An Anatomical Study of Metacarpal Morphology Utilizing CT Scans: Evaluating Parameters for Antegrade Intramedullary Compression Screw Fixation of Metacarpal Fractures

J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Feb;46(2):149.e1-149.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated metacarpal morphology for antegrade placement of intramedullary headless compression screws (IMHCS) for metacarpal fracture fixation.

Methods: We analyzed 100 hand computed tomography scans to quantify cortical thickness, intramedullary diameter, and metacarpal lengths. In addition, dorsal or ulnar overhang of the metacarpals over their respective carpal bones was measured. We also predicted optimal entry points for guidewire placement at the metacarpal head.

Results: The ring finger metacarpal had the narrowest medullary canal width (coronal, 2.8 mm; sagittal, 3.5 mm). Not counting the thumb, the little finger metacarpal had the widest midshaft medullary width of 4.1 mm in the coronal plane and the middle metacarpal was widest in the sagittal plane with canal width of 3.9 mm. On average, there was maximal dorsal overhang at the base of the middle metacarpal (4.2 mm) and maximal ulnar overhang at the base of the small metacarpal (3.9 mm). The optimal entry point for guidewire placement over each metacarpal head was approximately 3.5 to 3.8 mm volar to the dorsal cortex.

Conclusions: Minimum IMHCS diameters of 3.5 mm for the ring and 4.0 mm for the index, middle and little fingers are necessary to achieve interference fit within the medullary canal. Minimum screw lengths of 38 mm would be needed to ensure 6 mm fixation past the midshaft of the metacarpals. Antegrade IMHCS for fixation of proximal metacarpal fractures may be most feasible with thumb, middle, and little finger metacarpals because there was larger dorsal or ulnar overhang to allow screw placement without violating the carpometacarpal joints.

Clinical relevance: Our analysis provides a reference guide for intramedullary screw sizes for each metacarpal of the hand to achieve interference fit with fracture fixation. Furthermore, the dorsal and ulnar overhangs of the metacarpal bases suggest the practicality of antegrade IMHCS fixation.

Keywords: Antegrade approach; computed tomography; intramedullary screw fracture fixation; metacarpal morphology.

MeSH terms

  • Bone Screws
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Fractures, Bone* / diagnostic imaging
  • Fractures, Bone* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Metacarpal Bones* / diagnostic imaging
  • Metacarpal Bones* / surgery
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed