U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Macdonald G, Livingstone N, Hanratty J, et al. The effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for maltreated children and adolescents: an evidence synthesis. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Sep. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 20.69.)

Cover of The effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for maltreated children and adolescents: an evidence synthesis

The effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for maltreated children and adolescents: an evidence synthesis.

Show details

Appendix 14Overview of acceptability evidence by study interventions

Cognitive–behavioural interventions

StudySample sizeData collectionAnalysisQuality overview
Barker 200548114/67 children; 5 staffInterviewsSummary overviewAims of the research were clearly stated
Methodology and research design were appropriate for qualitative data
Data collection was not adequately described
The findings not clearly described
Buschbacher 2002629n = 1Interviews with foster parent and staff membersAims clearly described but this was a testimonial rather than a research study
One of the treatment team conducted interviews with foster mother and colleagues
Retrospective interview in one successful case
High risk of bias
Chasson 2008482n = 99Withdrawal metricsMultiple regression analysisAims were clearly stated and the methodology and research design were appropriate
Data collection was adequately described
Potential confounders not added to statistical model
Findings were clearly described
Chasson 2013630n = 134 (99 from Chasson 2008)Withdrawal metricsRegression analysis of trauma characteristics as predictors of attritionAims were clearly stated and the methodology and research design were appropriate
Data collection was adequately described
Potential confounders were not added to statistical model
Findings clearly described
Eslinger 2014631n = 115Baseline, post treatment and 3 monthsMultinomial logistic regression of predictors of dropoutStudy design was appropriate
Sampling methods were not sufficiently clear; age range was quite wide and sample heterogeneous
Data analysis was appropriate
Fraynt 2014632n = 562Factors predicting treatment engagementBinominal regression; multinomial logistic regressionStudy design and sampling was appropriate; however, the study did not measure the type of intervention received other than individual or group treatment, which limited the validity of the study
Data collection methods and measures were appropriate for the population and the analysis was adequate for the aim of the study
Hubel 2014492n = 99; n = 67 analysedChild and parent client evaluation formStudy design was appropriate but the acceptability questionnaire lacks validity, as it relied on satisfaction ratings
Findings were clearly reported
Kolko 1996108n = 25 CBT, n = 18 FT, n = 12 controlTreatment expectancy (Likert scale)
Brief telephone calls to parents
Post-treatment CEI
Study design appropriate and procedure were clearly described
Standardised measures were used with evidence of reliability and validity
Findings were reported clearly
Lange 2010497n = 24Client satisfaction: general, with treatment and with therapists
Interviews plus 10-point rating scale (1 = high)
Attrition
Study design appropriate and procedure were clearly described
Sampling through the media open to bias
Standardised measures were used with evidence of reliability and validity; however, acceptability was measured using subjective satisfaction ratings
Findings were clearly presented
McPherson 2012633n = 254Treatment completionUnivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression modelsAppropriate study design and sampling
Data collection based on electronic medical files which relies on accuracy of record-keeping
Data analysis was appropriate and clearly described
Salloum 2014504n = 6Parents completed expectancy rating form; client satisfaction questionnaire plus treatment costs calculated with the time tracking systemStudy design was appropriate
Acceptability measure relied on satisfaction ratings, although used a questionnaire that used in other research; however, no ‘depth’ of data was captured by this measure, such as why caregivers were or were not satisfied with treatment
Findings were clearly reported
San Diego 20116805/6 of those referredParticipants’ journals, therapy notes, and interviewsIPAStudy was well designed, and appropriate data collection methods and analysis were used
Findings were clearly reported
Ethical considerations were not clearly outlined
Silovsky 2007505n = 85CSBP preschool group satisfaction and social validity questionnaire – caregiver satisfactionStudy design was appropriate but measure of acceptability relies on satisfaction ratings
Findings were clearly reported
Smith 2008506n = 6Client satisfaction questionnaireStudy design was appropriate but measure of acceptability relies on satisfaction ratings
Findings only partially reported descriptively

CSBP, Children with Sexual Behavior Problems; IPA, interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Acceptability of attachment-based interventions

StudySample sizeData collectionAnalysis methodQuality overview
Cross 2013634n = 1085; 60% retainedCase file dataSingle predictors of study retention – logistic regression
Multivariate predictors of study retention – multivariate regression remodelling
One site was excluded because it did not comply with study protocol
Programme content and delivery varied across the 15 sites
Osofsky 2007515n = 346 children; n = 57 dyadsCaregivers’ and therapists’ qualitative impressions of treatmentStudy design suffered from differing procedures across sites
Some measures used were standardised and had evidence of reliability and validity, although impressions of treatment was measured using satisfaction ratings of ‘yes’ or ‘no’
Findings were clearly presented but lacked depth
Sudbery 2010663Experiences reports of n = 45 childrenInterviews; content analysis of files and organisational documents; children; surveys of social workers and othersStudy was adequately designed and described and the findings were clearly reported
Powell 2010662n = 5 children, n = 4 mothers and 1 grandmotherSemistructured qualitative interviewsMethodology and research design were appropriate for the research aims
Data were reported clearly and thoroughly
It is unclear whether or not ethical issues were considered

Acceptability of parent–child interaction therapy

StudySample sizeData collectionAnalysis methodQuality overview
Timmer 2004656102 kin; 157 non-kin foster carersTreatment completionThe study design was limited by having no control group
Patterns of termination of treatment were measured by clinician discharge sheets
Results were reported in full and the analysis is appropriate

Acceptability of parent training interventions

StudySample sizeData collectionAnalysis methodQuality overview
Ducharme 2000510n = 28 parents
n = 15 children from n = 9 families
Eight mothers completed the satisfaction questionnaireThe study design was limited by not having a control group
Treatment satisfaction was measured using mother’s self-report rating scales
It is unclear how perceptions of treatment was measured and analysed
Results were limited by not reporting variance
Golding 2004511n = 44 children, n = 41 foster carersParticipant satisfaction questionnaire, qualitative evaluation, group facilitator feedbackStudy design and methodology were appropriate
Findings were clearly reported
Taban 2001635n = 45 families health training, n = 37 home accident prevention; n = 31 PCITThree social validity questionnaires developed specifically for the studyStudy design was appropriate
Social validity questionnaire was well developed, but relied on satisfaction ratings as a measure of acceptability
Findings were partially reported

Acceptability of family/systemic interventions

StudySample sizeData collectionAnalysis methodQuality overview
Conran 1993621n = 2, mother and daughterInterviewsThis single case study was not adequately designed or reported
Costa 2009678n = 28; n = 8 families interviewedQuestionnaires, children drawings, evaluation of the effects of conversations and actions in familiesQualitative epistemologyThe study aims and objectives were clearly stated and the research methodology was appropriate
Reporting of findings was appropriate
Danielson 2010526n = 103–6 months post treatment
Ecological functioning measure treatment satisfaction and adherence
Study was well designed, and the data collection, analysis and findings were clearly reported
Tjersland 2006673n = 23 families, n = 32 childrenObservational data from therapeutic sessions; interviews with mothers, children and alleged perpetratorsDescriptive coding developed by two therapists, independently rated to verify categorisationSome relevant points about the tension that mothers feel between not wanting to talk about the abuse/suspected abuse to protect their child, but also wanting to help them
Nothing useful on children’s perspectives
Woodworth 1991533n = 16/22N = 40 interviews with n = 13 incest victims, n = 12 offenders, n = 2 siblingsPoorly described
Opportunistic sampling, insufficient methodological information to be able to properly assess the quality of the work

Acceptability of psychoeducation interventions

Study and locationSample size; response rateData collection: acceptabilityAnalysis methodQuality overview
Barth 1994161n = 15Brief client satisfaction surveyStudy design was appropriate but acceptability measures relied on satisfaction ratings with no other detail
Findings were clearly reported
Boisvert 2008658n = 116‘Dropout’ defined as someone who agrees to therapy and participates in at least one session and then stops before the half-way point without the therapists approval or an agreement that treatment is finished (Garfield 1994804)Univariate and multivariate analyses exploring relationships between dropout and sexual abuse, individual and family characteristicsStudy design did not include a control group and compared characteristics of only treatment completers and those who dropped out
Standardised measures were used but the study did not describe the treatment in any detail or measure effectiveness, which limited the conclusions of the study
Hyde 1995538Interview and ratingStudy procedure is unclear
Measures used had evidence of reliability and validity and were age appropriate
Analysis of data is unclear
Rushton 2000664n = 58; n = 46 mothers, n = 19 foster/adoptive mothers; 14 carersCarer interviews – 1- and 2-year follow-up
Follow-up interviews with carers’ workers 1 year after start of treatment
Methodology and research design were appropriate for the research aims
The research findings were reported clearly

Acceptability of group work for children

Study and locationSample sizeData collection: acceptabilityAnalysis methodQuality overview
Ashby 1987636n = 9Acceptability and usefulness evaluation rating on numerical scale – midway and final group; school counsellor reportsThe research aims were clearly described but the methodology, analysis and findings were not clearly reported
Baker 2001637n = 5–14Satisfaction ratings; evaluations conducted in 1997, 1998 and 2000
Four group evaluations and follow-up telephone survey of n = 7 terminated clients
The research aims were clearly described but the methodology, analysis and findings were not clearly reported
De Luca 1995170n = 35 intervention
n = 35 control
Child-report measuresStudy design was limited by no control group
Treatment satisfaction was measured using self-report social validation ratings by children and parents
Presentation of results was limited to percentages
Unclear how themes responded to were identified
Grayston 1996659n = 6Child feedback and parent feedback questionnairesResearch aims were clearly defined and methodology is appropriate
Data collection and ethical considerations were not described in detail
Findings were reported clearly
Gustafsson 1995676n = 19Semistructured interviews with group therapistsResearch was well designed but findings were not clearly reported
Monck 1996169n = 47Participant ratingStudy design was appropriate but the wide scope means that interventions lack specificity in terms of aims and theoretical underpinning
Although randomised, small sample size
Data collection lacked detail in description and appeared to lack sophistication in terms of non-standardised measures and the use of subjective rating scales
Data analysis lacked complexity and included a simplistic presentation of ratings
Peled 1992639n = 30Interviews plus observationsAims and methodology were well explained, and data collection and analysis appropriate
Findings were clearly reported

Acceptability of counselling interventions

Study and locationSample size; response rateData collection: acceptabilityAnalysis methodQuality overview
Baginsky 2001640n = 130Telephone interviews (Italy)
Interviews, letters, telephone and questionnaires (the Netherlands)
Individual and group interviews (UK)
Summary overviewResearch was well designed but data collection methods were not similar across the three countries and may not have been representative
Findings were clearly reported
Fowler 1992641n = 35Seven-point Likert scaleThe study design is appropriate for the research aims although is limited by a sample that includes only girls
Gender preference was measured using only self-reported rating scores
Results were reported in full and the analysis was appropriate
Fowler 1993642n = 20Pre- and post-treatment preference statedAlthough the study design was appropriate, sampling methods may not be representative of the typical population
The method of data collection is questionable, as data were collected post intervention but longer-term follow-up may have been more informative
Age range was wide and may have been too heterogeneous
The type of data analysis conducted was appropriate
Haight 2010175n = 15Views from children, caregivers and community clinicians; field notesEmic coding
Haskett 1991657n = 129Factors associated with treatment entryStudy design was appropriate and the sampling included all referred cases within a set time frame
Data relied on parents self-reports with no use of standardised questionnaires
The same therapists were also used as researchers; however, the analysis was appropriate and thorough
Kilcrease-Fleming 1992643n = 20Three counselling process rating scales of videotaped interviewsAn innovative design using observer ratings but with an unclear methodology in terms of participant recruitment, intervention type
Although measures were designed for the study and lack prior use or testing, clear efforts were made to improve the reliability of the measures
The analysis was appropriate but the small sample size hampered generalisations
Kolko 1999644n = 86Children and parents completed an evaluation of the level of perceived service needs, motivation and interests, goals or expectations and obstacles; interviewed at study intake and 4–8 months after initial servicePredictors of service use computed using Pearson’s correlations or chi-squared testsA clear study design, participant recruitment strategy and assessment schedule
Measures included standardised and non-standardised measures
Analysis was appropriate and findings were clearly presented
Nelson-Gardell 2001638n = 34 plus five focus groupsFocus group methodology to address the issues of interestThematic analysisThe aims of the research were clearly defined and the methodology was appropriate to meet these aims
Data analysis was not fully described
Findings were reported clearly
Overlien 2011674n = 50 women’s refuges directors, n = 22 childrenFace-to-face interviews, age-appropriate schedulesGrounded theory approachStudy design was appropriate, analysis was adequate and findings were clearly reported
Unclear if all ethical considerations were made
Porter 1996645n = 27Client Behavior System745 – verbalisation measureStudy design was appropriate overall but relies on the measurement of verbalisation within one specific session; however, attempts were made to blind therapists to the study aims and observer raters were recruited externally and trained to standardise ratings using a predetermined protocol (the Client Behavior System)
Findings were clearly reported, although descriptions lack direction, such as reporting that non-abuse-related questions elicited significantly more non-abuse-related answers
Reddy 2013176n = 70Qualitative post-treatment feedbackStudy design was appropriate as was sampling. However, data collection for treatment acceptability relied on non-standardised rating scales. Findings were reported clearly
Scott 1996677n = 10 families (n = 17 children)In-depth interviews with parentsResearch aims were not clearly stated but research design and data collection clearly described
Findings were clearly reported
Deb 2011679n = 120Quantitative and qualitative dataThe study design was appropriate for the aims of the research
It is unclear how perceptions of treatment were measured and analysed
Results were limited to descriptive narratives and percentages
Thompson 2011646n = 40Semistructured interviews developed to elicit information about mothers and youth experiences and satisfaction with mental health services – Mother Interview Guide and Youth Interview GuideThe methodology and research design were appropriate for the research aims
The research findings were reported clearly

Acceptability of psychotherapy interventions

Study and locationSample size; response rateData collection: acceptabilityAnalysis methodQuality overview
Davies 2009665n = 4Single time point interview of children’s experiences of participationIPAAims of the research were clearly defined and the methodology was appropriate to meet these aims
Findings were reported clearly
Horowitz 1997647n = 81Therapy experiences gathered from parentsRegression analysesStudy was part of a larger longitudinal study but the design suffers from a reliance on therapists’ own feedback, lacking child feedback and a lack of clarity on the type of intervention other than the format (individual, family or group); however, the analysis of data was appropriate and findings were clearly reported
Jensen 2010675n = 15Follow-up interview in child’s homeContent analysis guided by Bordin’s conceptualisation of the working allianceAims of the research were clearly defined and the methodology was appropriate to meet these aims
Findings were reported clearly
Lippert 2008648n = 101Case record review
Caregiver interview including ‘perceptions related to therapy’
Systematic and appropriate study design, including both quantitative and qualitative components
Measures used were standardised and interviews used a predetermined protocol
Data analysis was appropriate, although reported results lacked qualitative depth

IPA, interpretative phenomenological analysis.

Acceptability of peer-mentoring interventions

Study and locationSample size; response rateData collection: acceptabilityAnalysis methodQuality overview
Alaggia 199966024 families, 26 childrenInterviewed a sample of parents, youths and professionalsSummary overviewAims of the research were clearly defined and the methodology was appropriate to meet these aims
Data analysis was not fully described
Findings were reported clearly

Acceptability of therapeutic residential care interventions

Study and locationSample size; response rateData collection: acceptabilityAnalysis methodQuality overview
Cunningham 2009649n = 130Semistructured interviews with RTC staff; school, clinical and residential treatment team questionnaires (T2 and T3); data from client case filesInductive thematic coding; confirmatory factor analysisStudy design was adequate, and method was clearly described and appropriate
Data were collected over a number of time points (weeks after admission, the approximate midpoint of the client’s stay, immediately prior to discharge and 4 months after discharge) and from multiple sources
Clear thought was given to the age-appropriateness and ethics of data collection from young people
Thematic analysis and factor analysis were both appropriate and reported in detail
Gallagher 201266616/34Semistructured interviewsSummary overviewStudy was well designed and described, and the findings were clearly reported
Leenarts 2013672n = 154Multiple linear regression for treatment motivation. Logistic regression to identify possible predictors for dropoutAppropriate study design and sampling
Measures had evidence of reliability and validity
Appropriate data analysis and findings were clearly reported
Shennum 1995650n = 80Qualitative interviews with participantsSummary overviewAppropriate study design but sampling was unclear
Measures had evidence of reliability and validity
Data analysis could have been more rigorous but findings were clearly reported
West 2014651n = 39Focus groupThematic analysisAims, methodology, data collection and analysis were all good quality; however, the content may not be very relevant to our review – it is more focused on the components that a good intervention for externalising behaviour in a school setting should contain

RTC, residential treatment centre.

Acceptability of enhanced foster care interventions

Study and locationSample size; response rateData collection: acceptabilityAnalysisQuality overview
Biehal 2012145,146n = 219; RCT n = 34; observational n = 185
Case studies n = 20
Postal questionnaires; interviews; reports; parent recordsBivariate and multivariate analyses plus thematic analyses of interview data and more in-depth analyses of case study dataAims and progress of the study clearly stated
Criteria for case study selection clear and appropriate
Data analyses appropriate and findings clearly described
Laan 2001671n = 78Case notes and questionnaire dataAnalysis of questionnaire data; thematic analysis of case notesStudy design was appropriate
Data collection relied on satisfaction ratings, although bias was addressed by matching with qualitative answers when given
Satisfaction ratings were clearly presented but there is limited reporting of qualitative findings
Staines 2011667n = 450Questionnaires – foster parents and social workers; at placement start and 1 year onSummary overviewA well-designed study with appropriate data collection measures
Questionnaires were anonymised to prevent bias
Findings were clearly reported

RCT, randomised controlled trial.

Acceptability of activity-based Interventions

Study and locationSample size; response rateData collection: acceptabilityAnalysisQuality overview
Bannister 1996668n = 6Pre- and post-treatment interviews with social worker, carer and childAims, methodology, analysis and findings were not clearly described
Burgon 2011669n = 7Qualitative interviews, field note observationsQualitative, participative and reflexive ethnography; thematic analysisAims, methods and design of the study were appropriate
Recruitment of sample was unclear and author was participant researcher, which may be subject to bias
Reporting of findings were clear
Gilbert 1988652Group attendance ranged from two to six children (average attendance n = 4)Art qualitative feedbackAims and methodology were clearly described but data collection and analysis were lacking in depth
Hill 2009670
UK
13 families: mothers n = 12, fathers/stepfathers n = 4
Children n = 28
Qualitative case study of 13 cases files plus in-depth interviews with therapists (n = 27), parents (n = 18) and children (n = 3)Thematic analysisAims, methods and design of the study were appropriate
Data analysis was adequate
Reporting of findings are clear
Mishna 2012661n = 1163 interviews were conducted at 6, 12 and 18 months with parents, teachers and therapistsGrounded theory approachAims of the research were clearly stated, and the methodology and research design were appropriate
Data collection was adequate described and the findings were clearly described
Copyright © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2016. This work was produced by Macdonald et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.

Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License.

Bookshelf ID: NBK385389

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this title (4.2M)

Other titles in this collection

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...