NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM916507 Query DataSets for GSM916507
Status Public on Nov 21, 2012
Title Berry_treated_148DAFB_vs_untreated_110DAFB_BioRep1
Sample type RNA
 
Channel 1
Source name Whole deseeded berry, NAA-treated, at 148DAFB
Organism Vitis vinifera
Characteristics organ: whole berry (deseeded)
Treatment protocol One-hundred bunches from fifty homogeneous plants (two bunches per plant) were treated in planta with a synthetic auxin (naphtalenacetic acid, NAA, 200 mg/L; SIGMA-N640) at the pre-véraison stage corresponding to fifty-three days after full bloom (DAFB).
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol Total RNA was extracted from whole berries using the perchlorate method of Davies and Robinson (1996) modified by Rizzini et al. (2009).
Label chA: Cy3
Label protocol Total RNA was converted into target cDNA by reverse transcription using the SuperScriptTM Indirect cDNA Labeling System (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.
 
Channel 2
Source name Whole deseeded berry, untreated, at 110DAFB
Organism Vitis vinifera
Characteristics organ: whole berry (deseeded)
Treatment protocol One-hundred bunches from fifty homogeneous plants (two bunches per plant) were treated in planta with a synthetic auxin (naphtalenacetic acid, NAA, 200 mg/L; SIGMA-N640) at the pre-véraison stage corresponding to fifty-three days after full bloom (DAFB).
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol Total RNA was extracted from whole berries using the perchlorate method of Davies and Robinson (1996) modified by Rizzini et al. (2009).
Label chB: Cy5
Label protocol Total RNA was converted into target cDNA by reverse transcription using the SuperScriptTM Indirect cDNA Labeling System (Invitrogen, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.
 
 
Hybridization protocol The pre-hybridization and hybridization steps were carried out in Corning® hybridization chambers with some drops of 0.3× SSC to maintain internal humidity and salts concentration, immersed in a water bath at 48 °C. The microarray was pre-hybridized for 2 h with a solution containing 5× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 1× Denhardt's, and 100 ng/μl DNA carrier. Then the slides were washed once with 0.2× SSC solution and isopropanol, and dried by centrifuging for 2 min at 2000 rpm. Before hybridization, probes were mixed to have an equal amount of each fluorescent dye, ethanol precipitated with ammonium acetate (final 2 M) and resuspended in 37 μl of hybridization solution (5× SSC, 0.1% SDS, 25% formamide, and 40 ng/μl DNA carrier). The probe was denaturated for 30 s, distributed on the spotted area of the slide, and covered with a glass cover slip. After 48 h of hybridization the slides were washed once in 1× SSC 0.2% SDS and in 0.1× SSC 0.2% SDS for 5 min and twice in 0.2× SSC for 5 min to eliminate completely SDS residues that may cause shadows on the spotted area.
Scan protocol The microarrays were scanned with a two-channel confocal microarray scanner (ScanArray® Lite, Perkin-Elmer) using its dedicated software (ScanArray Express 3.0.0., Perkin-Elmer). The laser power was set between 67 and 79% of maximum and the photomultiplier tube (PMT) was set between 69 and 79% of maximum. The excitation/emission settings were 543/570 nm for Cy3 and 633/670 nm for Cy5. After laser focusing and balancing of the two channels, scans were conducted at a resolution of 5 μm. For any scan, two separate 16-bit TIFF images were produced.
Description Comparison between gene expression profiles of NAA-treated berries at 148 DAFB (harvest of the treated) and untreated berries at 110 DAFB (harvest of the control untreated) - Biological replicate 1
Data processing Raw hybridization data were quality-filtered, background-subtracted, and intra-array normalized with the loess method. Calculations were all carried out with the package limma and other basic statistical functions of R for Mac OS X v2.13.1 (http://www.r-project.org/).
 
Submission date Apr 17, 2012
Last update date Nov 22, 2012
Contact name Alessandro Botton
E-mail(s) alessandro.botton@unipd.it
Organization name University of Padova
Department Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment
Street address Agripolis - viale dell'università 16
City Legnaro
State/province Padova
ZIP/Postal code 35020
Country Italy
 
Platform ID GPL15453
Series (1)
GSE37341 Grape berry: control vs NAA-treated

Data table header descriptions
ID_REF
VALUE loess normalized log2 ratio representing treated/control

Data table
ID_REF VALUE
26354 -1.120194756
27758 -1.456959741
20522 -0.777120803
21926 -0.587120337
14690 -0.422647663
16094 -0.032207992
8858 -0.520523088
10262 -0.705703581
3026 -1.767096738
4430 -1.632582379
32190 1.277868976
33594 1.331278989
26358 -1.147791261
27762 -0.950321485
20526 1.378692628
21930 1.619918497
14694 0.372389603
16098 0.307174021
8862 -0.031752401
10266 0.000350294

Total number of rows: 29124

Table truncated, full table size 512 Kbytes.




Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSM916507_V7.txt.gz 1.1 Mb (ftp)(http) TXT
Processed data included within Sample table

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap