Universal newborn hearing screening: methods and results, obstacles, and benefits

Pediatr Res. 2017 Mar;81(3):415-422. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.250. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

Abstract

The incidence of sensorineural hearing loss ranges from 1 to 3 per 1,000 live births in term healthy neonates, and 2-4 per 100 in high-risk infants, a 10-fold increase. Early identification and intervention with hearing augmentation within 6 mo yields optimal effect. If undetected and without treatment, significant hearing impairment may negatively impact speech development and lead to disorders in psychological and mental behaviors. Hearing screening programs in newborns enable detection of hearing impairment in the first days after birth. Programs to identify hearing deficit have significantly improved over the two decades, and their implementation continues to grow throughout the world. Initially based on risk factors, these programs identified only 50-75% of infants with hearing loss. Current recommendations are to conduct universal hearing screening in all infants. Techniques used primarily include automated auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions that provide noninvasive recordings of physiologic auditory activity and are easily performed in neonates and infants. The aim of this review is to present the objectives, benefits, and results of newborn hearing screening programs including the pros and cons of universal vs. selective screening. A brief history and the anticipated future development of these programs will also be discussed.

Publication types

  • Historical Article
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Audiology / history
  • Deafness / diagnosis
  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
  • Hearing
  • Hearing Loss / diagnosis*
  • Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / diagnosis*
  • Hearing Tests*
  • History, 20th Century
  • History, 21st Century
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Neonatal Screening / history
  • Neonatal Screening / methods*
  • Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous*