This work was produced by Przulj et al. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited.
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Przulj D, Pesola F, Myers Smith K, et al. Helping pregnant smokers quit: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of electronic cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Jul. (Health Technology Assessment, No. 27.13.)
Helping pregnant smokers quit: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of electronic cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy.
Show detailsOverview of trial design
This was a pragmatic multi-centre RCT comparing ECs with NPs, with both interventions accompanied by the same brief behavioural support.
Objectives and hypothesis
The objective of the study was to compare ECs and NPs in effectiveness in helping pregnant smokers quit and in their safety. We hypothesised that ECs would be more effective than NPs. We did not formulate any hypotheses regarding comparative safety of the two products.
Participants
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Participants were eligible if they were pregnant (between 12 and 24 weeks’ gestation); aged ≥18 years or over; smoked on a daily basis and wanted help in stopping smoking; were willing to be randomised to use either NPs or ECs and to receive weekly support and follow-up calls; and could understand English to a level that permitted data collection.
Participants were ineligible if they had a known allergic reaction to nicotine skin patches; were currently using any NRT or EC on a daily basis; were taking part in another stop-smoking study; or had a serious medical problem or high-risk pregnancy at the time of initial consent. (Note: we did not withdraw participants if their pregnancy became high risk during the trial as this could have biased the evaluation of safety outcomes.)
Recruitment
Participants were recruited in several ways, depending on the resources of the site: identified by research midwives from patient records and sent the patient information sheet and invitation letters (alongside 12- or 20-week scan appointment letters if appropriate); invited via telephone, email or text; or approached in person and asked to complete a screening questionnaire when they attended antenatal hospital appointments. Community midwives who saw pregnant smokers at booking appointments or at other routine care appointments could refer pregnant smokers interested in the study to the research team. Specialist pregnancy stop-smoking advisors could also refer smokers interested in the study, and posters advertising the study were placed within the sites’ clinics (see Appendix 1).
Settings and locations
Participants were recruited from 23 hospital sites across England, and one NHS SSS in Scotland. Once randomised into the study, stop-smoking advisors and researchers at the Health and Lifestyle Research Unit (HAL), Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), delivered the interventions and conducted follow-up calls. Data were collected in person at the baseline visit, and over the phone or via online/postal questionnaires at follow-ups.
Trial procedures
Smokers who were interested in the study were provided with the patient information sheet. If they decided to take part, they were invited to the baseline visit, arranged where possible to coincide with their hospital appointments.
Baseline visit and informed consent procedures
At the baseline visit, a research midwife further explained the study and any queries were discussed. Eligibility to take part in the study was then checked, and participants signed the informed consent form and were given a copy for their records. Midwives taking consent undertook Good Clinical Practice training. After providing consent, participants were asked to complete a baseline questionnaire and to provide a saliva sample (which was then posted to HAL). They were then randomised to use either NPs or ECs. The midwife then demonstrated the relevant product to the participant and answered any questions. A convenient date and time was then arranged for the first support call with the stop-smoking advisor. This was usually in a week’s time.
Participants were informed that their product would be posted to them in time for their first call (for details see Interventions).
To limit contamination, participants were asked, should they wish to use the non-allocated product (ECs in the NP arm and NRT in the EC arm – use of other NRT products than patches in the NP arm was allowed), to refrain from doing so for at least the first 4 weeks of the intervention period.
Eligibility confirmation
Medically qualified site Principal Investigators (PIs) (usually a senior obstetrician) were asked to review the study documents and confirm the participants’ eligibility. As the site PIs were not present at baseline visits, this was normally done following randomisation, but PIs were blinded to treatment allocation during this process. In eight cases (four in each study arm), randomised participants were withdrawn before starting the intervention. In four cases the PIs considered the participants ineligible, in one case only verbal consent was taken, one pregnancy was terminated before the study product was received and one participant was using patches daily. One participant was randomised twice.
Interventions
E-cigarette arm
Participants were provided with a Tobacco Product Directive approved refillable EC starter kit (One Kit by the UK ECIG STORE®, Wembley, UK), together with two 10 ml bottles of tobacco-flavoured e-liquid (18 mg/ml) and a pack of five replacement coils. An instructional leaflet was also provided (see Appendix 2). The EC starter pack was posted to participants a few days ahead of their first support call. Further supplies of e-liquid were posted out to participants for up to 8 weeks. A lower strength e-liquid (11 mg) and fruit flavours were available if participants did not like the original e-liquid posted out, and participants were encouraged to shop around if these were also unsuitable or they preferred a different EC device to the one provided.
Nicotine patch arm
Participants were posted an initial 2-week supply of Nicorette® Invisi (McNeil Products Ltd., High Wycombe, UK) 15 mg/16-hour NPs a few days ahead of their first support call. They were instructed to use them every day, placing them on a suitable area of the skin in the morning upon waking and removing before bedtime. Further supplies were posted out to participants for up to 8 weeks. A lower strength patch (10 mg/16 hours) was available as an alternative. Participants were encouraged to seek out other NRT products (such as the gum, lozenges, spray, etc.) via their general practitioner (GP) or local SSS if they felt they were struggling with the patch alone. Standard stop-smoking advice was also provided (see Weekly support calls).
Weekly support calls
Participants in both arms were scheduled to receive six support calls on a weekly basis. The support provided followed that of usual advice given in the UK SSS35 and was conducted by trained stop-smoking advisors. Calls were scheduled at times convenient to the participants. If calls were not answered, a further two attempts to contact the participant were made via phone, followed by a text asking for when would be a good time to call.
