Table 168GRADE evidence profile: Best supportive care after progression from first-line chemotherapy

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQuality
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsBest supportive careControlRelative
(95% CI)
Absolute
Overall survival (mortality rate at follow-up)
11randomised trialsnonenonenoneserious2none103/117 (88%)-Median OS = 4.6 months⊕⊕⊕○
MODERATE
Progression-free survival
11randomised trialsnonenonenoneserious2noneN=117-Median PFS = 1.5 months⊕⊕⊕○
MODERATE
Overall tumour response (assessed with: RECIST)
11randomised trialsnonenonenoneserious2none0/117
(0%)
---⊕⊕⊕○
MODERATE
Grade 3-4 Neutropenia (assessed with: NCI- CTC)
11randomised trialsnonenonenoneserious2none1/117
(0.85%)
---⊕⊕⊕○
MODERATE
Grade 3-4 Thrombocytopenia (assessed with: NCI-CTC)
11randomised trialsnonenonenoneserious2none1/117
(0.85%)
---⊕⊕⊕○
MODERATE
Grade 3-4 Anaemia (assessed with: NCI-CTC)
11randomised trialsnonenonenoneserious2none9/117
(7.7%)
---⊕⊕⊕○
MODERATE
Health-related quality of life
11randomised trialsnonenonenoneserious2none-3---⊕⊕⊕○
MODERATE
1
2

Low number of events reduces precision of this outcome;

3

Mean scores not reported. There was a continuous decrement in quality of life scores from baseline through week 18. 24% receieved at least one palliative radiotherapy treatment

From: 5, Managing locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer

Cover of Bladder Cancer
Bladder Cancer: Diagnosis and Management.
NICE Guideline, No. 2.
National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK).
Copyright © National Collaborating Centre for Cancer.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.