U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1845+13A>T AND not specified

Germline classification:
Benign (3 submissions)
Last evaluated:
Nov 16, 2020
Review status:
2 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Somatic classification
of clinical impact:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Somatic classification
of oncogenicity:
None
Review status:
(0/4) 0 stars out of maximum of 4 stars
no assertion criteria provided
Record status:
current
Accession:
RCV000220325.24

Allele description [Variation Report for NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1845+13A>T]

NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1845+13A>T

Gene:
NF1:neurofibromin 1 [Gene - OMIM - HGNC]
Variant type:
single nucleotide variant
Cytogenetic location:
17q11.2
Genomic location:
Preferred name:
NM_001042492.3(NF1):c.1845+13A>T
HGVS:
  • NC_000017.11:g.31223580A>T
  • NG_009018.1:g.133604A>T
  • NM_000267.3:c.1845+13A>T
  • NM_001042492.3:c.1845+13A>TMANE SELECT
  • LRG_214t1:c.1845+13A>T
  • LRG_214t2:c.1845+13A>T
  • LRG_214:g.133604A>T
  • NC_000017.10:g.29550598A>T
  • NM_001042492.2:c.1845+13A>T
  • NM_001042492.3:c.1845+13A>T
Links:
dbSNP: rs17885739
NCBI 1000 Genomes Browser:
rs17885739
Molecular consequence:
  • NM_000267.3:c.1845+13A>T - intron variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001627]
  • NM_001042492.3:c.1845+13A>T - intron variant - [Sequence Ontology: SO:0001627]
Observations:
2

Condition(s)

Synonyms:
AllHighlyPenetrant
Identifiers:
MedGen: CN169374

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...

Assertion and evidence details

Submission AccessionSubmitterReview Status
(Assertion method)
Clinical Significance
(Last evaluated)
OriginMethodCitations
SCV000269446Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
criteria provided, single submitter

(LMM Criteria)
Benign
(Nov 24, 2014)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV000306241PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
criteria provided, single submitter

(ACMG Guidelines, 2015)
Benigngermlineclinical testing

PubMed (1)
[See all records that cite this PMID]

SCV001448480Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
criteria provided, single submitter

(LabCorp Variant Classification Summary - May 2015)
Benign
(Nov 16, 2020)
germlineclinical testing

PubMed (3)
[See all records that cite these PMIDs]

Citation Link

Summary from all submissions

EthnicityOriginAffectedIndividualsFamiliesChromosomes testedNumber TestedFamily historyMethod
not providedgermlinenot provided22not providednot providednot providedclinical testing
not providedgermlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing

Citations

PubMed

A systematic approach to assessing the clinical significance of genetic variants.

Duzkale H, Shen J, McLaughlin H, Alfares A, Kelly MA, Pugh TJ, Funke BH, Rehm HL, Lebo MS.

Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):453-63. doi: 10.1111/cge.12257.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
24033266
PMCID:
PMC3995020

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee..

Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

PubMed [citation]
PMID:
25741868
PMCID:
PMC4544753
See all PubMed Citations (5)

Details of each submission

From Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, SCV000269446.3

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not provided2not providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)

Description

1845+13A>T in intron 16 of NF1: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seque nce. It has been identified in 3.0% (131/4384) of African American chromosomes f rom a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wash ington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs17885739).

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlinenot providednot providednot providednot provided2not provided2not provided

From PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences, SCV000306241.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (1)
#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

From Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp, SCV001448480.1

#EthnicityIndividualsChromosomes TestedFamily HistoryMethodCitations
1not providednot providednot providednot providedclinical testing PubMed (3)

Description

Variant summary: NF1 c.1845+13A>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0023 in 249728 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 11 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in NF1 causing Neurofibromatosis Type 1 phenotype (0.00021), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1845+13A>T in individuals affected with Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign.

#SampleMethodObservation
OriginAffectedNumber testedTissuePurposeMethodIndividualsAllele frequencyFamiliesCo-occurrences
1germlineunknownnot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot providednot provided

Last Updated: Jun 9, 2024