Table 10Summary GRADE table (Take Charge intervention (coaching and mentoring) vs Usual Care)

OutcomeSample sizeEffect size (95% CI)QualityInterpretation of effecta
Mean number of hours spent doing homework post-intervention: assessed by self-report87MD 0.51 (0.08 to 0.94) hoursVery LowEffect favours intervention group but may be less than the MID
Mean number of hours spent doing homework at 9-month follow up: assessed by self-report87MD 0.14 (−0.24 to 0.52) hoursVery LowCould not differentiate
Mean youth knowledge and engagement in educational planning score post-intervention: assessed using the student version of the Educational Planning Assessment87MD 2.45 (0.98 to 3.92)Very LowEffect favours intervention group
Mean youth knowledge and engagement in educational planning score post-intervention: assessed using the parent version of the Educational Planning Assessment87MD 2.81 (−0.94 to 6.56)Very LowCould not differentiate
Mean youth knowledge and engagement in educational planning score post-intervention: assessed using the teacher version of the Educational Planning Assessment87MD 2.51 (−0.35 to 5.37)Very LowCould not differentiate
Mean youth knowledge and engagement in educational planning score at 9-month follow up: assessed using the student version of the Educational Planning Assessment87MD 2.68 (−0.23 to 5.59)Very LowCould not differentiate
Mean youth knowledge and engagement in educational planning score at 9-month follow up: assessed using the parent versions of the Educational Planning Assessment87MD 3.22 (0.32 to 6.12)Very LowEffect favours intervention group but may be less than the MID
Mean youth knowledge and engagement in educational planning score at 9-month follow up: assessed using the teacher versions of the Educational Planning Assessment87MD 2.77 (−0.23 to 5.77)Very LowCould not differentiate
Student self-attribution of accomplishments score post-intervention: youth were asked to list all their educational accomplishments for the past 6 months and a total count was gathered at each time point.87MD 0.80 (0.33 to 1.27)Very LowEffect favours intervention group but may be less than the MID
Student self-attribution of accomplishments score at 9-months follow up: youth were asked to list all their educational accomplishments for the past 6 months and a total count was gathered at each time point.87MD 0.24 (−0.22 to 0.70)Very LowCould not differentiate
(a)

No meaningful difference: crosses line of no effect but not line of MID; Could not differentiate: crosses line of no effect and line of MID; May favour: confidence intervals do not cross line of no effect but cross MID; Favours: confidence intervals do not cross line of no effect or MID

From: Interventions to support learning needs for school-aged looked-after children and young people

Cover of Interventions to support learning needs for school-aged looked-after children and young people
Interventions to support learning needs for school-aged looked-after children and young people: Looked-After Children and Young People: Evidence review I.
NICE Guideline, No. 205.
Copyright © NICE 2021.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.