Objective
To summarize the results of a pooled analysis of the two phase III pivotal trials, Study 301 and Study 302, for HP/TAZ (Duobrii).
Methods
All the patients who were randomized to Study 301 (N = 203) and Study 302 (N = 215) were included in the pooled analysis, for a total of 418 patients included in the ITT population used for efficacy analyses. The safety population consisted of 410 patients, which were used for the assessment of safety. The discrepancy between the two was due to a lack of post-baseline safety evaluation of eight patients.
The pooled analysis used the same primary efficacy end point as the individual pivotal trials: the percentage of patients with treatment success, defined by at least a two-grade improvement from baseline in the IGA and an IGA score of clear or almost clear at week 8. The secondary end points used the same definition of treatment success, but were reported at week 12, 6, 4, and 2. The percentage of patients with at least a two-grade improvement from baseline in the score of each of the three signs of psoriasis (erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling) were reported as exploratory end points at week 8, 12, 6, 4, and 2. A two-grade improvement of IGA scores and change from baseline in BSA were also summarized.
All pooled analyses of efficacy data were descriptive and no hypothesis testing was conducted. The MCMC multiple imputation method was used to handle missing efficacy data, as per the method used in Study 301 and Study 302. As previously described, the ITT set was used for all efficacy analyses, but the week 8 and week 12 per-protocol populations were also used.
Results
Patient Disposition
Table 48Patient Disposition (All Randomized Patients)
View in own window
| Pooled analysis (Study 301 + Study 302) |
---|
| HP/TAZ | Vehicle |
---|
Screened, N | Not reported |
---|
Randomized, N (%) | 276 | 142 |
---|
Discontinued from study, n (%) | 44 (15.9) | 24 (16.9) |
---|
Reason for discontinuation, n (%) | | |
---|
Adverse event | 11 (4.0) | 4 (2.8) |
---|
Patient request | 17 (6.2) | 12 (8.5) |
---|
Protocol violation | 3 (1.1) | 0 |
---|
Lost to follow-up | 9 (3.3) | 6 (4.2) |
---|
Worsening condition | 3 (1.1) | 2 (1.4) |
---|
Other | 1 (0.4) | 0 |
---|
ITT, N | 276 (100.0) | 142 (100.0) |
---|
PP,a n | 229 (83.0) | 120 (84.5) |
---|
Safety, n | 270 (97.8) | 140 (98.6) |
---|
HP/TAZ = halobetasol propionate and tazarotene; ITT = intention to treat; PP = per protocol.
- a
Data are for the week 8 PP population. Data for the week 12 PP population is also available (HP/TAZ = 220, vehicle = 113).
Source: Clinical Study Report for Pooled Analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.43
Table 49Summary of Baseline Characteristics (ITT Set)
View in own window
| Pooled analysis (Study 301 + Study 302) |
---|
Characteristic | HP/TAZ N = 276 | Vehicle N = 142 |
---|
Demographic characteristics |
---|
Age, mean (SD) | 50.0 (14.2) | 51.0 (13.2) |
---|
Sex (% male), n (%) | 175 (63.4) | 97 (68.3) |
---|
Ethnicity | | |
---|
Hispanic or Latino | 78 (28.3) | 37 (26.1) |
---|
Not Hispanic or Latino | 198 (71.7) | 105 (73.9) |
---|
Race | | |
---|
White | 232 (84.1) | 126 (88.7) |
---|
Black or African American | 18 (16.5) | 9 (6.3) |
---|
Asian | 16 (5.8) | 5 (3.5) |
---|
Other | 10 (3.6) | 2 (1.4) |
---|
Baseline disease characteristics |
---|
IGA score, n (%) | | |
---|
3 = moderate | 237 (85.9) | 119 (83.8) |
---|
4 = severe | 39 (14.1) | 23 (16.2) |
---|
Percentage BSA affected by psoriasis | | |
---|
Mean (SD) | 6.0 (2.86) | 5.7 (2.54) |
---|
Median (range) | 5.0 (3 to 12) | 5.0 (3 to 12) |
---|
Size of target lesion (cm2) | | |
---|
Mean (SD) | 36.4 (22.5) | 39.7 (23.6) |
---|
Median (range) | 26.5 (16 to 100) | 30.0 (16 to 100) |
---|
Signs | | |
---|
Erythema (target lesion) | | |
---|
2 = mild | 25 (9.1) | 11 (7.7) |
---|
3 = moderate | 221 (80.1) | 110 (77.5) |
---|
4 = severe | 30 (10.9) | 21 (14.8) |
---|
Plaque elevation (target lesion) | | |
---|
2 = mild | 30 (10.9) | 14 (9.9) |
---|
3 = moderate | 212 (76.8) | 108 (76.1) |
---|
4 = severe | 34 (12.3) | 20 (14.1) |
---|
Scaling (target lesion) | | |
---|
2 = mild | 36 (13.0) | 22 (15.5) |
---|
3 = moderate | 203 (73.6) | 100 (70.4) |
---|
4 = severe | 37 (13.4) | 20 (14.1) |
---|
BSA = body surface area; HP/TAZ = halobetasol propionate and tazarotene; IGA = Investigator’s Global Assessment; ITT = intention to treat; SD = standard deviation.
Source: Clinical Study Report for Pooled Analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.43
Exposure
Table 50Exposure to Study Drug (ITT Set)
View in own window
| Pooled analysis (Study 301 + Study 302) |
---|
HP/TAZ N = 276 | Vehicle N = 142 |
---|
Amount of study drug used (g) | | |
---|
Mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ |
---|
Median (range) | ▬ | ▬ |
---|
Number of days exposed | | |
---|
Mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ |
---|
Median (range) | ▬ | ▬ |
---|
Number of applications | | |
---|
Mean (SD) | ▬ | ▬ |
---|
Median (range) | ▬ | ▬ |
---|
HP/TAZ = halobetasol propionate and tazarotene; SD = standard deviation.
