GEO Accession viewer

NCBI > GEO > Accession Display

Not logged in | Login

GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.

Sample GSM5973529

Query DataSets for GSM5973529

Status

Public on Oct 12, 2022

Title

HN_DLS2

Sample type

SRA

Source name

HN_DLS2

Organism

Solanum tuberosum

Characteristics

tissue: roots and leaves
tag: Urea (containing N 46percent) 18kg/667m2

Treatment protocol

The roots and leaves were collected at the potato seedling stage (Seedling stage, S) and budding stage (A), respectively, quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen, stored at -80 °C and sent to Lianchuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for miRNA analysis. Sequencing and degradome analysis and qRT-PCR validation.

Growth protocol

Seed potatoes were potted after dicing treatment, and two different N treatments were set up. The main source of nitrogen fertilizer was urea (containing N 46%). No nitrogen application: 0kg/667m2, excessive nitrogen application: 25kg/667m2. The dosage of calcium superphosphate (containing P2O5 46%) is 18kg/667m2, the dosage of potassium sulfate (containing K2O 50%) is 36kg/667m2, all fertilizers are applied as base fertilizer at one time, 10 pots are planted in each treatment, and 3 biological plants are set up. Learn to repeat.

Extracted molecule

total RNA

Extraction protocol

Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's procedure
Approximately 5 µg of total RNA were used to prepare nine small RNA librariesaccording to the protocol of TruSeq Small RNA Sample Prep Kits (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). And then the libraries were sequenced by Illumina Hiseq 2500 at the LC-BIO following the vendor’s recommended protocol. Raw reads were subjected to an in-house program, ACGT101-miR (LC Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA) to remove adapter dimers, junk, low complexity, common RNA families (rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA) and repeats.
Total RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) following the manufacturer's procedure
Approximately 5 µg of total RNA were used to prepare nine small RNA librariesaccording to the protocol of TruSeq Small RNA Sample Prep Kits (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). And then the libraries were sequenced by Illumina Hiseq 2500 at the LC-BIO following the vendor’s recommended protocol. Raw reads were subjected to an in-house program, ACGT101-miR (LC Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA) to remove adapter dimers, junk, low complexity, common RNA families (rRNA, tRNA, snRNA, snoRNA) and repeats.

Library strategy

miRNA-Seq

Library source

transcriptomic

Library selection

size fractionation

Instrument model

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Data processing

Subsequently, unique sequences with length in 18~25 nucleotide were mapped to specific species precursors in miRBase 22.0 by BLAST search to identify known miRNAs and novel 3p- and 5p- derived miRNAs.
Length variation at both 3' and 5' ends and one mismatch inside of the sequence were allowed in the alignment.
The unique sequences mapping to specific species mature miRNAs in hairpin arms were identified as known miRNAs. The unique sequences mapping to the other arm of known specific species precursor hairpin opposite to the annotated mature miRNA-containing arm were considered to be novel 5p- or 3p-derived miRNA candidates.
The remaining sequences were mapped to other selected species precursors (with the exclusion of specific species) in miRBase 22.0 by BLAST search, and the mapped pre-miRNAs were further BLASTed against the specific species genomes to determine their genomic locations.
The above two we defined as known miRNAs. The unmapped sequences were BLASTed against the genomes, and the hairpin RNA structures containing sequences were predicated from the flank 120 nt sequences using RNAfold software (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac. at/cgi-bin/RNAfold.cgi). The criteria for secondary structure prediction were: (1) number of nucleotides in one bulge in stem (≤12) (2) number of base pairs in the stem region of the predicted hairpin (≥16) (3) cutoff of free energy (kCal/mol ≤-15) (4) length of hairpin (up and down stems + terminal loop ≥50) (5) length of hairpin loop (≤200). (6) number of nucleotides in one bulge in mature region (≤4) (7) number of biased errors in one bulge in mature region (≤2) (8) number of biased bulges in mature region (≤2) (9) number of errors in mature region (≤4) (10) number of base pairs in the mature region of the predicted hairpin (≥12) (11) percent of mature in stem (≥80).
Assembly: Reference Genome Information
Supplementary files format and content: excel,expression profiles
Subsequently, unique sequences with length in 18~25 nucleotide were mapped to specific species precursors in miRBase 22.0 by BLAST search to identify known miRNAs and novel 3p- and 5p- derived miRNAs.
Length variation at both 3' and 5' ends and one mismatch inside of the sequence were allowed in the alignment.
The unique sequences mapping to specific species mature miRNAs in hairpin arms were identified as known miRNAs. The unique sequences mapping to the other arm of known specific species precursor hairpin opposite to the annotated mature miRNA-containing arm were considered to be novel 5p- or 3p-derived miRNA candidates.
The remaining sequences were mapped to other selected species precursors (with the exclusion of specific species) in miRBase 22.0 by BLAST search, and the mapped pre-miRNAs were further BLASTed against the specific species genomes to determine their genomic locations.
The above two we defined as known miRNAs. The unmapped sequences were BLASTed against the genomes, and the hairpin RNA structures containing sequences were predicated from the flank 120 nt sequences using RNAfold software (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac. at/cgi-bin/RNAfold.cgi). The criteria for secondary structure prediction were: (1) number of nucleotides in one bulge in stem (≤12) (2) number of base pairs in the stem region of the predicted hairpin (≥16) (3) cutoff of free energy (kCal/mol ≤-15) (4) length of hairpin (up and down stems + terminal loop ≥50) (5) length of hairpin loop (≤200). (6) number of nucleotides in one bulge in mature region (≤4) (7) number of biased errors in one bulge in mature region (≤2) (8) number of biased bulges in mature region (≤2) (9) number of errors in mature region (≤4) (10) number of base pairs in the mature region of the predicted hairpin (≥12) (11) percent of mature in stem (≥80).

Submission date

Mar 25, 2022

Last update date

Oct 12, 2022

Contact name

yue lu

E-mail(s)

luyueyue9188@gmail.com

Phone

18186859188

Organization name

Jilin Agricultural University