| Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing for Young, Active Adults with Degenerative Hip Disease. Technote TN 33. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR); 2002208 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Ayers DC, Hays PL, Drew JM, Eskander MS, Osuch D, Bragdon CR. Two-year radiostereometric analysis evaluation of femoral head penetration in a challenging population of young total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2009;24(6 Suppl.):9–14218 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Baad-Hansen T, Kold S, Olsen N, Christensen F, Soballe K. Excessive distal migration of fiber-mesh coated femoral stems. Acta Orthop 2011;82:308–14381 | Exclude – comparison of different surfaces |
| Baker RP, Pollard TCB, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:158–63252 | Exclude – comparison of different coatings |
| Beckmann J, Stengel D, Tingart M, Gotz J, Grifka J, Luring C. Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2009;80:538–44165 | Exclude – non-RCT |
| Bernath V. Hip Resurfacing in Patients with Osteoarthritis. Clayton, Victoria: Centre for Clinical Effectiveness; 2002382 | Unavailable |
| Beswick A, Wylde V, Blom A, Gooberman-Hill R, Dieppe PA. Pain after hip or knee joint replacement for osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:S413383 | Exclude – abstract |
| Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open 2012;2:e000435384 | Exclude – this systematic review excluded RCTs and did not compare THR types |
| Bhan S, Pankaj A, Malhotra R. One- or two-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, controlled study in an Asian population. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:298–303146 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Bisseling P, Smolders JMH, Hol A, Van Susante JLC. No clear influence of preference bias on satisfaction and early functional outcome in resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2011;82:161–5385 | Exclude – observational study comparing satisfaction between randomised (no preference) group and preference (non-randomised) group |
| Boden H, Adolphson P. No adverse effects of early weight bearing after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study of 20 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:21–9386 | Exclude – early vs. late weight bearing post THR |
| Boe BG, Rohrl SM, Heier T, Snorrason F, Nordsletten L. A prospective randomized study comparing electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite on titanium stems. Acta Orthop 2011;82:13–19387 | Exclude – comparison of different coatings |
| Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Kotz R. Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:2168–73187 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Butler RA, Rosenzweig S, Myers L, Barrack RL. The Frank Stinchfield Award: the impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome after THA: a prospective, randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:339–47388 | Exclude – compares two different types of stems |
| Cai P, Hu Y, Xie J. Large-diameter delta ceramic-on-ceramic versus common-sized ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA. Orthopedics 2012;35:e1307–13219 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Carlsson LV, Albrektsson BE, Albrektsson BG, Albrektsson TO, Jacobsson CM, Macdonald W, et al. LR. Stepwise introduction of a bone-conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study: I. Preliminary investigations – 52 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 2006;77:549–58188 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Carlsson LV, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson BE, Jacobsson CM, Macdonald W, Regner L, et al. Stepwise introduction of a bone-conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study: II. Clinical proof of concept – 40 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop 2006;77:559–66189 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Cobb J. The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:3134389 | Exclude – letter to editor |
| Conroy JL, Chawda M, Kaushal R, Whitehouse SL, Crawford RW, English H. Does use of a ‘rim cutter’ improve quality of cementation of the acetabular component of cemented Exeter total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2009;24:71–6147 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Corbett KL, Losina E, Nti AA, Prokopetz JJZ, Katz JN. Population-based rates of revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. PLOS ONE 2010:5:e13520390 | Exclude – no RCTs included in this systematic review |
| Coyle D, Coyle K, Vale L, Verteuil R, Imamura M, Glazener C, et al.
Minimally Invasive Arthroplasty in the Management of Hip Arthritic Disease: Systematic Review and Economic Evaluation. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH); 2008148 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Dahlstrand H, Stark A, Anissian L, Hailer NP. Elevated serum concentrations of cobalt, chromium, nickel, and manganese after metal-on-metal alloarthroplasty of the hip: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:837–45220 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| D’Angelo F, Murena L, Zatti G, Cherubino P. The unstable total hip replacement. Ind J Orthop 2008;42:252–9391 | Exclude – non-systematic review |
| D’Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, Carcangiu A, Ferretti A. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol 2009;10:47–54149 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| de Verteuil R, Imamura M, Zhu S, Glazener C, Fraser C, Munro N, et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip. Health Technol Assess 2008;12(26)11 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J. Addition of fluoride to acrylic bone cement does not improve fixation of a total hip arthroplasty stem. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;448:58–66392 | Exclude – effect of fluoride; two different cements |
| Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation. Acta Orthop 2006;77:218–26190 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Digas G, Thanner J, Anderberg C, Karrholm J. Bioactive cement or ceramic/porous coating vs. conventional cement to obtain early stability of the acetabular cup – randomised study of 96 hips followed with radiostereometry. J Orthop Res 2004;22:1035–43191 |
| Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Herberts P. 5-year experience of highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop 2007;78:746–54221 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented THA: randomized study of 61 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;417:126–38218 |
| Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P. The Otto Aufranc Award. Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: randomized evaluation of penetration rate in cemented and uncemented sockets using radiostereometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;429:6–16223 |
| Johanson PE, Digas G, Herberts P, Thanner J, Karrholm J. Highly crosslinked polyethylene does not reduce aseptic loosening in cemented THA: 10-year findings of a randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:3083–93224 |
| Digas G, Thanner J, Anderberg C, Karrholm J. Fluoride-containing acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty. Randomized evaluation of 97 stems using radiostereometry and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Arthroplasty 2005;20:784–92393 | Exclude – effect of fluoride; two different cements |
| Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1153–60150 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Dutka J, Sosin P, Libura M, Skowronek P. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive lateral approach – our experience and early results. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 2007;9 39–45151 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Edwards SJ, Hamilton V, Nherera L, Arber M. Systematic review of the impact different metal femoral stems (MFSS) have on patient outcomes in total hip replacement (THR) due to osteoarthritis (OA). Value Health 2011;14:A245394 | Exclude – abstract |
| Eingartner C, Piel S, Weise K. Results of a cemented straight titanium alloy femoral stem after mean follow-up of 13 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2007;17:587–93395 | Exclude – single-arm cohort |
| Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:963–74192 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Fenandez-Lopez JC, Gossec L, Dougados M. Magnitude of the symptomatic at 3, 6 and 12 months after total articular replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:S245–6396 | Exclude – abstract |
| Fick DP, Nivbrant B. Minimally invasive surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2:CD004798397 | Exclude – systematic review concerned with the comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Flivik G. Fixation of the cemented acetabular component in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2005;76(Suppl. 76):3–30153 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Flivik G, Kristiansson I, Kesteris U, Ryd L. Is removal of subchondral bone plate advantageous in cemented cup fixation? A randomized RSA study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;448:164–72152 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC, Hildebrand M, Berli MC, Walker MR, et al. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches – a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech 2011;44:372–8154 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Freund KG, Houshian S, Riegels-Nielsen P. Occlusion and stability of two different femoral canal plugs in cemented hip arthroplasty. A prospective and randomized study, with a two year follow-up. Hip Int 2003;13:142–7398 | Exclude – compared two different femoral plugs |
| Gallart X, Riba J, Garcia S, Combalia A, Esteban PL, Marmolejo C. Time saving during acrylic bone cement setting in femoral stem implantation of hip arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomised study. Hip Int 2005;15:143–8399 | Exclude – comparison is concerned with two types of cement |
| Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Ramakrishnan R, Rondhuis J, Verburg AJ, Tonino AJ. Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study. Acta Orthop 2006;77:719–25193 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Glyn-Jones S, Isaac S, Hauptfleisch J, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW, Gill HS. Does highly cross-linked polyethylene wear less than conventional polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty? A double-blind, randomized, and controlled trial using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:337–43225 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, Murray DW. The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: a three-year randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:556–6183 |
| Thomas GER, Simpson DJ, Mehmood S, Taylor A, McLardy-Smith P, Gill HS, et al. The seven-year wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:716–22226 |
| Goosen JHM, Kollen BJ, Castelein RM, Kuipers BM, Verheyen CC. Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:200–8155 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Grant P, Aamodt A, Falch JA, Nordsletten L. Differences in stability and bone remodeling between a customized uncemented hydroxyapatite coated and a standard cemented femoral stem. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Orthop Res 2005;23:1280–5194 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Grubl A, Weissinger M, Brodner W, Gleiss A, Giurea A, Gruber M, et al. Serum aluminium and cobalt levels after ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1003–5195 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Hailer NP, Blaheta RA, Dahlstrand H, Stark A. Elevation of circulating HLA DR(+) CD8(+) T-cells and correlation with chromium and cobalt concentrations 6 years after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2011;82:6–12227 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Hallan G, Aamodt A, Furnes O, Skredderstuen A, Haugan K, Havelin LI. Palamed G compared with Palacos R with gentamicin in Charnley total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1143–8400 | Exclude – comparison of different cements |
| Hamadouche M, Baque F, Lefevre N, Kerboull M. Minimum 10-year survival of Kerboull cemented stems according to surface finish. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008;466:332–9401 | Exclude – comparison of different finishes |
| Hartl A, Schillinger M, Wanivenhaus A. Cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;3:CD004850196 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Haverkamp D, Klinkenbijl MN, Somford MP, Albers GHR, van der Vis HM. Obesity in total hip arthroplasty – does it really matter? A meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2011;82:417–22402 | Exclude – the effect of BMI on THR outcomes |
| Haverkamp D, Van Den Bekerom MPJ, Harmse I, Schafroth MU. One stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty, is it safe? A meta-analysis. Hip Int 2010;20:440–6164 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches, e.g. one- vs. two-stage approaches |
| HAYES, Inc. Ganz Trochanteric Flip Osteotomy Approach to Hip Resurfacing for Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Healthcare Technology Brief Publication. Lansdale, PA: HAYES, Inc.; 2012403 | Unavailable because of cost |
| Hoebink E, Struijs Peter AA. Effects of different bearing surface materials on aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;4:CD007494404 | Exclude – systematic review protocol for which no full systematic review is available |
| Honl M, Dierk O, Gauck C, Carrero V, Lampe F, Dries S, et al. Comparison of robotic-assisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85-A:1470–8156 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Howie DW, McGee MA, Costi K, Graves SE. Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement – the value of a randomized clinical trial. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:195–201197 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Husby OS, Haugan K, Benum P, Foss OA. A prospective randomised radiostereometric analysis trial of SmartSet HV and Palacos R bone cements in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 2010;11:29–35405 | Exclude – comparison of different cements |
| Ise K, Kawanabe K, Tamura J, Akiyama H, Goto K, Nakamura T. Clinical results of the wear performance of cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:1216–20406 | Exclude – secondary OA |
| ISPOR 14th Annual European Congress Research Abstracts. Value Health 2011;14:A233–A574407 | Exclude – abstract |
| Jager M, Begg MJ, Ready J, Bittersohl B, Millis M, Krauspe R, Thornhill TS. Primary total hip replacement in childhood, adolescence and young patients: quality and outcome of clinical studies. Technol Health Care 2008;16:195–214408 | Exclude – non-systematic review, population not relevant |
| Jandric S, Jovicic Z, Novakovic S. Differences in pain between women and men in patients with total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Pain 2009;13(Suppl. 1):S133409 | Exclude – abstract |
| Jandric S, Manojlovic S. Quality of life of men and women with osteoarthritis of the hip and arthroplasty assessment by WOMAC questionnaire. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009;88:328–35410 | Exclude – non-RCT |
| Jensen C, Aagaard P, Overgaard S. Recovery in mechanical muscle strength following resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty – a randomised clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:1108–16228 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Jensen C, Aagaard P, Overgaard S. Recovery in horizontal gait after hip resurfacing vs. total hip arthroplasty at 6-month follow-up – a randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012;20(Suppl. 1):S99411 | Exclude – abstract |
| Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty: direct lateral or posterior? J Rheumatol 2004;31:1790–6158 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Systc Rev 2006;3:CD003828157 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Jolles BM, Grzesiak A, Eudier A, Dejnabadi H, Voracek C, Pichonnaz C, et al. A randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements with a five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94B:648–55412 | Exclude – knee |
| Jolles BM, Michel J, Burnand B, Leyvraz P. Surgical treatment for advanced stage of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD006079413 | Exclude – population not relevant |
| Jones CA, Pohar S. Health-related quality of life after total joint arthroplasty: a scoping review. Clin Geriatr Med 2012;28:395–429294 | Exclude – not systematic review; no RCTs included |
| Kadar T, Hallan G, Aamodt A, Indrekvam K, Badawy M, Havelin LI, et al. A randomized study on migration of the Spectron EF and the Charnley flanged 40 cemented femoral components using radiostereometric analysis at 2 years. Acta Orthop 2011;82:538–44414 | Exclude – comparison of different finishes |
| Karachalios T, Tsatsaronis C, Efraimis G, Papadelis P, Lyritis G, Diakoumopoulos G. The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year, prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:469–75198 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Karas S. Outcomes of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a systematic review. Asian J Sports Med 2012;3:1–7415 | Exclude – this systematic review included no RCTs |
| Karrholm J, Anderberg C, Snorrason F, Thanner J, Langeland N, Malchau H, et al. Evaluation of a femoral stem with reduced stiffness. A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:1651–8199 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Kenanidis EI, Potoupnis ME, Papavasiliou KA, Sayegh FE, Kapetanos GA. Re: Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:821416 | Exclude – letter to editor |
| Khan RJ, Maor D, Hofmann M, Haebich S. A comparison of a less invasive piriformis-sparing approach versus the standard posterior approach to the hip: a randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:43–50159 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Kim S, Losina E, Solomon DH, Wright J, Katz JN. Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: literature review. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:69–74417 | Exclude – irrelevant – effectiveness of clinical pathways |
| Kim YH. Comparison of polyethylene wear associated with cobalt-chromium and zirconia heads after total hip replacement: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:1769–76201 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Kim Y-H. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique. A prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:1092–8160 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Kim YH, Kim JS, Joo JH, Park JW. Is hydroxyapatite coating necessary to improve survivorship of porous-coated titanium femoral stem? J Arthroplasty 2012;27:559–63418 | Exclude – comparison of different coatings |
| Kim YH, Oh JH. A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:774–81419 | Exclude – population with fractures |
| Kim YH, Oh SW, Kim JS. Prevalence of fat embolism following bilateral simultaneous and unilateral total hip arthroplasty performed with or without cement: a prospective, randomized clinical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:1372–9420 | Exclude – comparison and no outcome |
| Kim Y-H, Yoon S-H, Kim J-S. Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:174–9200 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Kraay MJ, Thomas RD, Rimnac CM, Fitzgerald SJ, Goldberg VM. Zirconia versus Co-Cr femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: early assessment of wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:86–90202 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Krych AJ, Pagnano MW, Coleman WK, Meneghini RM, Kaufman K. No strength or gait benefit of two-incision THA: a brief followup at 1 year. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:1110–18185 | Exclude – comparison of different operative techniques |
| Krych AJ, Pagnano MW, Wood KC, Meneghini RM, Kaufmann K. No benefit of the two-incision THA over mini-posterior THA: a pilot study of strength and gait. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:565–70186 | Exclude – comparison of different operative techniques |
| Lane NE. Osteoarthritis of the hip. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1413–21421 | Exclude – case report – narrative review |
| Laursen MB, Nielsen PT, Soballe K. Bone remodelling around HA-coated acetabular cups: a DEXA study with a 3-year follow-up in a randomised trial. Int Orthop 2007;31:199–204422 | Exclude – comparison of different coatings |
| Lavigne M, Masse V, Girard J, Roy AG, Vendittoli PA. [Return to sport after hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008;94:361–7423 | Exclude – abstract only in English |
| Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli PA. The John Charnley Award: the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:326–36229 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Lewis PM, Al-Belooshi A, Olsen M, Schemitch EH, Waddell JP. Prospective randomized trial comparing alumina ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:392–7230 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Li N, Deng Y, Chen L. Comparison of complications in single-incision minimally invasive THA and conventional THA. Orthopedics 2012;35:e1152–8166 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Lombardi J, Mallory TH, Cuckler JM, Williams J, Berend KR, Smith TM. Mid-term results of a polyethylene-free metal-on-metal articulation. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(7 Suppl. 2):42–7203 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Chess DG, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Cleland A, et al. Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;406:282–96204 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Mallmin H, Wolf O, Larsson S, Milbrink J, Mattsson P. Body composition and BMD after total hip arthroplasty. A randomised clinical trial of two different postoperative regimes with 5 years of follow-up. Bone 2011;48(Suppl. 2):S267424 | Exclude – abstract |
| Malviya A, Ramaskandhan JR, Bowman R, Hashmi M, Holland JP, Kometa S, et al. What advantage is there to be gained using large modular metal-on-metal bearings in routine primary hip replacement? A preliminary report of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:1602–9231 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Markmiller M, Weiss T, Kreuz P, Ruter A, Konrad G. Partial weightbearing is not necessary after cementless total hip arthroplasty: a two-year prospective randomized study on 100 patients. Int Orthop 2011;35:1139–43425 | Exclude – effect of weight bearing |
| Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S, Fraser BP, Docquier PL. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1362–72167 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Mayr E, Nogler M, Benedetti MG, Kessler O, Reinthaler A, Krismer M, et al. A prospective randomized assessment of earlier functional recovery in THA patients treated by minimally invasive direct anterior approach: a gait analysis study. Clin Biomech 2009;24:812–18168 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Mazoochian F, Weber P, Schramm S, Utzschneider S, Fottner A, Jansson V. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled prospective trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:1633–9169 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| McCalden RW, Charron KD, Yuan X, Bourne RB, Naudie DD, MacDonald SJ. Randomised controlled trial comparing early migration of two collarless polished cemented stems using radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92B:935–40232 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| McCombe P, Williams SA. A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and cementless cups. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86:344–9205 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Medical Advisory Secretariat. Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2006;6:1–57206 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Meek RD, Allan DB. Cemented versus cementless surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty revision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2:CD005322207 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Montin L, Leino-Kilpi H, Suominen T, Lepisto J. A systematic review of empirical studies between 1966 and 2005 of patient outcomes of total hip arthroplasty and related factors. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:40–5426 | Exclude – no RCTs; not a standard systematic review |
| Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr. Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 2007;78:315–2639 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Moskal JT, Capps SG. Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:1432–7427 | Exclude – comparison of different cup positioning |
| Mouilhade F, Matsoukis J, Oger P, Mandereau C, Brzakala V, Dujardin F. Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: a prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011;97:14–21428 | Exclude – comparison of different approaches |
| Muller M, Schwachmeyer V, Tohtz S, Tohtz S, Duda GN, Perka C, et al. The direct lateral approach: impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132:725–31170 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Muller M, Tohtz S, Springer I, Dewey M, Perka C. Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:179–89171 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM. How active are patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1891–904429 | Exclude – no RCTs; not a standard systematic review |
| Nakamura N, Sugano N, Nishii T, Kakimoto A, Miki H. A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1072–81172 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Nantel J, Termoz N, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Prince F. Gait patterns after total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:463–9430 | Exclude – non-randomised study |
| Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG. Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:874–80431 | Exclude – single-arm cohort study |
| Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG. The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10–12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 2012;83:129–34432 | Exclude – single-arm cohort study |
| Nikolaou VS, Edwards MR, Bogoch E, Schemitsch EH, Waddell JP. A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing three alternative bearing surfaces in primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:459–65233 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Nygaard M, Elling F, Bastholm L, Soballe K, Borgwardt A. No difference in early cellular response of the pseudo-synovial membrane after total hip arthroplasty: comparison of 3 combinations of bearing materials. Acta Orthop 2006;77:402–12433 | Exclude – observational study |
| Nygaard M, Zerahn B, Bruce C, Soballe K, Borgwardt A. Early periprosthetic femoral bone remodelling using different bearing material combinations in total hip arthroplasties: a prospective randomised study. Eur Cells Mater 2004;8:65–72434 | Exclude – no outcome |
| Nysted M, Benum P, Klaksvik J, Foss O, Aamodt A. Periprosthetic bone loss after insertion of an uncemented, customized femoral stem and an uncemented anatomical stem. A randomized DXA study with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop 2011;82:410–16234 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O’Brien S, et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:701–10173 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Pabinger C, Kroner A, Lange A, Eyb R. Cemented titanium stems show high migration: transprosthetic drainage system has no advantage over third-generation cementation technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004;124:489–94435 | Exclude – comparison of different cementation techniques |
| Pakvis D, Luites J, Hellemondt G, Spruit M. A cementless, elastic press-fit socket with and without screws. Acta Orthop 2012;83:481–7174 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Palm L, Jacobsson S-A, Ivarsson I. Hydroxyapatite coating improves 8- to 10-year performance of the Link RS cementless femoral stem. J Arthroplasty 2002;17:172–5436 | Exclude – comparison of different coating techniques |
| Palm L, Olofsson J, Astrom SE, Ivarsson I. No difference in migration or wear between cemented low-profile cups and standard cups: a randomized radiostereographic study of 53 patients over 3 years. Acta Orthop 2007;78:479–84209 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Parvizi J, Tarity TD, Sheikh E, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty: one-stage versus two-stage procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;453:137–41175 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Patel D, Parvizi J, Sharkey PF. Alternative bearing surface options for revision total hip arthroplasty. Instruct Course Lectures 2011;60: 257–67437 | Exclude – review chapter – does not meet criteria for a systematic review |
| Petersen MK, Andersen NT, Mogensen P, Voight M, Soballe K. Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 2011;35:667–74235 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Petersen MK, Andersen NT, Soballe K. Self-reported functional outcome after primary total hip replacement treated with two different perioperative regimes: a follow-up study involving 61 patients. Acta Orthop 2008;79:160–7438 | Exclude – effect of preoperative regime |
| Pitto RP, Blanquaert D, Hohmann D. Alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: zirconia–alumina pairing. Contribution or caveat? Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68:242–50210 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Pitto RP, Hamer H, Fabiani R, Radespiel-Troeger M, Koessler M. Prophylaxis against fat and bone-marrow embolism during total hip arthroplasty reduces the incidence of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis: a controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:39–48439 | Exclude – effect of bone vacuum technique |
| Pitto RP, Schikora N, Willmann G, Graef B, Schmidt R. Radiostereoanalysis of press-fit cups with alumina liner – a randomized clinical trial. Bioceramics 2003;15:817–21211 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mont MA. Results of total hip arthroplasty in patients who have rapidly progressive hip disease: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Med Dev 2012;9:257–62440 | Exclude – no RCT included |
| Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, Knahr K. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:328–37176 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Prudhon JL. Dual-mobility cup and cemented femoral component: 6 year follow-up results. Hip Int 2011;21:713–17441 | Exclude – non-randomised prospective study |
| Rasanen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto AM, Blom M, Ryynanen OP, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop 2007;78:108–15442 | Exclude – non-randomised study |
| Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS, Dua V, Ranawat AS, Rodriguez JA. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of smooth versus rough stems using cement fixation: minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2004;19(7 Suppl. 2):2–9443 | Exclude – comparison of different surface finishes |
| Ratko TA, Aronson N, Ziegler KM, Bonnell CJ. Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing. Chicago, IL: Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Technology Evaluation Center. Assessment Program; 2007444 | Exclude – this systematic review included only one RCT, which is already included in the present review |
| Reininga IH, Wagenmakers R, van den Akker-Scheek I, Stant AD, Groothoff JW, Bulstra SK, et al. Effectiveness of computer-navigated minimally invasive total hip surgery compared to conventional total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007;8:4177 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Reininga IHF, Zijlstra W, Wagenmakers R, Boerboom AL, Huijbers BP, Groothoff JW, et al. Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:92178 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Renkawitz T, Santori FS, Grifka J, Valverde C, Morlock MM, Learmonth ID. A new short uncemented, proximally fixed anatomic femoral implant with a prominent lateral flare: design rationals and study design of an international clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:147445 | Exclude – protocol with no publication of full trial |
| Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:671–9179 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Riddle DL, Stratford PW, Bowman DH. Findings of extensive variation in the types of outcome measures used in hip and knee replacement clinical trials: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum Arthritis Care Res 2008;59:876–83446 | Exclude – non-intervention study |
| Rohrl SM, Nivbrant B, Strom H, Nilsson KG. Effect of augmented cup fixation on stability, wear, and osteolysis: a 5-year follow-up of total hip arthroplasty with RSA. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:962–71447 | Exclude – comparison of different types of cup fixation |
| Saito S, Tokuhashi Y, Ishii T, Mori S, Hosaka K, Taniguchi S. One- versus two-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2010;33180 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Santaguida PL, Hawker GA, Hudak PL, Glazier R, Mahomed NN, Kreder HJ, et al. Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. Can J Surg 2008;51:428–36448 | Exclude – THR/RS not compared; prognostic factors only; no RCTs included |
| Sariali E, Mauprivez R, Khiami F, Pascal-Mousselard H, Catonne Y. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98:151–8181 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Schauss SM, Hinz M, Mayr E, Bach CM, Krismer M, Fischer M. Inferior stability of a biodegradable cement plug. 122 total hip replacements randomized to degradable or non-degradable cement restrictor. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2006;126:324–9449 | Exclude – comparison of different cementing techniques |
| Schmidutz F, Dull T, Voges O, Grupp T, Muller P, Jansson V. Secondary cement injection technique reduces pulmonary embolism in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2012;36:1575–81450 | Exclude – effect of cement injection |
