|
|
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information. |
|
Status |
Public on Oct 15, 2007 |
Title |
Environmental stress in an ectothermic vertebrate, the coral reef fish Pomacentrus moluccensis |
Platform organism |
Danio rerio |
Sample organism |
Pomacentrus moluccensis |
Experiment type |
Expression profiling by array
|
Summary |
Transcriptional profiling of gene responses in liver in the coral reef fish Pomacentrus moluccensis in response to different types of environmental stress: cold, heat, hypoxic and hyposmotic shock. Goal was to determine the common effects of different types of environmental stress on gene expression as well as responses unique to different stressors.
Abstract from Kassahn et al. BMC Genomics (2007) 8:358 Background While our understanding of the importance of transcriptional regulation for biological function is continuously growing, we still know comparatively little about how environmentally-induced stress affects gene expression in vertebrates and how consistent transcriptional stress responses are across different types of environmental stress. Results In this study, we looked for a genetic measure of environmental stress and used a multi-stressor approach to identify components of a common stress response as well as components unique to different types of environmental stress. We exposed individuals of the coral reef fish Pomacentrus moluccensis to hypoxic, hyposmotic, cold and heat shock and measured the responses of approximately 16,000 genes in liver. We also compared winter and summer responses to heat shock to examine the capacity for such responses to vary with acclimation to different ambient temperatures. We identified a series of gene functions that were consistently involved in all stress responses examined here, suggesting common effects of stress on biological function. These common responses were achieved by the regulation of largely independent sets of genes and the responses of individual genes varied greatly across different stress types. However, we were able to identify groups of co-regulated genes, the genes within which shared similar functions. Given current estimates of climatic change, we were particularly interested in the response to prolonged heat exposure. In total, 324 gene loci were differentially expressed following exposure to heat over five days. The functions of these heat-responsive genes suggest that prolonged heat stress leads to oxidative stress and protein damage, challenge of the immune system, and a re-allocation of energy sources. Conclusion This is the first environmental genomic study to measure gene regulation in response to different environmental stressors in a natural population of a warm-adapted ectothermic vertebrate. This study offers insight into the effects of environmental stress on biological function and sheds light on the expected sensitivity of coral reef fishes to elevated temperatures in the future. Keywords: Stress response
|
|
|
Overall design |
Balanced design with dye-swaps and biological replicates representing comparisons of environmentally-stressed fish compared against fish kept at ambient conditions and comparisons involving fish exposed to different types of environmental stress. No technical replicates were employed. In total 59 dual channel microarray hybridisations were performed using 118 different individuals. Thus, each microarray hybridisation employed two individual fish (no sample pooling).
|
|
|
Contributor(s) |
Kassahn KS, Crozier RH, Ward AC, Stone G, Caley MJ |
Citation(s) |
17916261 |
|
Submission date |
Apr 11, 2007 |
Last update date |
Aug 31, 2012 |
Contact name |
Karin Sonja Kassahn |
E-mail(s) |
k.kassahn@imb.uq.edu.au
|
Phone |
+61 7 3346 2606
|
Fax |
+61 7 3346 2101
|
Organization name |
University of Queensland
|
Department |
Institute for Molecular Bioscience
|
Lab |
Ragan Group
|
Street address |
Queensland Bioscience Precinct
|
City |
Brisbane |
State/province |
QLD |
ZIP/Postal code |
4072 |
Country |
Australia |
|
|
Platforms (1) |
|
Samples (59)
|
GSM181765 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. cold shock (22C, 3hrs) , a.rep1 |
GSM181766 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. cold shock (22C, 3hrs) , a.rep2 |
GSM181767 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. cold shock (22C, 3hrs) , a.rep3 |
GSM181768 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. cold shock (22C, 3hrs) , a.rep4 |
GSM181769 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. cold shock (22C, 3hrs) , a.rep5 |
GSM181770 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. cold shock (22C, 3hrs) , a.rep6 |
GSM181771 |
cold shock (22C, 3hrs) vs. hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs), b.rep1 |
GSM181772 |
cold shock (22C, 3hrs) vs. hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs), b.rep2 |
GSM181773 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. heat shock (31C, 5days), c.rep1 |
GSM181774 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. heat shock (31C, 5days), c.rep2 |
GSM181775 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep1 |
GSM181776 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep2 |
GSM181777 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep3 |
GSM181778 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep4 |
GSM181779 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep5 |
GSM181780 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep6 |
GSM181781 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep7 |
GSM181782 |
heat shock (31C, 5days) vs. ambient, d.rep8 |
GSM181783 |
ambient vs. ambient, e.rep1 |
GSM181784 |
ambient vs. ambient, e.rep2 |
GSM181785 |
ambient vs. ambient, e.rep3 |
GSM181786 |
ambient vs. ambient, e.rep4 |
GSM181787 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, f.rep1 |
GSM181788 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, f.rep2 |
GSM181789 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, f.rep3 |
GSM181790 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, f.rep4 |
GSM181791 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin, 3hrs), g.rep1 |
GSM181792 |
heat shock (31C, 3hrs) vs. hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin, 3hrs), g.rep2 |
GSM181793 |
cold shock (22C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, h.rep1 |
GSM181794 |
cold shock (22C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, h.rep2 |
GSM181795 |
cold shock (22C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, h.rep3 |
GSM181796 |
cold shock (22C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, h.rep4 |
GSM181797 |
hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs) vs. ambient, I.rep1 |
GSM181798 |
hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs) vs. ambient, I.rep2 |
GSM181799 |
hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs) vs. ambient, I.rep3 |
GSM181800 |
hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs) vs. ambient, I.rep4 |
GSM181801 |
hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs) vs. ambient, I.rep5 |
GSM181802 |
hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs) vs. ambient, I.rep6 |
GSM181803 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs), j.rep1 |
GSM181804 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs), j.rep2 |
GSM181805 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. hyposmotic shock (20ppt, 3hrs), j.rep3 |
GSM181806 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, k.rep1 |
GSM181807 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, k.rep2 |
GSM181808 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, k.rep3 |
GSM181809 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, k.rep4 |
GSM181810 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. ambient, k.rep5 |
GSM181811 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin, 3hrs), l.rep1 |
GSM181812 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin, 3hrs), l.rep2 |
GSM181813 |
heat shock (34C, 3hrs) vs. hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin, 3hrs), l.rep3 |
GSM181814 |
hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin) vs. ambient, m.rep1 |
GSM181815 |
hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin) vs. ambient, m.rep2 |
GSM181816 |
hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin) vs. ambient, m.rep3 |
GSM181817 |
hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin) vs. ambient, m.rep4 |
GSM181818 |
hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin) vs. ambient, m.rep5 |
GSM181819 |
hypoxic shock (~23-36% air saturatioin) vs. ambient, m.rep6 |
GSM181820 |
ambient vs. ambient, n.rep1 |
GSM181821 |
ambient vs. ambient, n.rep2 |
GSM181822 |
ambient vs. ambient, o.rep1 |
GSM181823 |
ambient vs. ambient, o.rep2 |
|
Relations |
BioProject |
PRJNA100481 |
Supplementary file |
Size |
Download |
File type/resource |
GSE7499_RAW.tar |
1.2 Gb |
(http)(custom) |
TAR (of SPOT, TIFF) |
|
|
|
|
|