Clinical Description
Heterozygosity for the Factor V Leiden Variant
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the primary clinical manifestation of factor V Leiden thrombophilia [Pastori et al 2023]. The most common site for VTE is the legs, but upper-extremity, cerebral, and superficial venous thrombosis may also occur.
The relative risk for VTE is increased approximately three- to eightfold in factor V Leiden variant heterozygotes [Rosendaal & Reitsma 2009]. Lower relative risks (four- to fivefold) were reported in two large meta-analyses [Gohil et al 2009, Simone et al 2013]. Despite the increase in relative risk, the overall annual incidence of a first VTE is low in heterozygotes, approximately 0.5% [Middeldorp 2011]. The reported adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for VTE in heterozygotes compared with controls was 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.8) [Juul et al 2004].
Individuals heterozygous for the factor V Leiden variant have a sixfold increased risk for primary upper-extremity thrombosis (not related to malignancy or a venous catheter) [Martinelli et al 2004]. They also have a sixfold increased risk of superficial vein thrombosis not associated with varicose veins, malignancy, or autoimmune disorders [Martinelli et al 1999].
There is an increased risk of VTE at unusual sites. Increased prevalence of the factor V Leiden variant was reported in individuals with cerebral venous thrombosis in a meta-analysis including 1,822 affected individuals and 7,795 controls (odds ratio [OR] 2.70, 95% CI 2.16-3.38) [Li et al 2018]. A meta-analysis including 1,748 affected individuals and 2,716 controls also showed an increased prevalence of the factor V Leiden variant in individuals with retinal vein obstruction (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.19-2.32) [Rehak et al 2008]. A higher prevalence of the factor V Leiden variant was also found in a cohort of individuals with splanchnic vein thrombosis, with a prevalence from 4%-26% in individuals with Budd-Chiari syndrome [De Stefano & Martinelli 2010].
Recurrent thrombosis. Prospective cohort studies of unselected individuals with a first VTE showed no increased recurrence risk in factor V Leiden variant heterozygotes [Christiansen et al 2005, Lijfering et al 2010]. Several meta-analyses showed a modest, approximately 1.5-fold increased risk of VTE recurrence [Marchiori et al 2007, Segal et al 2009].
The VTE recurrence risk may be higher in individuals from families prone to thrombosis than in unselected individuals. In a prospective study of families with a strong history of thrombosis, the incidence of recurrent VTE was 3.5 in 100 person-years in persons with the factor V Leiden variant [Vossen et al 2005]; however, a large family study found the rate of recurrent VTE in relatives with a factor V Leiden variant to be similar to those reported in the general population (7% after two years, 11% after five years, and 25% after ten years) [Lijfering et al 2009].
Risk for VTE in children. The cause of VTE in children is multifactorial and results from the interaction between acquired clinical risk factors (see Table 2), one or more underlying medical conditions, and an inherited predisposition to thrombophilia [Klaassen et al 2015, van Ommen & Nowak-Göttl 2017].
The most important clinical risk factor for thrombosis in children is a central venous catheter (CVC). A factor V Leiden variant was associated with CVC-related VTE in some [Neshat-Vahid et al 2016] but not all studies [Thom et al 2014].
A factor V Leiden variant was reported to increase the risk of neonatal cerebral vein thrombosis [Kenet et al 2010, Laugesaar et al 2010], and significantly increased the risk of cerebral venous thrombosis in children (OR 2.74) [Kenet et al 2010].
In a prospective study, asymptomatic children heterozygous for a factor V Leiden variant had no thrombotic complications during follow up that averaged five years [Tormene et al 2002]. Thus, asymptomatic heterozygous children appear to be at low risk for thrombosis except in the setting of strong circumstantial risk factors (see Table 2).
Risk for maternal VTE in pregnancy. Normal pregnancy is associated with a five- to tenfold increased risk of developing VTE. Women heterozygous for the factor V Leiden variant have a five- to eightfold greater risk of pregnancy-related VTE than women without the variant [Robertson et al 2006, Bleker et al 2014, Gerhardt et al 2016]. The risk is higher in women from families with a history of thrombosis and in women older than age 34 years. The highest risk of VTE occurs during the first six weeks post partum.
While heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant increases the relative risk for pregnancy-associated VTE, the absolute risk is low in the absence of other predisposing factors. VTE is estimated to occur in 1% of pregnancies in women who are factor V Leiden variant heterozygotes. The absolute risk increases to 3% in those with a positive family history of VTE [Bleker et al 2014, Campello et al 2016].
Women with a prior unprovoked VTE and factor V Leiden thrombophilia had the highest recurrence rate during pregnancy (20% of pregnancies). A factor V Leiden variant was associated with an increased risk of antepartum recurrence (OR 10) [Brill-Edwards et al 2000].
Other obstetric complications. Available data suggest that factor V Leiden variant heterozygosity is at most a weak contributor to recurrent or late pregnancy loss. A meta-analysis evaluating only prospective cohort studies reported a slightly increased risk of pregnancy loss in women with the factor V Leiden variant (4.2%) compared to those without the variant (3.2%) (OR 1.52) [Rodger et al 2010]. A meta-analysis found that heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant is associated with a twofold increased risk for a late unexplained fetal loss and a fourfold higher risk for loss in the second trimester compared to the first trimester [Robertson et al 2006]. Presence of the factor V Leiden variant was not associated with stillbirths in the subset of stillbirths resulting from placental insufficiency [Silver et al 2016].
A systematic review focused on prospective cohort studies found no significant association of preeclampsia or placental abruption with factor V Leiden thrombophilia [Rodger et al 2010]. A Danish case-cohort study found that heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant increased the risk of severe preeclampsia (OR 1.6), severe fetal growth restriction (OR 1.5), and symptomatic placental abruption (OR 1.7) [Lykke et al 2012]. Such conflicting results may reflect the varying diagnostic and selection criteria, different ethnic groups, and small number of individuals included. However, given that preeclampsia and placental abruption are heterogeneous disorders, it is unlikely that a single thrombophilic variant (such as the factor V Leiden variant) plays a major causal role.
Prognosis. Heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant is not associated with an increase in mortality or reduction in normal life expectancy even in the presence of a history of VTE [Pabinger et al 2012].
Homozygosity for the Factor V Leiden Variant
VTE. Compared to heterozygotes, homozygotes have a higher thrombotic risk and tend to develop thrombosis at a younger age. The risk for VTE in homozygotes is reported to be nine- to 80-fold [Rosendaal & Reitsma 2009] or nine- to 12-fold [Gohil et al 2009, Simone et al 2013]. The reported adjusted HR for VTE in homozygous individuals compared with controls was 18 (95% CI 4.1-41) [Juul et al 2004].
Recurrent thrombosis. Similar rates of VTE recurrence for both factor V Leiden variant homozygotes and heterozygotes were found in a recent study [Perez Botero et al 2016], whereas an earlier systematic review found that homozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant conferred a 2.6-fold increased risk of recurrent VTE [Segal et al 2009].
Risk for VTE in pregnancy. In women homozygous for the factor V Leiden variant, the relative risk of VTE during pregnancy is increased 17- to 34-fold [Robertson et al 2006, Gerhardt et al 2016]. The absolute risk of developing pregnancy-related VTE is estimated at 2.2%-4.8% of pregnancies. The risk is higher (14%) in homozygotes with a positive family history and in those older than age 34 years [Bleker et al 2014, Gerhardt et al 2016].
Obstetric complications. Maternal homozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant was associated with an increased risk of stillbirth (OR 87.44, 95% CI 7.88-970.92) in a Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network study [Silver et al 2016] but not in a Stockholm regional study [Björk et al 2019].
Additional Factors that Predispose to Thrombosis
In addition to the number of factor V Leiden variant alleles, the clinical expression of factor V Leiden thrombophilia is influenced by family history, coexisting genetic abnormalities, acquired thrombophilic disorders, and circumstantial risk factors.
Positive family history. Individuals with a factor V Leiden variant who have a first-degree relative with a history of thrombosis had a threefold increased risk for VTE compared to those with a factor V Leiden variant with a negative family history [Bezemer et al 2009]. In the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis, a population-based case-control study including 1,605 individuals with a first venous thrombosis and 2,159 controls, a total of 505 affected individuals (31.5%) and 373 controls (17.3%) reported having one or more first-degree relatives with a history of venous thrombosis. A positive family history increased the risk of venous thrombosis more than twofold (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.9-2.6) and up to fourfold (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.7-5.7) when more than one relative was affected. Family history corresponded poorly with known genetic risk factors [Bezemer et al 2009].
The risk was increased to fivefold in those with a relative with a VTE before age 50 years and to 18-fold with two or more affected relatives. The family history had additional value in predicting risk even in those with a factor V Leiden variant, suggesting the presence of unknown genetic risk factors.
Prothrombin thrombophilia due to heterozygosity for F2 variant c.*97G>A (commonly known as 20210G>A). Individuals with the factor V Leiden variant and the F2 20210G>A variant (double heterozygotes) had a three- to ninefold higher risk of recurrent VTE compared to those with neither variant, and a threefold higher risk compared to individuals heterozygous for the factor V Leiden alone [De Stefano et al 1999, Meinardi et al 2002, Segal et al 2009]. The annual incidence of recurrent VTE was 12% per year in double heterozygotes, compared to 2.8% in those with neither thrombophilia-related variant [González-Porras et al 2006]. Women with the factor V Leiden variant and the F2 20210G>A variant are reported to have an eight- to 47-fold increased relative risk of pregnancy-related VTE [Jacobsen et al 2010, Gerhardt et al 2016]. The probability of VTE during pregnancy and the puerperium is lower (5.5%) in double heterozygous women younger than age 35 years than in older women (8.2%) [Gerhardt et al 2016]. In children with the factor V Leiden variant, prothrombin thrombophilia appears to have at most a modest effect on the risk of recurrence, similar to findings in adults [Klaassen et al 2015].
Acquired thrombophilic disorders include antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, myeloproliferative disorders, and increased levels of clotting factors. Despite the following observations, the effect of these acquired disorders on factor V Leiden variant-associated thrombotic risk is not well defined.
Factor V Leiden variant heterozygotes with factor VIII levels greater than 150% of normal had a two- to threefold increased incidence of VTE than factor V Leiden variant heterozygotes alone [
Lensen et al 2001]. The reason for the association of high factor VIII levels with VTE is unknown.
A factor V Leiden variant was reported to contribute to increased risk for thrombotic complications in persons with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocytosis [
Trifa et al 2014].
Additional Acquired Risk Factors for VTE
Additional acquired risk factors for VTE in factor V Leiden variant heterozygotes or homozygotes are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.
Increased Risk of Thrombosis in Persons with the Factor V Leiden Variant and Additional Acquired Risk Factors
View in own window
Risk Factor | Risk for VTE | Comment | Citation |
---|
Malignancy 1
| HR 1.64 (95% CI 1.48-1.80) | Risk varies according to type of cancer; incl persons w/factor V Leiden &/or F2 G20210A variant |
Shi et al [2023]
|
CVC use
| RR 2.7 (95% CI 1.9-3.8) | Incl persons w/factor V Leiden or F2 G20210A variant |
Van Rooden et al [2004]
|
OR 4.6 (95% CI 2.6-8.1) | Meta-analysis involving 1,000 affected persons |
Dentali et al [2008]
|
Travel
| OR 8.1 (95% CI 2.7-24.7) | Risk ↑ w/travel duration; travel by car, bus, or train led to high RR of thrombosis. |
Cannegieter et al [2006]
|
Normal weight w/:
| Overweight/obese persons w/factor V Leiden & non-O blood had highest risk of thrombosis when travel coexisted as risk factor. |
Ribeiro et al [2016]
|
Overweight w/:
|
Obesity w/:
|
COCs 1
| OR 20.6 (95% CI 8.9-58) | COCs are assoc w/higher risk of VTE than progestin-only contraception in those w/factor V Leiden variant |
Bergendal et al [2014]
|
RR 6.14 (95% CI 2.58-14.46) | |
van Vlijmen et al [2016]
|
≤1 yr COC use: OR 62.2 (95% CI 29.8-129.6) >1 yr COC use: OR 25.4 (95% CI 16.5-39.2)
| After 1st year of COC use RR ↓ but remained high (data incl those w/factor V Leiden or F2 20210G>A variant) |
Martinelli et al [2016]
|
OR 19.3 (95% CI 13.9-26.8) | Risk by progestogen type in COC:
Gestodene: OR 22.1 (95% CI 11.3-43.3) Desogestrel: OR 26.3 (95% CI 15.2-45.5) Levonorgestrel: OR 17.4 (95% CI 11.4-26.6) Cyproterone: OR 31.8 (95% CI 17.2-59.0)
|
Khialani et al [2020]
|
≤2 yrs COC use: HR 5.73 (95% CI 5.31-6.17) >2 yrs COC use: HR 2 (95% CI 1.86-2.16)
| Highest risk of VTE in 1st 2 yrs of use; from study of 240,000 women in UK Biobank |
Lo Faro et al [2024]
|
Progestogen-only contraception
| OR 5.4 (95% CI 2.5-13) | |
Bergendal et al [2014]
|
Oral HRT 1
| OR 16.4 (95% CI 4.3-62.2) | Postmenopausal women |
Straczek et al [2005]
|
OR 17.1 (95% CI 3.7-78) | Estrogen-progestin HRT |
Douketis et al [2011]
|
OR 6.69 (95% CI 3.09-14.49) |
Cushman et al [2004]
|
Transdermal HRT 1
| OR 4.6 (95% CI 1.6-13.8) | Transdermal estrogen |
Straczek et al [2005]
|
Obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2)
| HR 5.27 (95% CI 2.74-10.14) | Risk ↑ w/BMI |
Severinsen et al [2010]
|
| Greater risk in those w/non-O blood |
Ribeiro et al [2016]
|
Overweight (BMI >25 to <30 kg/m2)
| HR 3.60 (95% CI 2.31-5.63) | Risk ↑ w/BMI |
Severinsen et al [2010]
|
| Greater risk in those w/non-O blood |
Ribeiro et al [2016]
|
Organ transplantation
| No significant association | ↑ risk of hepatic arterial thrombosis in liver transplantation has been reported. | Ghisdal et al [2010], Pereboom et al [2011], Parajuli et al [2016] |
Minor leg injury
| OR 49.7 (95% CI 6.8-362.7) | Minor injury in previous 3 mos |
van Stralen et al [2008]
|
OR 11.0 (95% CI 2.5-48.0) | Below-knee cast immobilization |
van Adrichem et al [2014]
|
Surgery
| Likely ↑ risk | Major orthopedic surgery | Joseph et al [2005], Charen et al [2015] |
>15-fold ↑ | Arthroscopy of knee |
van Adrichem et al [2015]
|
Age
| 17.1% (95% CI 11.4%-21.4%) | Lifetime risk in heterozygotes & homozygotes for factor V Leiden variant |
Bell et al [2016]
|
Age >70 yrs
| OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-3.9) | |
Karasu et al [2016]
|
Age <40 years + nonsmoker + BMI <25 kg/m2
| 0.7% in heterozygotes (95% CI 0.5%-1%) | Lowest 10-yr absolute risk of VTE is in those of younger age, nonsmokers, & lower BMI |
Juul et al [2004]
|
3% in homozygotes (95% CI 1%-8%) |
Age >60 years + smoker + BMI >30 kg/m2
| 10% in heterozygotes (95% CI 7%-14%) | Highest 10-yr absolute risk of VTE is in those of older age, smokers, & ↑ BMI |
51% in homozygotes (95% CI 13%-100%) |
BMI = body mass index; COCs = combined oral contraceptives; CVC = central venous catheter; HR = hazard ratio; HRT = hormone replacement therapy; OR = odds ratio; RR = relative risk; VTE = venous thromboembolism
- 1.
See text that follows table for more details.
Malignancy. To what extent inherited thrombophilia increases the risk of VTE in persons with cancer remains controversial [Decousus et al 2007, Pabinger et al 2015]. Because malignancy is such a strong thrombotic risk factor, it may obscure the effect of mild thrombophilic disorders including factor V Leiden thrombophilia. Thrombophilia status was not considered in guidelines for prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in individuals with cancer [Farge et al 2013].
Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use substantially increases the relative risk for VTE in women heterozygous for the factor V Leiden variant [LaVasseur et al 2022]. The incidence of VTE in COC users with either the factor V Leiden variant or the F2 20210G>A variant ranged from 0.49 to 0.86/100 pill-years in heterozygotes or double heterozygotes, respectively [van Vlijmen et al 2011].
The supra-additive effect of both a factor V Leiden variant and use of COCs was confirmed in multiple studies in which the OR for VTE ranged from 11 to 41 [Wu et al 2005, Dayan et al 2011, Bergendal et al 2014, van Vlijmen et al 2016]. For women who are either homozygous for the factor V Leiden variant or double heterozygous for the factor V Leiden variant and the F2 20210G>A variant, the OR for VTE ranged from 17 to 110 [Mohllajee et al 2006, van Vlijmen et al 2016].
The thrombotic risk in COC users with the factor V Leiden variant is at least as high in women older than age 50 years as in younger users [Roach et al 2013]. However, since the incidence of VTE increases with age, the absolute risk for VTE in women older than age 50 years is much higher than in younger COC users.
Oral hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with a two- to fourfold increased relative risk for VTE in healthy postmenopausal users of HRT compared to nonusers [Renoux et al 2010, Eisenberger & Westhoff 2014]. The risk increases with higher estrogen doses and may differ with the particular estrogen and progestin components [Renoux et al 2010, Canonico et al 2011, Smith et al 2014]. The risk of VTE is increased threefold in postmenopausal women with a factor V Leiden or F2 20210G>A variant than in HRT users without thrombophilia [Roach et al 2013].
Transdermal HRT. Multiple observational studies consistently found that transdermal HRT did not increase the risk of VTE [Canonico et al 2010, Sweetland et al 2012, ACOG 2013a]. There is also evidence that transdermal estrogen is associated with a lower thrombotic risk (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.8) than oral estrogen (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.8) in women with the factor V Leiden variant [Canonico et al 2010]. The risk for women with a prothrombotic variant (including the factor V Leiden variant) using transdermal estrogen was similar to that of women with a prothrombotic variant who were not using transdermal estrogen (OR 4.4, 95% CI 2.0 to 9.9 and OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.4, respectively) [Straczek et al 2005]. However, no prospective randomized trials have confirmed the safety of transdermal HRT in women with inherited thrombophilia. Among women with the factor V Leiden variant, the use of oral estrogen was associated with a fourfold increased risk for VTE over transdermal estrogen [Straczek et al 2005].
Arterial Thrombosis
Recent evidence from a large meta-analysis suggested a role for factor V thrombophilia in arterial thrombotic disease [Agosti et al 2023, Valeriani et al 2023]. The OR for cerebrovascular disease was 2.76 (95% CI 1.83-4.18) in individuals homozygous for the factor V Leiden variant, and 1.48 (95% CI 1.29-1.71) for individuals heterozygous for the factor V Leiden variant [Valeriani et al 2023]. The OR for coronary heart disease was 1.68 (95% CI 1.02-2.77) in individuals homozygous for the factor V Leiden variant, and 1.39 (95% CI 1.19-1.61) for individuals heterozygous for the factor V Leiden variant [Valeriani et al 2023].
Prevalence
Factor V Leiden thrombophilia is the most common inherited form of thrombophilia. The prevalence varies by population.
Heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant occurs in 3%-8% of the general United States and European populations. The highest heterozygosity rate is found in Europe. Within Europe, prevalence varies from 10%-15% in southern Sweden and Greece to 2%-3% in Italy and Spain [Kujovich 2011]. The factor V Leiden variant is extremely rare in Asian, African, and indigenous Australian populations [Kujovich 2011]. In the US, prevalence reflects the world distribution of the factor V Leiden variant [Ridker et al 1997, Kujovich 2011], which is present in 5.2% of Americans of European origin, 2.2% of Hispanic Americans, 1.2% of African Americans, 0.45% of Asian Americans, and 1.25% of Native Americans.
The frequency of homozygosity for the factor V Leiden variant is approximately 1:5,000.
The factor V Leiden variant is present in approximately 15%-20% of individuals with a first deep vein thrombosis and up to 50% of individuals with recurrent VTE or an estrogen-related thrombosis.