Utility of screening procedures for detecting recurrence of disease after complete response in patients with small cell lung carcinoma

Cancer. 1997 Aug 15;80(4):676-80.

Abstract

Background: Studies evaluating the efficacy of routine follow-up testing in detecting disease recurrence in treated lung carcinoma patients are lacking.

Methods: To investigate this subject, the authors studied 115 patients who had previously been entered on North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) small cell lung carcinoma clinical trials, had achieved a complete response after chemotherapy/radiotherapy treatment, and subsequently developed disease progression. The authors included 58 patients with limited stage and 57 patients with extensive stage disease. Follow-up testing on these clinical trials was scheduled at 4-month intervals in the first year and every 6 months thereafter. At each visit, testing included a clinical history, physical examination, chest X-ray, chemistry group, and hematology group. Patients' records were evaluated to determine the first test(s) to identify disease recurrence, whether the recurrence was diagnosed at the time of routine follow-up or between scheduled follow-up evaluations, the sites of recurrence, and patient outcome.

Results: Recurrences occurred in 56 patients (49%) in the first follow-up year, 51 (44%) in the second year, and 8 (7%) after 2 years. Recurrences were signaled by clinical histories in 71% of patients, by physical examinations in 10%, chest X-rays in 12%, and abnormal chemistry testing in 6%. Although 41% of recurrences were detected at scheduled clinical visits, 59% of patients had disease recurrence signaled by symptoms that prompted interval visits between scheduled appointments. At last follow-up, all the patients in this study had died (median survival, 115 days [range, 1-793 days] after diagnosis of recurrence), supporting the lack of curative therapy for patients with recurrent small cell lung carcinoma.

Conclusions: These data, demonstrating that clinical histories and physical examinations are the most fruitful means of detecting evidence of recurrent lung carcinoma, are consistent with data regarding the follow-up of other curatively treated cancers, such as breast carcinoma and melanoma. Chest X-rays in asymptomatic patients detect recurrences in a small proportion of patients, whereas routine blood tests appear to be of little value.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Small Cell / diagnosis*
  • Carcinoma, Small Cell / secondary*
  • Carcinoma, Small Cell / therapy
  • Continuity of Patient Care
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Lung Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Lung Neoplasms / therapy
  • Lymphatic Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local*
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic