Table 165GRADE evidence profile: Gemcitabine, Docetaxel for second-line chemotherapy

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQuality
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsGemcitabine, docetaxelControlRelative
(95% CI)
Absolute
Overall survival
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3noneN=29-Median OS = 7.7 months⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Progression-free survival
0No evidence available
Overall tumour response (assessed with: ECOG criteria)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none5/27
(18.5%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Neutropenic fever
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none2/29
(6.9%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Grade 3-4 Thrombocytopenia (assessed with: NCI-CTC)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none4/29
(13.8%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Grade 3-4 Anaemia (assessed with: NCI-CTC)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none8/29
(27.6%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Grade 3-4 Granulocytopenia (assessed with: NCI-CTC)
11observational studiesnonenoneserious2serious3none10/29
(34.5%)
---⊕○○○
VERY LOW
Treatment-related mortality
0No evidence available
Health-related quality of life
0No evidence available
1
2

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy considered as first-line chemotherapy (proportion of sample not stated);

3

Small sample size / low number of events limit the precision of this outcome

From: 5, Managing locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer

Cover of Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Management.
NICE Guideline, No. 2.
National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK).
Copyright © National Collaborating Centre for Cancer.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.