NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM262924 Query DataSets for GSM262924
Status Public on Jun 01, 2010
Title Mouse 197 Control Contralateral Unstimulated EDL Muscle
Sample type RNA
 
Source name Swiss Webster Male Mouse 197_Control EDL Muscle
Organism Mus musculus
Characteristics The contralateral muscle on the non-stimulated side of the animal provides a control that is genetically identical and subjected to the same circulating plasma hormones and growth factors.
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol Frozen tissue specimens were transferred to 15 ml tubes (Sarstedt, Inc. Newton, NC) containing a ten-fold volume of TRIzol based on tissue weight (1ml/0.1mg; Life Technologies/Gibco, Gaithersburg,MD) and subjected to RNA purification as previously described (38). Homogenization was performed in these tubes followed by incubation at room temperature to permit complete dissociation of nucleoprotein complexes. Addition of 0.2 ml of chloroform per 1 ml of TRIzol reagent and centrifugation was performed to allow phase separation of the RNA. Total RNA was precipitated by mixing the aqueous phase with isopropanol. Samples were subsequently incubated, centrifuged and the supernatant removed. The pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, vortexed, centrifuged and air-dried followed by reconstitution in 100 ul of nuclease free water. For cultured cells, TRIzol was added directly to culture plates (5mls/100mm plate) after they were rinsed with ice cold PBS. The cells were harvested with a cell scraper into 15 ml tubes followed by homogenization. The aqueous layer was collected after organic phase separation as previously described and RNA was precipitated, washed with ethanol and resuspended in nuclease-free water as for the whole muscles. Criteria for inclusion in microarray studies was a spectrophotometric absorption ratio 260/280>1.8 (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE) and RIN value >0.8 via electrophoretic analysis (Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA).
Label Biotin
Label protocol In vitro transcription (IVT) of total RNA utilized the CodeLink™ Target Preparation Protocol (GE CodeLink™ Microarray System, Piscataway, NJ) as previously described (38). Briefly, 5 micrograms of purified RNA underwent cDNA synthesis using Invitrogen First and Second strand cDNA kits (Invitrogen, Austin,TX). Six bacterial control mRNAs were amplified in parallel to serve as fiducial markers and for intensity normalization during microarray scanning. Purification of double-stranded cDNA was performed using the QIAquick purification kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and cRNA was synthesized via reverse transcriptase (Ambion, Austin, TX) in biotin-11-UTP (Perkin Elmer; Boston, MA) by incubation for 14 hours in a water bath at 37C. Biotin-labeled cRNA was recovered using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and quantitation of the cRNA was performed by UV spectrophotometry at 260 nm. Confirmation of cRNA diversity was obtained using the Bioanalyzer 2100 to generate an electrophoretogram for each IVT reaction substrate which was characterized regarding sample yield, integrity and size diversity against a calibrated laboratory RNA standard. Based on evaluation of bacterial sequences incorporated as controls in the IVT assay, this step resulted in amplification of mRNA by only 50 to 100-fold thereby reducing the potential for errors associated with primer specific exponential amplification (77).
 
Hybridization protocol CodeLink™ fragmentation buffer was added to the cRNA (5ul buffer/10ug cRNA) and incubated 20 minutes at 94C. Fragmented cRNA was suspended in hybridization solution containing nuclease-free water such that 250ul loading volume per array contained 10ug of cRNA. The solution was vortexed, heated (5 minutes at 90C) and transferred to ice prior to loading. Each slide contained a removable plastic hybridization chamber with an infusion port that was sealed immediately after loading. Microarrays were placed in a mixing incubator (Innova 4080 Shaking incubator, New Brunswick Scientific Co., Edison, NJ) for 18 hours, 300 rpm at 37C. CodeLink arrays were selected because of their high sensitivity and low error rate compared to other platforms especially regarding transcripts expressed at low copy numbers (73). After hybridization, arrays were individually taken from the incubator and their hybridization chambers were removed. The slides were placed in a reservoir containing 0.75X TNT (0.1M Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20) for a 1 hour high-stringency wash at 46C. The arrays were incubated in Streptavidin Alexa Fluor 647 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 minutes (0.2% Alexafluor-647 in TNB=0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.5% NEN Blocking Reagent, pH 7.6 (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA). Slides were subsequently washed (1XTNT-5 min. each of 4 washes at RT; 0.1% SSC and 0.05% Tween20, 30 sec. at RT) and dried by low speed centrifugation.
Scan protocol Slides were scanned using a 4000B GenePix scanner (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) that was calibrated prior to each use. Laser scanning parameters were set at 635 nm, PMT voltage at 600, resolution of 10 microns and the scan area adjusted for the entire array. Analysis of the array image was configured using the CodeLink™ Expression Analysis software (version 5.0). The program generates raw intensity outputs for each spot by segmentation and detection of spot intensity versus surrounding background. Data for each spot was determined as intensity per pixel within the probe zone after local background subtraction. The data for the array were then generated as both raw intensity values and normalized for the large dynamic range by dividing each spot by the overall median intensity value for that array. Values derived from poor or questionable spot profiles were removed from further computation as were all manufacturing errors designated by the CodeLink™ manufacturing spot report.
Description Biotinylated cRNA probe is prepared and hybridization is carried out following the CodeLink protocols and reagents
Data processing Raw intensities were normalized by CodeLink software based on global median for each array. CodeLink also calculated a threshold value based on the negative controls. The raw threshold value for this array is 7.941 and the normalized threshold value for this array is 0.208. To obtain the same data set we used for analysis, the normalized threshold value must be subtracted from each probe in the "value" column.
 
Submission date Feb 06, 2008
Last update date Jun 16, 2009
Contact name John Michael Krill-Burger
E-mail(s) burgerm@upmc.edu
Phone 412-656-6727
Organization name University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Street address Rm. WG21.3 Shadyside Hospital
City Pittsburgh
State/province PA
ZIP/Postal code 15232
Country USA
 
Platform ID GPL6462
Series (2)
GSE10454 Mouse EDL Muscle Chronic Electrical Stimulation Study
GSE14421 Acute Molecular Response of Mouse Hindlimb Muscle To Chronic Stimulation

Data table header descriptions
ID_REF
SIGNAL_RAW Raw Intensity
VALUE Median Normalized by CodeLink Software

Data table
ID_REF SIGNAL_RAW VALUE
1 55.55508475 1.453718068
2 2963.054313 77.5346777
3 125.4302789 3.282152543
4 9.344202899 0.244511131
5 4.13253012 0.108136523
6 401.8283262 10.51470087
7 374.5406504 9.800660247
8 4.759259259 0.124536237
9 316.0950704 8.271306166
10 10.84651163 0.283822264
11 635.2753623 16.62334377
12 10.70819672 0.280202957
13 1317.179054 34.4668179
14 328.6803279 8.600626447
15 17.56065574 0.45951226
16 33.43534483 0.874907582
17 59.21923077 1.549598315
18 1.445783133 0.03783202
19 4.163043478 0.108934971
20 2.006578947 0.052506446

Total number of rows: 10500

Table truncated, full table size 290 Kbytes.




Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSM262924.tif.gz 10.6 Mb (ftp)(http) TIFF
Processed data included within Sample table

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap