U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

Links from BioSample

SRX21375026: GSM7711802: K_RR_rep5; Rutilus rutilus; RNA-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina NovaSeq 6000) run: 11.7M spots, 3.5G bases, 1.4Gb downloads

External Id: GSM7711802_r1
Submitted by: Parasitology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University
Study: Transcriptome profile analyses of head kidney in roach (Rutilus rutilus), common bream (Abramis brama) and their hybrids: does infection by monogenean parasites in freshwater fish reveal differences in fish vigour among parental species and their hybrids?
show Abstracthide Abstract
Hybrid generations usually face either a heterosis advantage or a breakdown that can be expressed by the level of parasite infection in hybrid hosts. Hybrids are less infected by parasites than parental species (especially F1 generations) or more infected than parental species (especially post-F1 generations). We performed the experiment with blood-feeding gill parasite Paradiplozoon homoion (Monogenea) infecting leuciscid species, Abramis brama and Rutilus rutilus, their F1 generation, and two backcross generations. Backcross generations tended to be more parasitized than parental lines and the F1 generation. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was lower in F1 hybrids and higher in backcross hybrids when compared to each of the parental lines. The main groups of DEGs were shared among lines, however, Abramis brama and Rutilus rutilus differed in some of the top gene ontology (GO) terms. DEG analyses revealed the role of heme binding and erythrocyte differentiation after infection by blood-feeding P. homoion. Two backcross generations shared some of the top GO terms representing mostly downregulated genes associated with P. homoion infection. KEGG analysis revealed the importance of disease-associated pathways. The majority of them were shared by two backcross generations. Our study revealed the most pronounced DEGs associated with monogenean infection in backcross hybrids, potentially explained by hybrid breakdown. The gene expression of F1 hybrids was little affected by P. homoion, suggesting the hybrid advantage. Overall design: Transcriptome profile analyses of head kidney in roach (Rutilus rutilus), common bream (Abramis brama), and their F1 and backcross hybrids to see if infection by monogenean parasites in freshwater fish does reveal differences in fish vigour among parental species and their hybrids. Transcriptomic data includes the fish samples termed using three abbreviations, i.e., K – control samples (samples not exposed to parasite infection), OK - experiment with larval (termed oncomiracidia) infection of Paradiplozoon homoion, and PH – cohabitation experiment with P. homoion (see details below). Each of OK and PH representing independent experiment realized by two different methodologies using the same biological system - the infection by P. homoion (Monogenea) in Abramis brama, Rutilus rutilus and their two F1 generations (F1 generation with A. brama mtDNA, and F1 generation with R. rutilus mtDNA), and two backcross lines (backcross generation of F1 hybrid with A. brama mtDNA and paternal A. brama, and backcross generation of F1 hybrid with A. brama mtDNA and paternal R. rutilus). We performed transcriptome assembly from all the samples of A. brama and R. rutilus, separately. Then, we used the R. rutilus transcriptome for RNA-seq data analyses, including differential expression and functional gene enrichment (GO, KEGG) analyses because it showed better results than the other transcriptome, and at the same time, we avoided complicated cross-referencing. Two experiments (termed OK and PH) with the same biological system were performed. The manuscript associated with the submitted RNA-seq data of both experiments focused, however, only on the analysis of the OK experiment.
Sample: K_RR_rep5
SAMN36995780 • SRS18618118 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Rutilus rutilus
Library:
Name: GSM7711802
Instrument: Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Strategy: RNA-Seq
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC
Selection: cDNA
Layout: PAIRED
Construction protocol: Fish were investigated for the presence of parasites one month after oncomiracidia infection (or following cohabitation) by fish dissection, and parasites were counted. Head kidney was collected from individual fish including 4-5 non-infected control specimens per each fish line and at least 4 P. homoion-infected specimens per each of five fish lines (R. rutilus, A. brama, F1 generation with A. brama mtDNA, backcross generation of F1 hybrid with A. brama mtDNA and paternal A. brama, backcross generation of F1 hybrid with A. brama mtDNA and paternal R. rutilus) in the case of OK experiment, six fish lines in the case of PH experiment including F1 generation with R. rutilus mtDNA. Total RNA was isolated from the head kidney of each fish specimen. For extraction, PureLink RNA Mini Kit (Ambion) with Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and on-column PureLink DNase treatment were used according to the manufacturer´s protocol. Reagent and buffer volumes were adjusted according to the weight of tissue entering the isolation process (15.3 mg on average). The final elution was performed using 100 µl of RNAse-free water in the first step and the primal eluate in the second step. The yield and concentration of RNA isolates were checked using a QubitTM 4 fluorometer (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The quality and integrity of RNA were analyzed using RNA 6000 Nano Kit on a 2100 Bioanalyzer instrument (Agilent Technologies). All RNA isolates were normalized by dilution at a uniform concentration of 20 ng/µl with RNase-free water. They served as templates for DNA library preparation and for the reverse transcription of total RNA into single-stranded cDNA using High Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit (Applied Biosystems by Thermo Fisher Scientific) in twice the reaction volume recommended by the manufacturer. All fish samples (RNA integrity number – RIN > 7) were used for DNA library preparation. 500 ng of total RNA was used for mRNA enrichment using the Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs). Subsequently, NEBNext® Ultra™ Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina®, and NEBNext® Multiplex Oligos for Illumina® (Dual Index Primers Set 2, New England Biolabs) were used for library preparation, with 11 PCR cycles utilized for PCR enrichment. RNA fragmentation (13 minutes at 94°C) and the size selection conditions (a bead volume of 30 µl and 15 µl for the first and second bead selections, respectively) were further modified in the protocol. The quantification of DNA libraries was performed on a QubitTM 4 fluorometer (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific) using Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit, and quality and size control were performed on a 2100 Bioanalyzer with DNA 1000 Kit (Agilent Technologies). Finally, amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts. The final concentration of each particular library in the pool was 10nM in the pool. Libraries were sequenced by Macrogen Europe B.V. (Amsterdam, Netherlands) on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 system (one line on an S4 flow cell) in a paired-end configuration producing 150 bp long reads.
Runs: 1 run, 11.7M spots, 3.5G bases, 1.4Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR2564883911,732,0893.5G1.4Gb2023-10-01

ID:
28813252

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...