Table 97Summary clinical evidence profile, Comparison 8: Acupuncture compared to CHM for endometriosis

OutcomesIllustrative comparative risks (95% CI)Relative effect (95% CI)No of participants (studies)Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed riskCorresponding risk
CHMAcupuncture
Dysmenorrhoea-The mean dysmenorrhoea in the intervention groups was
4.81 lower
(6.25 to 3.37 lower)
MD −4.81 (−6.25 to 3.37)67
(1 study)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low2,3
Cure of symptoms1100 per 1,000297 per 1,000
(91 to 970)
RR 2.97 (0.91 to 9.7)67
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2,4

CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio

1

Defined according Guideline for Clinical Research on New Chinese Drugs for Treatment of Pelvic Endometriosis

2

No blinding

3

CI for estimate is very wide, crossing 2 thresholds

4

CI for estimate is very wide crossing 1 threshold

From: 11, Management strategies

Cover of Endometriosis: diagnosis and management
Endometriosis: diagnosis and management.
NICE Guideline, No. 73.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
© NICE 2017.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.