U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2024.

Cover of GeneReviews®

GeneReviews® [Internet].

Show details

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Synonym: Bourneville Disease

, MD, FACMG, , MD, , PhD, and , PhD.

Author Information and Affiliations

Initial Posting: ; Last Update: August 1, 2024.

Estimated reading time: 55 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) involves abnormalities of the skin (hypomelanotic macules, confetti skin lesions, facial angiofibromas, shagreen patches, fibrous cephalic plaques, ungual fibromas); brain (subependymal nodules, cortical tubers, and subependymal giant cell astrocytomas [SEGAs], seizures, TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorder [TAND]); kidneys (benign renal angiomyolipomas, epithelial cysts, oncocytoma, renal cell carcinoma); heart (rhabdomyomas, arrhythmias); and lungs (lymphangioleiomyomatosis [LAM], multifocal micronodular pneumonocyte hyperplasia). Central nervous system-related problems (including TAND) are the leading cause of morbidity, whereas kidney disease is the leading cause of mortality.

Diagnosis/testing.

The clinical diagnosis of TSC can be established in a proband based on clinical diagnostic criteria (presence of two major clinical features or one major clinical feature and two or more minor features). The molecular diagnosis can be established in a proband with a heterozygous pathogenic variant in TSC1 or TSC2 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Targeted therapies: Treatment with an mTOR inhibitor for enlarging SEGAs, intractable epilepsy, renal angiomyolipomas that are >4 cm, rapidly growing renal angiomyolipomas that are >3 cm, and LAM. Topical mTOR inhibitors for facial angiofibromas.

Treatment of manifestations: Neurosurgery for enlarging SEGAs that are causing life-threatening neurologic symptoms. Seizure treatments include vigabatrin, other anti-seizure medications, dietary therapy, and epilepsy surgery. Referral to a neurodevelopmental specialist and/or psychiatrist for TAND; applied behavior analysis for autism spectrum disorder; consideration of medication for those with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Treatment of renal cysts per nephrologist and surgical specialists. Secondary therapy options for renal angiomyolipomas that are >4 cm or rapidly growing renal angiomyolipomas that are >3 cm include selective embolization followed by corticosteroids, kidney-sparing resection, or ablative therapy. Embolization followed by corticosteroids for renal angiomyolipomas with acute hemorrhage. Treatment of retinal astrocytic hamartoma per ophthalmologist; treatment of extrarenal angiomyolipomas per surgeon and/or oncologist; treatment of neuroendocrine tumors per endocrinologist, surgeon, and/or oncologist.

Surveillance: Detailed annual dermatologic examination. Brain MRI every one to three years in asymptomatic individuals with TSC younger than age 25 years to monitor for new occurrence of SEGAs; those with asymptomatic SEGAs in childhood should continue to be imaged periodically in adulthood; for those with large or growing SEGAs or SEGA-causing ventricular enlargement, more frequent brain MRIs as deemed clinically appropriate. Assessment with neurologist for manifestations of seizures at each visit; EEG in asymptomatic infants every six weeks up to age 12 months, every three months up to age 24 months, and in individuals with known or suspected seizure activity as clinically indicated; prolonged video EEG in those with suspected seizures and normal routine EEG. Screening for TAND at least annually with comprehensive formal evaluation for TAND at key developmental time points. Abdominal MRI to assess for new or progression of angiomyolipoma and cystic kidney disease every one to three years; assess kidney function (glomerular filtration rate and blood pressure) at least annually. Echocardiogram every one to three years in asymptomatic infants and children with cardiac rhabdomyomas until regression is documented; echocardiogram in those with symptomatic cardiac rhabdomyomas per cardiologist. Clinical screening for LAM symptoms (exertional dyspnea and shortness of breath) at each visit in females older than age 18 years and males and females with respiratory symptoms; high-resolution CT every five to seven years in asymptomatic females without lung cysts beginning after age 18 years and continuing through menopause; for those with LAM-related cystic lung disease on CT, follow-up scan intervals are determined on an individual basis. Annual ophthalmology evaluation; vision testing for those on vigabatrin therapy. Surveillance for neuroendocrine tumors per endocrinologist. Detailed dental examination every six months with panoramic radiographs by age seven years.

Agents/circumstances to avoid: Smoking; estrogen use; nephrectomy.

Evaluation of relatives at risk: It is appropriate to evaluate apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk relatives (including children) of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from surveillance and early treatment.

Pregnancy management: Discussion of the risks and benefits of using a given anti-seizure medication during pregnancy should ideally take place prior to conception.

Genetic counseling.

TSC is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. About one third of individuals diagnosed with TSC have an affected parent; two thirds of individuals with TSC have the disorder as the result of a de novo pathogenic variant. Each child of an individual with TSC has a 50% chance of inheriting the TSC-related pathogenic variant. If the TSC-related pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, predictive testing for at-risk asymptomatic family members and prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is possible.

Diagnosis

Consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) have been published [Northrup et al 2021] (full text).

Suggestive Findings

TSC should be suspected in individuals with either one major clinical feature or two or more minor features.

Major features

  • Hypomelanotic macules (≥3 macules that are at least 5 mm in diameter)
  • Angiofibromas (≥3) or fibrous cephalic plaque
  • Shagreen patch
  • Ungual fibromas (≥2)
  • Subependymal nodules (SENs) (≥2)
  • Multiple cortical tubers and/or radial migration lines
  • Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA)
  • Renal angiomyolipomas (≥2) (See Clinical Diagnosis, * Note.)
  • Cardiac rhabdomyoma
  • Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) (See Clinical Diagnosis, * Note.)
  • Multiple retinal nodular hamartomas

Minor features

  • "Confetti" skin lesions (numerous 1- to 3-mm hypopigmented macules scattered across regions of the body such as the arms and legs)
  • Sclerotic bone lesions
  • Dental enamel pits (>3)
  • Intraoral fibromas (≥2)
  • Multiple renal cysts (≥2)
  • Extrarenal hamartomas
  • Retinal achromic patch

Establishing the Diagnosis

The clinical diagnosis of TSC can be established in a proband based on clinical diagnostic criteria [Northrup et al 2021]. The molecular diagnosis can be established in a proband with a heterozygous pathogenic variant in TSC1 or TSC2 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Clinical Diagnosis

A definite clinical diagnosis of TSC can be established in a proband with two major features (see * Note) or one major feature with two or more minor features (see Suggestive Findings).

* Note: The combination of LAM and renal angiomyolipomas without additional features does not meet the clinical diagnostic criteria for a definite diagnosis.

Molecular Diagnosis

The molecular diagnosis of TSC is established in a proband with a heterozygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in either TSC1 or TSC2 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: (1) Clinical manifestations of TSC develop over time; therefore, identification of a TSC1 or TSC2 pathogenic variant is sufficient to establish the diagnosis [Northrup et al 2021]. (2) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (3) Identification of a heterozygous TSC1 or TSC2 variant of uncertain significance (VUS) does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include concurrent gene testing or use of a multigene panel:

  • Concurrent gene testing. Perform sequence analysis and gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis of TSC1 and TSC2.
    Note: If no pathogenic variant is identified, somatic mosaicism for a pathogenic variant should be considered [Peron et al 2018, Klonowska et al 2023]. DNA testing of other tissues (e.g., tumors, saliva, skin, and/or hair follicles) is warranted when somatic mosaicism is suspected and routine molecular genetic testing has not identified a pathogenic variant. High-coverage sequencing is needed to identify mosaic variants with low allele frequency. If a VUS is suspected to affect splicing, mRNA sequencing should be considered. For more information on somatic mosaicism as a cause of TSC, click here (pdf).
  • A multigene panel that includes TSC1, TSC2, and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) may be considered to identify the genetic cause when the diagnosis of TSC is less certain in order to limit identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests. For this disorder a multigene panel that also includes deletion/duplication analysis is recommended (see Table 1).
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Gene 1, 2Proportion of TSC Attributed to Pathogenic Variants in GeneMethodProportion of Pathogenic Variants 3 Identified by Method
Familial casesSimplex cases 4
TSC1 ~25% 5Sequence analysis 6, 7~9.8%~15.5%
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 8~0.1%~0.5%
TSC2 ~70% 5Sequence analysis 613.8%~53%
Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis 8~0.2% 9~2% 9
Unknown~5% 10, 11NA

TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex

1.

Genes are listed in alphabetic order.

2.

See Table A. Genes and Databases for chromosome locus and protein.

3.

See Molecular Genetics for information on variants detected in these genes.

4.

Simplex case = single occurrence in a family

5.

Of the more than 10,000 individuals with TSC in whom pathogenic variants have been identified, ~26% of probands had a pathogenic variant in TSC1 and ~74% had a pathogenic variant in TSC2 [Sancak et al 2005, Au et al 2007, Tyburczy et al 2015, Peron et al 2018] (see Table A, TSC databases).

6.

Sequence analysis detects variants that are benign, likely benign, of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, or pathogenic. Variants may include missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions; typically, exon or whole-gene deletions/duplications are not detected. For issues to consider in interpretation of sequence analysis results, click here.

7.

TSC1 pathogenic variants are primarily small deletions and insertions and pathogenic nonsense variants detected by sequence analysis.

8.

Gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis detects intragenic deletions or duplications. Methods used may include a range of techniques such as quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and a gene-targeted microarray designed to detect single-exon deletions or duplications.

9.

TSC2 pathogenic variants include a significant number of large (exon and whole-gene) deletions and rearrangements that cannot be detected by sequence analysis of exons and thus require gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis for detection.

10.
11.

Inferring from the 5% detection rate for somatic mosaicism [Kozlowski et al 2007, Qin et al 2010] among the 15% of individuals with TSC who do not have a pathogenic variant identified on molecular genetic testing of TSC1 or TSC2, the authors conclude that at least 1% of persons with TSC have somatic mosaicism for a TSC1 or TSC2 pathogenic variant [H Northrup, MK Koenig, DA Pearson, & KS Au, personal observation].

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) involves abnormalities primarily of the skin, brain, kidneys, heart, and lungs (see Table 2), although any organ system can be involved. Central nervous system (CNS)-related problems (including TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorder [TAND]) are the leading cause of morbidity, whereas kidney disease is the leading cause of mortality [Amin et al 2017, Canevini et al 2018, de Vries et al 2018, Lu et al 2018]. TSC exhibits both inter- and intrafamilial variability.

Table 2.

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Frequency of Select Features

Feature% of Persons w/FeatureComment
Skin lesions ~100%Hypomelanotic macules, "confetti" skin lesions, facial angiofibromas, shagreen patches, fibrous cephalic plaques, ungual fibromas
CNS manifestations Subependymal nodules~80% 1
Cortical tubers~80%
Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma25% 1
Seizures~80%
TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorder>90%Behavioral, psychiatric, intellectual, academic, neuropsychological, & psychosocial difficulties
Kidney lesions Benign renal angiomyolipoma70%
Epithelial cysts20%-30%
Renal cell carcinoma<3%
Cardiac rhabdomyomas 47%-67%
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Up to 80% of females
Retinal lesions 30%-50%

CNS = central nervous system; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex

1.

Skin

The skin is affected in virtually 100% of individuals with TSC. Skin lesions include hypomelanotic macules (~90% of individuals), "confetti" skin lesions (frequency varies widely from 3% of children to ≤58% overall), facial angiofibromas (~75%), shagreen patches (~50%), fibrous cephalic plaques, and ungual fibromas (20% overall but ≤80% in older affected adults). Among the skin lesions, facial angiofibromas cause the most disfigurement. None of the skin lesions results in serious medical problems [Teng et al 2014, Nguyen et al 2018].

Central Nervous System (CNS)

The brain lesions of TSC, including subependymal nodules (SENs) and cortical tubers, occur in approximately 80% of affected individuals, and subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGAs) develop in up to 25% of all individuals with TSC [Kochare et al 2014, Kingswood et al 2017]. Individuals with SEGAs presenting with acute deterioration due to obstructive hydrocephalus should undergo urgent surgical treatment for their SEGA. Minimally invasive surgical techniques with an experienced surgical team may reduce morbidity and mortality. For large tumors, treatment of the hydrocephalus with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion such as a temporary ventricular drain or ventriculoperitoneal shunt may be required. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor treatment is the primary recommended therapy for growing or large SEGAs, those causing mild-to-moderate symptoms including asymptomatic ventriculomegaly, individuals who are not surgical candidates, and those who prefer medical management to surgery. The EXIST-1 clinical trial found that everolimus treatment resulted in >30% reduction in SEGA volume in 65%-79% of individuals. This effect was maintained for up to three years [Krueger et al 2013a]. Optimal outcome is associated with early detection and treatment.

Seizures

More than 80% of individuals with TSC have seizures, with most displaying features of focal or partial-onset seizures. Up to 75% of affected individuals develop seizures prior to age two years; caregivers should be educated to recognize seizures, especially when they are not present at the time of diagnosis. Two thirds of individuals with TSC experience drug-resistant epilepsy. Developmental delays, autism spectrum disorder, and psychiatric disorders demonstrate a strong association with early-onset and drug-resistant epilepsy.

Early recognition and control of seizures is highly correlated with improved developmental and neurologic outcomes in infants with TSC. Epileptiform activity on EEG can predict the eventual development of epilepsy; pre-emptive treatment with vigabatrin, before the onset of clinical seizures, may prevent infantile spasms and/or delay seizure onset. Pre-emptive treatment with vigabatrin has not, however, been shown to improve developmental or neurologic outcomes over that achieved by early recognition and control of clinical seizures alone.

TSC-Associated Neuropsychiatric Disorder (TAND)

TAND refers to the interrelated functional and clinical manifestations of brain dysfunction common in individuals with TSC, including behavioral, psychiatric, intellectual, academic, neuropsychological, and psychosocial difficulties [de Vries 2010a]. Recent studies have provided refined TAND clusters that include concerns in the domains of scholastic, neuropsychological, autism spectrum disorder-like, dysregulated behavior, overactive/impulsive behavior, mood/anxiety, and eat/sleep [de Vries et al 2020b, de Vries et al 2021]. Although more than 90% of children and adults with TSC will experience one or more TAND(s) in their lifetime, only 20% ever receive evaluation and intervention for them [Krueger 2013, de Vries et al 2015, Alperin et al 2021, de Vries et al 2021, Marcinkowska et al 2022]. Presence of TAND has been closely associated with clinical outcome and quality of life [Krueger 2013]. Unaddressed TAND contributes significantly to poor outcome [Lennert et al 2013, Rentz et al 2015].

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Individuals with TSC are at high risk for ASD, with an estimated prevalence of 16%-61% [Gillberg et al 1994, Bolton et al 2002, Wong 2006, de Vries et al 2007, Chung et al 2011, Numis et al 2011, Spurling Jeste et al 2014, Kingswood et al 2017, Zwaigenbaum et al 2021]. Signs of ASD in individuals with TSC emerge as early as age nine months [McDonald et al 2017]. ASD classification at age 12 months was predictive of confirmation of ASD by age two years using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) [Capal et al 2017b]. Specific behaviors most likely to distinguish an infant with TSC who will go on to have ASD are the quality of social overtures, facial expressions, and abnormal repetitive interests and behaviors [Capal et al 2021]. Individuals with TSC who have SEGAs are nearly twice as likely to have ASD [Kothare et al 2014], and treatment with everolimus has been found to reduce SEGA size, seizures, and features of ASD [Hwang et al 2016, Kilincaslan et al 2017]. Neurofunctional impairments closely associated with ASD, including impaired language pathways [Lewis et al 2013] and atypical face processing [Spurling Jeste et al 2014, Scherrer et al 2020], have been noted in persons with TSC. Also, tubers affecting the fusiform gyrus (involved in high-order visual information including face processing) provide a 3.7-fold increased risk for developing ASD [Cohen et al 2023]. Children with TSC and ASD are at higher risk for global cognitive impairment than are children with TSC who do not have ASD [Jeste et al 2008]; children with TSC and ASD are also at higher risk for having intellectual disability than children with idiopathic ASD [Mitchell et al 2022]. The ASD profile in toddlers with TSC has been found to have "complete convergence" with young children with nonsyndromic ASD [Jeste et al 2016]. Males with TSC have a higher risk for ASD than females [de Vries et al 2020a]. In children with TSC, ASD has been associated with a higher rate of sleep disorders as compared to children with TSC who do not have ASD [Moavero et al 2022]. However, sleep problems are more frequent in the TSC population as a whole relative to the general pediatric population [Zambrelli et al 2021]. Higher levels of ASD manifestations in children with TSC have also been found to be associated with greater levels of family distress [Uematsu et al 2020].

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is another common (and potentially seriously debilitating) condition closely associated with TSC. Estimates of ADHD prevalence in individuals with TSC range from 21% to 52% [Gillberg et al 1994, Prather & de Vries 2004, Muzykewicz et al 2007, Kopp et al 2008, Chung et al 2011, Kingswood et al 2017, Ding et al 2021]. Deficits in attention (particularly in dual-task performance), cognitive flexibility, and memory have also been noted in neuropsychological studies of children and adults with TSC [Ridler et al 2007, de Vries et al 2009, Tierney et al 2011, Curatolo et al 2015, de Vries et al 2015].

Learning and cognitive impairment. Individuals with TSC are at high risk for having intellectual disability, with prevalence rates estimated between 44% and 64% [Joinson et al 2003, Goh et al 2005, van Eeghen et al 2012a]. Approximately 36%-58% of children with TSC have serious academic difficulties (e.g., learning disabilities) requiring intervention [de Vries 2010b, Curatolo et al 2015, Kingswood et al 2017]. Even toddlers with TSC present with TAND concerns as well as language delays [McDonald et al 2024]; language delays at age 12 months are associated with a higher risk of an ASD diagnosis at age 36 months [Schoenberger et al 2020]. No significant age or sex differences have been found for academic concerns or neuropsychological deficits [de Vries et al 2020a].

The risk of learning and cognitive impairment increases significantly if seizure activity is not controlled. A number of investigations have demonstrated that a history of infantile spasms and/or poor seizure control in general is associated with lower intellectual ability [Joinson et al 2003, Goh et al 2005, Bolton et al 2015, Capal et al 2017a, Wu et al 2019, Gupta et al 2020]. In a small sample (n=6), a dramatic relationship between seizure activity and intellectual impairment was found [Humphrey et al [2014]; estimated intelligence quotient (IQ) dropped from 92 (prior to infantile spasms) to 73 (if infantile spasms duration was <1 month) to 62 (if infantile spasms duration was >1 month). Larger studies have also found that TSC-related epilepsy is associated with an increased risk of intellectual disability, with a risk of severe intellectual disability being associated with epilepsy onset before age two years [Gupta et al 2020, Marcinkowska et al 2022].

Disruptive behaviors and emotional problems are another cluster of debilitating conditions associated with TSC. Aggression has been noted in many individuals with TSC (13%-58%) [de Vries et al 2007, Kopp et al 2008, Staley et al 2008, Chung et al 2011, Eden et al 2014, Kingswood et al 2017, Wilde et al 2017], as has self-injurious behavior (27%-41%) [de Vries et al 2007, Eden et al 2014, Wilde et al 2017]. Even after controlling for intellectual disability, TSC2-related TSC was associated with a higher rate of self-injurious behaviors [de Vries et al 2020a]. Individuals with TSC are also at high risk for anxiety (9%-48%) [de Vries et al 2007, Muzykewicz et al 2007, Kopp et al 2008, Chung et al 2011, Kingswood et al 2017] and depression (6%-43%) [de Vries et al 2015, Kingswood et al 2017].

Given that neuropsychiatric concerns are more frequent in individuals with TSC and that many children and adults with TSC have multiple neuropsychiatric concerns [Toldo et al 2019, Ding et al 2021, Marcinkowska et al 2022], international consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of TAND have been developed [de Vries et al 2023]. Specific recommendations include lifelong monitoring for the emergence of TAND, with screenings at least annually coupled with referral for appropriate follow-up care. Key components of a TAND intervention plan include recognizing the impact of physical health problems and the important role of caregivers and families.

Kidneys

Kidney disease is the leading cause of early death (50%) in individuals with TSC [Amin et al 2017]. An estimated 80% of children with TSC have an identifiable kidney lesion by a mean age of 10.5 years [Ewalt et al 1998].

Five different kidney lesions occur in TSC: benign renal angiomyolipoma (AMLs; 70% of affected individuals); epithelial cysts (20%-30%) [Sancak et al 2005, Au et al 2007]; oncocytoma (benign adenomatous hamartoma) (<1%); malignant AMLs (<1%); and renal cell carcinoma (RCC; <3%) [Patel et al 2005].

Benign renal AMLs are comprised of abnormal blood vessels, sheets of smooth muscle, and mature adipose tissue. In children, benign renal AMLs tend to increase in size or number over time. Benign renal AMLs can cause life-threatening bleeding and can replace renal parenchyma, leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

Kidney cysts have an epithelial lining of hypertrophic hyperplastic eosinophilic cells. Some affected individuals have features of both TSC caused by deletion of TSC2 and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) caused by deletion of PKD1. In these individuals, progressive enlargement of the cysts may compress functional parenchyma and lead to ESKD [Martignoni et al 2002]. Individuals with the TSC2/PKD1 contiguous gene deletion syndrome are also at risk of developing complications of ADPKD, which include cystic lesions in other organs (e.g., the liver) and Berry aneurysms.

Malignant renal AMLs and RCC may result in death. Although rare, these two tumors are much more common in individuals with TSC than in the general population [Pea et al 1998]. It is estimated that 2%-5% of persons with TSC will develop RCC. The typical age of diagnosis of RCC in those with TSC is 28-30 years – much earlier than the age of diagnosis for sporadic RCC [Crino et al 2006, Borkowska et al 2011]. Note: Common imaging techniques may not distinguish fat-poor renal AMLs from RCC. Immunologic staining for HMB-45 antibody for AMLs and cytokeratin for RCC is recommended to distinguish these tumors.

Heart

Cardiac rhabdomyomas are present in ~50% of individuals with TSC [Kocabaş et al 2013, Ebrahimi-Fakhari et al 2018]. These tumors have been documented to regress with time and eventually disappear. Cardiac rhabdomyomas are often largest during the neonatal period. If cardiac outflow obstruction does not occur at birth, the individual is unlikely to have health problems from these tumors later, with the exception of some individuals who develop arrhythmias. It is postulated that cardiac arrhythmias result from rests of persistent cells that remain after the rhabdomyomas regress. Cardiac rhabdomyomas with outflow obstruction [Chen et al 2021, Nespoli et al 2021, Tsuchihashi et al 2021] and cardiac arrhythmias [Öztunç et al 2015, Ninic et al 2017, Silva-Sánchez et al 2021] have been successfully treated with mTOR inhibitors.

Lung

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) of the lung primarily affects women and has been estimated to occur in approximately 30%-40% of females with TSC; however, one study suggested that the diagnosis of LAM is age dependent and occurs in up to 80% of women with TSC by age 40 years [Henske et al 2016]. Cystic findings consistent with LAM are observed in 10%-12% of males with TSC [Northrup et al 2013]. LAM unrelated to TSC is rare.

The mean age of diagnosis for LAM in those with TSC is 28 years. Individuals with TSC-associated LAM may present with shortness of breath or hemoptysis [Taveira-DaSilva et al 2015]. Chest radiographs reveal a diffuse reticular pattern and CT examination shows diffuse interstitial changes with infiltrates and cystic changes. Pneumothorax and chylothorax may occur in individuals affected by LAM. Only 5%-10% of women with TSC-related LAM develop respiratory failure [Henske et al 2016].

Multifocal micronodular pneumonocyte hyperplasia (MMPH) is characterized by multiple nodular proliferations of type II pneumocytes. While MMPH does not have known prognostic or physiologic consequences, there have been at least two reports of respiratory failure associated with MMPH [Cancellieri et al 2002, Kobashi et al 2008]. The precise prevalence of MMPH in individuals with TSC is not known but may be as high as 40%-58% [Franz et al 2001, Muzykewicz et al 2009]. Males and females are equally likely to have MMPH, and it may occur in the presence or absence of LAM. MMPH can be confused with atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, which is a premalignant lesion that is not clearly associated with TSC.

Eyes

The retinal lesions of TSC include hamartomas (elevated mulberry lesions or plaque-like lesions), observed in 34% of individuals with TSC [Öhnell et al 2024]. These lesions are relatively rare in the general population; a case series of 3,573 healthy term newborns identified only two infants with retinal hamartomas [Li et al 2013]. Achromic patches (similar to the hypopigmented skin lesions) have been noted in 34% of individuals with TSC, while the general population incidence is 1:20,000 [Öhnell et al 2024].

Extrarenal AMLs

Extrarenal AMLs, including hepatic and pancreatic, have been reported. Hepatic AMLs are reported in 10%-15% of individuals with TSC and are most often observed in individuals who also have renal AMLs [Black et al 2012, Jóźwiak et al 2018].

Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs)

Functional and non-functional pancreatic NETs have been increasingly identified in individuals with TSC due to recommended abdominal MRI surveillance in individuals with TSC [Krueger et al 2013b]. The most common functional pancreatic NETs reported in individuals with TSC are insulinomas, but gastrinomas, glucagonomas, ACTHomas, and GHomas have also been described. There is also a growing number of reports of non-functional NETs, with pancreatic NETs being the most common [Mowrey et al 2021, Evans et al 2022]. TSC-related pancreatic NETs present earlier; there is no clear evidence that they are more aggressive than sporadic pancreatic NETs [Arya et al 2023]. Malignant and recurrent non-functional pancreatic NETs have been described in association with TSC [Mowrey et al 2021, Sauter et al 2021]. Pancreatic NETs have been seen more commonly associated with TSC2 pathogenic variants [Mowrey et al 2021]. Based on the current data, standard surveillance and management is recommended for non-functional pancreatic NETs in association with TSC [Arya et al 2023].

Sclerotic Bone Lesions

Sclerotic bone lesions are common in individuals with TSC. In one study, 51/70 (73%) children with TSC who underwent abdominal imaging had sclerotic bone lesions. These lesions were discovered much more frequently after surveillance imaging of the abdomen and lungs became standard of care in individuals with TSC. Sclerotic bone lesions in TSC are commonly observed in the posterior vertebral elements and increase in size and number over time [Boronat et al 2016]. Although sclerotic bone lesions are included in the diagnostic criteria for TSC, they do not cause any medical issues [Boronat & Barber 2018, Northrup et al 2021].

Oral and Dental Manifestations

Multiple dental findings are observed in individuals with TSC; the two most common are dental pitting and intraoral fibromas. Dental pitting (small depressions in the dental enamel) results in increased susceptibility to formation of dental caries. Intraoral fibromas are usually observed on the gingival surfaces. Intraoral fibromas typically occur after oral trauma or as a side effect of some anti-seizure medications [Teng et al 2014].

Phenotype Correlations by Gene

TSC2 pathogenic variants are associated with a more severe phenotype than TSC1 pathogenic variants. A higher percentage of individuals with more severe features of TSC have a de novo TSC2 pathogenic variant versus a de novo TSC1 pathogenic variant [Au et al 2007]. Individuals representing simplex cases (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) are more likely to have a TSC2 pathogenic variant, while those with familial TSC have an almost equal proportion of TSC1 and TSC2 pathogenic variants [Peron et al 2018].

Individuals with a TSC2 pathogenic variant are at greater risk for:

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

TSC2

  • Females with pathogenic variants in the carboxy terminus of tuberin, the TSC2 gene product, may have increased incidence and/or severity of LAM [Strizheva et al 2001].
  • Some pathogenic TSC2 missense variants – including but not limited to p.Arg622Trp, p.Arg905Gln, p.Ser1036Pro, p.Arg1200Trp, p.Gln1503Pro, p.Gly1579Ser, p.Arg1713His, and c.4255_4256delCA (see Table 8) – are associated with milder disease [Khare et al 2001, O'Connor et al 2003, Mayer et al 2004, Jansen et al 2006, Wentink et al 2012, Farach et al 2017, Fox et al 2017, Farach et al 2023]. Many of the pathogenic variants associated with milder disease have been identified in individuals with a family history of TSC.
  • Renal cystic disease may be more severe in individuals with small TSC2 pathogenic variants (single- to few-base pair insertions, deletions, and single-nucleotide variants).

Penetrance

The penetrance of TSC appears to be 100%. Rare instances of apparent non-penetrance have been reported; however, molecular studies revealed the presence of two different pathogenic variants in the family and gonadal mosaicism in others [Connor et al 1986, Webb & Osborne 1991, Rose et al 1999].

Nomenclature

Terms used in the past to describe findings in TSC that are now outdated or inappropriate but have not yet been eliminated from the medical literature include the following:

  • Adenoma sebaceum. Used previously to describe facial lesions that are now better characterized as facial angiofibromas because the lesions have no "sebaceous" elements
  • Myomata. Replaced by the more precise terms "cardiac rhabdomyomas" and "cortical tubers"
  • White ash leaf spots. Used previously to describe the hypopigmented macules; now discouraged because the hypopigmented macules can be any shape or size. Hypopigmented macules of a certain size and shape are not more or less indicative of TSC.
  • Epiloia. Used to describe individuals with TSC and epilepsy

Prevalence

The incidence of TSC may be as high as 1:5,800 live births [Osborne et al 1991] but is generally estimated at between 1:6,000 and 1:10,000 live births [Northrup et al 2021].

Differential Diagnosis

Many of the features of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) are nonspecific and can be seen as isolated findings or as a feature of another condition.

Skin findings

  • Hypopigmented macules have been observed in 0.8% of newborns in some studies and in most individuals have no medical significance [Alper & Holmes 1983]. A study by Vanderhooft et al [1996] determined that three or more hypopigmented macules are much more likely to be seen in an individual who will be diagnosed with TSC. Other conditions with hypopigmented macules as part of the phenotype include vitiligo, nevus depigmentus, nevus anemicus, piebaldism, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. Associated findings can usually distinguish these conditions from TSC.
  • Angiofibromas. A single facial angiofibroma or even two is not diagnostic of TSC (see Clinical Diagnosis). On physical examination, acne vulgaris, acne rosacea, or multiple trichoepithelioma (see CYLD Cutaneous Syndrome, Table 3) can be mistaken for angiofibromas, but biopsy easily distinguishes among them.
  • The shagreen patch of TSC is quite specific based on location and appearance. Shagreen patch must be distinguished from "connective tissue nevus," which encompasses a variety of skin lesions with excessive dermal connective tissue that are not necessarily associated with TSC.
  • Ungual fibromas can result from trauma, but generally traumatic ungual fibromas are single lesions and their presence can be explained (e.g., by a particular manner of holding a golf club). Ungual fibromas must be distinguished from epithelial inclusion cysts, verruca vulgaris, and infantile digital fibromatosis.

Simple kidney cysts are common in the general population, observed in 25% of individuals age >40 years and 50% of individuals age >50 years, but uncommon in individuals age <30 years (see StatPearls).

Renal angiomyolipomas (AMLs) are rare tumors that can occur in individuals with no other clinical manifestations of TSC. Sporadic AMLs can have loss of heterozygosity for TSC2, leading to the conclusion that they occur as a result of loss of function of TSC2 in individuals not affected with TSC (see Genetically Related Disorders, Sporadic tumors).

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM). Some women with LAM also have benign renal AMLs but no other findings of TSC. These individuals do not transmit TSC or LAM to their offspring. Individuals with LAM and benign renal AMLs who have no other features of TSC do not meet diagnostic criteria for TSC [Northrup et al 2021].

Cardiac rhabdomyomas. It is estimated that 90%-95% of infants with a prenatal diagnosis of two or more cardiac rhabdomyomas will have TSC. Multiple cardiac rhabdomyomas can be observed as an isolated sporadic finding, but this is unusual (see Genetically Related Disorders, Sporadic tumors).

Genes of Interest in the Differential Diagnosis of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

Table 3.

Genes of Interest in the Differential Diagnosis of Tuberous Sclerosis Complex

SystemGene(s)DisorderMOIFeatures of Disorder Overlapping w/TSCDistinguishing Features
Skin CYLD CYLD cutaneous syndrome ADMultiple facial papules (incl cylindromas, spiradenomas, & trichepitheliomas)Facial angiofibromas in TSC
Kidneys ALG5
ALG9
DNAJB11
GANAB
IFT140
PKD1 1
PKD2
Polycystic kidney disease, autosomal dominant ADKidney cystsRenal AMLs, LAM, cardiac rhabdomyomas, & skin & brain manifestations in TSC
CDC73 CDC73-related disorders ADKidney cystsRenal AML in TSC
Lungs DICER1 DICER1 tumor predisposition ADLung cysts &/or pneumothoraxLAM in TSC
FLCN Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHDS)ADLung cysts &/or pneumothorax
  • Characteristic skin lesions in BHDS incl fibrofolliculomas, acrochordons, oral papules, cutaneous collagenomas, & epidermal cysts. Facial angiofibromas have been reported in persons w/BHDS but are more common in persons w/TSC.
Central nervous system FLNA FLNA deficiency XLPeriventricular nodular heterotopia (may be misdiagnosed initially as TSC)SENs & cortical tubers in TSC
PDGFB
PDGFRB
SLC20A2
XPR1
Primary familial brain calcification (PFBC)ADIntracerebral calcificationsCalcifications around ventricles are calcified SENs in TSC.
TREX1 Retinal vasculopathy w/cerebral leukoencephalopathy & systemic manifestations AD
  • Multisystem disorder involving brain, kidney, & eye
  • Focal neurologic symptoms
  • Seizures
  • Mass lesions on brain imaging
Distinct eye lesions (hamartomas & achromic patches) & brain findings (SENs & cortical tubers) in TSC

AD = autosomal dominant; AMLs = angiomyolipomas; LAM = lymphangioleiomyomatosis; MOI = mode of inheritance; SENs = subependymal nodules; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex; XL = X-linked

1.

See also Genetically Related Disorders, TSC2/PKD1 contiguous gene deletion syndrome.

Management

Consensus clinical management and surveillance recommendations for individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) have been published [Northrup et al 2021] (full text).

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with TSC, the evaluations summarized in Table 4 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended by the International Tuberous Sclerosis Consensus Conference [Northrup et al 2021] (full text).

Table 4.

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

System/ConcernEvaluationComment
Skin Detailed dermatologic exam
Central nervous system Brain MRI for tubers, SENs, migrational defects, & SEGAs
  • Neurologic eval for manifestations of seizures
  • Baseline EEG while awake & asleep
  • During infancy, educate parents to recognize infantile spasms as well as other seizure types even if none have occurred at time of diagnosis.
  • Infantile spasms are a neurologic emergency in infants w/TSC requiring immediate eval & treatment.
  • If baseline EEG is abnormal or if TAND is present: 24-hr video EEG to assess for subclinical seizure activity
  • Earlier recognition & treatment of epilepsy in infancy is assoc w/better long-term neurologic outcome.
  • Parent/caregiver education & training re TAND manifestations (e.g., ASD, ADHD, language & anxiety disorders)
  • Comprehensive eval for all manifestations using TAND Checklist 1
  • To ensure families are monitoring for emerging TAND manifestations 1
  • Unaddressed TAND manifestations contribute significantly to poor outcome.
Kidney Blood pressure
Serum creatinineTo determine GFR & assess renal function
Abdominal MRITo assess for renal AMLs & kidney cysts
Cardiology EchocardiogramIn those birth to age 18 yrs; esp if age <3 yrs to assess for cardiac rhabdomyomas
EKG at all agesTo assess for underlying conduction defects
Pulmonary Baseline chest CTIn all females & in males w/pulmonary symptoms age >18 yrs
Baseline PFT & 6-min walk testIn those w/evidence of cystic lung disease c/w LAM on screening chest CT & in persons w/respiratory symptoms
In adults, inquire about tobacco exposure, signs of chyle leak, & other pulmonary manifestations (e.g., dyspnea, cough, & spontaneous pneumothorax)
Ophthalmology Complete ophthalmologic evalIncl dilated fundoscopy to assess for retinal lesions & visual field defects
Teeth Detailed clinical dental inspection
Genetic counseling By genetics professionals 2To obtain a pedigree & inform affected persons & their families re nature, MOI, & implications of TSC to facilitate medical & personal decision making

ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; AML = angiomyolipomas; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; c/w = consistent with; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; LAM = lymphangioleiomyomatosis; MOI = mode of inheritance; PFT = pulmonary function testing; SEGAs = subependymal giant cell astrocytomas; SENs = subependymal nodules; TAND = TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorder; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex

1.

A simple screening questionnaire available at no cost to address the significant gap between clinical need associated with TAND and those receiving intervention for these needs [de Vries et al 2015, Leclezio & de Vries 2015]

2.

Medical geneticist, certified genetic counselor, certified advanced genetic nurse

Treatment of Manifestations

Targeted Therapies

In GeneReviews, a targeted therapy is one that addresses the specific underlying mechanism of disease causation (regardless of whether the therapy is significantly efficacious for one or more manifestation of the genetic condition); would otherwise not be considered without knowledge of the underlying genetic cause of the condition; or could lead to a cure. —ED

Table 5.