| Schouten R, Malone AA, Tiffen C, Frampton CM, Hooper G. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:1462–7236 | Exclude – Total number of patients < 100 |
| Scott D. Osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Evid Handbook December 2009:398–9451 | Exclude – not a systematic review; no comparative results reported; includes THR and replacement. This is an updated version from 2009, based on 2007 search |
| Seyler TM, Bonutti PM, Shen J, Naughton M, Kester M. Use of an alumina-on-alumina bearing system in total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:116–25452 | Exclude – osteonecrosis patients |
| Sharma V, Morgan PM, Cheng EY. Factors influencing early rehabilitation after THA: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1400–11453 | Exclude – prognostic factors in postoperative patients |
| Shetty V, Shitole B, Shetty G, Thakur H, Bhandari M. Optimal bearing surfaces for total hip replacement in the young patient: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2011;35:1281–7454 | Exclude – no RCTs included |
| Singh JA. Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Open Orthop J 2011;5:80–5455 | Exclude – no RCTs included |
| Singh JA, Kundukulam J, Riddle DL, Strand V, Tugwell P. Early postoperative mortality following joint arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1507–13456 | Exclude – no RCTs included |
| Sluimer JC, Hoefnagels NH, Emans PJ, Kuijer R, Geesink RG. Comparison of two hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems: clinical, functional, and bone densitometry evaluation of patients randomized to a regular or modified hydroxyapatite-coated stem aimed at proximal fixation. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:344–52457 | Exclude – comparison of different cementing techniques |
| Smolders JM, Hol A, Rijnders T, van Susante JL. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement: a prospective randomised controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:1509–14238 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Smolders JM, Hol A, Rijnberg WJ, van Susante JL. Metal ion levels and functional results after either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or conventional metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2011;82:559–66237 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Sonny BB, Aleto TJ, Garino JP, Toni A, Hendricks KJ. Ceramic-on-ceramic versus ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: results of a multicenter prospective randomized study and update of modern ceramic total hip trials in the United States. Hip Int 2005;15:129–35212 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Speranza A, Iorio R, Ferretti M, D’Arrigo C, Ferretti A. A lateral minimal-incision technique in total hip replacement: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Hip Int 2007;17:4–8161 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Stanat SJC, Capozzi JD. Squeaking in third- and fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Meta-analysis and systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:445–53458 | Exclude – prognostic factors for squeaking |
| Stilling M, Rahbek O, Soballe K. Inferior survival of hydroxyapatite versus titanium-coated cups at 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:2872–9459 | Exclude – comparison of different cup coatings |
| Strom H, Kolstad K, Mallmin H, Sahlstedt B, Milbrink J. Comparison of the uncemented Cone and the cemented Bimetric hip prosthesis in young patients with osteoarthritis: an RSA, clinical and radiographic study. Acta Orthop 2006;77:71–8213 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Suda AJ, Knahr K. Early results with the cementless Variall hip system. Expert Rev Med Devices 2009;6:21–5460 | Exclude – lack of statistical comparative data between different THR treatments |
| Tanavalee A, Jaruwannapong S, Yuktanandana P, Itiravivong P. Early outcomes following minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a two-incision approach versus a mini-posterior approach. Hip Int 2006;16(Suppl. 4):17–22162 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Tang Z. Minimally Invasive Total Hip Replacement. No. 4. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment (CCOHTA); 2004163 | Exclude – comparison of different surgical approaches |
| Tarasevicius S, Robertsson O, Wingstrand H. Posterior soft tissue repair in total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Orthopedics 2010;33:871461 | Exclude – effect of soft tissue repair after THR |
| ten Broeke RHM, Hendrickx RPM, Leffers P, Jutten LMC, Geesink RGT. Randomised trial comparing bone remodelling around two uncemented stems using modified Gruen zones. Hip Int 2012;22:41–9462 | Exclude – comparison of different uncemented stems |
| Thien TM, Thanner J, Karrholm J. Randomized comparison between 3 surface treatments of a single anteverted stem design: 84 hips followed for 5 years. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:437–44463 | Exclude – comparison of different stem coatings |
| Thien TM, Thanner J, Karrholm J. Fixation and bone remodeling around a low-modulus stem. Seven-year follow-up of a randomized study with use of radiostereometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:134–42464 | Exclude – comparison of different stem coatings |
| Thomas W, Tafuro L, Thomas S. Osteoinductive gel in cementless hip joint replacement: a randomized prospective study. Curr Orthop Pract 2009;20:655–9465 | Exclude – effect of gel |
| Timperley AJ, Whitehouse SL, Hourigan PG. The influence of a suction device on fixation of a cemented cup using RSA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:792–8466 | Exclude – effect of suction device |
| Ullmark G, Sorensen J, Nilsson O. Analysis of bone formation on porous and calcium phosphate-coated acetabular cups: a randomised clinical [18F]fluoride PET study. Hip Int 2012;22:172–8467 | Exclude – comparison of different stem coatings |
