TABLE 10Vaccination

IdealA vaccine meeting acceptable standards should be available.
Field officers should have the necessary storage facilities to maintain full vaccine viability.
A contingency stock should be readily available.
Vaccination for the exposed animals in the first outbreak should be provided as a control measure by the official veterinary service.
ActualIs vaccination coverage as it should be or very variable?
Is a ready supply of the vaccine rapidly available?
Are there storage facilities for the vaccine at field level?
Are vaccine campaigns of adequate duration?
Is vaccination supplied and applied by the official veterinary service?
Constraints
(on achieving the ideal)
To what extent do the following prevent achieving the ideal and how can their influence be reduced:
  • perceived cost to the stock owner;
  • perception of failure from the cycle of “free” vaccination → retroactive immunization → perceived failure →loss of confidence in vaccination on the part of the stock owner.
Importance of vaccinationVaccination and safe disposal of carcasses are the hub of anthrax control in endemic areas.

Note. For maximum success, vaccination as a control measure should be applied together with other control measures and continued for a full specified period (frequently three years is the period specified in a region with a history of regular or periodic outbreaks). Attention needs to be paid to problems that may arise if antibiotics are being administered to the animals for any reason (see section 7.2.1.3, Annex 6, section 1.4). It makes sense in many endemic regions to use combined vaccines, such as BQ/Anthrax vaccine.

Vaccines are generally available (see Annex 5). Problems largely relate to the attitudes of farmers (Dietvorst, 1996a), cost, and logistics of carrying out and evaluating the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns. Examples of the sort of resistance on the part of farmers to vaccination, and the rationale for this resistance, are well covered by Dietvorst (1996a). As a first example, vaccination initiated in response to an outbreak has led to the situation in which the vaccine has been administered to animals already infected and which have died shortly after. This results in, at best, loss of faith in the vaccine and, at worst, a belief that the vaccine killed the animal(s). A second example is a belief that animals must be rested for two weeks after vaccination; frequently farmers feel they are unable to cease work for this period. The earliest identification of anthrax infection and application of annual vaccination of susceptible animals before the anthrax season in endemic areas will overcome most of these negative attitudes.

From: 9, Anthrax surveillance

Cover of Anthrax in Humans and Animals
Anthrax in Humans and Animals. 4th edition.
Copyright © World Health Organization 2008.

All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: tni.ohw@sredrokoob). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: tni.ohw@snoissimrep).

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.