Table F1.2Credibility Ratings (AMSTAR 2)

Author, YearPICO1Apriori Methods2Study Design Selection3Lit Search Strategy4Study Selection5Data Extraction6Excluded Studies7Included Studies8RoB Assessment9Funding Sources10Statistical Methods11Impact of RoB12RoB Results13Heterogeneity14Publication Bias15COI16Overall Rating17
Alphonsus, 2019YNNPYYNPYNPYNYYYYYNLow
Ashdown-Franks, 2019YNNPYYYPYYYNN/AN/AYYN/AYModerate
Bonini-Rocha, 2018YNNPYYNPYPYYNYNYYYYModerate
Boyne, 2017YNNPYNNPYPYPYNYNNYYNLow
Campbell, 2018YNNPYNNPYPYPYNN/AN/ANYN/AYLow
Charron, 2018YNNPYNNPYPYNNN/AN/ANNN/AYCritically Low
Cugusi, 2017aYNNPYYYYPYPYNN/AN/ANYN/AYLow
Cugusi, 2017bNNNPYYYYYYNYNNYYYModerate
Ćwiękała-Lewis, 2017NNNPYNNPYPYNNN/AN/ANNN/AYCritically Low
Dos Santos Delabary, 2017YNNPYYYPYPYYNYNNYYYLow
Eitivipart, 201918N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/ACritically Low
Firth, 2016YNNPYYNPYPYYNYYYYYYLow
Gaspar, 2019NNNPYYYNNNNN/AN/ANYN/ANCritically Low
Ge, 2017YNNPYYYPYPYYNYNYYYNModerate
Grassmann, 2017YNNPYNNNPYNNN/AN/ANNN/AYCritically Low
Ilunga Tshiswaka, 2018NNNPYYNNNNNN/AN/ANNN/AYCritically Low
Kalyani, 2019YPYNPYYYPYPYYNNNYNNNCritically Low
Krogh, 2017YPYNPYYYNYYYYYYYYYModerate
Li, 2018YNNPYYYPYPYYNYNYYNYLow
Maïano, 2018YNNPYYYNYPYNYYYYYYLow
Maïano, 2019YNNPYYYPYYYNN/AN/AYNN/AYModerate
Manca, 2018YNNPYYYYPYYNYNYYYYModerate
Melo, 2019YNNPYYYPYPYNNN/AN/ANNN/ANCritically Low
Miranda, 2018NNNPYNYYYPYNN/AN/AYYN/AYLow
Morrison, 2017NNNPYNNNYPYNN/AN/AYNN/AYCritically Low
Patterson, 2018YNNPYYYPYPYYNN/AN/AYYN/AYModerate
Pogrebnoy, 2019YNYPYYNPYPYPYNYNNYNNLow
Schröder, 2018YNNPYYYNPYYNN/AN/AYYN/AYLow
Stubbs, 2018YNYPYYYPYPYYNN/AN/AYYN/AYModerate
Stuckenschneider, 2019YNNPYNYPYYPYNN/AN/AYYN/AYModerate
Suarez-Manzano, 2018NNNPYYNNPYNNN/AN/ANNN/AYCritically Low
Veneri, 2018NNNPYYNNPYNNNNNNNYCritically Low
Wiener, 2019YNNPYYNNPYPYNN/AN/ANYN/AYLow
Wu, 2018YNNPYYYNPYNNNNYYNNCritically Low
Zou, 2018aYNNPYYYPYPYPYNYYYYYNLow
Zou, 2018bYNNPYYYPYPYPYNNNYYNYLow

Abbreviations: COI = conflict of interest; N = no; N/A = not applicable; PICO = population, intervention, comparator, outcome; PY = partial yes; RoB = risk of bias; Y = yes

1

Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include the components of PICO?

2

Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol?

3

Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review?

4

Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy?

5

Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate?

6

Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate?

7

Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions?

8

Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail?

9

Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review?

10

Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review?

11

If meta-analysis was performed did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results?

12

If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors assess the potential impact of RoB in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis or other evidence synthesis?

13

Did the review authors account for RoB in individual studies when interpreting/ discussing the results of the review?

14

Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review?

15

If they performed quantitative synthesis did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review?

16

Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review?

17

Shea et al. 2017. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.

18

Eitivipart, 2019 is a review-of-reviews. All included reviews were rated as critically low by review authors and was therefore rated as critically low overall.

From: F1, EVIDENCE ON PHYSICAL ACTIVITY FOR CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS AND ADULTS LIVING WITH DISABILITY

Cover of WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour
WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour.
© World Health Organization 2020.

Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.

Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.

Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).

Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.

Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.