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Targeted Therapies

Treatment ClassMechanism of ActionSpecific DrugsComment
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitorBlocks binding of accessory protein raptor (regulatory-associated protein of mTOR) to mTORRapamycin & rapalogs (sirolimus & everolimus)mTOR inhibitors replace the function w/in the cell normally provided by the hamartin/tuberin multimer.

Supportive Care

Supportive care to improve quality of life, maximize function, and reduce complications is recommended. This ideally involves multidisciplinary care by specialists in relevant fields (see Table 6).

Table 6.

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Treatment of Manifestations

Manifestation/ConcernTreatmentConsiderations/Other
Facial angiofibromas Topical mTOR inhibitorOral mTOR inhibitors prescribed for FDA indications (e.g., SEGAs, AMLs) may ↓ presence/size of facial angiofibromas; topical mTOR inhibitors can be used alone or in combination w/oral mTOR inhibitors to treat facial angiofibromas.
SEGAs
  • mTOR inhibitor (See Table 5.)
  • Resection by neurosurgeon if size of SEGA causes life-threatening neurologic symptoms
mTOR inhibitor treatment is the recommended therapy for growing or large SEGAs, for those w/mild-to-moderate symptoms incl asymptomatic ventriculomegaly, & for those who are either not surgical candidates or who prefer medical mgmt to surgery.
Seizures Treatments incl:
  • Vigabatrin
  • Standard ASMs
  • mTOR inhibitors for intractable epilepsy (See Table 5.)
  • Dietary therapy
  • Epilepsy surgery
Note: Vigabatrin is recommended as first-line treatment for TSC-related infantile spasms. If abatement of infantile spasms does not occur w/in 2 weeks, ACTH or prednisolone can be added as second-line therapy.
  • If sharp or poly-spike waves develop on presymptomatic EEG, treatment w/vigabatrin should be considered to prevent infantile spams & delay onset of focal seizures.
  • Early seizure control is correlated w/improved developmental & neurologic outcomes.
  • Other than for infantile spasms, seizure treatment should generally follow that of other epilepsies. Everolimus & a specific formulation of cannabidiol have been evaluated in randomized controlled clinical trials to treat TSC-related seizures & were effective; however, no comparative efficacy data exists to recommend any specific ASM, everolimus, or cannabidiol over another.
  • Up to two thirds of seizures in persons w/TSC may be resistant to polydrug therapy w/ASMs & mTOR inhibitors; epilepsy surgery should be considered for persons w/refractory epilepsy & TSC.
TAND
  • Refer to neurodevelopmental specialist &/or psychiatry based on features.
  • ABA therapy for ASD
  • Consider medication for ADHD.
Renal cysts Treatment per nephrologist & surgical specialists
Renal AML AML that is asymptomatic, growing, & >4 cm or growing rapidly & >3 cm: mTOR inhibitor (See Table 5.)Avoid nephrectomy because of high incidence of complications & ↑ risk for future renal insufficiency, end-stage kidney failure, & the poor prognosis that results from chronic kidney disease.
Second-line treatment for asymptomatic AML: selective embolization followed by corticosteroids, kidney-sparing resection, or ablative therapy for exophytic lesions
AML w/acute hemorrhage: embolization followed by corticosteroids
Cardiac rhabdomyomas
  • Consider use of an mTOR inhibitor (see Table 5) if outflow obstruction is severe.
  • Alternative treatment is open heart surgery.
LAM mTOR inhibitor (See Table 5.)Official guidelines for diagnosis & mgmt of LAM have been published. 1
Retinal astrocytic hamartomas
  • Treatment per ophthalmologist
  • Monitor for signs of rapid growth or effects on vision.
Extrarenal AML
  • Consider use of mTOR inhibitor if rapid growth or local issues w/compression to potentially avoid surgery.
  • Surgery if indicated
NETs Treatment per endocrinologist, surgeon, &/or oncologist

ABA = applied behavior analysis; ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; ADHD = attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; AML = angiomyolipoma; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; ASM = anti-seizure medication; LAM = lymphangioleiomyomatosis; NETs = neuroendocrine tumors; SEGAs = subependymal giant cell astrocytomas; TAND = TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorder

1.

Surveillance

To monitor existing manifestations, the individual's response to supportive care, and the emergence of new manifestations, the evaluations summarized in Table 7 are recommended (adapted from Northrup et al [2021], Table 3).

Table 7.

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Recommended Surveillance

System/ConcernEvaluationFrequency
Skin Detailed clinical dermatologic examAnnually
SEGAs Brain MRIIn those w/o SEGAs: every 1-3 yrs until age 25 yrs in asymptomatic persons (no CNS-related symptoms) to monitor for new occurrence of SEGAs
In those w/known asymptomatic SEGAs:
  • Continue imaging periodically throughout adulthood to monitor for SEGA growth.
  • For large or growing SEGAs causing ventricular enlargement w/o symptoms, brain MRI should be performed more frequently; these persons & their families should be educated re potential for new symptoms.
Seizures Assessment w/neurologist for clinical manifestations of seizuresAt each visit
EEG
  • In asymptomatic infants: every 6 wks up to age 12 mos; every 3 mos up to age 24 mos 1
  • In those w/known or suspected seizures: as clinically indicated
  • If infantile spams or focal seizures are suspected but cannot be confirmed clinically or on routine EEG, prolonged video EEG that includes sleep should be performed.
TAND Screening for TAND using validated screening tools (e.g., TAND Checklist)At least annually or more frequently as needed
Comprehensive formal eval for TANDIn infancy (age 0-3 yrs), preschool (age 3-6 yrs), pre-middle school (age 6-9 yrs), adolescence (age 12-16 yrs), early adulthood (age 18-25 yrs), & as needed thereafter
Referral for further eval when any concerns are identified on screeningAs needed
Renal AMLs & cysts / Extrarenal AMLs Abdominal MRI to assess for new or progression of AMLs & renal cystic diseaseEvery 1-3 yrs
Assessment of renal function (incl determination of GFR) & blood pressureAt least annually
Cardiac Echocardiogram
  • Every 1-3 yrs in asymptomatic infants & children w/cardiac rhabdomyomas until regression of lesions begins
  • Frequency per cardiologist in those w/symptomatic cardiac rhabdomyomas
Additional diagnostic assessment (e.g., EKG) per cardiologistIn those w/symptomatic cardiac rhabdomyomas
Pulmonary
  • Clinical screening (targeted history) for LAM symptoms (e.g., exertional dyspnea & shortness of breath)
  • Counseling regarding ↑ risk of LAM assoc w/smoking & estrogen use
At each visit in all females age >18 yrs & in males & females w/respiratory symptoms
High-resolution lung CT
  • Every 5-7 yrs through menopause in asymptomatic persons at risk for LAM who have no evidence of lung cysts on baseline high-resolution CT
  • For persons w/cystic lung disease consistent w/LAM on CT, follow-up imaging should be determined on an individual basis (e.g., presence of symptoms, ability to perform reliable PFTs, pre-existing use of mTOR inhibitor, response to treatment, & development of other pulmonary complications).
Ophthalmologic Ophthalmologic evalAnnually
Vision testingFor those on vigabatrin therapy: w/in 4 weeks of therapy initiation, at 3-mo intervals while on treatment, & 3-6 mos after treatment is discontinued because of the risk for peripheral visual field restriction (see Sabril® prescribing information).
NETs Per endocrinologistPer endocrinologist
Dental Detailed dental examEvery 6 mos
Panoramic radiographsBy age 7 yrs, if not performed previously

AML = angiomyolipoma; CNS = central nervous system; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; LAM = lymphangioleiomyomatosis; NETs = neuroendocrine tumors; PFTs = pulmonary function tests; SEGAs = subependymal giant cell astrocytomas; TAND = TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorder; TSC = tuberous sclerosis complex

1.

Abnormal EEG frequently precedes onset of clinical seizures.

Agents/Circumstances to Avoid

Avoid the following:

  • Smoking
  • Estrogen use in adolescent and adult females
  • Nephrectomy (See Table 6, Renal AML.)

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

It is appropriate to evaluate apparently asymptomatic older and younger at-risk relatives (including children) of an affected individual in order to identify as early as possible those who would benefit from surveillance and early treatment. Evaluations can include:

  • Molecular genetic testing if the pathogenic variant in the family is known;
  • If the pathogenic variant in the family is not known, physical examination and imaging studies (skin examination, retinal examination, brain imaging, and renal MRI examination) to assess for the clinical features of TSC (see Clinical Diagnosis).

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Pregnancy Management

In general, women with epilepsy or a seizure disorder from any cause are at greater risk for mortality during pregnancy than pregnant women without a seizure disorder; use of anti-seizure medication (ASM) during pregnancy reduces this risk. However, exposure to ASMs may increase the risk for adverse fetal outcome (depending on the drug used, the dose, and the stage of pregnancy at which medication is taken). Nevertheless, the risk of an adverse outcome to the fetus from ASM exposure is often less than that associated with exposure to an untreated maternal seizure disorder. Therefore, use of ASMs to treat a maternal seizure disorder during pregnancy is typically recommended. Discussion of the risks and benefits of using a given ASM during pregnancy should ideally take place prior to conception. Transitioning to a lower-risk medication prior to pregnancy may be possible [Sarma et al 2016].

See MotherToBaby for more information on medication use during pregnancy.

Therapies Under Investigation

Many clinical trials are assessing the effect of drug therapy on the manifestations of TSC (see ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe).

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a proband

  • About one third of individuals diagnosed with TSC have an affected parent.
  • Two thirds of individuals with TSC have the disorder as the result of a de novo TSC1 or TSC2 pathogenic variant. Individuals representing simplex cases (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) are more likely to have a TSC2 pathogenic variant than a TSC1 pathogenic variant [Au et al 2007].
  • If the proband appears to be the only affected family member, recommended evaluations for the parents of the proband include:
    • Molecular genetic testing if the TSC-related pathogenic variant has been identified in the proband;
    • Skin examination, retinal examination, brain imaging, and renal MRI if the TSC-related pathogenic variant has not been identified in the proband. Evaluation of parents may determine that one is affected but has escaped previous diagnosis because of a milder phenotypic presentation.
  • If a molecular diagnosis has been established in the proband, the pathogenic variant identified in the proband is not identified in either parent, and parental identity testing has confirmed biological maternity and paternity, the following possibilities should be considered:
    • The proband has a de novo pathogenic variant.
    • The proband inherited a pathogenic variant from a parent with gonadal (or somatic and gonadal) mosaicism.* Parental gonadal mosaicism has been reported in several families [Rose et al 1999, Ye et al 2022]. Note: Testing of parental leukocyte DNA may not detect all instances of somatic mosaicism and will not detect a pathogenic variant that is present in the germ (gonadal) cells only.
      * A parent with somatic and gonadal mosaicism for a TSC-related pathogenic variant may be mildly/minimally affected [Ye et al 2022].
  • The family history of some individuals diagnosed with TSC may appear to be negative because of failure to recognize the disorder in family members or early death of the parent before the recognition of symptoms. Therefore, an apparently negative family history cannot be confirmed unless appropriate clinical evaluation or (if a molecular diagnosis has been established in the proband) molecular genetic testing has demonstrated that neither parent is heterozygous for the pathogenic variant identified in the proband.

Sibs of a proband. The risk to the sibs of the proband depends on the clinical/genetic status of the proband's parents:

  • If a parent is affected and/or known to have a TSC1 or TSC2 pathogenic variant, the risk to the sibs of inheriting the pathogenic variant is 50%.
    • Although the penetrance of TSC is thought to be 100% (see Penetrance), clinical variability is observed among affected family members. Heterozygous females tend to have milder neurologic features than heterozygous males [Sancak et al 2005, Au et al 2007] and lower rates of impulsivity, overactivity, autism spectrum disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [de Vries et al 2020a].
  • If the proband represents a simplex case and has a known TSC-related pathogenic variant that cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of either parent, the recurrence risk to sibs is low (~1%-2%) but greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of parental gonadal mosaicism [Rose et al 1999, Ye et al 2022].
  • If the TSC-related pathogenic variant identified in the proband is known to have occurred as a postzygotic event (i.e., the proband has somatic mosaicism for the pathogenic variant) (see Establishing the Diagnosis), it is presumed that neither parent has the pathogenic variant and that the risk to the sibs of the proband is not increased over that of the general population.
  • If the proband represents a simplex case and the parents are clinically unaffected (based on skin examination, retinal examination, brain imaging, and renal imaging) but their genetic status is unknown, the risk to the sibs of a proband appears to be low but increased over that of the general population because of the possibility of parental gonadal mosaicism [Rose et al 1999, Ye et al 2022].

