NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Series GSE81987 Query DataSets for GSE81987
Status Public on Nov 11, 2016
Title Hsf1-ChIP-on-chip: Molecular mechanisms that distinguish TFIID housekeeping from regulatable SAGA promoters
Organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Experiment type Genome binding/occupancy profiling by array
Summary An important distinction is frequently made between constitutively expressed housekeeping genes versus regulated genes. Although generally characterized by different DNA elements, chromatin architecture and cofactors, it is not known to what degree promoter classes strictly follow regulatability rules and which molecular mechanisms dictate such differences. We show that SAGA-dominated/TATA-box promoters are more responsive to changes in the amount of activator, even compared to TFIID/TATA-like promoters that depend on the same activator Hsf1. Regulatability is therefore an inherent property of promoter class. Further analyses show that SAGA/TATA-box promoters are more dynamic because TBP recruitment through SAGA is susceptible to removal by Mot1. In addition, the nucleosome configuration upon activator depletion shifts on SAGA/TATA-box promoters and seems less amenable to preinitiation complex formation. The results explain the fundamental difference between housekeeping and regulatable genes, revealing an additional facet of combinatorial control: an activator can elicit a different response dependent on core promoter class.
 
Overall design Hsf1 was depleted from the nucleus using a low dose of rapamycin (0.15 µM) and cells were crosslinked and harvested at different times after the rapamycin addition (0, 15, 30, 60 and 90 minutes). As a control, WT cells were taken along that were subjected to 90 minutes of the same rapamycin concentration. Subsequently, the cells were harvested and ChIP was performed using an anti-GFP antibody. All immunoprecipitations (IPs) were done in biological quadruplicate. After cleanup, the DNA was hybridized to high-density tilling arrays, with the IP sample in one channel and the corresponding input in the other channel. Two out of the four replicates were used for the dye-swap.
 
Contributor(s) de Jonge W, O'Duibhir E, Lijnzaad P, van Leenen D, Groot Koerkamp MJ, Kemmeren P, Holstege F
Citation(s) 27979920
Submission date May 27, 2016
Last update date Dec 19, 2016
Contact name Marian Groot Koerkamp
Organization name Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Department Research
Lab Drostlab
Street address Heidelberglaan 25
City Utrecht
State/province Utrecht
ZIP/Postal code 3584 CS
Country Netherlands
 
Platforms (1)
GPL21864 A-UMCU-Y44K-4.0
Samples (24)
GSM2179661 HSF1_t0_slow_2_INPUT vs. HSF1_t0_slow_2_IP
GSM2179662 HSF1_t0_slow_3_IP vs. HSF1_t0_slow_3_INPUT
GSM2179663 HSF1_t0_slow_4_IP vs. HSF1_t0_slow_4_INPUT
This SubSeries is part of SuperSeries:
GSE81481 HSF1 and MOT1-expression and binding: Molecular mechanisms that distinguish TFIID housekeeping from regulatable SAGA promoters
Relations
BioProject PRJNA323574

Download family Format
SOFT formatted family file(s) SOFTHelp
MINiML formatted family file(s) MINiMLHelp
Series Matrix File(s) TXTHelp

Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSE81987_RAW.tar 45.9 Mb (http)(custom) TAR (of TXT)
GSE81987_final_gene_expression_matrix.txt.gz 2.3 Mb (ftp)(http) TXT
Processed data included within Sample table
Processed data are available on Series record

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap