients having empiric antibiotic therapy for neutropenic sepsis only after:
    -

    the patient's risk of developing septic complications has been reassessed as low by a healthcare professional with competence in managing complications of anticancer treatment using a validated risk scoring system7 and

    -

    taking into account the patient's social and clinical circumstances and discussing with them the need to return to hospital promptly if a problem develops.

Duration of empiric antibiotic treatment

Footnotes

4

Examples of risk scoring systems include The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000;18:3038–51. [PubMed: 10944139] and the modified Alexander rule for children (aged under 18). European Journal of Cancer. 2009;45:2843–9. [PubMed: 19616427].

5

For more information see the Department of Health's Updated guidance on the diagnosis and reporting of Clostridium difficile) and guidance from the Health Protection Agency and the Department of Health on Clostridium difficile infection: how to deal with the problem.

6

At the time of publication (September 2012) piperacillin with tazobactam did not have a UK marketing authorisation for use in children aged under 2 years. The prescriber should follow relevant professional guidance, taking full responsibility for the decision. The child's parent or carer should provide informed consent, which should be documented. See the GMC's Good practice in prescribing medicines – guidance for doctors and the prescribing advice provided by the Joint Standing Committee on Medicines (a joint committee of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacists Group) for further information.

7

Examples of risk scoring systems include The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: a multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2000;18:3038–51. [PubMed: 10944139] and the modified Alexander rule for children) (aged under 18). European Journal of Cancer. 2009;45:2843–9. [PubMed: 19616427].

Copyright © National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, 2012.
Bookshelf ID: NBK373678

Views

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...