Table 12Clinical evidence profile. Comparison 8. Methyldopa versus placebo

Quality assessmentNumber of patientsEffectQualityImportance
Number of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsMethyldopaPlaceboRelative (95% CI)Absolute
Stillbirth
1 (Weitz 1987)randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionnone

0/13

(0%)

0/12

(0%)

not calculablenot calculableMODERATECRITICAL
Neonatal death
1 (Weitz 1987)randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionnone

0/13

(0%)

0/12

(0%)

not calculablenot calculableMODERATECRITICAL
Gestational age at birth, weeks (Better indicated by higher values)
1 (Weitz 1987)randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessno serious imprecisionnone1312-MD 1.43 higher (1.07 to 1.79 higher)MODERATEIMPORTANT
Superimposed pre-eclampsia
1 (Weitz 1987)randomised trialsserious1no serious inconsistencyno serious indirectnessvery serious2none

5/13

(38.5%)

4/12

(33.3%)

RR 1.15 (0.40 to 3.31)50 more per 1000 (from 200 fewer to 770 more)VERY LOWIMPORTANT
1

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 1 level due to an unclear risk of random sequence generation, allocation concealment and selective reporting

2

The quality of the evidence was downgraded by 2 levels as the 95% CI crossed 2 default MID thresholds (0.8 and 1.25)

From: Evidence review for interventions for chronic hypertension

Cover of Evidence review for interventions for chronic hypertension
Evidence review for interventions for chronic hypertension: Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management: Evidence review A.
NICE Guideline, No. 133.
National Guideline Alliance (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2019.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.