Table 161GRADE evidence profile: Docetaxel, ifosfamide for second-line chemotherapy

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQuality
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsDocetaxel, ifosfamideControlRelative
(95% CI)
Absolute
Overall survival
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3noneN=22-Median OS = 4 months⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Progression-free survival
0No evidence available
Overall tumour response (assessed with: WHO criteria)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none5/20
(25%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Neutropenic sepsis (assessed with: WHO criteria)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none1/22
(4.5%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Grade 3-4 Thrombocytopenia (assessed with: WHO criteria)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none1/22
(4.5%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Grade 3-4 Anaemia (assessed with: WHO criteria)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none0/22
(0%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Grade 3-4 Leucopenia (assessed with: WHO criteria)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none11/53
(20.8%)4
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Treatment-related mortality
0No evidence available
Health-related quality of life
0No evidence available
1
2

Neoadjuvant (n=2) and adjuvant (n=4) chemotherapy considered as first-line chemotherapy;

3

Small sample size / low number of events limit the precision of this outcome

4

Reported as per cycle

From: 5, Managing locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer

Cover of Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Management.
NICE Guideline, No. 2.
National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK).
Copyright © National Collaborating Centre for Cancer.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.