Except where otherwise noted, this work is distributed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), a copy of which is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Ustekinumab (Stelara) [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2017 Apr.
Clinical Remission Subgroup Analyses
Table 27Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 8 by Disease Severity (Baseline CDAI Score), Crohn’s Disease–Related Medication History in the Induction Studies
Subgroups, n (%) | UNITI-1 | UNITI-2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 247) | UST (N = 249) | PLA (N = 210) | UST (N = 209) | |
Baseline CDAI score ≤ 300 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | ||
P value | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Baseline CDAI score > 300 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | ||
P value | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Inadequate response, intolerant, or contraindication to CS or immunomodulators — Yes | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Inadequate response, intolerant, or contraindication to CS or immunomodulators — No | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Initial response to TNF antagonist —Yes | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Initial response to TNF antagonist — No | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Primary nonresponder to TNF antagonist | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Secondary nonresponder to TNF antagonist | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Intolerance to TNF antagonist | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Failed ≥ 2 TNF antagonists — Yes | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Failed ≥ 2 TNF antagonists — No | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Previously received TNF antagonist — Yes | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ | |||
Previously received TNF antagonist — No | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ||
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | |||
P value | ▬ |
Table 28Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinical Remission at Week 44 by Disease Severity (Baseline CDAI Score) and Crohn’s Disease Medication History in the Maintenance Study
Subgroups, n (%) | IM-UNITI- | ||
---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 131) | UST q.12.w. (N = 129) | UST q.8.w. (N = 128) | |
Baseline CDAI score ≤ 300 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Clinical remission at week 44 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
Baseline CDAI score > 300 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Clinical remission at week 44 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
Inadequate response, intolerant, or contraindication to CS or immunomodulators | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Clinical remission at week 44 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
TNF antagonist refractory population — Yes (UNITI-1) | N = 61 | N = 57 | N = 56 |
Clinical remission at week 44 | 16 (26.2) | 22 (38.6) | 23 (41.1) |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | |
P value | 0.140 | 0.102 | |
TNF antagonist refractory population — No (UNITI-2) | N = 70 | N = 72 | N = 72 |
Clinical remission at week 44 | NR (44.3) | NR (56.9) | NR (62.5) |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | |
P value | 0.146 | 0.020 | |
Previously received TNF antagonist — Yes | N = 19 | N = 19 | N = 20 |
Clinical remission at week 44 | NR (31.6) | NR (57.9) | NR (55.0) |
OR (95% CI) | 2.9 (0.7 to 11.7) | 2.5 (0.7 to 9.3) | |
P value | 0.150 | 0.206 | |
Previously received TNF antagonist — No | N = 51 | N = 53 | N = 52 |
Clinical remission at week 44 | NR (49.0) | NR (56.6) | NR (65.4) |
OR (95% CI) | 1.4 (0.6 to 3.0) | 2.4 (1.0 to 5.5) | |
P value | 0.512 | 0.041 |
CDAI = Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; CI = confidence interval; CS = corticosteroid; NR = not reported; OR = odds ratio; PLA = placebo; q.8.w. = every 8 weeks; q.12.w. = every 12 weeks; TNF = tumour necrosis factor; UST = ustekinumab.