| Vail TP, Goetz D, Tanzer M, Fisher DA, Mohler CG, Callaghan JJ. A prospective randomized trial of cemented femoral components with polished versus grit-blasted surface finish and identical stem geometry. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:95–102468 | Exclude – comparison of different stem coatings |
| Vale L, Wyness L, McCormack K, McKenzie L, Brazzelli M, Stearns SC. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty for treatment of hip disease. Health Technol Assess 2002;6(15)19 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Van der Wal BC, Rahmy AI, Grimm B, Blake GM, Heyligers IC, Tonino AJ. The influence of implant design on periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented HA-coated hip stems. A two-year follow-up study using DEXA. Hip Int 2006;16:8–17469 | Exclude – comparison of different stem coatings |
| Van Der Weegen W, Hoekstra HJ, Sijbesma T, Bos E, Schemitsch EH, Poolman RW. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:298–306470 | Exclude – this systematic review includes only one RCT but no comparative results are reported between RS and THR |
| van Gerwen, Shaerf DA, Veen RM. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of functional outcome. Acta Orthop 2010;81:680–3471 | Exclude – this systematic review includes only one RCT but no comparative results are reported between RS and THR |
| Veldstra R, van Dongen A, Kraaneveld EC. Comparing alumina-reduced and conventional surface grit-blasted acetabular cups in primary THA: early results from a randomised clinical trial. Hip Int 2012;22:296–301472 | Exclude – comparison of different stem coatings |
| Vendittoli PA, Ganapathi M, Duval N, Lavoie P, Roy A, Lavigne M. Randomised controlled trial comparing two methods of acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2007;17:137–42473 | Exclude – comparison of different cup positioning methods |
| Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JA, Arends LR, Furlan AD, Reijman M. Recovery of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Phys Ther 2011;91:615–29474 | Exclude – this systematic review includes only two relevant RCTs, both of which have been included in the present review |
| Vissers MM, Reijman M, Bussmann HB, Arends LR, Verhaar JA. Recovery of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009;17(Suppl. 1):S287–8475 | Exclude – abstract |
| von Schewelov T, Sanzen L, Onsten I, Carlsson A, Besjakov J. Total hip replacement with a zirconium oxide ceramic femoral head: a randomised roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:1631–5214 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Wassilew GI, Perka C, Janz V, Konig C, Asbach P, Hasart O. Use of an ultrasound-based navigation system for an accurate acetabular positioning in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:687–94182 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Weissinger M, Grubl A, Poll G. Serum-cobalt levels with metal-on-metal bearings in the cement-free total hip arthroplasty results covering two years; prospective study. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2011;78:410–15239 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Witzleb WC, Stephan L, Krummenauer F, Neuke A, Gunther KP. Short-term outcome after posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty – a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Med Res 2009;14:256–63183 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Wyness L, Vale L, McCormack K, Grant A, Brazzelli M. The effectiveness of metal on metal hip resurfacing: a systematic review of the available evidence published before 2002. BMC Health Serv Res 2004;4:39215 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Yamauchi Y, Jinno T, Koga D, Asou Y, Morita S, Okawa A. Comparison of different distal designs of femoral components and their effects on bone remodeling in 1-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:1538–43476 | Exclude – comparison of different stem coatings |
| Yang B, Li H, He X, Wang G, Xu S. Minimally invasive surgical approaches and traditional total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and complications outcomes. PLOS ONE 2012;7:e37947184 | Exclude – comparison of different operative approaches |
| Zagra L, Bianchi L, Licari V, Champlon C, Giacometti CR. Gait analysis of THA with different head diameters: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Traumatol 2011;12(1 Suppl.):S149–50477 | Exclude – abstract |
| Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007;15:981–1000216 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:137–6212 | Exclude – a guideline |
| Zhang W, Nuki G, Moskowitz RW, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden NK, et al OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis Part III: changes in evidence following systematic cumulative update of research published through January 2009. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:476–99478 | Exclude – says virtually nothing about THR |
| Zhang Y, Yang T-T, Zhou Y, Ma B-A. Comparison of postoperative curative effect and the possible survival rate of prosthesis following cemented and cementless total hip replacement. Chin J Clin Rehabil 2006;10:10479 | Exclude – observational cohort study |
| Zhou ZK, Li MG, Borlin N, Wood DJ, Nivbrant B. No increased migration in cups with ceramic-on-ceramic bearing: an RSA study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;448:39–45217 | Exclude – publication date before 2008 |
| Zijlstra WP, Bos N, van Raaij JJ. Large head metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasty versus 28 mm metal-on-polyethylene cementless total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:136241 | Exclude – protocol leading to study published later in which total number of patients is < 100 |
| Zijlstra WP, van den Akker-Scheek I, Zee MJ, van Raay JJ. No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop 2011;35:1771–6240 | Exclude – total number of patients < 100 |
| Zwartele RE, Witjes S, Doets HC, Stijnen T, Poll RG. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012;132:535–46480 | Exclude – no RCTs included in this systematic review |
