The efficacy of trimetazidine on stable angina pectoris: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of trimetazidine in combination with other anti-anginal drugs versus other anti-anginal drugs in the treatment of stable angina pectoris (SAP). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English and Chinese were retrieved from computerized databases: Embase, PubMed, and CNKI. Primary outcomes consist of clinical parameters (numbers of weekly angina attacks and nitroglycerin use) and ergometric parameters (time to 1mm ST-segment depression, and total work (in Mets) and exercise duration (in seconds) at peak exercise) in stable angina pectoris treated by trimetazidine or not. The quality of studies was evaluated using Jadad score. Data analysis of 13 studies was performed using Stata 12.0 software. Results showed that treatment of trimetazidine and other anti-anginal drugs was associated with a smaller weekly mean number of angina attacks (WMD=-0.95, 95%CI: -1.30 to -0.61, Z=5.39, P<0.001), fewer weekly nitroglycerin use (WMD=-0.98, 95%CI: -1.44 to -0.52, Z=4.19, P<0.001), longer time to 1mm ST-segment depression (WMD=0.30, 95%CI: 0.17 to 0.43, Z=4.46, P<0.001), higher total work (WMD=0.82, 95%CI: 0.44 to 1.20, Z=4.22, P<0.001) and longer exercise duration at peak exercise (WMD=49.81, 95%CI: 15.04 to 84.57, Z=6.38, P<0.001) than treatment of other anti-anginal drugs for stable angina pectoris. Sensitivity analysis was performed. Sub-group analysis showed that treatment duration was not a significant moderator and patients treated within 8 weeks and above 12 weeks had no difference in the outcomes addressed in this meta-analysis. No publish bias was detected. This meta-analysis confirms the efficacy of trimetazidine in the treatment of stable angina pectoris, in comparison with conventional antianginal agents, regardless of treatment duration.