Objective: To identify clinical, radiological, and histopathological characteristics that could be predictive factors of microinvasive/invasive breast carcinoma in patients with diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by core-needle biopsy.
Material and methods: This is a retrospective study conducted from 2006-2017, which included women ≥18 years of age with initial DCIS, and who were treated with surgery. Final diagnosis was divided in DCIS and microinvasive/invasive carcinoma.
Results: 334 patients were included: 193 (57.8%) with DCIS and 141 (42.2%) with microinvasive/invasive carcinoma (microinvasive 5.1%, invasive 37.1%). Lymph node metastasis occurred in 16.3%. Differences between DCIS and microinvasive/invasive groups included the presence of palpable nodule (36.7% vs. 63.2%), radiological nodule (29% vs. 51%), bigger radiological-tumor size (1.2 cm vs. 1.7 cm), and larger microcalcification extension (2.5 cm vs. 3.1 cm), all of these variables p ≤0.05. Hormonal receptors and HER2 expression were similar. After logistic regression analysis, predictive factor of invasion was the presence of palpable nodule (OR = 4.072, 95%CI = 2.520-6.582, p <0.001) and radiological multicentric disease (OR = 1.677, 95%CI = 1.036-2.716, p = 0.035).
Conclusions: In patients with DCIS, palpable nodule, and radiological multicentric disease, upgrade to microinvasive/invasive is high, and sentinel lymph node is recommended.
Objetivo: Identificar características clínicas, radiológicas e histopatológicas como factores predictivos de carcinoma mamario microinvasor/invasor en pacientes con Carcinoma Ductal In Situ (CDIS) diagnosticado mediante aguja de corte.
Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de 2006–2017, en mujeres ≥18 años con CDIS diagnosticado con aguja de corte y tratadas con cirugía. Los diagnósticos finales fueron CDIS y carcinoma microinvasor/invasor.
Resultados: Se incluyeron 334 pacientes, 193 (57.8%) con CDIS y 141 (42.2%) con carcinoma microinvasor/invasor (microinvasor 5.1%, invasor 37.1%). Hubo 16.3% casos con afección ganglionar. Las diferencias entre el grupo de CDIS y carcinoma microinvasor/invasor fue la presencia de tumor palpable (36.7% vs. 63.2%), nódulo visto por imagen (29% vs. 51%), tumores más grandes (1.2 cm vs. 1.7 cm), y mayor extensión de microcalcificaciones (2.5 cm vs. 3.1 cm), estas variables con p ≤0.05. Los receptores hormonales y HER2 fueron similares. En el análisis de regresión logística, los factores predictivos de invasión fueron tumor palpable (OR = 4.072, IC95% = 2.520–6.582, p <0.001) y multicentricidad radiológica (OR = 1.677, IC95% = 1.036–2.716, p = 0.035).
Conclusiones: En CDIS, tumor palpable y enfermedad multicéntrica radiológica, el escalamiento a carcinoma microinvasor/invasor es alto y es recomendable realizar ganglio centinela.
Keywords: Carcinoma ductal in situ; Carcinoma microinvasor; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Factores predictivos; Microinvasive carcinoma; Predictive factors.
Copyright: © 2022 Permanyer.