Source: Clinical Study Report for IM-UNITI.9
Clinical Response Subgroup Analyses
Table 29Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinical Response at Week 6 by Disease Severity (Baseline CDAI Score), Crohn’s Disease–Related Medication History in the Induction Studies
Subgroups, n (%) | UNITI-1 | UNITI-2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 247) | UST (N = 249) | PLA (N = 210) | UST (N = 209) | |
Baseline CDAI score ≤ 300 | N = 104 | N = 94 | N = 123 | N = 119 |
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (17.3) | NR (28.7) | NR (24.4) | NR (51.3) |
OR (95% CI) | 2.0 (1.0 to 3.9) | 3.3 (1.9 to 5.7) | ||
P value | 0.048 | < 0.001 | ||
Baseline CDAI score > 300 | N = 143 | N = 155 | N = 86 | N = 90 |
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (24.5) | NR (36.8) | NR (34.9) | NR (61.1) |
OR (95% CI) | 1.8 (1.1 to 3.0) | 3.2 (1.7 to 6.0) | ||
P value | 0.023 | < 0.001 | ||
Inadequate response, intolerant, or contraindication to CS or immunomodulators — Yes | N = 215 | N = 217 | ||
Clinical Response at week 6 | NR (20.9) | NR (33.6) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 1.9 (1.2 to 3.0) | |||
P value | 0.005 | |||
Inadequate response, intolerant, or contraindication to CS or immunomodulators — No | N = 32 | N = 32 | ||
Clinical Response at week 6 | NR (25.0) | NR (34.4) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 1.5 (0.5 to 4.8) | |||
P value | 0.485 | |||
Initial response to TNF antagonist —Yes | N = 187 | N = 190 | ||
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (20.3) | NR (38.4) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 2.5 (1.6 to 3.9) | |||
P value | < 0.001 | |||
Initial response to TNF antagonist — No | N = 60 | N = 59 | ||
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (25.0) | NR (18.6) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 0.7 (0.3 to 1.7) | |||
P value | 0.376 | |||
Primary nonresponder to TNF antagonist | N = 74 | N = 72 | ||
Clinical Response at week 6 | NR (23.0) | NR (23.6) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 1.1 (0.5 to 2.4) | |||
P value | 0.816 | |||
Secondary nonresponder to TNF antagonist | N = 170 | N = 171 | ||
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (20.0) | NR (36.8) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 2.3 (1.4 to 3.8) | |||
P value | < 0.001 | |||
Intolerance to TNF antagonist | N = 87 | N = 105 | ||
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (24.1) | NR (34.3) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 1.6 (0.8 to 3.0) | |||
P value | 0.188 | |||
Failed ≥ 2 TNF antagonists — Yes | N = 134 | N = 126 | ||
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (19.4) | NR (34.9) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 2.1 (1.2 to 3.8) | |||
P value | 0.008 | |||
Failed ≥ 2 TNF antagonists — No | N = 113 | N = 123 | ||
Clinical response at week 6 | NR (23.9) | NR (32.5) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 1.5 (0.8 to 2.7) | |||
P value | 0.176 | |||
Previously received TNF antagonist — Yes | N = 74 | N = 65 | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | NR (21.6) | NR (53.8) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 4.3 (2.0 to 9.2) | |||
P value | < 0.001 | |||
Previously received TNF antagonist — No | N = 135 | N = 144 | ||
Clinical remission at week 8 | NR (32.6) | NR (56.3) | ||
OR (95% CI) | 2.8 (1.7 to 4.6) | |||
P value | < 0.001 |
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and Short Form (36) Health Survey Additional Data
Table 30Summary of Change From Baseline in the IBDQ Dimension Scores in the Induction Studies
Parameter | UNITI-1 | UNITI-2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 247) | UST (N = 249) | PLA (N = 210) | UST (N = 209) | |
Change in bowel score at week 8 | ||||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Change in emotional score at week 8 | ||||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Change in systemic score at week 8 | ||||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | ||
Change in social score at week 8 | ||||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ |
Table 31Responder Analyses for Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and Short Form (36) Health Survey in the Induction Studies
Parameter | UNITI-1 | UNITI-2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 247) | UST (N = 249) | PLA (N = 210) | UST (N = 209) | |
≥ 16 point improvement from baseline in IBDQ total score at week 8 | ||||
n (%) | 89 (36.5) | 136 (54.8) | 85 (41.1) | 141 (68.1) |
P value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
≥ 5 point improvement from baseline in SF-36 PCS score at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
n (%) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | ||
≥ 5 point improvement from baseline in SF-36 MCS score at week 8 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
n (%) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ |
Table 32Summary of Change From Baseline in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire Dimension Scores in the Maintenance Study
Parameter | IM-UNITI | ||
---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 131) | UST q.12.w. (N = 129) | UST q.8.w. (N = 128) | |
Change in bowel score at week 44 | |||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
Change in emotional score at week 44 | |||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
Change in systemic score at week 44 | |||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
Change in social score at week 44 | |||
Baseline score, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Change from baseline, mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ |
PLA = placebo; q.8.w. = every 8 weeks; q.12.w. = every 12 weeks; SD = standard deviation; UST = ustekinumab.
Source: Clinical Study Report for IM-UNITI.9
Table 33Responder Analyses for Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire and Short Form (36) Health Survey in the Maintenance Study
Parameter | IM-UNITI | ||
---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 131) | UST q.12.w. (N = 129) | UST q.8.w. (N = 128) | |
≥ 16 point improvement from baseline in IBDQ total score at week 44 | |||
n (%) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
≥ 5 point improvement from baseline in SF-36 PCS score at week 44 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
n (%) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
≥ 5 point improvement from baseline in SF-36 MCS score at week 44 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
n (%) | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
P value | ▬ | ▬ |
IBDQ = Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; MCS = mental component score; PCS = physical component score; PLA = placebo; q.8.w. = every 8 weeks; q.12.w. = every 12 weeks; SF-36 = Short Form (36) Health Survey; UST = ustekinumab.
Source: Clinical Study Report for IM-UNITI.9
Table 34Clinical Remission at Week 44 of Maintenance Study by Ustekinumab Induction Regimen
Subgroups, n (%) | IM-UNITI | ||
---|---|---|---|
PLA (N = 131) | UST q.12.w. (N = 129) | UST q.8.w. (N = 128) | |
UST 130 mg IV induction regimen | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Clinical remission at week 44 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | |
P value | ▬ | ▬ | |
UST 6 mg/kg IV induction regimen | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
Clinical remission at week 44 | ▬ | ▬ | ▬ |
OR (95% CI) | ▬ | ▬ | |
P value | ▬ | ▬ |
CI = confidence interval; IV = intravenous; OR = odds ratio; PLA = placebo; q.8.w. = every 8 weeks; q.12.w. = every 12 weeks; UST = ustekinumab.
Source: Clinical Study Report for IM-UNITI.9
Table 35Summary of Results for Endoscopic Outcomes at Week 8 of Induction and Week 44 of Maintenance Study
Parametera | PLA (N = 97) | USTb (N = 155) |
---|---|---|
Change from baseline in SES-CD at week 8 of induction, mean (SD) | −0.7 (4.97) | −2.8 (5.68) |
P value | 0.012 | |
Change from induction baseline in the SES-CD score at week 44 of maintenance, mean (SD) | Not reported | Not reported |
P value | ||
Patients with mucosal healing at week 44 of maintenance, n (%) | ||
P value | ||
Patients with mucosal healing at week 8 of induction, n (%) | 4 (4.1) | 14 (9.0) |
P value | 0.141c |
PLA = placebo; SD = standard deviation; SES-CD = Simplified Endoscopic Activity Score for Crohn’s Disease; UST = ustekinumab.
- a
Only the primary outcome (i.e., change from baseline in the SES-CD score at week 8 of induction) and key secondary outcomes pre-specified and part of the hierarchical analysis plan in the endoscopy substudy are reported.
- b
Ustekinumab 130 mg and tiered ustekinumab doses ~6 mg/kg combined.
- c
Note that the statistical analysis hierarchy also failed at a higher-order comparison.
Source: Manufacturer’s submission to CDR.26
- DETAILED OUTCOME DATA - Ustekinumab (Stelara)DETAILED OUTCOME DATA - Ustekinumab (Stelara)
- CONCLUSIONS - Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)CONCLUSIONS - Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)
- CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW REANALYSES - Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)CADTH COMMON DRUG REVIEW REANALYSES - Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)
- INTRODUCTION - Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)INTRODUCTION - Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)
- Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)Glycerol Phenylbutyrate (Ravicti)
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...