U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_007373.4(SHOC2):c.1594A>G (p.Ser532Gly) AND not specified

Germline classification:
Benign (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Feb 17, 2020
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000128044.7

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_007373.4(SHOC2):c.1594A>G (p.Ser532Gly)]

NM_007373.4(SHOC2):c.1594A>G (p.Ser532Gly)

Gene:
SHOC2:SHOC2 leucine rich repeat scaffold protein [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
10q25.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_007373.4(SHOC2):c.1594A>G (p.Ser532Gly)
Other names:
p.S532G:AGC>GGC; NM_007373.3(SHOC2):c.1594A>G
HGVS:
  • NC_000010.11:g.111011663A>G
  • NG_028922.1:g.97121A>G
  • NM_001269039.3:c.1456A>G
  • NM_001324336.2:c.1594A>G
  • NM_001324337.2:c.1594A>G
  • NM_007373.4:c.1594A>GMANE SELECT
  • NP_001255968.1:p.Ser486Gly
  • NP_001311265.1:p.Ser532Gly
  • NP_001311266.1:p.Ser532Gly
  • NP_031399.2:p.Ser532Gly
  • NP_031399.2:p.Ser532Gly
  • LRG_753t1:c.1594A>G
  • LRG_753:g.97121A>G
  • LRG_753p1:p.Ser532Gly
  • NC_000010.10:g.112771421A>G
  • NM_007373.3:c.1594A>G
  • NR_136749.2:n.945A>G
Protein change:
S486G
Links:
dbSNP: rs145463534
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs145463534
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_001269039.3:c.1456A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001324336.2:c.1594A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_001324337.2:c.1594A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NM_007373.4:c.1594A>G - missense variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001583]
  • NR_136749.2:n.945A>G - non-coding transcript variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001619]

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000171635GeneDx
criteria provided, single submitter

(GeneDx Variant Classification (06012015))
Benign
(Oct 22, 2013)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link,

SCV000311807PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Benigngermlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV001338168Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Benign
(Feb 17, 2020)
germlineclinical testing

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee..

Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25741868
PMCID:
PMC4544753

Details of each submission

From GeneDx, SCV000171635.10

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineyesnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences, SCV000311807.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV001338168.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testingnot provided

Description

Variant summary: SHOC2 c.1594A>G (p.Ser532Gly) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 282828 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.013 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 520 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in SHOC2 causing Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign. In addition, one expert panel, ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel, classified this variant as benign after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2024