Source: Clinical Study Report for Pooled Analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.43
Efficacy
Health-Related Quality of Life
HRQoL was not reported in the pooled analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.
Skin Clearance
Table 51Treatment Success in IGA (ITT Set)
View in own window
Pooled analysis (Study 301 + Study 302) |
---|
Time point | Treatment outcome (% patients) | HP/TAZ N = 276 | Vehicle N = 142 |
---|
Week 2 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 4 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 6 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 8 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 12 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
HP/TAZ = halobetasol propionate and tazarotene; IGA = Investigator’s Global Assessment; ITT = intention to treat; MCMC = Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Note: Missing data were handled using multiple imputation (MCMC).
- a
Treatment success was defined as at least a two-grade improvement from baseline in the IGA score and an IGA score equal to clear or almost clear.
Source: Clinical Study Report for Pooled Analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.43
Table 52Change From Baseline of Affected BSA (ITT Set)
View in own window
Pooled analysis (Study 301 + Study 302) |
---|
| Total N | Baseline | End-of-treatment time point (week 8) |
---|
Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Percentage change from baseline, mean (SD) |
---|
Percentage BSAa affected by psoriasis |
---|
HP/TAZ | 276 | 6.0 (2.9) | 3.6 (2.9) | −37.6 (39.5) |
Vehicle | 142 | 5.7 (2.5) | 5.3 (3.4) | −3.1 (61.1) |
BSA = body surface area; HP/TAZ = halobetasol propionate and tazarotene; ITT = intention to treat; SD = standard deviation.
- a
Assessment of BSA affected by psoriasis did not include areas of the face, scalp, palms, soles, axillae, and other intertriginous areas.
Source: Clinical Study Report for Pooled Analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.43
Psoriasis-Related Signs and Symptoms
Table 53Improvement From Baseline for Each Sign of Psoriasis (ITT Set)
View in own window
Pooled Analysis (Study 301 + Study 302) |
---|
Time point | Treatment outcome (% patients) | HP/TAZ N = 276 | Vehicle N = 142 |
---|
Week 2 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 4 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 6 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 8 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
Week 12 | Successa | ▬ | ▬ |
Failure | ▬ | ▬ |
HP/TAZ = halobetasol propionate and tazarotene; ITT = intention to treat; MCMC = Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Note: For all end points, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was stratified by analysis centre. Values were adjusted for multiple imputation (MCMC).
- a
Treatment success was defined as at least a two-grade improvement from baseline for each of the signs of psoriasis (erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling).
Source: Clinical Study Report for Pooled Analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.43
Treatment Adherence
Similar to the individual pivotal trials, the pooled analysis of Study 301 and Study 302 did not directly assess treatment adherence as an efficacy outcome, but compliance was reported. A patient who was compliant was defined as a patient who applied between 80% and 120% of the expected applications while enrolled in the respective study. Of the patients treated with HP/TAZ, ▬ were compliant. For patients receiving vehicle, ▬ were compliant.
Safety
Harms
Table 54Summary of Harms, up to Week 8 Study Visit (Safety Set)
View in own window
| Pooled analysis (Study 301 + Study 302) |
---|
HP/TAZ N = 270 | Vehicle N = 140 |
---|
Patients with ≥ 1 AE |
---|
n (%) | 97 (35.9) | 30 (21.4) |
---|
Most common AEs,a n (%) | | |
---|
Contact dermatitis | 20 (7.4) | 0 |
---|
Pruritus | 8 (3.0) | 4 (2.9) |
---|
Skin atrophy | 5 (1.9) | 0 |
---|
Patients with ≥ 1 SAE |
---|
n (%) | 3 (1.1) | 0 |
---|
SAEs by preferred term, n (%) | | |
---|
Cellulitis staphylococcal, asthma exacerbationb | 1 (0.4) | 0 |
---|
Pneumonia | 1 (0.4) | 0 |
---|
Anemia | 1 (0.4) | 0 |
---|
Patients who stopped treatment due to AEsc |
---|
n (%) | 17 (6.3) | 5 (3.6) |
---|
AEs by preferred term, n (%) | | |
---|
Deaths |
---|
n (%) | 0 | 0 |
---|
Notable harms |
---|
AE of interest, n (%) | | |
---|
Pruritus | 8 (3.0) | 4 (2.9) |
---|
Thinning of skin (skin atrophy) | 5 (1.9) | 4 (2.9) |
---|
Folliculitis | 5 (1.9) | 0 |
---|
Skin irritation | 2 | 1 (0.7) |
---|
Burning sensation | 2 (0.7) | 2 (1.4) |
---|
Hypersensitivity events | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.7) |
---|
HPA axis suppressiond | 0 | 0 |
---|
Severe dryness | 0 | 0 |
---|
AE = adverse event; HP/TAZ = halobetasol propionate and tazarotene; HPA = hypothalamic pituitary adrenal; SAE = serious adverse event.
- a
Frequency of two or more patients in any treatment group.
- b
One patient reported two SAEs: cellulitis staphylococcal (1) and asthma (1).
- c
Includes patients with a treatment-emergent AE leading to permanent withdrawal of study drug and/or early study discontinuation.
- d
Includes: secondary glucocorticoid insufficiency, adrenal hypercorticism (Cushing syndrome, hyperglycemia, glycosuria).
Source: Clinical Study Report for Pooled Analysis of Study 301 and Study 302.43