Table 50GRADE findings for predictive accuracy of no fetal heart rate acceleration following fetal scalp blood sampling puncture as stimulus

Quality assessmentNumber of women & baby pairsMeasure of diagnostic accuracy (95% CI)Quality
Number. of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsSensitivitySpecificityPositive likelihood ratioNegative likelihood ratio
Fetal scalp pH < 7.20

1 study

(Edersheim 1987)

Case seriesNo serious risk of biasNo serious inconsistencySerious1No serious imprecisionpH < 7.20 = 6/188 (3% of samples)188 samples; women & baby pairs

100%

(Not calculable [NC])a

43.41%

(36.21 to 61)a

1.77

(1.56 to 2.01)a

(NC)aVery low

1 study

(Elimian 1997)

Case seriesSerious2No serious inconsistencySerious1No serious imprecisionpH < 7.20 = 15/108 (14%)108

100%

(NC)b

53.76%

(43.63 to 9)b

2.16

(1.73 to 69)a

(NC)a UsefulLow

1 study

(Lazebnik 1992)

Case seriesNo serious risk of biasNo Serious inconsistencySerious3No serious imprecisionpH < 7.20 = 15/104 (14%)104

73%

(50.95 to 71)b

17%

(9.08 to 63)b

0.88

(0.64 to 21)a

1.58

(0.61 to 12)a

Very low

1 study

(Spencer 1991)

Case seriesSerious2No serious inconsistencySerious4No serious imprecisionpH < 7.20 = 6/138 (4%)138

100%

(NC)a

52.27%

(43.75 to 79)a

2.10

(1.75 to 50)a

0

(NC)a

Very low

1 study

(Umstad 1992)

Case seriesNo serious risk of biasNo serious inconsistencySerious5No serious imprecisionpH < 7.20 = 8/60 (13%)60

62.5%

(28.95 to 96.05)b

67.3%

(54.56 to 80.06)b

1.91

(0.98 to 71)a

0.56

(0.22 to 39)a

Moderate
Fetal scalp pH < 7.21

1 study

(Clark 1982)

Case seriesSerious6No serious inconsistencySerious7No serious imprecisionpH < 7.21 = 19/200 (10%)200

100%

(NC)a

93.37%

(89.75 to 96.99)a

15.08

(8.73 to 26.06)a

0

(NC)a Useful

Very low
Fetal scalp pH < 7.25

1 study

(Spencer 1991)

Case seriesSerious2No serious inconsistencySerious4No serious imprecisionpH < 7.25 = 17/138 (5%)138

65.38%

(47.10 to 83.67)a

53.57%

(44.33 to 62.81)a

1.41

(1.00 to 1.96)a

0.87

(0.79 to 0.95)a

Very low

1 study

(Umstad 1992)

Case seriesNo serious risk of biasNo serious inconsistencySerious5No serious imprecisionpH < 7.25 = 23/60 (38%)60

82.6%

(67.12 to 98.10)b

91.9%

(83.10 to 100)b

10.19

(3,39 to 30.63)a

0.19

(0.08 to 0.46)a

Moderate
Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes

1 study

(Spencer 1991)

Case seriesSerious2No serious inconsistencySerious4No serious imprecisionApgar < 7 = 1/138 (0.7%)138

100%

(NC)a

50.36%

(41.99 to 58.74)a

2.01

(1.70 to 2.38)a

0

(NC)a

Very low

CI confidence interval, NC not calculable

a

Calculated by the 2014 NCC-WCH technical team

b

As reported in study, confidence intervals calculated by the 2014 NCC-WCH technical team

1

Included gestational age > 34 weeks and unclear whether any included women were considered high risk

2

Unclear whether FHR tracing assessor blinded to outcome. Period of FHR observation following stimulation not reported

3

Positive predictive test defined as mean change in FHR < 15 bpm (rather than absence of an acceleration). Insufficient reporting of population, and inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess indirectness

4

Included gestational age < 37 weeks and unclear whether any women were considered high risk

5

Included gestational age > 36 weeks and unclear whether any included women were considered high risk

6

Unclear whether consecutive women were included in the study

7

Insufficient reporting of population and inclusion and exclusion criteria to assess indirectness

From: Appendix I, GRADE tables

Cover of Addendum to intrapartum care: care for healthy women and babies
Addendum to intrapartum care: care for healthy women and babies.
Clinical Guideline, No. 190.1.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
Copyright © National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2017.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.