A text reminder was sent the day before the first call. At this first call, the receipt of the product was checked and participants were guided on how to use it. They discussed their past experience with quit attempts and set up their target quit date (TQD). Participants could choose to start using their product immediately or wait until the TQD.
A second call was conducted on or near the TQD. The advisor checked on any product issues and discussed quitting strategies (e.g. preparing for the TQD, avoiding triggers to smoking and distracting themselves with other tasks). Participants were encouraged to avoid taking even a single puff of a cigarette from the TQD onwards and to use their products on a regular basis. The first call took up to 20 minutes, the other calls took on average 10 minutes.
If participants wanted to have their TQD straight after the first call, the contents of the first and second calls were combined.
During the further four weekly calls, the advisors checked on clients’ progress, supplies of e-liquid/patches and any product-related issues, and offered guidance on maintaining abstinence/stopping smoking. At the final call, participants were given information on how to get further product supplies if they wished to continue using the products (e.g. purchase own e-liquid or obtain NRT prescriptions from GP or from local SSS) and were informed that a final supply could be sent out to them in the next 2 weeks upon request. Participants were also reminded that they would be contacted for a follow-up around their due date.
Follow-up calls
Two follow-ups were conducted, one at the EOP to collect effectiveness and safety data and another at 3 months post partum, requested by the study funder, to collect additional health outcomes of the mother and infant. Text reminders were sent prior to these calls. If participants were not contactable via phone, then emails, texts, postal and online questionnaires were sent to obtain the data. The follow-up efforts at EOP used the following protocol: two calls and text in week 1; two calls and text in week 2; one call in week 3 followed by posting a questionnaire, emailing it and a text; no contact during weeks 4–5 to allow return of questionnaires; two calls in week 6; one text in week 7; two calls in week 8; one text in week 9; one call in week 10; one text in week 11 followed by an email; one call in week 12; one text in week 13; one call in week 14; and a final text in week 15. The follow-up efforts at 3 months post partum were as follows: two calls and text in week 1; one call in week 2 followed by posting and emailing of questionnaire and a text; no contact during weeks 3–4 to allow return of questionnaires; one call and one text in week 5; and a final call in week 6.
To prevent distress to participants, the co-ordinating office sent a list of participants due for follow-up to the local research teams to identify participants who had experienced an event which could make follow-up distressing, and to advise whether follow-up should be attempted. A text reminder was also sent to all participants the day before their follow-up call was due to take place. Participants were asked to text back if they did not wish to be called. Participants were also able to text back their smoking status if a call was not convenient.
As the majority of pregnant smokers who abstain during pregnancy return to smoking after delivery,6,36 the first follow-up call was made at 35 weeks’ gestation. Following an example from a recent trial,37 to increase the chance of reaching participants, the period for data collection was from 35 weeks’ gestation to 10 weeks post estimated delivery date.
Participants reporting abstinence from smoking, those who were using both cigarettes and NRT/ECs (‘dual users’) and those who reported a reduction of cigarette consumption of 50% or more were asked to provide a saliva sample. Saliva sample kits and instruction on use were posted with a self-addressed envelope for the return of the sample. Once received by the study team, the participants were sent a text to thank them and £20 was sent in the post for their time and effort.
During the last 14 months of the study, we also asked self-reported abstainers using nicotine-containing products to attend local study sites to provide a CO reading. Once the site sent the CO reading to the study team, the participants were sent a text to thank them and £20 was sent in the post for their time and effort.
A further amendment was approved in January 2020 to see if any improvement in sample returns could be achieved by including £10 with the sampling kit (an upfront payment) and sending a further £10 when the saliva sample was returned (total remained £20). This was implemented in February 2020.
Measures
The following were collected at baseline (for categories and units, e.g. age in years, ng/ml, see Table 3):
- demographics: age, ethnicity, employment, whether living with a partner and level of education
- smoking history: Fagerström Test for Cigarette Dependence (FTCD),38 cigarettes per day, previous stop-smoking product use, longest previous period of abstinence and whether they live with other smokers
- saliva sample to measure nicotine intake via cotinine levels.
The following were collected weekly (from 1 to 4 weeks post TQD), and at EOP:
- smoking status
- allocated product use during the trial: on how many days per week; product type; reasons for stopping/switching (where applicable); for ECs only: e-liquid flavour and strength
- non-allocated product use (same as above)
- contact with local SSS
- adverse events (AEs) and adverse reactions (ARs), and infant AEs at 3 months post partum
- at EOP only: weeks of using products regularly (on ≥5 days/week) and weeks of using occasionally (at least once a week)
- respiratory health questionnaire asking about shortness of breath, phlegm, wheezing and cough39
- in participants reporting abstinence from smoking: salivary cotinine and anabasine or CO reading (in abstainers using nicotine products)
- in participants reporting reduction of smoking by at least 50% and in those reporting both smoking and using nicotine products: salivary cotinine.
Birth outcomes were also collected by research staff at the participating site via hospital records.
- Methods - Helping pregnant smokers quit: a multi-centre randomised controlled tr...Methods - Helping pregnant smokers quit: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of electronic cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy
- List of abbreviations - Optimal pharmacotherapy pathway in adults with diabetic ...List of abbreviations - Optimal pharmacotherapy pathway in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: the OPTION-DM
- List of abbreviations - Progesterone to prevent miscarriage in women with early ...List of abbreviations - Progesterone to prevent miscarriage in women with early pregnancy bleeding: the PRISM RCT
- Assessment of cost-effectiveness - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and/or colour du...Assessment of cost-effectiveness - Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and/or colour duplex ultrasound for surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and economic evaluation
- Discussion - Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted pod...Discussion - Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls prevention in older people: a multicentre cohort randomised controlled trial (the REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention trial)
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
See more...