NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM296850 Query DataSets for GSM296850
Status Public on Jun 12, 2008
Title PimaS7 Cotton fiber Expression at 8dpa relative to 5dpa
Sample type RNA
 
Channel 1
Source name Developing Cotton fiber at 8 days post anthesis (dpa)
Organism Gossypium barbadense
Characteristics Flowers were tagged on the day of anthesis (0 days post anthesis (dpa)). Developing bolls from the first fruiting positions closest to the stem were collected at 8 dpa between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. to eliminate diurnal effects. Bolls were collected from different plants, and immediately mingled, frozen in liquid Nitrogen, and then stored in 50-ml polypropylene tubes at -80°C.
Growth protocol G. barbadense L. cv. Pima S7, also known as Egyptian cotton, was grown in the green house under a 30/21°C day/night temperature regime in a randomized block design
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol Total RNA was extracted using the modified hot borate method (Wan and Wilkins, 1994; Wilkins and Smart, 1996; Arpat et al., 2004)
Label Alexa Fluor® 555 and Alexa Fluor® 647 (Dye Swap included)
Label protocol Total RNA samples were reverse transcribed and fluorescently labeled using the amino-allyl reverse transcription labeling protocol (Hughes et al., 2001; Arpat et al., 2004).
Total RNA (10 μg) spiked with 1000 pg of a reference mRNA spike mix (Lucidea Universal Scorecard, Amersham Pharmacia) was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA in the presence of amino allyl-modified dUTP (aa-dUTP) (Arpat et al., 2004, Hughes et al., 2001). The reverse transcription reaction mix contained ~10 µg “spiked” total RNA, 5g poly-T21VQ primers (Operon), 0.2 mM dNTPs (Sigma), 0.2 mM aminoallyl-dUTP/dUTP (Sigma) in a 2:3 ratio, and 2.5 U SuperScript III (Invitrogen). Following incubation for 2 hours at 45°C, the aminoallyl-labeled cDNA was purified using Microcon YM-30 columns (MilliPore) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Aminoallyl-cDNA was labeled using Alexa Fluor 555 and 647 succinimidyl ester dyes according to manufacturer’s instructions (Molecular Probes, Inc.), and purified using the QiaQuick PCR purification kit (Qiagen).
 
Channel 2
Source name Developing Cotton fiber at 5 days post anthesis (dpa)
Organism Gossypium barbadense
Characteristics Flowers were tagged on the day of anthesis (0 days post anthesis (dpa)). Developing bolls from the first fruiting positions closest to the stem were collected at 8 dpa between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. to eliminate diurnal effects. Bolls were collected from different plants, and immediately mingled, frozen in liquid Nitrogen, and then stored in 50-ml polypropylene tubes at -80°C.
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol Total RNA was extracted using the modified hot borate method (Wan and Wilkins, 1994; Wilkins and Smart, 1996; Arpat et al., 2004)
Label Alexa Fluor® 555 and Alexa Fluor® 647 (Dye Swap included)
Label protocol Total RNA samples were reverse transcribed and fluorescently labeled using the amino-allyl reverse transcription labeling protocol (Hughes et al., 2001; Arpat et al., 2004).
Total RNA (10 μg) spiked with 1000 pg of a reference mRNA spike mix (Lucidea Universal Scorecard, Amersham Pharmacia) was used to synthesize first-strand cDNA in the presence of amino allyl-modified dUTP (aa-dUTP) (Arpat et al., 2004, Hughes et al., 2001). The reverse transcription reaction mix contained ~10 µg “spiked” total RNA, 5g poly-T21VQ primers (Operon), 0.2 mM dNTPs (Sigma), 0.2 mM aminoallyl-dUTP/dUTP (Sigma) in a 2:3 ratio, and 2.5 U SuperScript III (Invitrogen). Following incubation for 2 hours at 45°C, the aminoallyl-labeled cDNA was purified using Microcon YM-30 columns (MilliPore) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Aminoallyl-cDNA was labeled using Alexa Fluor 555 and 647 succinimidyl ester dyes according to manufacturer’s instructions (Molecular Probes, Inc.), and purified using the QiaQuick PCR purification kit (Qiagen).
 
 
Hybridization protocol The hybridization was performed according to Arpat et al., 2004.
Printed slides were pre-hybridized in 5X SSC, 0.1% SDS, and 1 mg/µl BSA in a sealed coplin jar for 45 minutes at 42˚C, followed by two washes of 10 sec each in filtered ddH2O preheated to 42˚C, and dried with filtered compressed air. Alexa-labeled cDNA (500 ng/fluor or the equivalent of 40 to 45 pmol of dye depending upon the frequency of incorporation (FOI)) was suspended in 45µl of hybridization buffer (25% formamide, 4.16X SSC, 0.08% SDS, and 0.1 µg/µl sheared salmon sperm DNA) and loaded underneath the cover-slip (M Series LifterSlip, 22x60mm, Erie Scientific) using capillary action. Following hybridization at 42ºC for 16-18 hours in a humidified hybridization chamber (Genetix), slides were washed sequentially at 42ºC in 2X SSC, 0.2% SDS for 5 min, 0.5X SSC for 3 minutes, 4 times in 0.1X SSC for 1 minute per wash, and 0.05X SSC for 10 seconds, followed by drying with filtered compressed air.
Scan protocol Hybridized slides were scanned using a GenPix3000 array scanner (Axon Instruments, CA, USA) followed by feature extraction to quantify signal intensities using ImaGene 4.2 software (BioDiscovery).
Description PDF files of detailed experimental protocols for RNA isolation (SOP MA002 v1.1), amino-allyl labeling (SOP MA003 v2.1) and microarray hybridization (SOP MA004 v2.1) can be accessed at Cotton Functional Genomics Center website.
Data processing Data were filtered and corrected for bias using the following steps: (1) Low quality spots (dust particles, scratches, high background, or irregularly shaped spots) were manually flagged and excluded. (2) Spot intensities were corrected by subtracting the mean of the background intensities from the signal intensity to reduce background noise. (3) Corrected spot intensities lower than the mean of corrected buffer spot plus 3 STDEV (Standard Deviation) were excluded (Hüser et al., 2003). (4) The absolute ratios (M) of dye swaps were correlated and the upper most 30% quartile of divergent data points were removed. This cut-off value enhanced the correlation between dye swaps by increasing the linearity. (5) Exclusion of all genes in which <60% of their data points did not pass all filtration steps. Reference calibration spots, which were spiked-in at a 1:1 ratio in both channels, were weighted to 10 before normalizing data. In order to adjust for effects that arise from variation inherent to microarray technology rather than biological differences in the RNA samples, filtered data was normalized using intensity-dependent normalization (Yang et al., 2002). The robust scatter plot smoother ‘Lowess’ implemented in R (version2.0.1) statistical software package and LIMMA (version 1.9.0) was used to perform a local per chip normalization. To make full use of within-array duplicated spots, LIMMA’s pooled correlation method (Symth et al., 2003) was used to estimate the strength of the correlation between duplicated spots by fitting separate linear models to the expression data for each gene, but with a common value for the between-replicate correlations. Normalized expression data at each time point was used as a reference point for all other time points (global reference) to calculate the relative expression, meaning that the expression at any given time point will be estimated independently six times relative to each of the other six time points.
 
Submission date Jun 04, 2008
Last update date Jun 05, 2008
Contact name Thea A Wilkins
URL http://genomics.ttu.edu
Organization name Texas Tech University
Department Plant and Soil Sciences
Lab Plant Functional Genomics Lab
Street address 2500 Broadway,Campus Box 42122
City Lubbock
State/province TX
ZIP/Postal code TX 79409
Country USA
 
Platform ID GPL6917
Series (1)
GSE11689 Expression profiling of cotton (Gossypium barbadense L. Pima S7) fiber transcriptome during the development

Data table header descriptions
ID_REF
VALUE The expression ratio; Lg2-fold changes between test channel and 5dpa (M-value)
A.Value The Average Log2-expression level for the gene across all arrays and channels in the experiment
T.statistics Moderate t-statistics
P.Value P. value
adj.P.Value P. value adjusted for multiple testing (FDR)
B.statistics The log-odds that the gene is differentially expressed

Data table
ID_REF VALUE A.Value T.statistics P.Value adj.P.Value B.statistics
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_12134|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig2327 4.842749214 11.39260683 9.209040872 1.84E-12 2.26E-08 16.20726097
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_11973|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig1306 1.728030711 9.02831314 8.642843254 1.00E-11 6.16E-08 15.10284875
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_10713|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig2124 1.661364838 9.850882744 8.355522864 3.30E-11 1.35E-07 14.0662143
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_09993|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig2093 0.982542389 8.115772046 5.83101683 3.28E-07 0.00082855 6.208765674
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_04883|CON_001_22763 1.119176975 8.857938784 5.839415384 3.37E-07 0.00082855 6.185891573
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_12330|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig1737 1.877124184 8.793515188 5.717895993 4.96E-07 0.001017311 5.848826675
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_10188|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig979 2.097173854 10.3264376 5.207914899 3.26E-06 0.005725527 4.197616522
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_06214|CON_001_20350 2.489714121 4.656599565 5.164864751 7.72E-06 0.01186546 3.131368418
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_09886|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig2056 1.637082648 7.588965286 4.735246011 1.82E-05 0.022712385 2.67720231
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_05975|CON_001_19719 -1.84705721 5.386657241 -4.934882005 1.90E-05 0.022712385 2.648629702
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_03216|Ed_contig_1160 1.466258334 7.560025339 4.678926127 2.13E-05 0.022712385 2.559760034
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_10590 -1.43864308 9.741465995 -4.650524517 2.22E-05 0.022712385 2.531112484
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_07666|CON_001_24630 1.456798315 6.408846173 4.566188326 3.32E-05 0.031421871 2.135430749
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_12212|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig2355 1.469334306 11.10698354 4.471124554 4.31E-05 0.035771358 1.938333542
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_12227|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig1700 -1.541615636 6.878669442 -4.544554607 4.36E-05 0.035771358 1.888517961
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_11603|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig776 2.219326799 7.376493469 4.436221215 4.73E-05 0.036337929 1.86624657
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_10047|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig928 0.994858189 8.411878728 4.333259238 6.52E-05 0.047204246 1.588147758
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_07485|CON_002_17025 -2.595486437 4.827160323 -4.485022531 0.000103021 0.069702561 0.871953386
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_11074|Ed_XGI.screen.Contig1924 -7.855681087 3.771686263 -5.249497282 0.000111721 0.069702561 -1.205134891
GA_10dpa_fiberEST_07415|CON_001_23973 0.629792893 10.41788465 4.167483692 0.00011331 0.069702561 1.106625665

Total number of rows: 12263

Table truncated, full table size 1362 Kbytes.




Supplementary file Size Download File type/resource
GSM296850_filtered_tw3304_cy3.txt.gz 1.5 Mb (ftp)(http) TXT
GSM296850_filtered_tw3304_cy5.txt.gz 1.5 Mb (ftp)(http) TXT
GSM296850_filtered_tw3305_cy3.txt.gz 1.5 Mb (ftp)(http) TXT
GSM296850_filtered_tw3305_cy5.txt.gz 1.5 Mb (ftp)(http) TXT
Processed data included within Sample table

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap