Table 117Summary clinical evidence profile: Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for endometriosis and endometrioma

OutcomesIllustrative comparative risks (95% CI)Relative effect (95% CI)No of Participants (studies)Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Assumed riskCorresponding risk
Diagnostic laparoscopyExcisional/ablation
Endometriosis
Pain score (reduction in VAS at 12 months) - Overall-The mean pain score (reduction in VAS at 12 months) - overall in the intervention groups was
0 higher
(1.22 lower to 1.22 higher)
MD 0 (−1.22 to 1.22)103
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1
Pain score (reduction in VAS at 12 months) - Pelvic-The mean pain score (reduction in VAS at 12 months) - pelvic in the intervention groups was
0.1 lower
(1.3 lower to 1.1 higher)
MD −0.1 (−1.3 to 1.1)103
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1
Pain score (reduction in VAS at 12 months) - Dyspareunia-The mean pain score (reduction in VAS at 12 months) - dyspareunia in the intervention groups was
1.3 higher
(0.29 lower to 2.89 higher)
MD 1.3 (−0.29 to 2.89)103
(1 study)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low1,2
Unintended effects (reduction from VAS score by 12 months after operation (nausea, vomiting) - Nausea-The mean unintended effects (reduction from VAS score by 12 months after operation (nausea, vomiting) - nausea in the intervention groups was
1.1 higher
(0.14 lower to 2.34 higher)
MD 1.1 (−0.14 to 2.34)103
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2,3
Unintended effects (reduction from VAS score by 12 months after operation (nausea, vomiting) - Vomiting-The mean unintended effects (reduction from VAS score by 12 months after operation (nausea, vomiting) - vomiting in the intervention groups was
0.2 higher
(0.71 lower to 1.11 higher)
MD 0.2 (−0.71 to 1.11)103
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate3
Unintended effects (reduction from VAS score by 12 months after operation (nausea, vomiting) - Bloating-The mean unintended effects (reduction from VAS score by 12 months after operation (nausea, vomiting) - bloating in the intervention groups was
0.9 higher
(0.3 lower to 2.1 higher)
MD 0.9 (−0.3 to 2.1)103
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2,3
Endometrioma
Recurrence of pelvic pain - Dysmenorrhoea548 per 1,000389 fewer per 1,000
(from 247 fewer to 466 fewer)
RR 0.29 (0.15 to 0.55)104
(2 studies)
⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate3
Recurrence of pelvic pain - Non-menstrual pelvic pain529 per 1,000429 fewer per 1,000
(from 127 fewer to 503 fewer)
RR 0.19 (0.05 to 0.76)37
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low2,3
Pregnancy rate after surgical treatment233 per 1,000242 more per 1,000
(from 56 more to 552 more)
RR 2.04 (1.24 to 3.37)138
(3 studies)
⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderate2,4
Recurrence of endometrioma - At 12 months256 per 1,000146 fewer per 1,000
(from 69 fewer to 192 fewer)
RR 0.43 (0.25 to 0.73)258
(4 studies)
⊕⊕⊕⊕
High
Recurrence of endometrioma - At 60 months368 per 1,000147 fewer per 1,000
(from 261 fewer to 96 more)
RR 0.6 (0.29 to 1.26)74
(1 study)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low5
Reoperation after surgical treatment up to 60 months follow-up94 per 1,00059 fewer per 1,000
(from 85 fewer to 33 more)
RR 0.37 (0.1 to 1.35)174
(2 studies)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low4,5

CI: confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; MD: mean difference

1

Evidence was downgraded by two due to performance bias (lack of blinding) and attrition bias.

2

Evidence was downgraded by one due to serious imprecision as 95%CI crossed one default MID

3

Evidence was downgraded by one due to lack of blinding.

4

Taking into account weighting in a meta-analysis and the likely contribution from each component, evidence was downgraded by one due to lack of blinding.

5

Evidence was downgraded by two due to very serious imprecision as 95%CI crossed two default MIDs.

From: 11, Management strategies

Cover of Endometriosis: diagnosis and management
Endometriosis: diagnosis and management.
NICE Guideline, No. 73.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
© NICE 2017.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.