Initiation
|
---|
1. Adult and pediatric patients 1 month of age and older must meet all 3 of the following criteria for initial treatment: 1.1. Confirmed diagnosis of aHUS at initial presentation, defined by presence of TMA: 1.1.1. ADAMTS-13 activity ≥ 10% on blood samples taken before PE/PI; and 1.1.2. STEC test negative in patients with a history of bloody diarrhea in the preceding 2 weeks. 1.1.3. TMA must be unexplained (not a secondary TMA). 1.2. Evidence of ongoing active TMA and progressing, defined by laboratory test abnormalities despite plasmapheresis, if appropriate. Patients must demonstrate: 1.2.1. Unexplained (not a secondary TMA) thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150 × 109 /L); and hemolysis as indicated by the documentation of 2 of the following: schistocytes on the blood film; low or absent haptoglobin; or LDH above normal. OR 1.2.2. Tissue biopsy confirms TMA in patients who do not have evidence of platelet consumption and hemolysis. 1.3. Evidence of at least 1 of the following documented clinical features of active organ damage or impairment: 1.3.1. Kidney impairment, as demonstrated by one of the following: 1.3.1.1. A decline in eGFR of > 20% in a patient with pre-existing renal impairment; and/or 1.3.1.2. SCr > ULN for age or GFR < 60mL/min and renal function deteriorating despite prior PE/PI in patients who have no history of preexisting renal impairment (i.e., who have no baseline eGFR measurement); OR 1.3.1.3. SCr > the age-appropriate ULN in pediatric patients (as determined by or in consultation with a pediatric nephrologist) OR 1.3.2. The onset of neurological impairment related to TMA. 1.3.3. Other TMA-related manifestations, such as cardiac ischemia, bowel ischemia, pancreatitis, and retinal vein occlusion. | Based on clinical expert opinion and/or evidence from 2 phase III studies that demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in complete TMA response in adult patients with aHUS and pediatric patients with aHUS who are complement inhibitor-naive, and stable hematologic parameters for patients previously treated with eculizumab. | Based on clinical expert opinion, drug plans may consider treatment with ravulizumab for patients who do not respond or lost response to treatment with eculizumab on a case-by-case basis (e.g., when the biology of the complement activation clearly demonstrated C5 activation [by biochemical assessment of complement activation pathways and/or genetics] and as per clinical judgment, where C5 inhibition would be sensible to manage the condition). Based on clinical expert opinion, in pediatrics, where TTP is less common, clinicians would likely not first initiate plasmapheresis (i.e., not early initiation of plasmapheresis until the diagnosis is confirmed) since use of plasmapheresis is not recommended in this setting; however, they agree this would be prudent to do in older patients. |
2. Transplant patients with a documented history of aHUS (i.e., history of TMA [not a secondary TMA only] with ADAMTS 13 > 10%) would be eligible for ravulizumab if they: 2.1. Develop TMA immediately (within hours to 1 month) following a kidney transplant; or 2.2. Previously lost a native or transplanted kidney due to the development of TMA; or 2.3. Have a history of proven aHUS and require prophylaxis with ravulizumab at the time of a kidney transplant | Based on clinical expert opinion. TMAs most commonly appear within 1 month of post-transplant, as such immediately could be considered within hours to 1 month. If a patient previously lost their native kidney to TMA/aHUS, and aHUS is now occurring in their transplanted kidney, they should be eligible to receive treatment with ravulizumab, as their current graft is similarly at risk with each subsequent transplant. | For 2.3, based on clinical expert opinion, if the genotype of the aHUS is tissue related (i.e., not present in the transplant), then ravulizumab should be given pretransplant and for at least 1-month post-transplant with monitoring closely after discontinuation for recurrence. |
3. Patients should not have a history of ravulizumab treatment failure (i.e., treated with ravulizumab with a previous aHUS recurrence). 3.1. Treatment failure is defined as: 3.1.1. Dialysis-dependent at 6 months, and failed to demonstrate resolution or stabilization of neurological or extrarenal complications if these were originally present; OR 3.1.2. On dialysis for ≥ 4 of the previous 6 months while receiving ravulizumab and failed to demonstrate resolution or stabilization of neurological or extrarenal complications if these were originally present; OR 3.1.3. Worsening of kidney function with a reduction in eGFR or increase in SCr ≥ 25% from baseline. | Study 311 and Study 312 exclusion criteria included:Clinical experts stated they would not re-treat a patient with ravulizumab if they had a history of ravulizumab treatment failure. | — |
Renewal
|
---|
4. Assessment of treatment response should be conducted at 6-months, at 12-months, then annually thereafter the following: 4.1. Treatment response is defined as, but not limited to, hematological normalization (e.g., platelet count, LDH), stabilization of end-organ damage (such as acute kidney injury and brain ischemia), transplant graft survival in susceptible individuals, and dialysis avoidance in patients who are pre-ESKD. 4.2. Treatment with ravulizumab can be renewed as long as the patient exhibits a response to treatment or as per physician discretion (e.g., long-term funding based on factors like limited organ reserve or high-risk genetic mutation such as Factor H deficiency). 4.3. At the 6-month assessment, treatment response and no treatment failure (defined in 3.1 above) is required. 4.4. At the 12-month and annual assessments, treatment response, no treatment failure (defined in 3.1 above), and the patient has limited organ reserve or high-risk genetic mutation are required. 4.4.1. Limited organ reserve is defined as significant cardiomyopathy, neurological, gastrointestinal, or pulmonary impairment related to TMA; or Grade 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 30mL/min) is required. | Based on clinical expert opinion, the outcomes indicating a favourable response include resolution of TMA (normalization of LDH and platelet count), and stabilization of end-organ damage such as acute kidney injury and brain ischemia, transplant graft survival in susceptible individuals, and dialysis avoidance in patients who are pre-ESKD. According to clinical experts, the required duration of treatment with C5 inhibition is unknown. It is possible to discontinue treatment with ravulizumab in patients with aHUS without a genetic mutation in complement 3 to 6 months after remission is achieved. Lifelong treatment may be considered for patients with high-risk complement genetic variations (such as, but not limited to, Factor H deficiency,) or limited organ reserve. Patients with DGKE mutations may discontinue if no response to treatment is observed. | — |
5. A patient previously diagnosed with aHUS and who responded to treatment with ravulizumab and has not failed ravulizumab is eligible to restart ravulizumab if the patient redevelops a TMA related to aHUS and meets the following clinical conditions: 5.1. Significant hemolysis as evidenced by presence of schistocytes on the blood film, or low or absent haptoglobin, or LDH above normal; AND 5.2. EITHER 5.2.1. Platelet consumption as measured by either ≥ 25% decline from patient baseline or thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150,000 × 109/L); OR 5.2.2. TMA-related organ impairment (e.g., unexplained rise in serum creatinine with onset of urine dipstick positive for hemoglobin) including on recent biopsy. | Based on clinical expert opinion, if a patient redevelops a TMA related to aHUS, ravulizumab needs to be restarted to prevent end-organ damage. | — |
Prescribing
|
---|
6. Ravulizumab should be prescribed by or in consultation with a pediatric nephrologist, a nephrologist, a pediatric hematologist or a hematologist. | Based on clinical expert input, ravulizumab can be given at home with nursing support or at an infusion centre. A specialist, such as a nephrologist or hematologist with expertise in TMA, is needed to monitor the patients. | — |
Pricing
|
---|
7. Ravulizumab should be negotiated so that it does not exceed the drug program cost of treatment with the least costly complement inhibitor reimbursed for the treatment of aHUS. | No clear evidence of non-inferiority of ravulizumab relative to eculizumab was established through the submitted indirect treatment comparison. Additionally, the finding of no statistically significant difference for ravulizumab relative to eculizumab within the context of the submitted indirect treatment comparison is subject to substantial uncertainty owing to methodological challenges of the available data. As such, there is insufficient evidence to justify a cost premium for ravulizumab over the least expensive complement inhibitor reimbursed for aHUS. | — |
Feasibility of adoption
|
---|
8. The feasibility of the adoption of ravulizumab must be addressed. | The magnitude of uncertainty in the budget impact must be addressed to ensure the feasibility of adoption. Based on public list prices for eculizumab, ravulizumab is expected to lead to cost savings in plans that reimburse eculizumab in this population. However, there is uncertainty regarding the potential cost-savings across all participating plans, since not all plans currently reimburse eculizumab. The feasibility of adoption will be an issue in these jurisdictions. | — |