Offspring of a proband. Each child of an individual with TSC has a 50% chance of inheriting the TSC-related pathogenic variant.

Other family members. The risk to other family members depends on the status of the proband's parents: if a parent is affected and/or is known to have the familial pathogenic variant, the parent's family members may be at risk.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

See Management, Evaluation of Relatives at Risk for information on evaluating at-risk relatives for the purpose of early diagnosis and treatment.

Predictive testing (i.e., testing of asymptomatic at-risk individuals)

  • Predictive testing for at-risk asymptomatic family members requires prior identification of the TSC1 or TSC2 pathogenic variant in the family.
  • Predictive testing of at-risk family members (including children) is recommended in order to guide medical management [Touraine et al 2022]. Special consideration should be given to education of the children and their parents prior to genetic testing. A plan should be established for the manner in which results are given to the parents and their children.
  • Potential consequences of such testing – including but not limited to socioeconomic changes and the need for long-term follow up and evaluation arrangements for individuals with a positive test result – as well as the capabilities and limitations of predictive testing should be discussed in the context of formal genetic counseling prior to testing.

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected or at risk.

DNA banking. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, pathogenic mechanisms, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA from probands in whom a molecular diagnosis has not been confirmed (i.e., the causative pathogenic mechanism is unknown). For more information, see Huang et al [2022].

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

High-risk pregnancies

  • Molecular genetic testing. If the TSC-related pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for TSC are possible.
  • Fetal imaging studies. For families in which a TSC-related pathogenic variant has not been identified, high-resolution ultrasound examination for tumors is possible; however, its sensitivity is unknown. Fetal MRI may be of use in the evaluation of TSC in fetuses at 50% risk.
    Note: The cardiac tumors are generally not detected until the third trimester.

Low-risk pregnancies. When cardiac lesions consistent with rhabdomyoma are identified on fetal ultrasound examination, the risk to the fetus with no known family history of TSC of having TSC is 90%-95% [Northrup et al 2013].

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing. While most health care professionals would consider use of prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table A.

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Genes and Databases

Data are compiled from the following standard references: gene from HGNC; chromosome locus from OMIM; protein from UniProt. For a description of databases (Locus Specific, HGMD, ClinVar) to which links are provided, click here.

Table B.

OMIM Entries for Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (View All in OMIM)

191092TSC COMPLEX SUBUNIT 2; TSC2
191100TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS 1; TSC1
605284TSC COMPLEX SUBUNIT 1; TSC1
613254TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS 2; TSC2

Molecular Pathogenesis

Hamartin (protein encoded by TSC1) and tuberin (protein encoded by TSC2) form heterodimers that act to downregulate cell growth in response to the insulin signaling pathway in cells. When either hamartin or tuberin is not produced, cell growth is constantly turned on resulting in cell overgrowth. Overgrowth of cells causes production of benign tumors (hamartomas and hamartias). This explains the origin of the tumors in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). The molecular pathogenesis also explains why mTOR inhibitors work to stabilize and/or shrink the tumors in individuals with TSC.

Additionally, because tuberin and hamartin are subjected to regulation by multiple cell signaling pathways, somatic pathogenic variants and environmental factors affecting these pathways are expected to modify disease severity in individuals with only one normal germline copy of TSC1 or TSC2.

A pathogenic variant is defined as a variant that clearly inactivates the function of hamartin or tuberin (i.e., out-of-frame indel or nonsense variant), prevents protein synthesis (i.e., large genomic deletion), or whose effect on protein function has been established by functional assessment (see LOVD Database – TSC1, LOVD Database – TSC2, Hoogeveen-Westerveld et al [2012], and Hoogeveen-Westerveld et al [2013]). Other TSC1 or TSC2 variants whose effects on function are less certain do not meet the criteria for diagnosis of TSC.

Mechanism of disease causation. Loss of function

Table 8.

Pathogenic Variants Referenced in This GeneReview by Gene

GeneReference SequencesDNA Nucleotide ChangePredicted Protein ChangeComment
TSC2 NM_000548​.5
NP_000539​.2
c.1864C>Tp.Arg622TrpSee Genotype-Phenotype Correlations.
c.2714G>Ap.Arg905Gln
c.3106T>Cp.Ser1036Pro
c.3598C>Tp.Arg1200Trp
c.4508A>Cp.Gln1503Pro
c.4735G>Ap.Gly1579Ser
c.5138G>Ap.Arg1713His
c.4255_4256delCASee footnote 1.

Variants listed in the table have been provided by the authors. GeneReviews staff have not independently verified the classification of variants.

GeneReviews follows the standard naming conventions of the Human Genome Variation Society (varnomen​.hgvs.org). See Quick Reference for an explanation of nomenclature.

1.

This DNA nucleotide change results in creation of a cryptic splice donor site that gives rise to the inframe deletion p.Gln1419_Ser1449del rather than the predicted nonsense variant p.Gly1419ValfsTer104 [Farach et al 2023].

Chapter Notes

Revision History

  • 1 August 2024 (sw) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 12 July 2018 (sw) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 3 September 2015 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 23 November 2011 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 7 May 2009 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 5 December 2005 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 29 August 2003 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 18 April 2001 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 13 July 1999 (pb) Review posted live
  • 5 February 1999 (hn) Original submission

References

Published Guidelines / Consensus Statements

  • Gupta N, Finlay GA, Kotloff RM, Strange C, Wilson KC, Young LR, Taveira-DaSilva AM, Johnson SR, Cottin V, Sahn SA, Ryu JH, Seyama K, Inoue Y, Downey GP, Han MK, Colby TV, Wikenheiser-Brokamp KA, Meyer CA, Smith K, Moss J, McCormack FX; ATS Assembly on Clinical Problems. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis diagnosis and management: high-resolution chest computed tomography, transbronchial lung biopsy, and pleural disease management. An official American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1337-48. [PubMed]
  • McCormack FX, Gupta N, Finlay GR, Young LR, Taveira-DaSilva AM, Glasgow CG, Steagall WK, Johnson SR, Sahn SA, Ryu JH, Strange C, Seyama K, Sullivan EJ, Kotloff RM, Downey GP, Chapman JT, Han MK, D'Armiento JM, Inoue Y, Henske EP, Bissler JJ, Colby TV, Kinder BW, Wikenheiser-Brokamp KA, Brown KK, Cordier JF, Meyer C, Cottin V, Brozek JL, Smith K, Wilson KC, Moss J; ATS/JRS Committee on Lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Official American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society clinical practice guidelines: lymphangioleiomyomatosis diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:748-61. [PubMed]
  • Northrup H, Aronow ME, Bebin EM, Bissler J, Darling TN, de Vries PJ, Frost MD, Fuchs Z, Gosnell ES, Gupta N, Jansen AC, Jóźwiak S, Kingswood JC, Knilans TK, McCormack FX, Pounders A, Roberds SL, Rodriguez-Buritica DF, Roth J, Sampson JR, Sparagana S, Thiele EA, Weiner HL, Wheless JW, Towbin AJ, Krueger DA; International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group. Updated international tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria and surveillance and management recommendations. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;123:50-66. [PubMed]

Literature Cited

  • Alper JC, Holmes LB. The incidence and significance of birthmarks in a cohort of 4,641 newborns. Pediatr Dermatol. 1983;1:58–68. [PubMed: 6679890]
  • Alperin S, Krueger DA, Franz DN, Agricola KD, Stires G, Horn PS, Capal JK. Symptom rates and profile clustering in tuberous sclerosis complex-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND). J Neurodev Disord. 2021;13:60. [PMC free article: PMC8903711] [PubMed: 34903167]
  • Amin S, Lux A, Calder N, Laugharne M, Osborne J, O'callaghan F. Causes of mortality in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:612-7. [PubMed: 27935023]
  • Arya S, Ventin M, Nebbia M, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Lionetto G, Qadan M, Lillemoe KD, Deshpande V, Catalano OA, Thiele EA, Ferrone CR. Long-term outcomes of tuberous sclerosis complex-associated non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: should we be more conservative? Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30:7748-55. [PMC free article: PMC10562497] [PubMed: 37648887]
  • Au KS, Williams AT, Roach ES, Batchelor L, Sparagana SP, Delgado MR, Wheless JW, Baumgartner JE, Roa BB, Wilson CM, Smith-Knuppel TK, Cheung MY, Whittemore VH, King TM, Northrup H. Genotype/phenotype correlation in 325 individuals referred for a diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex in the United States. Genet Med. 2007;9:88–100. [PubMed: 17304050]
  • Black ME, Hedgire SS, Camposano S, Paul E, Harisinghani M, Thiele EA. Hepatic manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex: a genotypic and phenotypic analysis. Clin Genet. 2012;82:552-7. [PubMed: 22251200]
  • Bolton PF, Clifford M, Tye C, Maclean C, Humphrey A, le Maréchal K, Higgins JN, Neville BG, Rijsdjik F, Yates JR, et al. Intellectual abilities in tuberous sclerosis complex: risk factors and correlates from the Tuberous Sclerosis 2000 Study. Psychol Med. 2015;45:2321-31. [PubMed: 25827976]
  • Bolton PF, Park RJ, Higgins JN, Griffiths PD, Pickles A. Neuro-epileptic determinants of autism spectrum disorders in tuberous sclerosis complex. Brain. 2002;125:1247–55. [PubMed: 12023313]
  • Borkowska J, Schwartz RA, Kotulska K, Jozwiak S. Tuberous sclerosis complex: tumors and tumorigenesis. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50:13–20. [PubMed: 21182496]
  • Boronat S, Barber I. Less common manifestations in TSC. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:348-54. [PubMed: 30156054]
  • Boronat S, Barber I, Pargaonkar V, Chang J, Thiele EA. Sclerotic bone lesions at abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46:689-94. [PubMed: 26965910]
  • Cancellieri A, Poletti V, Corrin B. Respiratory failure due to micronodular type II pneumocyte hyperplasia. Histopathology. 2002;41:263–5. [PubMed: 12207789]
  • Canevini MP, Kotulska-Jozwiak K, Curatolo P, La Briola F, Peron A, Słowińska M, Strzelecka J, Vignoli A, Jóźwiak S. Current concepts on epilepsy management in tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:299-308. [PubMed: 30255982]
  • Capal JK, Bernardino-Cuesta B, Horn PS, Murray D, Byars AW, Bing NM, Kent B, Pearson DA, Sahin M, Krueger DA; TACERN Study Group. Influence of seizures on early development in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Behav. 2017a;70:245-52. [PMC free article: PMC5497719] [PubMed: 28457992]
  • Capal JK, Horn PS, Murray DS, Byars AW, Bing NM, Kent B, Bucher LA, Williams ME, O'Kelley S, Pearson DA, Sahin M, Krueger DA; TACERN Study Group. Utility of the Autism Observation Scale for infants in early identification of autism in tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr Neurol. 2017b;75:80-6. [PMC free article: PMC5610103] [PubMed: 28844798]
  • Capal JK, Williams ME, Pearson DA, Kissinger R, Horn PS, Murray D, Currans K, Kent B, Bebin M, Northrup H, Wu JY, Sahin M, Krueger DA; TACERN Study Group. Profile of autism spectrum disorder in tuberous sclerosis complex: results from a longitudinal, prospective, multisite study. Ann Neurol. 2021;90:874-86. [PMC free article: PMC8639652] [PubMed: 34668231]
  • Chen XQ, Wang YY, Zhang MN, Lu Q, Pang LY, Liu LY, Li YF, Zou LP. Sirolimus can increase the disappearance rate of cardiac rhabdomyomas associated with tuberous sclerosis: a prospective cohort and self-controlled case series study. J Pediatr. 2021;233:150-5.e4 [PubMed: 33631166]
  • Chung TK, Lynch ER, Fiser CJ, Nelson DA, Agricola K, Tudor C, Franz DN, Krueger DA. Psychiatric comorbidity and treatment response in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2011;23:263–9. [PubMed: 22073383]
  • Cohen AL, Kroeck MR, Wall J, McManus P, Ovchinnikova A, Sahin M, Krueger DA, Bebin EM, Northrup H, Wu JY, Warfield SK, Peters JM, Fox MD; Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Autism Center of Excellence Network Study Group. Tubers affecting the fusiform face area are associated with autism diagnosis. Ann Neurol. 2023;93:577-90. [PMC free article: PMC9974824] [PubMed: 36394118]
  • Connor JM, Stephenson JB, Hadley MD. Non-penetrance in tuberous sclerosis. Lancet. 1986;2:1275. [PubMed: 2878149]
  • Consugar MB, Wong WC, Lundquist PA, Rossetti S, Kubly VJ, Walker DL, Rangel LJ, Aspinwall R, Niaudet WP, Ozen S, David A, Velinov M, Bergstralh EJ, Bae KT, Chapman AB, Guay-Woodford LM, Grantham JJ, Torres VE, Sampson JR, Dawson BD, Harris PC, et al. Characterization of large rearrangements in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and the PKD1/TSC2 contiguous gene syndrome. Kidney Int. 2008;74:1468–79. [PMC free article: PMC2756756] [PubMed: 18818683]
  • Crino PB, Nathanson KL, Henske EP. The tuberous sclerosis complex. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1345–56. [PubMed: 17005952]
  • Curatolo P, Moavero R, de Vries PJ. Neurological and neuropsychiatric aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:733–45. [PubMed: 26067126]
  • de Vries PJ. Neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and cognitive aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex. In: Kwiatkowski DJ, Whittemore VH, Thiele EA, eds. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Genes, Clinical Features, and Therapeutics. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010a:229267.
  • de Vries PJ. Targeted treatments for cognitive and neurodevelopmental disorders in tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurotherapeutics. 2010b;7:275–82. [PMC free article: PMC5084231] [PubMed: 20643380]
  • de Vries PJ, Belousova E, Benedik MP, Carter T, Cottin V, Curatolo P, Dahlin M, D'Amato L, Beaure d'Augères G, Ferreira JC, Feucht M, Fladrowski C, Hertzberg C, Jozwiak S, Lawson JA, Macaya A, Marques R, Nabbout R, O'Callaghan F, Qin J, Sander V, Sauter M, Shah S, Takahashi Y, Touraine R, Youroukos S, Zonnenberg B, Kingswood JC, Jansen AC; TOSCA Investigators. Tuberous sclerosis complex-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND): new findings on age, sex, and genotype in relation to intellectual phenotype. Front Neurol. 2020a;11:603. [PMC free article: PMC7358578] [PubMed: 32733359]
  • de Vries PJ, Belousova E, Benedik MP, Carter T, Cottin V, Curatolo P, D'Amato L, Beure d'Augères G, Ferreira JC, Feucht M, Fladrowski C, Hertzberg C, Jozwiak S, Lawson JA, Macaya A, Marques R, Nabbout R, O'Callaghan F, Qin J, Sander V, Sauter M, Shah S, Takahashi Y, Touraine R, Youroukos S, Zonnenberg B, Kingswood JC, Jansen AC; TOSCA Consortium and TOSCA Investigators. Natural clusters of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND): new findings from the TOSCA TAND research project. J Neurodev Disord. 2020b;12:24. [PMC free article: PMC7465404] [PubMed: 32873244]
  • de Vries PJ, Gardiner J, Bolton PF. Neuropsychological attention deficits in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:387–95. [PubMed: 19215038]
  • de Vries PJ, Heunis TM, Vanclooster S, Chambers N, Bissell S, Byars AW, Flinn J, Gipson TT, van Eeghen AM, Waltereit R, Capal JK, Cukier S, Davis PE, Smith C, Kingswood JC, Schoeters E, Srivastava S, Takei M, Gardner-Lubbe S, Kumm AJ, Krueger DA, Sahin M, De Waele L, Jansen AC. International consensus recommendations for the identification and treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND). J Neurodev Disord. 2023;15:32. [PMC free article: PMC10503032] [PubMed: 37710171]
  • de Vries PJ, Hunt A, Bolton PF. The psychopathologies of children and adolescents with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC): a postal survey of UK families. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007;16:16–24. [PubMed: 17268883]
  • de Vries PJ, Leclezio L, Gardner-Lubbe S, Krueger D, Sahin M, Sparagana S, De Waele L, Jansen A. Multivariate data analysis identifies natural clusters of tuberous sclerosis complex associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:447. [PMC free article: PMC8543869] [PubMed: 34689816]
  • de Vries PJ, Whittemore VH, Leclezio L, Byars AW, Dunn D, Ess KC, Hook D, King BH, Sahin M, Jansen A. Tuberous sclerosis associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND) and the TAND Checklist. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;52:25–35. [PMC free article: PMC4427347] [PubMed: 25532776]
  • de Vries PJ, Wilde L, de Vries MC, Moavero R, Pearson DA, Curatolo P. A clinical update on tuberous sclerosis complex-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND). Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:309-20. [PMC free article: PMC6209538] [PubMed: 30117265]
  • Ding Y, Wang J, Zhou H, Li T, Zhou S, Wang Y. Assessment of tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders using the MINI-KID tool: a pediatric case-control study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:181. [PMC free article: PMC8052770] [PubMed: 33865427]
  • Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Mann LL, Poryo M, Graf N, von Kries R, Heinrich B, Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Flotats-Bastardas M, Gortner L, Zemlin M, Meyer S. Incidence of tuberous sclerosis and age at first diagnosis: new data and emerging trends from a national, prospective surveillance study. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13:117. [PMC free article: PMC6050673] [PubMed: 30016967]
  • Eden KE, de Vries PJ, Moss J, Richards C, Oliver C. Self-injury and aggression in tuberous sclerosis complex: cross syndrome comparison and associated risk markers. J Neurodev Disord. 2014;6:10. [PMC free article: PMC4017702] [PubMed: 24822087]
  • Evans LM, Geenen KR, O'Shea A, Hedgire SS, Ferrone CR, Thiele EA. Tuberous sclerosis complex-associated nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: management and surgical outcomes. Am J Med Genet A. 2022;188:2666-71. [PubMed: 35612824]
  • Ewalt DH, Sheffield E, Sparagana SP, Delgado MR, Roach ES. Renal lesion growth in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. J Urol. 1998;160:141–5. [PubMed: 9628635]
  • Farach LS, Gibson WT, Sparagana SP, Nellist M, Stumpel CT, Hietala M, Friedman E, Pearson DA, Creighton SP, Wagemans A, Segel R, Ben-Shalom E, Au KS, Northrup H. TSC2 c.1864C>T variant associated with mild cases of tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:771–5. [PubMed: 28211972]
  • Farach LS, Northrup H, Nellist M, van Unen L, Hillman P, Klonowska K, Ekong R, Crino PB, Au KS. Mild TSC phenotype and non-penetrance associated with a frameshift variant in TSC2 prompts caution in evaluating pathogenicity of frameshift variants. Gene. 2023;877:147566. [PubMed: 37311496]
  • Farach LS, Pearson DA, Woodhouse JP, Schraw JM, Sahin M, Krueger DA, Wu JY, Bebin EM, Lupo PJ, Au KS, Northrup H; TACERN Study Group. Tuberous sclerosis complex genotypes and developmental phenotype. Pediatr Neurol. 2019;96:58-63. [PMC free article: PMC6837240] [PubMed: 31005478]
  • Fox J, Ben-Shachar S, Uliel S, Svirsky R, Saitsu H, Matsumoto N, Fattal-Valevski A. Rare familial TSC2 gene mutation associated with atypical phenotype presentation of tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:744–8. [PubMed: 28127866]
  • Franz DN, Brody A, Meyer C, Leonard J, Chuck G, Dabora S, Sethuraman G, Colby TV, Kwiatkowski DJ, McCormack FX. Mutational and radiographic analysis of pulmonary disease consistent with lymphangioleiomyomatosis and micronodular pneumocyte hyperplasia in women with tuberous sclerosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:661–8. [PubMed: 11520734]
  • Giannikou K, Klonowska K, Tsuji J, Wu S, Zhu Z, Probst CK, Kao KZ, Wu CL, Rodig S, Marino-Enriquez A, Zen Y, Schaefer IM, Kwiatkowski DJ. TSC2 inactivation, low mutation burden and high macrophage infiltration characterize hepatic angiomyolipomas. Histopathology. 2023;83:569-81. [PubMed: 37679051]
  • Gillberg IC, Gillberg C, Ahlsén G. Autistic behaviour and attention deficits in tuberous sclerosis: a population-based study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:50–6. [PubMed: 8132114]
  • Goh S, Kwiatkowski DJ, Dorer DJ, Thiele EA. Infantile spasms and intellectual outcomes in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology. 2005;65:235–8. [PubMed: 16043792]
  • Gupta A, de Bruyn G, Tousseyn S, Krishnan B, Lagae L, Agarwal N; TSC Natural History Database Consortium. Epilepsy and neurodevelopmental comorbidities in tuberous sclerosis complex: a natural history study. Pediatr Neurol. 2020;106:10-16. [PubMed: 32139167]
  • Gupta N, Finlay GA, Kotloff RM, Strange C, Wilson KC, Young LR, Taveira-DaSilva AM, Johnson SR, Cottin V, Sahn SA, Ryu JH, Seyama K, Inoue Y, Downey GP, Han MK, Colby TV, Wikenheiser-Brokamp KA, Meyer CA, Smith K, Moss J, McCormack FX; ATS Assembly on Clinical Problems. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis diagnosis and management: high-resolution chest computed tomography, transbronchial lung biopsy, and pleural disease management. An official American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1337–48. [PMC free article: PMC5694834] [PubMed: 29140122]
  • Henske EP, Jóźwiak S, Kingswood JC, Sampson JR, Thiele EA. Tuberous sclerosis complex. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16035. [PubMed: 27226234]
  • Hoogeveen-Westerveld M, Ekong R, Povey S, Karbassi I, Batish SD, den Dunnen JT, van Eeghen A, Thiele E, Mayer K, Dies K, Wen L, Thompson C, Sparagana SP, Davies P, Aalfs C, van den Ouweland A, Halley D, Nellist M. Functional assessment of TSC1 missense variants identified in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum Mutat. 2012;33:476–9. [PubMed: 22161988]
  • Hoogeveen-Westerveld M, Ekong R, Povey S, Mayer K, Lannoy N, Elmslie F, Bebin M, Dies K, Thompson C, Sparagana SP, Davies P, van Eeghen AM, Thiele EA, van den Ouweland A, Halley D, Nellist M. Functional assessment of TSC2 variants identified in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum Mutat. 2013;34:167–75. [PubMed: 22903760]
  • Huang SJ, Amendola LM, Sternen DL. Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on. J Community Genet. 2022;13:389-97. [PMC free article: PMC9314484] [PubMed: 35834113]
  • Humphrey A, MacLean C, Ploubidis GB, Granader Y, Clifford M, Haslop M, Neville BG, Yates JR, Bolton PF, et al Intellectual development before and after the onset of infantile spasms: a controlled prospective longitudinal study in tuberous sclerosis. Epilepsia. 2014;55:108–16. [PubMed: 24417555]
  • Hwang SK, Lee JH, Yang J, Lim CS, Lee JA, Lee YS, Lee K, Kaang BK. Everolimus improves neuropsychiatric symptoms in a patient with tuberous sclerosis carrying a novel TSC2 mutation. Mol Brain. 2016;9:56. [PMC free article: PMC4878062] [PubMed: 27216612]
  • Jansen AC, Sancak O, D'Agostino MD, Badhwar A, Roberts P, Gobbi G, Wilkinson R, Melanson D, Tampieri D, Koenekoop R, Gans M, Maat-Kievit A, Goedbloed M, van den Ouweland AM, Nellist M, Pandolfo M, McQueen M, Sims K, Thiele EA, Dubeau F, Andermann F, Kwiatkowski DJ, Halley DJ, Andermann E. Unusually mild tuberous sclerosis phenotype is associated with TSC2 R905Q mutation. Ann Neurol. 2006;60:528–39. [PubMed: 17120248]
  • Jeste SS, Sahin M, Bolton P, Ploubidis GB, Humphrey A. Characterization of autism in young children with tuberous sclerosis complex. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:520–5. [PubMed: 18160549]
  • Jeste SS, Varcin KJ, Hellemann GS, Gulsrud AC, Bhatt R, Kasari C, Wu JY, Sahin M, Nelson CA. Symptom profiles of autism spectrum disorder in tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology. 2016;87:766–72. [PMC free article: PMC4999317] [PubMed: 27440144]
  • Joinson C, O'Callaghan FJ, Osborne JP, Martyn C, Harris T, Bolton PF. Learning disability and epilepsy in an epidemiological sample of individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex. Psychol Med. 2003;33:335–44. [PubMed: 12622312]
  • Jóźwiak S, Sadowski K, Borkowska J, Domańska-Pakieła D, Chmielewski D, Jurkiewicz E, Jaworski M, Urbańska M, Ogrodnik M, Słowińska M, Kotulska K. Liver angiomyolipomas in tuberous sclerosis complex-their incidence and course. Pediatr Neurol. 2018;78:20-6. [PubMed: 29249553]
  • Khare L, Strizheva GD, Bailey JN, Au KS, Northrup H, Smith M, Smalley SL, Henske EP. A novel missense mutation in the GTPase activating protein homology region of TSC2 in two large families with tuberous sclerosis complex. J Med Genet. 2001;38:347–9. [PMC free article: PMC1734876] [PubMed: 11403047]
  • Kilincaslan A, Kok BE, Tekturk P, Yalcinkaya C, Ozkara C, Yapici Z. Beneficial effects of everolimus on autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in a group of patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017;27:383–8. [PubMed: 27797585]
  • Kingswood JC, d’Augères GB, Belousova E, Ferreira JC, Carter T, Castellana R, Cottin V, Curatolo P, Dahlin M, de Vries PJ, Feucht M, Fladrowski C, Gislimberti G, Hertzberg C, Jozwiak S, Lawson JA, Macaya A, Nabbout R, O’Callaghan F, Benedik MP, Qin J, Marques R, Sander V, Sauter M, Takahashi Y, Touraine R, Youroukos S, Zonneberg B, Jansen AC. TuberOus SClerosis registry to increase disease Awareness (TOSCA)–baseline data on 2093 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:2. [PMC free article: PMC5217262] [PubMed: 28057044]
  • Klonowska K, Giannikou K, Grevelink JM, Boeszoermenyi B, Thorner AR, Herbert ZT, Afrin A, Treichel AM, Hamieh L, Kotulska K, Jozwiak S, Moss J, Darling TN, Kwiatkowski DJ. Comprehensive genetic and phenotype analysis of 95 individuals with mosaic tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Hum Genet. 2023;110:979-88. [PMC free article: PMC10257004] [PubMed: 37141891]
  • Kobashi Y, Sugui T, Irei T, Nakata M, Oka M. Clinicopathological analysis of multifocal micronodular pneumocyte hyperplasia associated with tuberous sclerosis in Japan. Respirology. 2008;13:1076–81. [PubMed: 18699800]
  • Kocabaş A, Ekici F, Cetin Iİ, Emir S, Demir HA, Arı ME, Değerliyurt A, Güven A. Cardiac rhabdomyomas associated with TSC in 11 children: presentation to outcome. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013;30:71-9. [PubMed: 23151153]
  • Kochare SV, Singh K, Hochman T, Chalifoux JR, Staley BA, Weiner HL, Menzer K, Devinsky KM. Genotype/phenotype in tuberous sclerosis complex: associations with clinical and radiologic manifestations. 2014;55:1020-4. [PubMed: 24754401]
  • Kopp CM, Muzykewicz DA, Staley BA, Thiele EA, Pulsifer MB. Behavior problems in children with tuberous sclerosis complex and parental stress. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;13:505–10. [PubMed: 18602868]
  • Kothare SV, Singh K, Chalifoux JR, Staley BA, Weiner HL, Menzer K, Devinsky O. Severity of manifestations in tuberous sclerosis complex in relation to genotype. Epilepsia. 2014;55:1025–9. [PubMed: 24917535]
  • Kozlowski P, Roberts P, Dabora S, Franz D, Bissler J, Northrup H, Au KS, Lazarus R, Domanska-Pakiela D, Kotulska K, Jozwiak S, Kwiatkowski DJ. Identification of 54 large deletions/duplications in TSC1 and TSC2 using MLPA, and genotype-phenotype correlations. Hum Genet. 2007;121:389–400. [PubMed: 17287951]
  • Krueger DA. Management of CNS-related disease manifestations in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2013;15:618–33. [PubMed: 23852707]
  • Krueger DA, Care MM, Agricola K, Tudor C, Mays M, Franz DN. Everolimus long-term safety and efficacy in supependymal giant cell astrocytoma. Neurology. 2013a;80:574-80. [PMC free article: PMC3589289] [PubMed: 23325902]
  • Krueger DA, Northrup H; International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group. Tuberous sclerosis complex surveillance and management: recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr Neurol. 2013b;49:255-65. [PMC free article: PMC4058297] [PubMed: 24053983]
  • Kwiatkowski DJ. Genetics of tuberous sclerosis complex. In: Kwiatkowski DJ, Whittemore VH, Thiele EA, eds. Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Genes, Clinical Features, and Therapeutics. Weinheim: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:29-57.
  • Leclezio L, de Vries PJ. Advances in the treatment of tuberous sclerosis complex. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28:113–20. [PubMed: 25602245]
  • Lennert B, Farrelly E, Sacco P, Pira G, Frost M. Resource utilization in children with tuberous sclerosis complex and associated seizures: a retrospective chart review study. J Child Neurol. 2013;28:461–9. [PubMed: 22772159]
  • Lewis WW, Sahin M, Scherrer B, Peters JM, Suarez RO, Vogel-Farley VK, Jeste SS, Gregas MC, Prabhu SP, Nelson CA 3rd, Warfield SK. Impaired language pathways in tuberous sclerosis complex patients with autism spectrum disorders. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:1526–32. [PMC free article: PMC3673171] [PubMed: 22661408]
  • Li LH, Li N, Zhao JY, Fei P, Zhang GM, Mao JB, Rychwalski PJ. Findings of perinatal ocular examination performed on 3573, healthy full-term newborns. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97:588–91. [PMC free article: PMC3632968] [PubMed: 23426739]
  • Lu DS, Karas PJ, Krueger DA, Weiner HL. Central nervous system manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:291-8. [PubMed: 30230171]
  • Luo C, Zhang Y, Zhang YS, Zhang MX, Ning J, Chen MF, Li Y, Qi L, Zu XB, Li YL, Cai Y. Renal phenotypes correlate with genotypes in unrelated individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex in China. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17:288. [PMC free article: PMC9308181] [PubMed: 35870981]
  • Marcinkowska AB, Jóźwiak S, Tarasewicz A, Dębska-Ślizień A, Szurowska E. Tuberous sclerosis complex patients' needs and difficulties-results of TAND questionnaire analysis in Polish adult population. J Clin Med. 2022;11:6536. [PMC free article: PMC9658121] [PubMed: 36362764]
  • Martignoni G, Bonetti F, Pea M, Tardanico R, Brunelli M, Eble JN. Renal disease in adults with TSC2/PKD1 contiguous gene syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26:198–205. [PubMed: 11812941]
  • Mayer K, Goedbloed M, van Zijl K, Nellist M, Rott HD. Characterization of a novel TSC2 missense mutation in the GAP related domain associated with minimal clinical manifestations of tuberous sclerosis. J Med Genet. 2004;41:e64. [PMC free article: PMC1735780] [PubMed: 15121792]
  • McCormack FX, Gupta N, Finlay GR, Young LR, Taveira-DaSilva AM, Glasgow CG, Steagall WK, Johnson SR, Sahn SA, Ryu JH, Strange C, Seyama K, Sullivan EJ, Kotloff RM, Downey GP, Chapman JT, Han MK, D'Armiento JM, Inoue Y, Henske EP, Bissler JJ, Colby TV, Kinder BW, Wikenheiser-Brokamp KA, Brown KK, Cordier JF, Meyer C, Cottin V, Brozek JL, Smith K, Wilson KC, Moss J; ATS/JRS Committee on Lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Official American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society clinical practice guidelines: lymphangioleiomyomatosis diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:748–61. [PMC free article: PMC5803656] [PubMed: 27628078]
  • McDonald NM, Jacobs S, Hyde C, Kasari C, Jeste SS. Measurement of developmental and behavioral concerns in toddlers with tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr Neurol. 2024;155:62-7. [PMC free article: PMC11143920] [PubMed: 38603983]
  • McDonald NM, Varcin KJ, Bhatt R, Wu JY, Sahin M, Nelson CA, Jeste SS. Early autism symptoms in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex. Autism Research. 2017;10:1981–1990. [PMC free article: PMC7254928] [PubMed: 28801991]
  • Mitchell RA, Mitchell M, Williams K. The autism spectrum disorder phenotype in children with tuberous sclerosis complex: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64:1214-29. [PubMed: 35724267]
  • Moavero R, Voci A, La Briola F, Matricardi S, Toldo I, Mancardi MM, Negrin S, Messana T, Mazzone L, Valeriani M, Curatolo P, Bruni O. Sleep disorders and neuropsychiatric disorders in a pediatric sample of tuberous sclerosis complex: a questionnaire-based study. Sleep Med. 2022;89:65-70. [PubMed: 34915263]
  • Mowrey K, Northrup H, Rougeau P, Hashmi SS, Krueger DA, Ebrahimi-Fakhari D, Towbin AJ, Trout AT, Capal JK, Franz DN, Rodriguez-Buritica D. Frequency, progression, and current management: report of 16 new cases of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in tuberous sclerosis complex and comparison with previous reports. Front Neurol. 2021;12:627672. [PMC free article: PMC8062856] [PubMed: 33897589]
  • Muzykewicz DA, Newberry P, Danforth N, Halpern EF, Thiele EA. Psychiatric comorbid conditions in a clinic population of 241 patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Behav. 2007;11:506–13. [PubMed: 17936687]
  • Muzykewicz DA, Sharma A, Muse V, Numis AL, Rajagopal J, Thiele EA. TSC1 and TSC2 mutations in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis and tuberous sclerosis complex. J Med Genet. 2009;46:465–8. [PubMed: 19419980]
  • Nespoli LF, Albani E, Corti C, Spaccini L, Alfei E, Daniele I, Zuccotti GV, Lista G, Calcaterra V, Mannarino S. Efficacy of everolimus low-dose treatment for cardiac rhabdomyomas in neonatal tuberous sclerosis: case report and literature review. Pediatr Rep. 2021;13:104-12 [PMC free article: PMC7931111] [PubMed: 33804320]
  • Ng SY, Luk HM, Hau EW, Cheng SS, Yu KP, Ho S, Mok MT, Lo IF. Genotype/phenotype correlation in 123 Chinese patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Eur J Med Genet. 2022;65:104573. [PubMed: 35918040]
  • Nguyen QD, DarConte MD, Hebert AA. The cutaneous manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:321-5. [PubMed: 30246432]
  • Ninic S, Kalaba M, Jovicic B, Vukomanovic V, Prijic S, Vucetic B, Kravljanac R, Vujic A, Kosutic J. Successful use of sirolimus for refractory atrial ectopic tachycardia in a child with cardiac rhabdomyoma. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017;22:e12435. [PMC free article: PMC6931800] [PubMed: 28217909]
