NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Series GSE251837 Query DataSets for GSE251837
Status Public on Jun 18, 2024
Title The motility defect caused by absence of the transcriptional regulator LdtR in Sinorhizobium meliloti is restored by mutations in the motility genes motA and motS
Organism Sinorhizobium meliloti RU11/001
Experiment type Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing
Summary The flagellar motor is a powerful macromolecular machine used to propel bacteria through various environments. Flagellar motility of the alpha-proteobacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti is nearly abolished in the absence of the transcriptional regulator LdtR, which is involved in peptidoglycan remodeling. We report that LdtR does not regulate motility gene transcription. Remarkably, the motility defects of the DldtR mutant can be restored by secondary mutations in the motility gene motA or a previously uncharacterized gene in the flagellar regulon, which we named motS. MotS is not essential for S. meliloti motility and may serve an accessory role in flagellar motor function. Structural modeling predicts that MotS is comprised of an N-terminal transmembrane segment, a long-disordered region, and a conserved β-sandwich domain. The C-terminus of MotS is localized in the periplasm. Genetics-based substitution of MotA with a MotAG12S variant protein also restored the ΔldtR motility defect. The MotAG12S variant causes a local polarity shift at the periphery of the MotAB stator units. We propose that MotS may be required for optimal alignment of stators in wild-type flagellar motors but becomes detrimental in cells with altered peptidoglycan. Similarly, the polarity shift in the stator units composed of MotB/MotAG12S might stabilize its interaction with altered peptidoglycan.
 
Overall design To investigate the differential gene expression profiles of Sinorhizobium meliloti ΔldtR cells compared to wild-type under motility-promoting conditions, we grew three replicates of each strain (six samples total) in Bromfield overlay plates to early log phase and harvested RNA from equivalent amounts of bacteria.
RNA-seq analysis was performed for both strains (three replicates) and the data used to perform comparative gene expression analysis between the two strains.
 
Contributor(s) Sobe RC, Scharf BE
Citation(s) 38458990
Submission date Dec 21, 2023
Last update date Sep 17, 2024
Contact name Birgit E Scharf
E-mail(s) bscharf@vt.edu
Phone 1-540-231-0757
Organization name Virginia Tech
Department Biological Sciences
Lab Scharf
Street address 970 Washington St SW
City Blacksburg
State/province VA
ZIP/Postal code 24060
Country USA
 
Platforms (1)
GPL34034 NextSeq 1000 (Sinorhizobium meliloti RU11/001)
Samples (6)
GSM7988866 Wild type RU11/001- Replicate 1
GSM7988867 Wild type RU11/001- Replicate 2
GSM7988868 Wild type RU11/001- Replicate 3
Relations
BioProject PRJNA1055534

Download family Format
SOFT formatted family file(s) SOFTHelp
MINiML formatted family file(s) MINiMLHelp
Series Matrix File(s) TXTHelp

Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSE251837_DESeqs2_Analysis.xlsx 414.6 Kb (ftp)(http) XLSX
GSE251837_RAW.tar 2.6 Mb (http)(custom) TAR (of XLSX)
SRA Run SelectorHelp
Raw data are available in SRA

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap