Table 12Clinical evidence profile: Surgery versus conservative treatment (non-randomised)

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQualityImportance
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsSurgeryConservative treatment (NRS)Relative (95% CI)Absolute
Mortality
2observational studiesvery seriousano serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionnone--cHR 0.65 (0.57 to 0.74)-3VERY LOWCRITICAL
Fractures
2observational studiesvery seriousano serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessSeriousbnone--cHR 0.67 (0.55 to 0.82)-3VERY LOWCRITICAL
Cancer
1observational studiesvery seriousano serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessSeriousbNone

135/1934

(7%)

119/1279

(9.3%)

HR1.11 (0.9 to 1.37)10 more per 1000 (from 9 fewer to 32 more)VERY LOWIMPORTANT
Kidney stones
1observational studiesvery seriousano serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionNone

297/1934

(15.4%)

83/1279

(6.5%)

HR 1.87 (1.3 to 2.69)53 more per 1000 (from 19 more to 100 more)VERY LOWCRITICAL
a

Downgraded by 1 increment if the majority of studies were at high risk of bias, and downgraded by 2 increments if the majority of studies were at very high risk of bias

b

Downgraded by 1 increment if the confidence interval crossed 1 MID, and downgraded by 2 increments if the confidence interval crossed both MIDs

c

Control group rate not reported

From: Evidence review for indications for surgery

Cover of Evidence review for indications for surgery
Evidence review for indications for surgery: Hyperparathyroidism (primary): diagnosis, assessment and initial management: Evidence review C.
NICE Guideline, No. 132.
National Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2019.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.