Carboplatin is being advocated more frequently for treatment of childhood germ cell tumors (GCT), due to less long-term toxicity, and demonstrable equivalence in outcome as compared to cisplatin. This analysis presents the survival of GCT in a low middle-income country and compares two different chemotherapeutic regimens. A retrospective analysis of patient case records was carried out over 10-years (January 2007-December 2016). Chemotherapy regimen used was bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (PEb) for initial 6-½ years and carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (CEb) subsequently. Ninety patients with GCT were treated over 10-years. Malignant GCT was diagnosed in 69 (77%) patients, with 21(23%) having teratoma. The chemotherapy protocol was PEb in 38 (42%), CEb in 28 (31%) patients, while 24 patients were treated with surgery only. Stage 4 tumor was observed in 19 (21%) patients. Relapse or disease progression was seen in 11(12%). Overall and event-free survival at 5-years for the entire cohort was 77% and 73%, being similar with PEb (OS:77%; EFS:72.5%) vs. CEb (OS:69%; EFS: 69%). Significantly better overall survival was noted for patients with gonadal GCT) and non-stage 4 disease, while event-free survival was significantly better in patients with non-stage 4 disease. The chemotherapeutic regimen (PEb vs. CEb), very high AFP (value ≥10,000 IU/L), and risk stratification (low, intermediate, or high-risk disease) did not affect survival significantly. Carboplatin-based strategy was equivalent in our cohort to cisplatin-based strategy, and could be used safely in the LMIC set-up. The overall survival is suboptimal, with delayed presentation, abandonment, and relapse being barriers to survival.
Keywords: CEb; PEb; abandonment; low-middle income country; outcome.