NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Walton M, Wade R, Claxton L, et al. Selective internal radiation therapies for unresectable early-, intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020 Sep. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 24.48.)
Selective internal radiation therapies for unresectable early-, intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation.
Show detailsTABLE 43
Intervention | Comparator | HR (95% CrI) | |
---|---|---|---|
ITT | Per protocol | ||
SIR-Spheres | Sorafenib | 0.94 (0.68 to 1.26) | 1.13 (0.86 to 1.46) |
SIR-Spheres | Lenvatinib | 0.92 (0.52 to 1.51) | 1.11 (0.66 to 1.74) |
TheraSphere | SIR-Spheres | 0.46 (0.19 to 0.94) | 0.42 (0.19 to 0.82) |
TheraSphere | Sorafenib | 0.42 (0.18 to 0.83) | 0.48 (0.20 to 0.97) |
TheraSphere | Lenvatinib | 0.41 (0.15 to 0.89) | 0.46 (0.17 to 1.02) |
Lenvatinib | Sorafenib | 1.07 (0.67 to 1.63) | 1.07 (0.70 to 1.58) |
SD | 0.11 (0.004 to 0.352) | 0.13 (0.005 to 0.378) | |
DIC | 0.9 | 2.1 | |
pD | 3.4 | 3.4 |
pD, number of parameters.
TABLE 44
Intervention | Comparator | HR (95% CrI), random effects | |
---|---|---|---|
OS | PFS | ||
SIR-Spheres | Sorafenib | 0.97 (0.73 to 1.26) | 1.15 (0.89 to 1.45) |
SIR-Spheres | Lenvatinib | 1.58 (0.40 to 4.21) | 1.12 (0.68 to 1.73) |
Lenvatinib | Sorafenib | 0.87 (0.23 to 2.33) | 1.07 (0.70 to 1.57) |
SD | 0.11 (0.004 to 0.352) | 0.12 (0.005 to 0.367) | |
DIC | –1.69 | 2.18 | |
pD | 2.4 | 2.5 |
pD, number of parameters.
TABLE 45
Intervention | Comparator | OS HR (95% CrI) |
---|---|---|
SIR-Spheres | Sorafenib | 1.15 (0.89 to 1.45) |
SIR-Spheres | Lenvatinib | 1.11 (0.68 to 1.73) |
TheraSphere | SIR-Spheres | 0.50 (0.26 to 0.89) |
TheraSphere | Sorafenib | 0.58 (0.29 to 1.06) |
TheraSphere | Lenvatinib | 0.56 (0.24 to 1.13) |
Lenvatinib | Sorafenib | 1.07 (0.70 to 1.57) |
TABLE 46
Intervention | Comparator | OS HR (95% CrI) | |
---|---|---|---|
ITT population | Per-protocol population | ||
SIR-Spheres | Sorafenib | 1.16 (0.71 to 1.78) | 1.03 (0.63 to 1.61) |
SIR-Spheres | Lenvatinib | 1.13 (0.55 to 2.09) | 1.02 (0.49 to 1.88) |
Lenvatinib | Sorafenib | 1.08 (0.65 to 1.71) | 1.08 (0.65 to 1.71) |
SD | 0.15 (0.006 to 0.426) | 0.15 (0.006 to 0.426) | |
DIC | 0.92 | 1.1 | |
pD | 2.0 | 2.0 |
pD, number of parameters.
- Random-effects network meta-analysis results - Selective internal radiation ther...Random-effects network meta-analysis results - Selective internal radiation therapies for unresectable early-, intermediate- or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation
- Clinical case report form - The Role of Ultrasound Compared to Biopsy of Tempora...Clinical case report form - The Role of Ultrasound Compared to Biopsy of Temporal Arteries in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (TABUL): a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study
- Search strategies - Interventions to Reduce or Prevent Obesity in Pregnant Women...Search strategies - Interventions to Reduce or Prevent Obesity in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review
- Completion of the clinical case report form - The Role of Ultrasound Compared to...Completion of the clinical case report form - The Role of Ultrasound Compared to Biopsy of Temporal Arteries in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (TABUL): a diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness study
- References - The second Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness, cost-effecti...References - The second Randomised Evaluation of the Effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and Acceptability of Computerised Therapy (REEACT-2) trial: does the provision of telephone support enhance the effectiveness of computer-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy? A randomised controlled trial
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...