  • Northrup H, Aronow ME, Bebin EM, Bissler J, Darling TN, de Vries PJ, Frost MD, Fuchs Z, Gosnell ES, Gupta N, Jansen AC, Jóźwiak S, Kingswood JC, Knilans TK, McCormack FX, Pounders A, Roberds SL, Rodriguez-Buritica DF, Roth J, Sampson JR, Sparagana S, Thiele EA, Weiner HL, Wheless JW, Towbin AJ, Krueger DA; International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group. Updated international tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria and surveillance and management recommendations. Pediatr Neurol. 2021;123:50–66. [PubMed: 34399110]
  • Northrup H, Krueger DA; International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group. Tuberous sclerosis complex diagnostic criteria update: recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49:243–54. [PMC free article: PMC4080684] [PubMed: 24053982]
  • Numis AL, Major P, Montenegro MA, Muzykewicz DA, Pulsifer MB, Thiele EA. Identification of risk factors for autism spectrum disorders in tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology. 2011;76:981–7. [PMC free article: PMC3271577] [PubMed: 21403110]
  • O'Connor SE, Kwiatkowski DJ, Roberts PS, Wollmann RL, Huttenlocher PR. A family with seizures and minor features of tuberous sclerosis and a novel TSC2 mutation. Neurology. 2003;61:409–12. [PubMed: 12913212]
  • Öhnell HM, Kjellström U, Eklund E, Pearsson K, Bekassy Z, Gränse L. Ophthalmic manifestations in children with tuberous sclerosis complex. Acta Ophthalmol. 2024;102:421-7. [PubMed: 37991117]
  • Osborne JP, Fryer A, Webb D. Epidemiology of tuberous sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;615:125–7. [PubMed: 2039137]
  • Öztunç F, Atik SU, Günes AO. Everolimus treatment of a newborn with rhabdomyoma causing severe arrhythmia. Cardiol Young. 2015;25:1411-4. [PubMed: 26339757]
  • Patel U, Simpson E, Kingswood JC, Saggar-Malik AK. Tuberose sclerosis complex: analysis of growth rates aids differentiation of renal cell carcinoma from atypical or minimal-fat-containing angiomyolipoma. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:665–73. [PubMed: 16038693]
  • Pea M, Bonetti F, Martignoni G, Henske EP, Manfrin E, Colato C, Bernstein J. Apparent renal cell carcinomas in tuberous sclerosis are heterogeneous: the identification of malignant epithelioid angiomyolipoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998;22:180–7. [PubMed: 9500218]
  • Peron A, Au KS, Northrup H. Genetics, genomics, and genotype-phenotype correlations of TSC: insights for clinical practice. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018;178:281-90. [PubMed: 30255984]
  • Prather P, de Vries PJ. Behavioral and cognitive aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex. J Child Neurol. 2004;19:666–74. [PubMed: 15563012]
  • Qin W, Kozlowski P, Taillon BE, Bouffard P, Holmes AJ, Janne P, Camposano S, Thiele E, Franz D, Kwiatkowski DJ. Ultra deep sequencing detects a low rate of mosaic mutations in tuberous sclerosis complex. Hum Genet. 2010;127:573–82. [PMC free article: PMC2854849] [PubMed: 20165957]
  • Rentz AM, Skalicky AM, Liu Z, Wheless JW, Dunn DW, Frost MD, Nakagawa J, Magestro M, Prestifilippo J. Tuberous sclerosis complex: a survey of health care resource use and health burden. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;52:435–41. [PubMed: 25771998]
  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]
  • Ridler K, Suckling J, Higgins NJ, de Vries PJ, Stephenson CM, Bolton PF, Bullmore ET. Neuroanatomical correlates of memory deficits in tuberous sclerosis complex. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:261–71. [PubMed: 16603714]
  • Rose VM, Au KS, Pollom G, Roach ES, Prashner HR, Northrup H. Germ-line mosaicism in tuberous sclerosis: how common? Am J Hum Genet. 1999;64:986–92. [PMC free article: PMC1377822] [PubMed: 10090883]
  • Sancak O, Nellist M, Goedbloed M, Elfferich P, Wouters C, Maat-Kievit A, Zonnenberg B, Verhoef S, Halley D, van den Ouweland A. Mutational analysis of the TSC1 and TSC2 genes in a diagnostic setting: genotype--phenotype correlations and comparison of diagnostic DNA techniques in tuberous sclerosis complex. Eur J Hum Genet. 2005;13:731–41. [PubMed: 15798777]
  • Sarma AK, Khandker N, Kurczewski L, Brophy GM. Medical management of epileptic seizures: challenges and solutions. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016;12:467–85. [PMC free article: PMC4771397] [PubMed: 26966367]
  • Sauter M, Belousova E, Benedik MP, Carter T, Cottin V, Curatolo P, Dahlin M, D'Amato L, d'Augères GB, de Vries PJ, Ferreira JC, Feucht M, Fladrowski C, Hertzberg C, Jozwiak S, Lawson JA, Macaya A, Marques R, Nabbout R, O'Callaghan F, Qin J, Sander V, Shah S, Takahashi Y, Touraine R, Youroukos S, Zonnenberg B, Jansen A, Kingswood JC; TOSCA investigators. Rare manifestations and malignancies in tuberous sclerosis complex: findings from the TuberOus SClerosis registry to increAse disease awareness (TOSCA). Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:301. [PMC free article: PMC8259106] [PubMed: 34229737]
  • Scherrer B, Prohl AK, Taquet M, Kapur K, Peters JM, Tomas-Fernandez X, Davis PE, M Bebin E, Krueger DA, Northrup H, Y Wu J, Sahin M, Warfield SK. The connectivity fingerprint of the fusiform gyrus captures the risk of developing autism in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:2199-214. [PMC free article: PMC7175001] [PubMed: 31812987]
  • Schoenberger A, Capal JK, Ondracek A, Horn PS, Murray D, Byars AW, Pearson DA, Williams ME, Bebin M, Northrup H, Wu JY, Sahin M, Krueger DA. Language predictors of autism spectrum disorder in young children with tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;103:106844. [PMC free article: PMC6947531] [PubMed: 31864941]
  • Silva-Sánchez MP, Alvarado-Socarras JL, Castro-Monsalve J, Meneses KM, Santiago J, Prada CE. Everolimus for severe arrhythmias in tuberous sclerosis complex related cardiac rhabdomyomas. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185:1525-31 [PubMed: 33590972]
  • Spurling Jeste S, Wu JY, Senturk D, Varcin K, Ko J, McCarthy B, Shimizu C, Dies K, Vogel-Farley V, Sahin M, Nelson CA 3rd. Early developmental trajectories associated with ASD in infants with tuberous sclerosis complex. Neurology. 2014;83:160–8. [PMC free article: PMC4117170] [PubMed: 24920850]
  • Staley BA, Montenegro MA, Major P, Muzykewicz DA, Halpern EF, Kopp CM, Newberry P, Thiele EA. Self-injurious behavior and tuberous sclerosis complex: frequency and possible associations in a population of 257 patients. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;13:650–3. [PubMed: 18703161]
  • Strizheva GD, Carsillo T, Kruger WD, Sullivan EJ, Ryu JH, Henske EP. The spectrum of mutations in TSC1 and TSC2 in women with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangiomyomatosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:253–8. [PubMed: 11208653]
  • Taveira-DaSilva AM, Jones AM, Julien-Williams P, Yao J, Stylianou M, Moss J. Severity and outcome of cystic lung disease in women with tuberous sclerosis complex. Eur Respir J. 2015;45:171-80 [PMC free article: PMC8356806] [PubMed: 25537563]
  • Teng JM, Cowen EW, Wataya-Kaneda M, Gosnell ES, Witman PM, Hebert AA, Mlynarczyk G, Soltani K, Darling TN. Dermatologic and dental aspects of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Statements. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:1095-101. [PMC free article: PMC11100257] [PubMed: 25029267]
  • Tierney KM, McCartney DL, Serfontein JR, de Vries PJ. Neuropsychological attention skills and related behaviours in adults with tuberous sclerosis complex. Behav Genet. 2011;41:437–44. [PubMed: 21191642]
  • Toldo I, Brasson V, Miscioscia M, Pelizza MF, Manara R, Sartori S, Mantegazza G, Vecchi M, Nosadini M, Gatta M. Tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders: a paediatric cohort study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61:168-73. [PubMed: 30298907]
  • Touraine R, Hauet Q, Harzallah I, Baruteau AE. Tuberous sclerosis complex: genetic counselling and perinatal follow-up. Arch Pediatr. 2022;29:5S3-5S7. [PubMed: 36585068]
  • Tsuchihashi T, Tsuno Y, Kakimoto N, Riko M, Kumagai T. Use of everolimus for cardiac rhabdomyomas in a very-low-birthweight infant. Pediatr Int. 2021;63:726-7 [PubMed: 34038023]
  • Tyburczy ME, Dies KA, Glass J, Camposano S, Chekaluk Y, Thorner AR, Lin L, Krueger D, Franz DN, Thiele EA, Sahin M, Kwiatkowski DJ. Mosaic and intronic mutations in TSC1/TSC2 explain the majority of TSC patients with no mutation identified by conventional testing. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005637. [PMC free article: PMC4634999] [PubMed: 26540169]
  • Uematsu M, Numata-Uematsu Y, Aihara Y, Kobayashi T, Fujikawa M, Togashi N, Shiihara T, Ohashi K, Hattori A, Saitoh S, Kure S. Behavioral problems and family distress in tuberous sclerosis complex. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;111:107321. [PubMed: 32698109]
  • van Eeghen AM, Black ME, Pulsifer MB, Kwiatkowski DJ, Thiele EA. Genotype and cognitive phenotype of patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012a;20:510–5. [PMC free article: PMC3330219] [PubMed: 22189265]
  • Vanderhooft SL, Francis JS, Pagon RA, Smith LT, Sybert VP. Prevalence of hypopigmented macules in a healthy population. J Pediatr. 1996;129:355–61. [PubMed: 8804323]
  • Webb DW, Osborne JP. Non-penetrance in tuberous sclerosis. J Med Genet. 1991;28:417–9. [PMC free article: PMC1016911] [PubMed: 1870099]
  • Wentink M, Nellist M, Hoogeveen-Westerveld M, Zonnenberg B, van der Kolk D, van Essen T, Park SM, Woods G, Cohn-Hokke P, Brussel W, Smeets E, Brooks A, Halley D, van den Ouweland A, Maat-Kievit A. Functional characterization of the TSC2 c.3598C>T (p.R1200W) missense mutation that co-segregates with tuberous sclerosis complex in mildly affected kindreds. Clin Genet. 2012;81:453–61. [PubMed: 21332470]
  • Wilde L, Eden K, de Vries P, Moss J, Welham A, Oliver C. Self-injury and aggression in adults with tuberous sclerosis complex: frequency, associated person characteristics, and implications for assessment. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;64:119–30. [PubMed: 28411579]
  • Wong V. Study of the relationship between tuberous sclerosis complex and autistic disorder. J Child Neurol. 2006;21:199–204. [PubMed: 16901420]
  • Wu JY, Goyal M, Peters JM, Krueger D, Sahin M, Northrup H, Au KS, O'Kelley S, Williams M, Pearson DA, Hanson E, Byars AW, Krefting J, Beasley M, Cutter G, Limdi N, Bebin EM. Scalp EEG spikes predict impending epilepsy in TSC infants: a longitudinal observational study. Epilepsia. 2019;60:2428-36. [PMC free article: PMC6910957] [PubMed: 31691264]
  • Yang P, Cornejo KM, Sadow PM, Cheng L, Wang M, Xiao Y, Jiang Z, Oliva E, Jozwiak S, Nussbaum RL, Feldman AS, Paul E, Thiele EA, Yu JJ, Henske EP, Kwiatkowski DJ, Young RH, Wu CL. Renal cell carcinoma in tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:895–909. [PMC free article: PMC4139167] [PubMed: 24832166]
  • Ye Z, Lin S, Zhao X, Bennett MF, Brown NJ, Wallis M, Gao X, Sun L, Wu J, Vedururu R, Witkowski T, Gardiner F, Stutterd C, Duan J, Mullen SA, McGillivray G, Bodek S, Valente G, Reagan M, Yao Y, Li L, Chen L, Boys A, Adikari TN, Cao D, Hu Z, Beshay V, Zhang VW, Berkovic SF, Scheffer IE, Liao J, Hildebrand MS. Mosaicism in tuberous sclerosis complex: lowering the threshold for clinical reporting. Hum Mutat. 2022;43:1956-69. [PubMed: 36030538]
  • Zambrelli E, Turner K, Peron A, Leidi A, La Briola F, Vignoli A, Canevini MP. Sleep and behavior in children and adolescents with tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185:1421-9. [PubMed: 33650172]
  • Zwaigenbaum L, Bryson SE, Brian J, Smith IM, Sacrey L, Armstrong V, Roberts W, Szatmari P, Garon N, Vaillancourt T, Roncadin C. Assessment of autism symptoms from 6 to 18 months of age using the Autism Observation Scale for Infants in a prospective high-risk cohort. Child Dev. 2021;92:1187-98. [PubMed: 33368222]
Copyright © 1993-2024, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved.

GeneReviews® chapters are owned by the University of Washington. Permission is hereby granted to reproduce, distribute, and translate copies of content materials for noncommercial research purposes only, provided that (i) credit for source (http://www.genereviews.org/) and copyright (© 1993-2024 University of Washington) are included with each copy; (ii) a link to the original material is provided whenever the material is published elsewhere on the Web; and (iii) reproducers, distributors, and/or translators comply with the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer. No further modifications are allowed. For clarity, excerpts of GeneReviews chapters for use in lab reports and clinic notes are a permitted use.

For more information, see the GeneReviews® Copyright Notice and Usage Disclaimer.

For questions regarding permissions or whether a specified use is allowed, contact: ude.wu@tssamda.

Bookshelf ID: NBK1220PMID: 20301399

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this page (697K)

Key Sections in This GeneReview

Tests in GTR by Gene

Related information

  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • OMIM
    Related OMIM records
  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed
  • Gene
    Locus Links

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...